IP Library Granted Patent US 11,348,193
Granted Patent B1
US 11,348,193 · App. 15/409,349 · Granted May 31, 2022

Component damage and salvage assessment

Inventors: Blake Konrardy (Bloomington, IL); Scott T. Christensen (Salem, OR); Gregory Hayward (Bloomington, IL); Scott Farris (Bloomington, IL)
Assignee: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
G06Q50/163B60R16/0234G05D1/0088G06Q10/20G06Q40/08G07C5/0808
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,348,193
App. No.
15/409,349
Granted
May 31, 2022
Kind
B1
Abstract

Methods and systems for assessing, detecting, and responding to malfunctions involving components of autonomous vehicle and/or smart homes are described herein. Autonomous operation features and related components can be assessed using direct or indirect data regarding operation. Such assessment may be performed to determine the condition of components for salvage following a collision or other loss-event. To this end, the information regarding a plurality of components may be received. A component of the plurality of components may be identified for assessment. Assessment may including causing test signals to be sent to the identified component. In response to the test signal, one or more responses may be received. The received response may be compared to an expected response to determine whether the identified component is salvageable.

Claims (66)

1. A computer-implemented method of assessing salvage potential for a smart home following damage to the smart home, comprising:

receiving, at one or more processors, information regarding a plurality of components associated with autonomous operation features of the smart home, wherein the information includes measurements taken by physical sensors of the plurality of components;

determining, by one or more processors, that the information regarding the plurality of components indicates a loss-event involving the smart home;

receiving, at one or more processors, operating data associated with operation of the smart home at a time associated with the loss event, wherein the operating data includes measurements taken by the physical sensors;

identifying, by one or more processors, a plurality of components likely to be associated with the loss-event and to assess, based on the operating data and stored information;

causing, by one or more processors, one or more test signals to be sent to each of the plurality of components identified to assess;

receiving, at one or more processors, one or more received responses from each of the plurality of components identified to assess in response to the one or more test signals;

determining, by one or more processors, one or more expected responses from each of the plurality of components identified to assess based upon the received information regarding the plurality of components;

making a determination, by one or more processors, of a salvage potential for a first component of the plurality of components including an estimated damage to the first component, wherein the salvage potential is based upon a received response of the one or more received responses and an expected response of the one or more expected responses for the first component, and upon a received response of the one or more received responses and an expected response of the one or more expected responses for a second component of the plurality of components; and

making a determination, by one or more processors, of a salvage value associated with the first component based upon the determined salvage potential for the first component; and

outputting, by one or more processors to an interface, the estimated salvage value.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein determining the salvage potential for a component of the one or more components includes:

determining, by one or more processors, the salvage potential for the component based upon the received response being within a range of acceptable responses based upon the one or more expected responses and indicating proper functioning of the component.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein determining the salvage potential for a component of the one or more components includes determining whether the component is damaged.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein:

at least one of the one or more received responses from the one or more components is an implied response based upon an absence of a signal from at least one of the one or more components;

the at least one of the one or more components is determined to be damaged based upon the implied response; and

the at least one of the one or more components is determined not to have salvage potential based upon the determination that the at least one of the one or more components is damaged.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are disposed within a computing device communicatively connected to a smart home controller of the smart home.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 5 , wherein the computing device is a special-purpose computing device and is communicatively connected to the smart home controller via a communication port.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 5 , wherein the computing device is a mobile computing device and is communicatively connected to the smart home controller via a wireless connection.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are disposed within a smart home controller configured to operate the smart home.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein the smart home controller is controlled to assess the salvage potential by a special-purpose computing device communicatively connected to the smart home controller via a data port of the smart home controller.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining, by one or more processors, a preliminary assessment of the salvage potential for the smart home based upon the operating data, wherein the one or more components of the plurality of components are identified based upon the determined preliminary assessment.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining, by one or more processors, an estimated level of damage associated with one or more additional components based upon the one or more received responses and the one or more expected responses from the one or more components, wherein the one or more additional components are components of the smart home that are not sensors or not autonomous operation features; and

determining, by one or more processors, the salvage potential for each of the one or more additional components based upon the estimated level of damage associated with the one or more additional components.

12. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining, by one or more processors, that the smart home is a total loss based upon an estimated level of damage for each of the one or more components exceeding a value for the smart home.

13. A computer system configured to assess salvage potential for smart home following damage to the smart home, comprising:

one or more processors;

a communication module adapted to communicate with a plurality of components associated with autonomous operation features of the smart home; and

a non-transitory program memory coupled to the one or more processors and storing executable instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the computer system to:

receive information, from the plurality of components, regarding the plurality of components associated with autonomous operation features of the smart home, wherein the information includes measurements taken by physical sensors of the plurality of components;

determine that the information regarding the plurality of components indicates a loss-event involving the smart home;

receive operating data associated with operation of the smart home at a time associated with the loss event, wherein the operating data includes measurements taken by the physical sensors;

identify a plurality of components likely to be associated with the loss-event and to assess, based on the operating data and stored information;

cause one or more test signals to be sent to each of the identified components to assess;

receive one or more received responses from each of the identified components to assess in response to the one or more test signals;

determine one or more expected responses from each of the identified components to assess based upon the information regarding the plurality of components;

make a determination of a salvage potential for a first component of the plurality of components including an estimated damage to the first component, wherein the salvage potential is based upon a received response of the one or more received responses and an expected response of the one or more expected responses for the first component, and upon a received response of the one or more received responses and an expected response of the one or more expected responses for a second component of the plurality of components;

make a determination of a salvage value associated with the first component based upon the determined salvage potential for the first component; and

output to a server the estimated salvage value.

14. The computer system of claim 13 , wherein to determine the salvage potential for a component of the one or more components, the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, further cause the computer system to:

determine the salvage potential for the component based upon the received response being within a range of acceptable responses based upon the one or more expected responses and indicating proper functioning of the component.

15. The computer system of claim 13 , wherein:

at least one of the received responses from the one or more components is an implied response based upon an absence of a signal from at least one of the one or more components;

the at least one of the one or more components is determined to be damaged based upon the implied response; and

the at least one of the one or more components is determined not have salvage potential based upon the determination that the at least one of the one or more components is damaged.

16. The computer system of claim 13 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, further cause the computer system to:

determine an estimated level of damage associated with one or more additional components based upon the one or more received responses and the one or more expected responses from the one or more components, wherein the one or more additional components are components of the autonomous vehicle that are not sensors or not autonomous operation features; and

determine the salvage potential for each of the one or more additional components based upon the estimated level of damage associated with the one or more additional components.

17. The computer system of claim 13 , the instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, further cause the computer system to:

determine that the smart home is a total loss based upon an estimated level of damage for each of the one or more components exceeding a value for the smart home.

18. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing processor-executable instructions, that when executed cause one or more processors to:

receive information regarding a plurality of components associated with autonomous operation features of a smart home, wherein the information includes measurements taken by physical sensors of the plurality of components;

determine that the information regarding the plurality of components indicates a loss-event involving the smart home;

receive operating data associated with operation of the smart home at a time associated with the loss event, wherein the operating data includes measurements taken by the physical sensors;

identify a plurality of components likely to be associated with the loss-event and to assess, based on the operating data and stored information;

cause one or more test signals to be sent to each of the plurality of components identified to assess;

receive one or more received responses from each of the plurality of components identified to assess in response to the one or more test signals;

determine one or more expected responses from each of the plurality of components identified to assess based upon the received information regarding the plurality of components;

make a determination of a salvage potential for a first component of the plurality of components including an estimated damage to the first component, wherein the salvage potential is based upon a received response of the one or more received responses and an expected response of the one or more expected responses for the first component, and upon a received response of the one or more received responses and an expected response of the one or more expected responses for a second component of the plurality of components;

make a determination of a salvage value associated with the first component based upon the determined salvage potential for the first component; and

output to a server the estimated salvage value.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 24, 2017
From: KONRARDY, BLAKE; CHRISTENSEN, SCOTT T.; HAYWARD, GREGORY; FARRIS, SCOTT
To: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Reel/Frame 041471/0673 →
Continuity (35)
Provisional Application 62434368 · Dec 14, 2016
Provisional Application 62434355 · Dec 14, 2016
Provisional Application 62434361 · Dec 14, 2016
Provisional Application 62434370 · Dec 14, 2016
Provisional Application 62434359 · Dec 14, 2016
Provisional Application 62434365 · Dec 14, 2016
Provisional Application 62430215 · Dec 5, 2016
Provisional Application 62428843 · Dec 1, 2016
Provisional Application 62424093 · Nov 18, 2016
Provisional Application 62424078 · Nov 18, 2016
Provisional Application 62419023 · Nov 8, 2016
Provisional Application 62418999 · Nov 8, 2016
Provisional Application 62419002 · Nov 8, 2016
Provisional Application 62419017 · Nov 8, 2016
Provisional Application 62419009 · Nov 8, 2016
Provisional Application 62418988 · Nov 8, 2016
Provisional Application 62415668 · Nov 1, 2016
Provisional Application 62415672 · Nov 1, 2016
Provisional Application 62415678 · Nov 1, 2016
Provisional Application 62415673 · Nov 1, 2016
Provisional Application 62406600 · Oct 11, 2016
Provisional Application 62406605 · Oct 11, 2016
Provisional Application 62406611 · Oct 11, 2016
Provisional Application 62406595 · Oct 11, 2016
Provisional Application 62381848 · Aug 31, 2016
Provisional Application 62380686 · Aug 29, 2016
Provisional Application 62376044 · Aug 17, 2016
Provisional Application 62373084 · Aug 10, 2016
Provisional Application 62351559 · Jun 17, 2016
Provisional Application 62349884 · Jun 14, 2016
Provisional Application 62312109 · Mar 23, 2016
Provisional Application 62303500 · Mar 4, 2016
Provisional Application 62302990 · Mar 3, 2016
Provisional Application 62287659 · Jan 27, 2016
Provisional Application 62286017 · Jan 22, 2016
Cited By (50)
US 12,190,392 US 12,190,728 US 12,196,211 US 12,198,428 US 12,205,450 US 12,229,383 US 12,230,027 US 12,234,826 US 12,234,827 US 12,241,471 US 12,248,907 US 12,264,680 US 12,277,616 US 12,282,893 US 12,282,966 US 12,313,414 US 12,314,020 US 12,315,015 US 12,315,024 US 12,321,142 US 12,345,536 US 12,354,170 US 12,359,669 US 12,359,926 US 12,359,927 US 12,361,376 US 12,390,109 US 12,406,494 US 12,423,755 US 12,423,760 US 12,423,972 US 12,437,865 US 12,444,499 US 12,450,662 US 12,475,515 US 12,511,695 US 12,511,696 US 12,518,871 US 12,530,727 US 12,536,889 US 12,541,682 US 12,572,892 US 12,573,283 US 12,586,135 US 12,614,235 US 12,632,748 US 12,655,849 US 12,656,857 US 12,657,633 US 12,682,401