IP Library Granted Patent US 12,465,502
Granted Patent B2
US 12,465,502 · App. 18/898,303 · Granted Nov 11, 2025

Volitional EMG controller for a powered knee prosthesis

Inventors: Tommaso Lenzi (Salt Lake City, UT); Suzi Creveling (Salt Lake City, UT); Lukas R. Gabert (Salt Lake City, UT)
Assignee: University of Utah Research Foundation
A61F2/72A61F2/64A61F2002/5003A61F2002/701A61F2002/704A61F2002/7625A61F2002/7635A61F2002/7645
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,465,502
App. No.
18/898,303
Granted
Nov 11, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Disclosed are prosthetic systems comprising a powered knee upper leg prosthesis and a volitional controller configured to provide control of the prosthesis to the user. The prosthetic system may be configured to enable a user to climb a set of stairs. The prosthetic system may be activated by the activation of an EMG signal source, such as the biceps femoris muscle of the upper leg. The volitional controller of the prosthetic system may be further configured to receive a ground state signal and/or an IMU signal to determine a target knee torque for operating the powered knee of the prosthesis.

Claims (55)

1 . A volitional controller for a powered knee prosthesis, comprising:

one or more processors; and

one or more hardware storage devices having instructions stored thereon that are executable by the one or more processors to cause the volitional controller to at least:

receive an electromyography (EMG) signal from a single EMG sensor source;

receive a ground state signal from a ground reaction force (GRF) sensor;

determine a target knee torque based on the received EMG signal and ground state signal; and

output a knee torque signal for controlling a powered knee joint of a powered knee prosthesis,

wherein the target knee torque comprises a flexion torque component and an extension torque component, wherein:

the flexion torque component comprises a flexion ground gain and a flexion thigh gain and wherein both the flexion ground gain and the flexion thigh gain are continuously variable between a lower threshold and an upper threshold; and/or

the extension torque component comprises an extension ground gain and an extension knee gain and wherein both the extension ground gain and the extension knee gain are continuously variable between a lower threshold and an upper threshold.

2 . The volitional controller of claim 1 ,

wherein when the ground state signal indicates that the prosthesis is off the ground, the EMG signal is mapped to a knee torque signal exhibiting flexion torque, and

wherein when the ground state signal indicates that the prosthesis is on the ground, the EMG signal is mapped to a knee torque signal exhibiting extension torque.

3 . The volitional controller of claim 1 , wherein transition of the knee torque signal between flexion torque and extension torque is continuous.

4 . The volitional controller of claim 1 , wherein the EMG sensor source is a biceps femoris muscle.

5 . The volitional controller of claim 1 , wherein the instructions further cause the volitional controller to receive an inertial measurement unit (IMU) signal from an IMU sensor.

6 . The volitional controller of claim 5 , wherein determining the target knee torque is further based on the IMU signal.

7 . The volitional controller of claim 5 , wherein the IMU signal is used to determine a thigh angle and/or a knee angle.

8 . The volitional controller of claim 1 , wherein determining the target knee torque further comprises one or more damping components.

9 . A powered knee and prosthetic leg system configured to provide volitional control to a user, the system comprising:

a powered knee prosthesis; and

the controller of claim 1 .

10 . The powered knee and prosthetic leg system of claim 9 , wherein the powered knee prosthesis comprises:

a pylon having a proximal and a distal end;

a prosthetic foot connected to the distal end of the pylon;

a powered knee joint connected to the proximal end of the pylon; and

a socket configured to receive a residual limb of a user, wherein the socket is connected to the powered knee joint.

11 . The powered knee and prosthetic leg system of claim 10 , wherein the powered knee prosthesis further comprises an EMG sensor, a GRF sensor, and an IMU sensor.

12 . The powered knee and prosthetic leg system of claim 11 , wherein the IMU sensor is disposed at or near a proximal end of the pylon.

13 . The powered knee and prosthetic leg system of claim 9 , wherein the powered knee and prosthetic leg system is configured to enable a user to ascend stairs in a forwards and backwards orientation.

14 . A method for controlling a powered knee prosthesis, comprising:

receiving an EMG signal from a single EMG sensor source;

receiving a ground state signal from a ground reaction force (GRF) sensor;

determining a target knee torque based on the received EMG signal and ground state signal; and

outputting a knee torque signal for controlling a powered knee joint of a powered knee prosthesis,

wherein determining the target knee torque comprises determining a flexion torque component and an extension torque component, wherein:

the flexion torque component comprises a flexion ground gain and a flexion thigh gain and wherein both the flexion ground gain and the flexion thigh gain are continuously variable between a lower threshold and an upper threshold; and/or

the extension torque component comprises an extension ground gain and an extension knee gain and wherein both the extension ground gain and the extension knee gain are continuously variable between a lower threshold and an upper threshold.

15 . The method of claim 14 ,

wherein when the ground state signal indicates that the powered knee prosthesis is off the ground, the EMG signal is mapped to a knee torque signal exhibiting flexion torque, and

wherein when the ground state signal indicates that the powered knee prosthesis is on the ground, the EMG signal is mapped to a knee torque signal exhibiting extension torque.

16 . The method of claim 14 , further comprising receiving an inertial measurement unit (IMU) signal from an IMU sensor and wherein determining the target knee torque is further based on the IMU signal.

17 . A powered knee and prosthetic leg system configured to provide volitional control to a user, the system comprising:

a powered knee prosthesis including a powered knee joint configured to provide a knee torque; and

a volitional controller, comprising:

one or more processors; and

one or more hardware storage devices having instructions stored thereon that are executable by the one or more processors to cause the volitional controller to at least:

receive an electromyography (EMG) signal from a single EMG sensor source;

receive a ground state signal from a ground reaction force (GRF) sensor;

receive an inertial measurement unit (IMU) signal from an IMU sensor;

determine a target knee torque based on the received EMG signal, ground state signal, and IMU signal; and

output a knee torque signal for controlling the powered knee joint,

wherein the target knee torque comprises a flexion torque component and an extension torque component, wherein:

the flexion torque component comprises a flexion ground gain and a flexion thigh gain and wherein both the flexion ground gain and the flexion thigh gain are continuously variable between a lower threshold and an upper threshold; and/or

the extension torque component comprises an extension ground gain and an extension knee gain and wherein both the extension ground gain and the extension knee gain are continuously variable between a lower threshold and an upper threshold.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 7, 2024
From: LENZI, TOMMASO; CREVELING, SUZI; GABERT, LUKAS R.
To: UNIVERSITY OF UTAH
Reel/Frame 069185/0522 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 7, 2024
From: UNIVERSITY OF UTAH
To: UNIVERSITY OF UTAH RESEARCH FOUNDATION
Reel/Frame 069185/0646 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63541694 · Sep 29, 2023
Related Publication 20250107908A1 · Apr 3, 2025
References Cited (55)
US 8623098B2 · Goldfarb et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8652218B2 · Goldfarb et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8696764B2 · Hansen et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8852292B2 · Ragnarsdottir et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9192487B2 · Flaven et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9221177B2 · Herr et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9248031B2 · Pusch et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9443203B2 · Young et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9649207B2 · Hahn et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9687377B2 · Han et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9763809B2 · Palmer et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9975249B2 · Herr et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10369023B2 · Simon et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10575971B2 · Herr et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20020052663A1 · Herr et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20040167641A1 · Kawai et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20090265018A1 · Goldfarb et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100241242A1 · Herr et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20120004736A1 · Goldfarb et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120221120A1 · Seyr et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120226364A1 · Kampas et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130310949A1 · Goldfarb et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140364962A1 · Gregg et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150066156A1 · Geyer et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150127119A1 · Simon et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150182354A1 · Bonnet et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160058582A1 · Lenzi et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160302686A1 · Sigurpórsson et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160338857A1 · Herr et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170354529A1 · Han et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20190388247A1 · Goldfarb et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20230270570A1 · Hofmann et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20250107905A1 · Lenzi et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20250107907A1 · Lenzi et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
CA 2762265A1 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
CN 114795604A · 2022 [cited by applicant]
EP 2849687B1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013067407A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016130745A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022087161A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2022087160A1 · 2022 [cited by examiner]
Alcock L., et al., “Biomechanical demands of the 2-step transitional gait cycles linking level gait and stair descent gait in older women,” Journal of biomechanics, vol. 48, Issue 16, 2015, pp. 4191-4197. [cited by applicant]
Au S. et al., “Powered ankle-foot prosthesis to assist level-ground and stair-descent gaits,” Neural Networks, vol. 21, Issue 4, 2008, pp. 654-666. [cited by applicant]
Best T. K. et al., “Data-Driven Variable Impedance Control of a Powered Knee-Ankle Prosthesis for Adaptive Speed and Incline Walking”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2023, pp. 19. [cited by applicant]
Ha K. H. et al., “Myoelectric control of a powered knee prosthesis for volitional movement during non-weight-bearing activities”, 32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS., 2010, pp. 3515-3518. [cited by applicant]
Hood S. et al., “Powered Knee and Ankle Prosthesis with Adaptive Control Enables Climbing Stairs with Different Stair Heights, Cadences, and Gait Patterns”, IEEE Trans Robot, vol. 38, Issue 3, Jun. 2022, pp. 1430-1441. [cited by applicant]
Huang H. et al., “A strategy for identifying locomotion modes using surface electromyography,” IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, vol. 56, Issue 1, Jan. 2009, pp. 65-73. [cited by applicant]
Neuman R. M., et al., “There are unique kinematics during locomotor transitions between level ground and stair ambulation that persist with increasing stair grade,” Scientific Reports, vol. 13, Issue 1, 2023, 8576, pp. … [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 18/898,315, mailed on Nov. 14, 2024, 29 pages. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 18/898,320, mailed on Nov. 20, 2024, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Peng J., et al., “Anticipatory kinematics and muscle activity preceding transitions from level-ground walking to stair ascent and descent,” Journal of biomechanics vol. 49, Issue 4, 2016, pp. 528-536. [cited by applicant]
Shultz, A. H. et al., “Variable cadence walking and ground adaptive standing with a powered ankle prosthesis,” IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng., vol. 24, Issue 4, Apr. 2016, pp. 495-505. [cited by applicant]
Examiner Interview Summary Record Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 18/898,320, mailed on Mar. 13, 2025, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 18/898,315, mailed on Mar. 19, 2025, 31 pages. [cited by applicant]
Translation of originally published on May 19, 2011. [cited by applicant]