IP Library Granted Patent US 8,060,260
Granted Patent B2
US 8,060,260 · App. 12/179,137 · Granted Nov 15, 2011

Adaptive vehicle control system with driving style recognition based on vehicle passing maneuvers

Assignee: GM Global Technology Operations LLC
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,060,260
App. No.
12/179,137
Granted
Nov 15, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

An adaptive vehicle control system that classifies a driver's driving style based on vehicle passing maneuvers. A process determines whether the vehicle has started a lane change from a first lane to a second lane as a first phase of the passing maneuver. If so, the process determines whether the lane change to the second lane has been completed as a second phase of the passing maneuver. If the lane change to the second lane has been completed, the process determines whether there has been a lane change back to the first lane to complete the passing maneuver as a third phase of the passing maneuver. Further, the process determines whether a time threshold has been exceeded after the passing maneuver is in a second phase, but no lane change back to the first lane has occurred.

Claims (48)

1. A method for identifying whether a vehicle maneuver is a passing maneuver, said method comprising:

reading a vehicle speed signal and a vehicle yaw rate signal from vehicle sensors;

determining whether the vehicle has started a lane change from a first lane to a second lane as a first phase of the passing maneuver;

determining whether the lane change to the second lane has been completed as a second phase of the passing maneuver; and

determining whether there has been a lane change back to the first lane to complete the passing maneuver if the passing maneuver is in the second phase as a third phase of the passing maneuver.

2. The method according to claim 1 further comprising determining whether a lane change has been aborted when the passing maneuver is in the first phase and the third phase.

3. The method according to claim 1 further comprising determining whether a time threshold has been exceeded after the passing maneuver is in the second phase, but no lane change back to the first lane has occurred.

4. The method according to claim 1 further comprising classifying the passing maneuver to determine a driver's driving style after the passing maneuver has been completed.

5. The method according to claim 4 wherein classifying the passing maneuver includes using selected discriminant features derived or obtained from the passing maneuver.

6. The method according to claim 5 wherein the discriminant features are derived or obtained from the group comprising a maximum vehicle yaw rate, a maximum vehicle lateral acceleration, a maximum lateral jerk, a distance for lane change, an average vehicle speed, a maximum speed variation, a maximum braking pedal force, a maximum throttle percentage, a minimum distance to a preceding vehicle, a maximum range rate to the preceding vehicle and a minimum distance to a following vehicle for the first phase of the passing maneuver.

7. The method according to claim 6 wherein the discriminant features are derive or obtained from the group comprising a maximum throttle percentage, an average throttle percentage, a distance traveled and maximum speed variation for the second phase of the passing maneuver.

8. The method according to claim 5 wherein a discriminant feature extraction method is selected from the group comprising principal component analysis, linear discriminant analysis, colonial principal component analysis and generalized discriminant analysis, and a discriminant feature selection method is obtained from the group comprising exhaustive search, branch-and-bound search, sequential forward/backward selection and sequential forward/backward floating search.

9. The method according to claim 4 wherein classifying the passing maneuver includes using support vector machines.

10. The method according to claim 4 wherein classifying the passing maneuver includes using a technique selected from a group comprising fuzzy logic, clustering, neural networks, support vector machines and threshold-based logic.

11. A method for identifying a vehicle maneuver as a passing maneuver, said method comprising:

reading a vehicle speed signal and a vehicle yaw rate signal form vehicle sensors;

determining whether the vehicle has started a lane change from a first lane to a second lane as a first phase of the passing maneuver;

determining whether the lane change to the second lane has been completed as a second phase of the passing maneuver;

determining whether there has been a lane change back to the first lane to complete the passing maneuver if the passing maneuver is in the second phase as a third phase of the passing maneuver;

determining whether a time threshold has been exceeded after the passing maneuver is in the second phase, but no lane change back to the first lane has occurred; and

classifying the passing maneuver to determine a driver's driving style after the passing maneuver has been completed.

12. The method according to claim 11 further comprising determining whether a lane change has been aborted when the passing maneuver is in the first phase and the third phase.

13. The method according to claim 11 wherein classifying the passing maneuver includes using selected discriminant features derived or obtained from the passing maneuver.

14. The method according to claim 13 wherein the discriminant features are derived or obtained from the group comprising a maximum vehicle yaw rate, a maximum vehicle lateral acceleration, a maximum lateral jerk, a distance for lane change, an average vehicle speed, a maximum speed variation, a maximum braking pedal force, a maximum throttle percentage, a minimum distance to a preceding vehicle, a maximum range rate to the preceding vehicle and a minimum distance to a following vehicle for the first phase of the passing maneuver.

15. The method according to claim 14 wherein the discriminant features are derived or obtained from the group comprising a maximum throttle percentage, an average throttle percentage, a distance traveled and maximum speed variation for the second phase of the passing maneuver.

16. The method according to claim 13 wherein a discriminant feature extraction method is selected from the group comprising principal component analysis, linear discriminant analysis, colonial principal component analysis and generalized discriminant analysis, and a discriminant feature selection method is obtained from the group comprising exhaustive search, branch-and-bound search, sequential forward/backward selection and sequential forward/backward floating search.

17. The method according to claim 11 wherein classifying the passing maneuver includes using support vector machines.

18. A system for identifying a vehicle maneuver as a passing maneuver, said system comprising:

vehicle sensors that provide a vehicle speed signal and a vehicle yaw rate signal;

means for determining whether the vehicle has started a lane change from a first lane to a second lane as a first phase of the passing maneuver;

means for determining whether the lane change to the second lane has been completed as a second phase of the passing maneuver; and

means for determining whether there has been a lane change back to the first lane to complete the passing maneuver if the passing maneuver is in the second phase as a third phase of the passing maneuver.

19. The system according to claim 18 further comprising means for determining whether a lane change has been aborted when the passing maneuver is in the first phase and the third phase.

20. The system according to claim 18 further comprising means for determining whether a time threshold has been exceeded after the passing maneuver is in the second phase, but no lane change back to the first lane has occurred.

21. The system according to claim 18 further comprising means for classifying the passing maneuver to determine a driver's driving style after the passing maneuver has been completed.

22. The system according to claim 21 wherein the means for classifying the passing maneuver includes means for extracting and selecting discriminant features from the passing maneuver.

23. The system according to claim 22 wherein the discriminant features are derive or obtained from the group comprising a maximum vehicle yaw rate, a maximum vehicle lateral acceleration, a maximum lateral jerk, a distance for lane change, an average vehicle speed, a maximum speed variation, a maximum braking pedal force, a maximum throttle percentage, a minimum distance to a preceding vehicle, a maximum range rate to the preceding vehicle and a minimum distance to a following vehicle for the first phase of the passing maneuver.

24. The system according to claim 23 wherein the discriminant features are selected from the group comprising a maximum throttle percentage, an average throttle percentage, a distance traveled and maximum speed variation for the second phase of the passing maneuver.

25. The system according to claim 22 wherein a discriminant feature extraction method is selected from the group comprising principal component analysis, linear discriminant analysis, colonial principal component analysis and generalized discriminant analysis, and a discriminant feature selection method is obtained from the group comprising exhaustive search, branch-and-bound search, sequential forward/backward selection and sequential forward/backward floating search.

26. The system according to claim 21 wherein the means for classifying the passing maneuver uses support vector machines.

27. A method for identifying a vehicle passing maneuver, said method comprising:

providing a vehicle speed signal from a speed sensor;

providing a vehicle yaw rate signal from a vehicle yaw rate sensor;

providing a steering angle signal from a steering angle sensor;

providing a heading angle signal from a heading angle sensor;

providing a vehicle acceleration signal from an acceleration sensor;

providing a vehicle position signal from a position sensor; and

using the sensor signals to determine whether the vehicle is in the passing maneuver.

Assignments (12)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 7, 2014
From: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 034384/0758 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 10, 2011
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 025781/0211 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 8, 2010
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
Reel/Frame 025324/0475 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 5, 2010
From: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025315/0046 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 4, 2010
From: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025245/0909 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 28, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST
Reel/Frame 023162/0237 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 27, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Reel/Frame 023156/0313 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 21, 2009
From: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES; CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 023155/0769 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 21, 2009
From: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 023126/0914 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 16, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES; CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES
Reel/Frame 022554/0538 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 4, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Reel/Frame 022201/0448 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 29, 2008
From: HUANG, JIHUA; LIN, WILLIAM C.; CHIN, YUEN-KWOK
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 021309/0033 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20100023181A1 · Jan 28, 2010