IP Library Granted Patent US 12,697,233
Granted Patent B2
US 12,697,233 · App. 18/898,315 · Granted Aug 4, 2026

Powered knee and ankle prosthesis controller for adaptive ambulation

Inventors: Tommaso Lenzi (Salt Lake City, UT); Lukas R. Gabert (Salt Lake City, UT); Liam Sullivan (Salt Lake City, UT); Marissa Ann Cowan (Salt Lake City, UT)
Assignee: University of Utah Research Foundation
A61F2/70A61F2/64A61F2/6607A61F2/76A61F2002/6614A61F2002/763A61F2002/7645
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,697,233
App. No.
18/898,315
Filed
Sep 26, 2024
Granted
Aug 4, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3774
USPC
623/24
Abstract

Disclosed are embodiments of a volitional controller and prosthetic leg system comprising a volitional controller and a powered prosthetic leg. The volitional controller may be configured to control a powered knee joint and a powered ankle joint to enable a user to walk at different speeds and inclines. The orientation of the components of the powered prosthetic leg may be monitored continuously to enable the system to adapt to changes in the duration of the user's gait. The volitional controller may be configured to determine a target knee torque and a target ankle torque that may be based on the global shank orientation, a prosthetic knee velocity, and a prosthetic ankle velocity.

Claims (57)

1 . A powered leg prosthesis system, comprising:

a powered leg prosthesis comprising a shank that includes a proximal end and a distal end, a powered knee joint connected to the proximal end of the shank, a powered ankle joint connected to the distal end of the shank, and a prosthetic foot connected to the powered ankle joint; and

a volitional controller, the volitional controller comprising one or more processors and one or more hardware storage devices having instructions stored thereon that are executable by the one or more processors to cause the controller to at least:

determine a global shank orientation, wherein the global shank orientation is the angle between the shank of the powered lower leg prosthesis and direction of gravity;

determine a target ankle torque based on the global shank orientation;

determine a biarticular torque based on the target ankle torque;

determine a target knee torque based on the biarticular torque; and

output a knee torque signal for controlling the powered knee joint of the powered leg prosthesis based on the determined target knee torque,

wherein the biarticular torque is proportional to and opposite the target ankle torque.

2 . The powered leg prosthesis system of claim 1 , wherein the instructions further cause the controller to output an ankle torque signal for controlling the powered ankle joint of the powered leg prosthesis based on the determined target ankle torque.

3 . The powered leg prosthesis system of claim 1 , wherein determining the target knee torque is further based on a first virtual damping torque, wherein the first virtual damping torque is proportional to and opposite a prosthesis knee velocity.

4 . The powered leg prosthesis system of claim 1 , wherein the biarticular torque increases with ankle plantarflexion torque.

5 . The powered leg prosthesis system of claim 1 , wherein determining the target ankle torque is further based on a shank torque, wherein the shank torque is proportional to and opposite the global shank orientation.

6 . The powered leg prosthesis system of claim 1 , wherein determining the target ankle torque is further based on a second virtual damping torque, wherein the second virtual damping torque is proportional to and opposite a prosthetic ankle velocity.

7 . The powered leg prosthesis system of claim 1 , wherein the volitional controller is configured to adapt to an incline and/or uneven terrain based solely on the global shank orientation.

8 . The powered leg prosthesis system of claim 1 , wherein the target knee torque is output by the volitional controller when the volitional controller determines that the powered leg prosthesis is in a stance state.

9 . The powered leg prosthesis system of claim 8 , wherein the instructions, when the volitional controller determines that the powered leg prosthesis is in a swing state, cause the volitional controller to:

determine an ankle transition orientation; and

determine a target swing torque based on the ankle transition orientation.

10 . The powered leg prosthesis system of claim 8 , wherein when the volitional controller determines that the powered leg prosthesis is in a swing state, a desired end position of the knee and/or ankle joints is determined using a minimum-jerk optimizer.

11 . The powered leg prosthesis system of claim 1 , wherein the powered leg prosthesis comprises a ground reaction force sensor and/or one or more IMU sensors.

12 . A powered leg prosthesis system, comprising:

a powered leg prosthesis comprising a shank that includes a proximal end and a distal end, a powered knee joint connected to the proximal end of the shank, a powered ankle joint connected to the distal end of the shank, and a prosthetic foot connected to the powered ankle joint; and

a volitional controller, the volitional controller comprising one or more processors and one or more hardware storage devices having instructions stored thereon that are executable by the one or more processors to cause the controller to at least:

determine a global shank orientation, wherein the global shank orientation is the angle between the shank of the powered lower leg prosthesis and direction of gravity;

determine a target ankle torque based on the global shank orientation;

determine a biarticular torque based on the target ankle torque;

determine a target knee torque based on the biarticular torque; and

output a knee torque signal for controlling the powered knee joint of the powered leg prosthesis based on the determined target knee torque,

wherein the biarticular torque increases with ankle plantarflexion torque.

13 . A powered leg prosthesis system, comprising:

a powered leg prosthesis comprising a shank that includes a proximal end and a distal end, a powered knee joint connected to the proximal end of the shank, a powered ankle joint connected to the distal end of the shank, and a prosthetic foot connected to the powered ankle joint; and

a volitional controller, the volitional controller comprising one or more processors and one or more hardware storage devices having instructions stored thereon that are executable by the one or more processors to cause the controller to at least:

determine a global shank orientation, wherein the global shank orientation is the angle between the shank of the powered lower leg prosthesis and direction of gravity;

determine a target ankle torque based on the global shank orientation;

determine a biarticular torque based on the target ankle torque;

determine a target knee torque based on the biarticular torque; and

output a knee torque signal for controlling the powered knee joint of the powered leg prosthesis based on the determined target knee torque,

wherein determining the target ankle torque is further based on a shank torque, wherein the shank torque is proportional to and opposite the global shank orientation.

14 . A powered leg prosthesis system, comprising:

a powered leg prosthesis comprising a shank that includes a proximal end and a distal end, a powered knee joint connected to the proximal end of the shank, a powered ankle joint connected to the distal end of the shank, and a prosthetic foot connected to the powered ankle joint; and

a volitional controller, the volitional controller comprising one or more processors and one or more hardware storage devices having instructions stored thereon that are executable by the one or more processors to cause the controller to at least:

determine a global shank orientation, wherein the global shank orientation is the angle between the shank of the powered lower leg prosthesis and direction of gravity;

determine a target ankle torque based on the global shank orientation;

determine a biarticular torque based on the target ankle torque;

determine a target knee torque based on the biarticular torque; and

output a knee torque signal for controlling the powered knee joint of the powered leg prosthesis based on the determined target knee torque,

wherein determining the target ankle torque is further based on a second virtual damping torque, wherein the second virtual damping torque is proportional to and opposite a prosthetic ankle velocity.

15 . A powered leg prosthesis system, comprising:

a powered leg prosthesis comprising a shank that includes a proximal end and a distal end, a powered knee joint connected to the proximal end of the shank, a powered ankle joint connected to the distal end of the shank, and a prosthetic foot connected to the powered ankle joint; and

a volitional controller, the volitional controller comprising one or more processors and one or more hardware storage devices having instructions stored thereon that are executable by the one or more processors to cause the controller to at least:

determine a global shank orientation, wherein the global shank orientation is the angle between the shank of the powered lower leg prosthesis and direction of gravity;

determine a target ankle torque based on the global shank orientation;

determine a biarticular torque based on the target ankle torque;

determine a target knee torque based on the biarticular torque; and

output a knee torque signal for controlling the powered knee joint of the powered leg prosthesis based on the determined target knee torque,

wherein determining the target knee torque is further based on a first virtual damping torque, wherein the first virtual damping torque is proportional to and opposite a prosthesis knee velocity.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 12, 2024
From: UNIVERSITY OF UTAH
To: UNIVERSITY OF UTAH RESEARCH FOUNDATION
Reel/Frame 069226/0261 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 12, 2024
From: LENZI, TOMMASO; GABERT, LUKAS R.; SULLIVAN, LIAM; COWAN, MARISSA ANN
To: UNIVERSITY OF UTAH
Reel/Frame 069226/0197 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63541700 · Sep 29, 2023
Related Publication 20250107907A1 · Apr 3, 2025
References Cited (55)
US 8623098B2 · Goldfarb et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8652218B2 · Goldfarb et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8696764B2 · Hansen et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8852292B2 · Ragnarsdottir et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9192487B2 · Flaven et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9221177B2 · Herr et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9248031B2 · Pusch et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9443203B2 · Young et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9649207B2 · Hahn et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9687377B2 · Han et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9763809B2 · Palmer et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9975249B2 · Herr et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10369023B2 · Simon et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10575971B2 · Herr et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20020052663A1 · Herr et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20040167641A1 · Kawai et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20090265018A1 · Goldfarb et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100241242A1 · Herr et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20120004736A1 · Goldfarb et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120221120A1 · Seyr et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120226364A1 · Kampas et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130310949A1 · Goldfarb · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140364962A1 · Gregg et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150066156A1 · Geyer et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150127119A1 · Simon · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150182354A1 · Bonnet et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160058582A1 · Lenzi · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160302686A1 · Sigurpórsson et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160338857A1 · Herr et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170354529A1 · Han et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20230270570A1 · Hofmann et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20250107905A1 · Lenzi et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20250107908A1 · Lenzi et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20260090900A1 · Lenzi et al. · 2026 [cited by applicant]
US 20260115019A1 · Lenzi et al. · 2026 [cited by applicant]
CA 2762265A1 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
CN 114795604A · 2022 [cited by applicant]
EP 2849687B1 · 2018 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2013067407A1 · 2013 [cited by examiner]
WO 2016130745A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022087160A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022087161A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
Translation of WO2011057792A1 (Year: 2011). [cited by examiner]
Alcock L., et al., “Biomechanical demands of the 2-step transitional gait cycles linking level gait and stair descent gait in older women,” Journal of biomechanics, vol. 48, Issue 16, 2015, pp. 4191-4197. [cited by applicant]
Au S. et al., “Powered ankle-foot prosthesis to assist level-ground and stair-descent gaits,” Neural Networks, vol. 21, Issue 4, 2008, pp. 654-666. [cited by applicant]
Best T. K. et al., “Data-Driven Variable Impedance Control of a Powered Knee-Ankle Prosthesis for Adaptive Speed and Incline Walking”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2023, pp. 19. [cited by applicant]
Ha K. H. et al., “Myoelectric control of a powered knee prosthesis for volitional movement during non-weight-bearing activities”, 32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Embs., 2010, pp. 3515-3518. [cited by applicant]
Hood S. et al., “Powered Knee and Ankle Prosthesis with Adaptive Control Enables Climbing Stairs with Different Stair Heights, Cadences, and Gait Patterns”, IEEE Trans Robot, vol. 38, Issue 3, Jun. 2022, pp. 1430-1441. [cited by applicant]
Huang H. et al., “A strategy for identifying locomotion modes using surface electromyography,” IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, vol. 56, Issue 1, Jan. 2009, pp. 65-73. [cited by applicant]
Neuman R. M., et al., “There are unique kinematics during locomotor transitions between level ground and stair ambulation that persist with increasing stair grade,” Scientific Reports, vol. 13, Issue 1, 2023, 8576, pp. … [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 18/898,320, mailed on Nov. 20, 2024, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Peng J., et al., “Anticipatory kinematics and muscle activity preceding transitions from level-ground walking to stair ascent and descent,” Journal of biomechanics vol. 49, Issue 4, 2016, pp. 528-536. [cited by applicant]
Shultz, A. H. et al., “Variable cadence walking and ground adaptive standing with a powered ankle prosthesis,” IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng., vol. 24, Issue 4, Apr. 2016, pp. 495-505. [cited by applicant]
Examiner Interview Summary Record Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 18/898,320, mailed on Mar. 13, 2025, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 18/898,303, mailed on Dec. 19, 2024, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]