IP Library Granted Patent US 8,500,209
Granted Patent B2
US 8,500,209 · App. 12/428,531 · Granted Aug 6, 2013

Manually rotatable tool

Inventors: David R. Hall (Provo, UT); Ronald B. Crockett (Payson, UT); Gary Peterson (Provo, UT); Jeff Jepson (Spanish Fork, UT)
Assignee: Schlumberger Technology Corporation
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,500,209
App. No.
12/428,531
Granted
Aug 6, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

A degradation assembly comprises a rotary portion and a stationary portion. The rotary portion includes a cemented metal bolster bonded to a tip. The tip comprises a symmetric, substantially conically shaped tip formed of diamond and a cemented metal carbide substrate. The stationary portion comprises a holder configured to be coupled to a block mounted to a driving mechanism. A compressible element is disposed intermediate, or between, and in mechanical contact with both the rotary portion and the stationary portion.

Claims (24)

1. A degradation tool assembly, comprising:

a rotary portion comprising:

a bolster and an impact tip bonded to the bolster;

a shield having a recess;

a stationary portion comprising:

a block adapted to couple to the rotary portion and further adapted to couple to a drive mechanism;

a shank having a first end, the recess of the shield being rotatably connected to the first end of the shank, and a second end spaced apart from the first end, the second end of the shank adapted to be secured within the block; and

a compressible element disposed between and in mechanical contact with the rotary portion and the stationary portion, the rotary portion and the stationary portion compressing the compressible element sufficiently to prevent free rotation of the rotary portion relative to the stationary portion during a degradation operation.

2. The degradation tool assembly of claim 1 , wherein the compressible element is an O-ring under 20 percent to 40 percent compression.

3. The degradation tool assembly of claim 1 , wherein the compressible element is an O-ring of 70 durometers to 90 durometers.

4. The degradation tool assembly of claim 1 , wherein the compressible element is an O-ring.

5. The degradation tool assembly of claim 1 , wherein the compressible element is a seal that retains lubricant between the rotating portion and the stationary portion.

6. The degradation tool assembly of claim 1 , wherein the rotary portion has a puller attachment.

7. The degradation tool assembly of claim 1 , wherein the rotary portion has a wrench flat.

8. The degradation tool assembly of claim 1 , wherein the compressible element includes at least one rubber ball disposed in a cavity between the stationary portion and the rotary portion.

9. The degradation tool assembly of claim 1 , wherein the compressible element is a non-round spring clip.

10. The degradation tool assembly of claim 9 , wherein the spring clip has at least one substantially flat surface.

11. The degradation tool assembly of claim 1 , wherein the stationary portion includes a holder.

12. The degradation tool assembly of claim 1 , wherein the assembly further comprises a back-up adjacent to the O-ring.

13. A degradation tool assembly, comprising:

a rotary portion comprising a bolster and an impact tip bonded to the bolster;

a stationary portion comprising a block adapted to couple to the rotary portion and further adapted to couple to a drive mechanism; and

a compressible element disposed between and in mechanical contact with the rotary portion and the stationary portion, the rotary portion and the stationary portion compressing the compressible element sufficient to prevent free rotation of the rotary portion relative to the stationary portion during a degradation operation;

wherein the compressible element is comprised of a first rubber compressible element disposed on the stationary portion and a second rubber compressible element disposed on the rotary portion, the first rubber compressible element being in contact with the second rubber compressible element.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 24, 2010
From: HALL, DAVID R., MR.
To: SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 023982/0922 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 23, 2009
From: CROCKETT, RONALD B., MR.; PETERSON, GARY, MR.; JEPSON, JEFF, MR.
To: HALL, DAVID R., MR.
Reel/Frame 022585/0507 →
Continuity (25)
Continuation In Part 12177556 · Jul 22, 2008
Continuation In Part 12135595 · Jun 9, 2008
Continuation In Part 12112743 · Apr 30, 2008
Continuation In Part 12051738 · Mar 19, 2008
Continuation In Part 12051689 · Mar 19, 2008
Continuation In Part 12051586 · Mar 19, 2008
Continuation In Part 12021051 · Jan 28, 2008
Continuation 12021019 · Jan 28, 2008
Continuation In Part 11971965 · Jan 10, 2008
Continuation 11947644 · Nov 29, 2007
Continuation In Part 11844586 · Aug 24, 2007
Continuation In Part 11829761 · Jul 27, 2007
Continuation In Part 11773271 · Jul 3, 2007
Continuation In Part 11766903 · Jun 22, 2007
Continuation 11766865 · Jun 22, 2007
Continuation In Part 11742304 · Apr 30, 2007
Continuation 11742261 · Apr 30, 2007
Continuation In Part 11464008 · Aug 11, 2006
Continuation In Part 11463998 · Aug 11, 2006
Continuation In Part 11463990 · Aug 11, 2006
Continuation In Part 11463975 · Aug 11, 2006
Continuation In Part 11463962 · Aug 11, 2006
Continuation In Part 11695672 · Apr 3, 2007
Continuation In Part 11686831 · Mar 15, 2007
Related Publication 20090200857A1 · Aug 13, 2009