IP Library › Granted Patent US 7,206,150
Granted Patent B2
US 7,206,150 · App. 09/944,925 · Granted Apr 17, 2007

In situ media defect image analysis

Assignee: Seagate Technology LLC
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,206,150
App. No.
09/944,925
Granted
Apr 17, 2007
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present invention is a method or apparatus configured for analyzing a data storage device containing a transducer head positionable adjacent a data storage media surface. First, a defect is detected in a region of the surface. Two or more readback signals are obtained, each received during a respective pass of the transducer head adjacent the defective region. The signals are then combined to define a category for the defective region, either automatically or by visual examination of an image. Preferably, all of the read signals are received from the transducer head while the data storage device remains sealed in a substantially opaque chamber. That way, the media defects of an entire population of data storage devices can be analyzed quickly, disassembling the drives for direct visual analysis only on a selective basis.

Claims (22)

1. A method comprising imaging a characteristic size of a defective region of a data storage medium by combining a plurality of data readback signals received from different tracks adjacent the defective region, and indicating that the defective region is unreliable if a ratio defined by a size of a portion of the defective region with a less-than-expected readback signal strength compared to a total size of the detective region is greater than a preselected threshold.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising categorizing the defective region by comparing the characteristic size of the defective region to a plurality of predefined category profiles.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the categorizing step comprises identifying the defective region as likely being characteristic of a scratch.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the imaging step comprises representing an array of data points each having independent coordinates X and Y with respect to the data storage media.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein the imaging step comprises representing an array of data points wherein each X and Y coordinate is associated with a corresponding Z coordinate relating to a strength of the associated readback signal.

6. The method of claim 2 wherein the categorizing step comprises identifying the defective region as likely being characteristic of corrosion.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

modifying a list of bad sectors in a manner that depends upon the imaging step; and

retaining the modified list in a memory.

8. A data storage apparatus comprising a list of bad sectors that is modified according to the method of claim 7 and stored in a memory.

9. The method of claim 2 , further comprising:

assigning a value to each of the defective regions according to the categorizing step; and

reworking the data storage medium if an aggregation of the assigned values exceeds a predetermined threshold.

10. The method of claim 1 in which the imaging step comprises receiving all of the plurality of readback signals from a transducer head of a sealed data storage apparatus in which the medium is rotated.

11. The method of claim 3 wherein the categorizing step identifies the defective region as likely being characteristic of a scratch if the characteristic size comprises a length that is greater than a width by a factor of about 2.5.

12. An apparatus comprising:

a data storage medium comprising a defective region; and

means for assigning a category for the defective region by combining a plurality of data readback signals received from different tracks adjacent the defective region, wherein the means for assigning comprises means for generating a topographical image of the defective region of the media surface.

13. The apparatus of claim 12 in which the means for assigning comprises defining a profile for each of at least 3 categories defining a set that includes the category assigned for the defective region.

14. The apparatus of claim 12 in which the means for assigning is completed while the combination of readback signals has been compared against at most 30 profiles each corresponding to a respective category, die assigned category being one of the respective categories.

15. The apparatus of claim 12 in which the means for assigning comprises a category identifier indicating whether the defective region is likely to contain a scratch.

16. The apparatus of claim 12 in which the means for assigning is configured to receive all of the plurality of read signals from the transducer head while the media storage and transducer head are sealed in a substantially opaque chamber.

Assignments (8)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 23, 2025
From: THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA
To: SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY; SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY; SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HDD HOLDINGS; I365 INC.; SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC; SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL; SEAGATE HDD CAYMAN; SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY (US) HOLDINGS, INC.
Reel/Frame 072193/0001 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS Recorded Jul 19, 2013
From: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT AND SECOND PRIORITY REPRESENTATIVE
To: SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC; EVAULT INC. (F/K/A I365 INC.); SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL; SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY US HOLDINGS, INC.
Reel/Frame 030833/0001 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 24, 2011
From: SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC
To: THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 026010/0350 →
RELEASE Recorded Jan 19, 2011
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
To: SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HDD HOLDINGS; MAXTOR CORPORATION; SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC; SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
Reel/Frame 025662/0001 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 15, 2009
From: MAXTOR CORPORATION; SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC; SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT AND FIRST PRIORITY REPRESENTATIVE; WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT AND SECOND PRIORITY REPRESENTATIVE
Reel/Frame 022757/0017 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTERESTS IN PATENT RIGHTS Recorded Dec 21, 2005
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT (FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK AND JPMORGAN CHASE BANK)
To: SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC
Reel/Frame 016926/0342 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 5, 2002
From: SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 013177/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 31, 2001
From: KOSHKINA, OLGA VALERIEVNA; ARNAOUT, BADIH MOHAMADNAJI
To: SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC
Reel/Frame 012142/0834 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 6029602500 · Jun 4, 2001
Related Publication 20020181133A1 · Dec 5, 2002