IP Library Granted Patent US 12,657,633
Granted Patent B2
US 12,657,633 · App. 17/954,015 · Granted Jun 16, 2026

Apparatuses, systems and methods for mitigating property loss based on an event driven probable roof loss confidence score

Inventors: Joshua M. Mast (Bloomington, IL); Douglas L. Dewey (Bloomington, IL); Todd Binion (Bloomington, IL); Jeffrey Feid (Normal, IL)
Assignee: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
G06Q40/08G01W1/14
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,657,633
App. No.
17/954,015
Filed
Sep 27, 2022
Granted
Jun 16, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3694
USPC
705/4
Abstract

Apparatuses, systems and methods are provided for performing insurance property loss mitigation processes based on an event driven probable roof loss confidence score based on a particular weather event, the event driven probable roof loss confidence score associated with a roof of a building. An example method may include receiving a base-line probable roof loss confidence score for the building. The method may further include receiving weather data associated with the particular weather event, that occurred in the geographic area of the building, and hail data associated with the particular weather event. The method also may include estimating at least one attribute of the one or more attributes, and generating the event driven probable roof loss confidence score based on the base-line probable roof loss confidence score, the weather data, the hail data, and the at least one estimated attribute.

Claims (51)

1 . A system for performing an insurance property loss mitigation process based on an event driven probable roof loss confidence score based on a particular weather event, wherein the event driven probable roof loss confidence score is associated with a roof of a building, the system comprising:

one or more processors;

a non-transitory computer-readable medium; and

instructions stored on the non-transitory computer-readable medium that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to:

receive, by executing a base-line probable roof loss confidence score data receiving module, a base-line probable roof loss confidence score for the building, wherein the base-line probable roof loss confidence score is at least partially based on historical weather data representative of storm attributes associated with historical storms that have occurred in a geographic area that includes a geographic location of the building;

receive, by executing a weather data receiving module, weather data, wherein the weather data is representative of storm attributes associated with a storm, associated with the particular weather event, that occurred in the geographic area;

receive, by executing a roof data receiving module, audio data and roof data of the building collected by a smart home device in real-time;

detect from the audio data, by executing a roof data storage module, an audio signature of hail;

responsive to detecting the audio signature of hail, analyze, by executing the roof data storage module, the audio data in order to estimate at least one attribute of the hail based on the audio signature of the hail, wherein the at least one attribute of the hail includes at least one of an elevation of the building exposed to hail, a density of the hail, and a hardness of the hail;

generate, by executing a probable roof loss confidence score data generation module, the event driven probable roof loss confidence score based on the base-line probable roof loss confidence score, the weather data, the at least one estimated attribute of the hail the roof data, by implementing a probability function, wherein a first contribution of a first term of the probability function is weighted via a first weighting variable, relative to a second term of the probability function, and wherein the first weighting variable is dynamically determined based on at least one of the weather data or the at least one estimated attribute of the hail; and

determine, by executing an insurance claim data generation module, a level of damage to the roof of the building based on the event driven probable roof loss confidence score.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the event driven probable roof loss confidence score indicates a probability that the roof is a total loss due to the particular weather event, and wherein the instructions further cause the one or more processors to:

in response to determining that the event driven probable roof loss confidence score indicates that the probability is above a predetermined percentage, automatically process an insurance claim for the roof.

3 . The system of claim 2 , wherein automatically processing the insurance claim includes:

causing a payment to be transmitted to a repair vendor for the roof.

4 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the event driven probable roof loss confidence score indicates a probability that the roof is a total loss due to the particular weather event, and wherein the instructions further cause the one or more processors to:

in response to determining that the event driven probable roof loss confidence score indicates that the probability is below a predetermined percentage, generate insurance claim data indicating that an insurance claim for the roof is to be manually verified.

5 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one attribute of the hail further includes at least one of: a physical characteristic of the hail, a size of the hail, a shape of the hail, a resistance to flexing of the hail, and a temporal pattern of the hail.

6 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the storm attributes of the storm include at least one of: a storm meteorological signature, a storm duration, a storm direction, thermal shock, whether the storm is conducive to producing damaging hail, whether the storm is conducive to producing strong winds, key meteorological aspects of the storm, length of time that the storm impacted the roof, a direction from which the storm impacts the building, a roof temperature prior to the storm, a roof temperature after the storm, or a thermal shock to roofing material.

7 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the instructions further cause the one or more processors to:

responsive to detecting the audio signature of hail, transmit, by the one or more processors, a notification of hail to one or more computing devices associated with at least one of a property owner, an insurer, a property inspector, or a repair vendor.

8 . A method for performing an insurance property loss mitigation process based on an event driven probable roof loss confidence score based on a particular weather event, wherein the event driven probable roof loss confidence score is associated with a roof of a building, the method comprising:

receiving, by one or more processors executing a base-line probable roof loss confidence score data receiving module, a base-line probable roof loss confidence score for the building, wherein the base-line probable roof loss confidence score is at least partially based on historical weather data representative of storm attributes associated with historical storms that have occurred in a geographic area that includes a geographic location of the building;

receiving, by the one or more processors executing a weather data receiving module, weather data, wherein the weather data is representative of storm attributes associated with a storm, associated with the particular weather event, that occurred in the geographic area;

receiving by one or more processors executing a roof data receiving module, audio data and roof data of the building collected by a smart home device in real-time;

detecting, by the one or more processors executing a roof data storage module, an audio signature of hail from the audio data;

responsive to detecting the audio signature of hail, analyzing, by the one or more processors executing the roof data storage module, the audio data in order to estimate, by the one or more processors, at least one attribute of the hail based on the audio signature of the hail, wherein at least one attribute of one or more attributes of the hail includes at least one of an elevation of the building exposed to hail, a density of the hail, and a hardness of the hail;

generating, by the one or more processors executing a probable roof loss confidence score data generation module, the event driven probable roof loss confidence score based on the base-line probable roof loss confidence score, the weather data, the at least one estimated attribute of the hail and the roof data, by implementing a probability function, wherein a first contribution of a first term of the probability function is weighted via a first weighting variable, relative to a second term of the probability function, and wherein the first weighting variable is dynamically determined based on at least one of the weather data or the at least one estimated attribute of the hail; and

determining, by the one or more processors executing an insurance claim data generation module, a level of damage to the roof of the building based on the event driven probable roof loss confidence score.

9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the event driven probable roof loss confidence score indicates a probability that the roof is a total loss due to the particular weather event, and wherein the method further comprises:

in response to determining that the event driven probable roof loss confidence score indicates that the probability is above a predetermined percentage, automatically processing, by the one or more processors, an insurance claim for the roof.

10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein automatically processing the insurance claim includes:

causing a payment to be transmitted to a repair vendor for the roof.

11 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the event driven probable roof loss confidence score indicates a probability that the roof is a total loss due to the particular weather event, and wherein the method further comprises:

in response to determining that the event driven probable roof loss confidence score indicates that the probability is below a predetermined percentage, generating, by the one or more processors, insurance claim data indicating that an insurance claim for the roof is to be manually verified.

12 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the at least one attribute of the hail includes at least one of: a physical characteristic of the hail, a size of the hail, a shape of the hail, a resistance to flexing of the hail, and a temporal pattern of the hail.

13 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions for performing an insurance property loss mitigation process based on an event driven probable roof loss confidence score based on a particular weather event, wherein the event driven probable roof loss confidence score is associated with a roof of a building, and wherein the instructions, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to:

receive, by executing a base-line probable roof loss confidence score data receiving module, a base-line probable roof loss confidence score for the building, wherein the base-line probable roof loss confidence score is at least partially based on historical weather data representative of storm attributes associated with historical storms that have occurred in a geographic area that includes a geographic location of the building;

receive, by executing a weather data receiving module, weather data, wherein the weather data is representative of storm attributes associated with a storm, associated with the particular weather event, that occurred in the geographic area;

receive, by executing a roof data receiving module, audio data and roof data of the building collected by a smart home device in real-time;

detect from the audio data, by executing a roof data storage module, an audio signature of hail;

responsive to detecting the audio signature of hail, analyze, by executing the roof data storage module, the audio data in order to estimate at least one attribute of the hail based on the audio signature of the hail, wherein the at least one attribute of the hail includes at least one of an elevation of the building exposed to hail, a density of the hail, and a hardness of the hail;

generate, by executing a probable roof loss confidence score data generation module, the event driven probable roof loss confidence score based on the base-line probable roof loss confidence score, the weather data, the at least one estimated attribute of the hail and the roof data, by implementing a probability function, wherein a first contribution of a first term of the probability function is weighted via a first weighting variable, relative to a second term of the probability function, and wherein the first weighting variable is dynamically determined based on at least one of the weather data or the at least one estimated attribute of the hail; and

determine, by executing an insurance claim data generation module, a level of damage to the roof of the building based on the event driven probable roof loss confidence score.

14 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein the event driven probable roof loss confidence score indicates a probability that the roof is a total loss due to the particular weather event, and wherein the instructions further cause the one or more processors to:

in response to determining that the event driven probable roof loss confidence score indicates that the probability is above a predetermined percentage, automatically process an insurance claim for the roof.

15 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein automatically processing the insurance claim includes:

causing a payment to be transmitted to a repair vendor for the roof.

16 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein the event driven probable roof loss confidence score indicates a probability that the roof is a total loss due to the particular weather event, and wherein the instructions further cause the one or more processors to:

in response to determining that the event driven probable roof loss confidence score indicates that the probability is below a predetermined percentage, generate insurance claim data indicating that an insurance claim for the roof is to be manually verified.

17 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein the at least one attribute of the hail further includes at least one of: a physical characteristic of the hail, a size of the hail, a shape of the hail, a resistance to flexing of the hail, and a temporal pattern of the hail.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 5, 2022
From: MAST, JOSHUA M.; DEWEY, DOUGLAS L.; BINION, TODD; FEID, JEFFREY
To: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Reel/Frame 061321/0350 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 16983794 · Aug 3, 2020
Related Publication 20230021783A1 · Jan 26, 2023
References Cited (307)
US 5528224A · Wang · 1996 [cited by examiner]
US 6424917B1 · Kalkstein et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 8081795B2 · Brown · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8106769B1 · Maroney · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 8229769B1 · Hopkins, III · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 8280633B1 · Eldering et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8346578B1 · Hopkins, III · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8400299B1 · Maroney · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8490006B1 · Reeser et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8527306B1 · Reeser et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8533144B1 · Reeser et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8640038B1 · Reeser et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8665084B2 · Shapiro et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8749381B1 · Maroney et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8756085B1 · Plummer et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8874454B2 · Plummer · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 8890680B2 · Reeser et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8917186B1 · Grant · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8976937B2 · Shapiro et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9049168B2 · Jacob et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9057746B1 · Houlette et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9098655B2 · Plummer et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9117349B2 · Shapiro et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9121779B2 · Martin · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9142119B1 · Grant · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9152737B1 · Micali et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9152863B1 · Grant · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9183578B1 · Reeser et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9202363B1 · Grant · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9262564B2 · Plummer et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9262909B1 · Grant · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9286772B2 · Shapiro et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9344330B2 · Jacob et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9424737B2 · Bailey et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9443195B2 · Micali et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9472092B1 · Grant · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9536148B2 · Gross · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9589441B2 · Shapiro et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9609003B1 · Chmielewski et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9633146B2 · Plummer et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9665892B1 · Reeser et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9666060B2 · Reeser et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9678206B2 · Sneed · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9699529B1 · Petri et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9739813B2 · Houlette et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9786158B2 · Beaver et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9798979B2 · Fadell et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9798993B2 · Payne et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9800570B1 · Bleisch · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9800958B1 · Petri et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9812001B1 · Grant · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9888371B1 · Jacob · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9892463B1 · Hakimi-Boushehri et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9898168B2 · Shapiro et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9898912B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9911042B1 · Cardona et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9923971B2 · Madey et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9942630B1 · Petri et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9947202B1 · Moon et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9948477B2 · Marten · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9970881B1 · Hillman · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 9978033B1 · Payne et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9997056B2 · Bleisch · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10002295B1 · Cardona et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10032226B1 · Suizzo et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10042341B1 · Jacob · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10047974B1 · Riblet et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10055793B1 · Call et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10055803B2 · Orduna et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10057664B1 · Moon et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10073929B2 · Vaynriber et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10102584B1 · Devereaux et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10102585B1 · Bryant et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10107708B1 · Schick et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10134092B1 · Harvey et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10142394B2 · Chmielewski et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10169856B1 · Farnsworth et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10176705B1 · Grant · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10181079B2 · Labrie · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10181160B1 · Hakimi-Boushehri et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10186134B1 · Moon et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10198771B1 · Madigan et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10217068B1 · Davis et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10229394B1 · Davis et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10235716B2 · Boutin · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10244294B1 · Moon et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10249158B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10268691B2 · Emison et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10282787B1 · Hakimi-Boushehri et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10282788B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10282961B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10295431B1 · Schick et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10296978B1 · Corder et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10297138B2 · Reeser et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10304313B1 · Moon et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10311302B2 · Kottenstette et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10323860B1 · Riblet et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10325473B1 · Moon et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10332059B2 · Matsuoka et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10346811B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10353359B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10354386B1 · Farnsworth et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10356303B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10366288B1 · Kottenstette et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10373256B1 · Allen · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10387966B1 · Shah et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10388135B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10412169B1 · Madey et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10430890B1 · Corder · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10446000B2 · Friar et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10467476B1 · Cardona et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10469282B1 · Konrardy et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10480825B1 · Riblet et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10482746B1 · Moon et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10497250B1 · Hayward · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10506411B1 · Jacob · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10514669B1 · Call et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10515372B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10522009B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10546478B1 · Moon et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10547918B1 · Moon et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10565541B2 · Payne et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10573146B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10573149B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10579028B1 · Jacob · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10586177B1 · Choueiter et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10607295B1 · Hakimi-Boushehri et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10634576B1 · Schick et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10643072B2 · Kottenstette et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10664922B1 · Madigan et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10679292B1 · Call et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10685402B1 · Bryant et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10692160B1 · Lyons et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10699346B1 · Corder et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10699348B1 · Devereaux et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10726494B1 · Shah et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10726500B1 · Shah et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10726558B2 · Ruda et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10733671B1 · Hakimi-Boushehri et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10733868B2 · Moon et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10735829B2 · Petri et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10740691B2 · Choueiter et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10741033B1 · Jordan et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10750252B2 · Petri et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10755357B1 · Davis et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10776883B2 · Labrie et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10795329B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10796149B2 · Labrie · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10796557B2 · Sundermeyer et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10802477B1 · Konrardy et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10804700B2 · Cohen et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10818105B1 · Konrardy et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10823458B1 · Riblet et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10824971B1 · Davis et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10825320B1 · Moon et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10825321B2 · Moon et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10832225B1 · Davis et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10846800B1 · Bryant et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10885587B1 · Mendoza et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10907844B2 · Ribbich et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10922756B1 · Call et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10922948B1 · Moon et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10943447B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10949923B1 · Veith et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10970990B1 · Jacob · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10977490B1 · Bokshi-Drotar · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 10990069B1 · Jacob · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11003334B1 · Conway et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11004320B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11015997B1 · Schick et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11017480B2 · Shah et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11017487B1 · Campbell · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11042137B1 · Call et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11042942B1 · Hakimi-Boushehri et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11043098B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11049078B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11049189B2 · Shah et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11055786B2 · Shreve · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11074658B1 · Burgess · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11074659B1 · Hakimi-Boushehri et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11100594B1 · West et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11100918B2 · Smith · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11118812B1 · Riblet et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11126708B2 · Reimer · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11131597B1 · Oakes, III · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11151378B2 · Kottenstette et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11164257B1 · Devereaux et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11210552B2 · Kossyk et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11210741B1 · Allen · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11222426B2 · Richter et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11232150B2 · Vianello et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11232873B1 · Aspro et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11257166B2 · Coonrod · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11277465B2 · Chmielewski et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11348193B1 · Konrardy et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11361544B2 · Splittstoesser · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11367053B2 · Watson et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11367265B2 · Vianello et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11417212B1 · Farooqui et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11430069B1 · Pedersen · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11593887B1 · Gaudin et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11634214B1 · Parchment · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11709253B1 · Maestas · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11941702B1 · Devereaux et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12182873B2 · Mast · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 12354250B1 · McKinney · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20070038484A1 · Hoffner et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070168155A1 · Ravela et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20090216552A1 · Watrous · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090265193A1 · Collins et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100070309A1 · Deede · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20130317861A1 · Tofte et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140019166A1 · Swanson · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140067332A1 · Chen · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140176362A1 · Sneed · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140245165A1 · Battcher · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140245204A1 · Battcher et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140246165A1 · Minisandram · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140266669A1 · Fadell et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140358592A1 · Wedig · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150061859A1 · Matsuoka et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150073864A1 · Labrie et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150082883A1 · Moffatt · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150170288A1 · Harton et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150228031A1 · Emison et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150302529A1 · Jagannathan · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150347910A1 · Fadell et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150348204A1 · Daues · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150356686A1 · Cook et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160048923A1 · Maher · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160048925A1 · Emison et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160189531A1 · Modi et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160239921A1 · Bray et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160265993A1 · Sutter et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160267602A1 · Boutin · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160267603A1 · Wolch · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160334545A1 · Varelas et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170032466A1 · Feldman et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170039307A1 · Koger et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170176640A1 · Kodra et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170249510A1 · Labrie · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170270612A1 · Howe · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170270650A1 · Howe et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170330282A1 · Pratt · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170345069A1 · Labrie · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170352099A1 · Howe · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170352104A1 · Hanson et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180071949A1 · Giles · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180336418A1 · Splittstoesser · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180336652A1 · Wani et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190095764A1 · Li · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190114717A1 · Labrie · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190147244A1 · Labrie · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190213688A1 · Boutin · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190251520A1 · Bentley, III et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190304026A1 · Lyman · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200066257A1 · Smith · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200134573A1 · Vickers · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200134728A1 · Vickers · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200134753A1 · Vickers · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200193524A1 · Verstraete et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200302549A1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200327791A1 · Moon et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210027528A1 · Labrie et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210035432A1 · Moon et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210042843A1 · Bryant et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210089811A1 · Strong · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210133891A1 · Jagannathan · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210158671A1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210192631A1 · Coonrod et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210241439A1 · Lutich · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210279811A1 · Waltman et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210312789A1 · Linn · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210383481A1 · Richardson et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220101275A1 · Aspro et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220317639A1 · Karri et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
CN 111626536A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 113138558A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
JP 2003157357A · 2003 [cited by applicant]
KR 20150129845A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014159131A2 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016081511A2 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021087185A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021248030A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2022165303A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
I. Majumdar, B. Banerjee, M. T. Preeth and M. K. Hota, “Design of Weather Monitoring System and Smart Home Automation,” 2018 ieee international conference on system, computation, automation and networking (icscan), Pond… [cited by examiner]
Aufranc, Haven Open Source App Transforms Your Old Android Smartphone into a Smart Security Camera, CNX Software—Embedded Systems News, Dec. 23, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Chen, Smart Home, Investopedia, updated Feb. 25, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Dube, How to Build a Security Camera Nework Out of Old Smartphones, downloaded from the Internet at: <https://www.makeusof.com/tag/how-to-build-a-security-camera-network-out-of-old-smartphones> Jul. 12, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Alud et al., Planning for Atmospheric Hazards and Disaster Management Under Changing Climate Conditions, IEEE EIC Climate Change Conference, 1-9 (2006). [cited by applicant]
Deep analytics for workplace risk and disaster management, IBM Journal of Research and Development, 64(1/2):14.1-14.9 (Jan. 2020). [cited by applicant]
Hail Monitoring System, HailSens Monitoring (Oct. 2020). [cited by applicant]
Powers et al., Measuring and modeling the effect of snow on photovoltaic system performance, 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 000973-000978 (2010). [cited by applicant]
Upgrading your roof? Consider these hurricane-resistant tips, Renew Financial, Oct. 7, 2016. [cited by applicant]
McHale et al., Stormy future for U.S. property/casualty insurers: The growing costs and risks fo extreme weather events, Ceres, Sep. 2012). [cited by applicant]
Gibbons et al., Land management practices associated with house loss in wildfires, PLoS One, 7(1):e29212 (2012). [cited by applicant]
Beck et al., Data Descriptor: Present and future Koppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution, Scientific Data, 5:180214 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Scheel et al., A Bayesian hierarchical model with spatial variable selection: the effect of weather on insurance claims, Appl. Statist., 62, Part 1, pp. 85-100 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Herrera et al., A review of current and future weather data for building simulation, Building Serv. Eng. Res. Technol., 38(5):602-27 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Saghir et al., Weighted distributions: A brief review, perspective and characterizations, International Journal of Statistics and Probability, vol. 6, No. 3, 23 pages (2017). [cited by applicant]
Dean, Probability Weighting, Lecture Notes for Spring 2015 Behavioral Economics—Brown University (2015). [cited by applicant]
Brownlee, A gentle introduction to probability density estimation, Machine Learning Mastery.com, Jul. 24, 2020 (53 pp). [cited by applicant]
Chakraverty et al., IoT based Weather and Location Aware Recommender System, 8th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering (Confluence), 610-617 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Majumdar et al., Design of Weather Monitoring System and Smart Home Automation, IEEE International Conference on System, Computation, Automation and Networking (ICSCAN), 1-5 (2018). [cited by applicant]
“How Predictive Modeling Has Revolutionized Insurance,” Insurance Journal (Jun. 18, 2012). (Year: 2012). [cited by applicant]
Heneka et al., “A Damage Model for the Assessment of Storm Damage to Buildings,” Engineering Structures, (Jul. 17, 2008), pp. 3603-3609. (Year: 2008). [cited by applicant]
Pinelli et al. “Hurricane Damage Prediction Model for Residential Structures,” Journal of Structural Engineering. (Nov. 2004), p. 1685-1691. [cited by applicant]