IP Library Granted Patent US 10,624,366
Granted Patent B2
US 10,624,366 · App. 16/218,074 · Granted Apr 21, 2020

Methods of decreasing feed conversion ratios in fowl

Inventors: Mallory Embree (San Diego, CA); Grant Gogul (Cardiff, CA); Cameron Martino (Solana Beach, CA); Norm Pitt (San Diego, CA)
Assignee: Ascus Biosciences, Inc.
A23K10/18A01K45/00A23K40/30A23K50/75A61K9/0053A61K35/742A61K35/747C12N1/20C12R1/01C12R1/225A61K2035/115
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,624,366
App. No.
16/218,074
Granted
Apr 21, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

The disclosure relates to methods for decreasing feed conversion ratios in fowl through administering isolated microorganisms to the fowl. In particular aspects, the disclosure provides methods of decreasing feed conversion ratios in fowl through administration of a Bacillus sp. to the fowl. The disclosure further relates to isolated microorganisms and compositions comprising the same.

Claims (25)

1. A method for decreasing feed conversion ratio of a fowl, the method comprising:

(a) administering to the fowl an effective amount of a probiotic fowl supplement comprising:

a Bacillus sp. comprising a 16S nucleic acid sequence comprising SEQ ID NO:13, and

(ii) a carrier suitable for fowl administration;

wherein the fowl administered the effective amount of the probiotic fowl supplement exhibits a decrease in feed conversion ratio, as compared to fowl not having been administered the supplement.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the administering of the probiotic fowl supplement is an oral administration.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the oral administration comprises combining the probiotic fowl supplement with the fowl's feed, water, litter, medicine, or vaccine; or spraying the fowl with the probiotic fowl supplement.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the Bacillus sp. is in spore form.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the carrier is selected from calcium carbonate, a mineral mixture, edible feed grade material, glycol, molasses, grease, tallow, soybean oil, rice bran oil, olive oil, corn oil, sesame oil, vegetable oil, and corn oil.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the probiotic fowl supplement is administered to the fowl at least once a day.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein each administration of the probiotic fowl supplement comprises at least 10 3 colony forming units of the Bacillus sp.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the fowl is a broiler.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the probiotic fowl supplement is dried.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the Bacillus sp. is freeze dried.

11. The method of claim 9 , wherein the probiotic fowl supplement has a moisture content of less than 10%.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the probiotic fowl supplement is formulated as a water additive, a feed additive, a pre-pelleted feed additive, a pelleted feed additive, a post-pelleting-applied feed additive, a consumable liquid, a consumable solid, a consumable gel, or a gavage.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the probiotic fowl supplement occurs within the pelleted feed.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the feed conversion ratio of the fowl decreases by at least 1%.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the feed conversion ratio of the fowl decreases by at least 5%.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein the administration of the probiotic fowl supplement shifts the gut microbiome of the fowl.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein the gut microbiome shift is a decrease in the relative abundance of one or more microbes that were present in the gut prior to administration of the probiotic fowl supplement.

18. The method of claim 16 , wherein the gut microbiome shift is an increase in the relative abundance of one or more microbes that were present in the gut prior to administration of the probiotic fowl supplement.

19. The method of claim 18 , wherein the gut microbiome shift is an increase in the relative abundance of obligate anaerobes.

20. The method of claim 18 , wherein the gut microbiome shift is an increase in the relative abundance of lactic acid-producing microbes.

21. The method of claim 1 , wherein the Bacillus sp. is deposited as NRRL B-67266.

Assignments (3)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 30, 2025
From: NATIVE MICROBIALS, INC.
To: WESTERN ALLIANCE BANK
Reel/Frame 072324/0001 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Sep 9, 2020
From: ASCUS BIOSCIENCES, INC.
To: NATIVE MICROBIALS, INC.
Reel/Frame 053732/0496 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 16, 2019
From: EMBREE, MALLORY; GOGUL, GRANT; MARTINO, CAMERON; PITT, NORM
To: ASCUS BIOSCIENCES, INC.
Reel/Frame 048898/0304 →
Continuity (5)
Continuation 16093923
Provisional Application 62323305 · Apr 15, 2016
Provisional Application 62335559 · May 12, 2016
Provisional Application 62425480 · Nov 22, 2016
Related Publication 20190254311A1 · Aug 22, 2019
Cited By (1)
US 12,605,239