IP Library Granted Patent US 12,527,673
Granted Patent B2
US 12,527,673 · App. 18/898,320 · Granted Jan 20, 2026

Unified controller for a powered knee prosthesis

Inventors: Tommaso Lenzi (Salt Lake City, UT); Lukas R. Gabert (Salt Lake City, UT); Liam Sullivan (Salt Lake City, UT); Marissa Ann Cowan (Salt Lake City, UT)
Assignee: The University of Utah Research Foundation
A61F2/64A61F2002/701A61F2002/704
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,527,673
App. No.
18/898,320
Granted
Jan 20, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Disclosed are prosthetic systems comprising a powered knee prosthesis and a volitional controller configured to provide control of the prosthesis to the user. The prosthetic system may be configured to enable a user to walk on smooth and/or uneven terrain and to ascend and/or descend stairs. The volitional controller may be configured in a contact state when the prosthesis is in contact with a ground surface and a no contact state when the prosthesis is lifted from the ground surface. When in the contact state, the controller may output a knee torque signal for controlling the powered knee of the prosthesis. The knee torque signal may be based on a target knee torque determined by the knee orientation and the torque measured at the ankle of a prosthetic foot. When in the no contact state, the controller may output a knee torque signal based on a desired knee position.

Claims (48)

1 . A system for providing volitional control to a powered knee prosthesis, comprising:

a powered knee prosthesis comprising a powered knee joint; and

a volitional controller comprising one or more processors and one or more hardware storage devices having instructions stored thereon that are executable by the one or more processors to cause the controller to at least:

determine a knee orientation and an ankle torque;

determine a target knee torque based on the knee orientation and ankle torque, wherein the target knee torque is determined by summing

(i) a step-up torque calculated from measured knee orientation wherein the step-up torque increases from a lower knee orientation threshold to a maximum value and then decreases toward an upper knee orientation threshold, and

(ii) a biarticular torque defined as a knee flexion torque that is proportional to a measured ankle plantarflexion torque; and

output a knee torque signal to the powered knee joint of the powered knee prosthesis to adjust the powered knee joint toward the target knee torque,

wherein the controller does not classify ambulation activity or switch between activity-specific controllers according to walking, stair ascent, or stair descent activities.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the instructions further cause the controller to determine a thigh orientation and a prosthetic knee velocity.

3 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the biarticular torque is further determined by multiplying the measured ankle plantarflexion torque with a biarticular knee gain and a biarticular thigh gain, wherein:

the biarticular knee gain has a value dependent on measured knee orientation, with a maximum value at or below a lower knee orientation threshold and a minimum value at or above an upper knee orientation threshold; and

the biarticular thigh gain has a value dependent on measured thigh orientation, with a minim value at or below a lower thigh orientation threshold and a maximum value at or above an upper thigh orientation threshold.

4 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the target knee torque is further determined by adding a damping torque.

5 . The system of claim 4 , wherein the damping torque is proportional to and opposite a prosthetic knee velocity.

6 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the instructions further cause the volitional controller to:

receive a ground state signal; and

configure the controller in a contact state or a no contact state;

wherein the knee torque signal is configured to adjust the powered knee joint toward the target knee joint when the controller is in the contact state.

7 . They system of claim 6 , wherein when the controller is in the no contact state the knee torque signal is configured to adjust the powered knee joint toward a desired knee orientation, the desired knee orientation being determined by summing a minimum jerk trajectory and an adaptive orientation, wherein:

the minimum jerk trajectory is a trajectory selected to minimize changes to angular acceleration of a shank of the powered knee prosthesis; and

the adaptive orientation is a product of a synergistic orientation angle and an adaptive gain, wherein

(i) the synergistic orientation angle is proportional to and opposite the knee orientation, and

(ii) the adaptive gain is based on a toe-off knee orientation measured at the transition from the contact state to the no contact state, the adaptive gain having a higher value at lower toe-off knee orientation and a lower value at higher toe-off knee orientation.

8 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the powered knee prosthesis comprises:

a shank having a proximal and a distal end;

a prosthetic foot connected to the distal end of the shank;

a powered knee joint connected to the proximal end of the shank; and

a socket configured to receive a residual limb of a user, wherein the socket is connected to the powered knee joint.

9 . The powered-kace-and-prosthetic log-system of claim 1 , wherein the powered knee prosthesis comprises a ground reaction force (GRF) sensor and an inertial measurement unit (IMU).

10 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the powered knee prosthesis is configured to enable a user to walk on even and/or inclined surfaces and to ascend and/or descend stairs.

11 . A method for controlling a powered knee prosthesis, comprising:

determining a knee orientation and an ankle torque;

determining a target knee torque based on the knee orientation and ankle torque, wherein the target knee torque is determined by summing

(i) a step-up torque that is related to knee orientation wherein the step-up torque increases from a lower knee orientation threshold to a maximum value and then decreases toward an upper knee orientation threshold, and

(ii) a biarticular torque defined as a knee flexion torque that is proportional to a measured ankle plantarflexion torque; and

outputting a knee torque signal to a powered knee joint of the powered knee prosthesis to adiost powered knee joint toward the target knee torque.

12 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising determining a thigh orientation and a prosthetic knee velocity.

13 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising configuring a volitional controller in a contact state or a no contact state and basing the knee torque signal on the target knee torque when the volitional controller is in the contact state.

14 . A system for providing volitional control to a powered knee prosthesis, comprising:

a powered knee prosthesis comprising a powered knee joint;

and a volitional controller comprising one or more processors and one or more hardware storage devices having instructions stored thereon that are executable by the one or more processors to cause the controller to at least:

receive a ground state signal indicating a transition from a contact state to a no contact state;

determine a toe-off knee orientation defined as the knee orientation measured at the transition from the contact state to the no contact state;

and output a knee torque signal to the powered knee joint of the powered knee prosthesis to adjust the powered knee joint toward a desired knee orientation, the desired knee orientation being determined by summing a minimum jerk trajectory and an adaptive orientation, wherein the minimum jerk trajectory is a trajectory selected to minimize changes to angular acceleration of a shank of the powered knee prosthesis, wherein the adaptive orientation is a product of a synergistic orientation angle and an adaptive gain,

wherein (i) the synergistic orientation angle is proportional to and opposite a current knee orientation, and

(ii) the adaptive gain is based on the toe-off knee orientation, with a higher value at lower toe-off knee orientation and a lower value at higher toe-off knee orientation.

15 . The system of claim 14 , wherein the controller does not classify ambulation activity or switch between activity-specific controllers according to walking, stair ascent, or stair descent activities.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 29, 2024
From: LENZI, TOMMASO; GABERT, LUKAS R.; SULLIVAN, LIAM; COWAN, MARISSA ANN
To: UNIVERSITY OF UTAH
Reel/Frame 069055/0294 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 29, 2024
From: UNIVERSITY OF UTAH
To: UNIVERSITY OF UTAH RESEARCH FOUNDATION
Reel/Frame 069055/0414 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63541705 · Sep 29, 2023
Related Publication 20250107905A1 · Apr 3, 2025
References Cited (53)
US 8623098B2 · Goldfarb et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8652218B2 · Goldfarb et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8696764B2 · Hansen et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8852292B2 · Ragnarsdottir et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9192487B2 · Flaven et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9221177B2 · Herr et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9248031B2 · Pusch et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9443203B2 · Young et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9649207B2 · Hahn et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9687377B2 · Han et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9763809B2 · Palmer et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9975249B2 · Herr et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10369023B2 · Simon et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10575971B2 · Herr et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20040167641A1 · Kawai et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20090265018A1 · Goldfarb et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100241242A1 · Herr et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20120004736A1 · Goldfarb · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120221120A1 · Seyr et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120226364A1 · Kampas et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130310949A1 · Goldfarb et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140364962A1 · Gregg et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150066156A1 · Geyer et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150127119A1 · Simon et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150182354A1 · Bonnet · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160058582A1 · Lenzi et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160302686A1 · Sigurpórsson et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160338857A1 · Herr et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170354529A1 · Han et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20190388247A1 · Goldfarb et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20230270570A1 · Hofmann et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20250107907A1 · Lenzi et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20250107908A1 · Lenzi et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
CA 2762265A1 · 2001 [cited by examiner]
CN 114795604A · 2022 [cited by applicant]
EP 2849687B1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013067407A1 · 2013 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2016130745A1 · 2016 [cited by examiner]
WO 2022087160A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022087161A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
Alcock L., et al., “Biomechanical demands of the 2-step transitional gait cycles linking level gait and stair descent gait in older women,” Journal of biomechanics, vol. 48, Issue 16, 2015, pp. 4191-4197. [cited by applicant]
Au S. et al., “Powered ankle-foot prosthesis to assist level-ground and stair-descent gaits,” Neural Networks, vol. 21, Issue 4, 2008, pp. 654-666. [cited by applicant]
Best T. K. et al., “Data-Driven Variable Impedance Control of a Powered Knee-Ankle Prosthesis for Adaptive Speed and Incline Walking”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2023, pp. 19. [cited by applicant]
Ha K. H. et al., “Myoelectric control of a powered knee prosthesis for volitional movement during non-weight-bearing activities”, 32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS., 2010, pp. 3515-3518. [cited by applicant]
Hood S. et al., “Powered Knee and Ankle Prosthesis with Adaptive Control Enables Climbing Stairs with Different Stair Heights, Cadences, and Gait Patterns”, IEEE Trans Robot, vol. 38, Issue 3, Jun. 2022, pp. 1430-1441. [cited by applicant]
Huang H. et al., “A strategy for identifying locomotion modes using surface electromyography,” IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, vol. 56, Issue 1, Jan. 2009, pp. 65-73. [cited by applicant]
Neuman R. M., et al., “There are unique kinematics during locomotor transitions between level ground and stair ambulation that persist with increasing stair grade,” Scientific Reports, vol. 13, Issue 1, 2023, 8576, pp. … [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 18/898,315, mailed on Nov. 14, 2024, 29 pages. [cited by applicant]
Peng J., et al., “Anticipatory kinematics and muscle activity preceding transitions from level-ground walking to stair ascent and descent,” Journal of biomechanics vol. 49, Issue 4, 2016, pp. 528-536. [cited by applicant]
Shultz, A. H. et al., “Variable cadence walking and ground adaptive standing with a powered ankle prosthesis,” IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng., vol. 24, Issue 4, Apr. 2016, pp. 495-505. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 18/898,303, mailed on Dec. 19, 2024, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 18/898,315, mailed on Mar. 19, 2025, 31 pages. [cited by applicant]
Translation of WO2011057792A1 (Year: 2011). [cited by applicant]