IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,191,176
Granted Patent B2
US 12,191,176 · App. 18/335,899 · Granted Jan 7, 2025

Integrated substrate measurement system to improve manufacturing process performance

Inventors: Upendra V. Ummethala (Cupertino, CA); Blake Erickson (Gilroy, CA); Prashanth Kumar (Union City, CA); Michael Kutney (Santa Clara, CA); Steven Trey Tindel (Austin, TX); Zhaozhao Zhu (Milpitas, CA)
Assignee: Applied Materials, Inc.
H01L21/67253H01L21/67288H01L22/20H01L21/67063H01L21/67167
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,191,176
App. No.
18/335,899
Granted
Jan 7, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A process recipe associated with a substrate at a manufacturing system is identified. A first set of measurements for the substrate is obtained from a substrate measurement subsystem. A second set of measurements for the substrate is obtained from one or more sensors of a chamber of the manufacturing system. A determination is made based on the obtained first set of measurements and the obtained second set of measurements of whether to modify the process recipe by at least one of modifying an operation of the process recipe or generating an instruction to prevent completion of execution of one or more operations of the process recipe.

Claims (47)

1. A method comprising:

identifying a process recipe associated with a substrate at a manufacturing system by a controller which is operatively coupled to the manufacturing system;

obtaining a first set of measurements for the substrate from a substrate measurement subsystem;

obtaining a second set of measurements for the substrate from one or more sensors of a chamber of the manufacturing system; and generating a mapping between the first set of measurements and the second set of measurements of the substrate; storing the first set of measurements mapped to the second set of measurements;

determining, based on the obtained first set of measurements mapped to the obtained second set of measurements, whether to modify the process recipe by at least one of:

modifying an operation of the process recipe, or

generating an instruction to prevent completion of execution of one or more operations of the process recipe; and

providing, via a user interface of a client device connected to the manufacturing system, a notification of the modification to the process recipe.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first set of measurements for the substrate comprises at least one of spectral data, positional data, or property data and wherein the second set of measurements for the substrate comprises at least one of spectral data, temperature data, pressure data, or power data.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the at least one of the spectral data of the first set of measurements or the spectral data of the second set of measurements comprises at least one of reflectometry spectral data, ellipsometry spectral data, hyperspectral imaging data, chemical imaging data, thermal spectral data or conductive spectral data.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

storing at least one of the first set of measurements or the second set of measurements fat a data store for the manufacturing system, wherein the data store is inaccessible to an operator of the manufacturing system.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining, based on the first set of measurements and the second set of measurements, whether to modify the process recipe comprises:

calculating a difference between a first measurement of the first set of measurements and a second measurement of the second set of measurements; and

determining whether the difference between the first measurement and the second measurement exceeds a difference threshold.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining, based on the first set of measurements and the second set of measurements, whether to modify the process recipe comprises:

determining a target value associated with a first measurement of the first set of measurement;

calculating a difference between the target value and the first measurement; and

determining whether the difference between the target value and the first measurement exceeds a difference threshold.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the notification of the modification to the process recipe comprises a request to modify the process recipe, and wherein the method further comprises:

detecting a user interaction with the user interface in response to the request; and

modifying the process recipe in accordance with the detected user interaction.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the chamber is a processing chamber of the manufacturing system.

9. A method comprising:

identifying a first substrate at a manufacturing system by a controller which is operatively coupled to the manufacturing system and a second substrate at the manufacturing system by the controller, wherein the first substrate is associated with a first process recipe and the second substrate is associated with a second process recipe;

obtaining a first set of measurements for the first substrate from a substrate measurement subsystem;

obtaining a second set of measurements for the first substrate from a chamber of the manufacturing system; and generating a mapping between the first set of measurements and the second set of measurements of the substrate;

storing the first set of measurements mapped to the second set of measurements;

determining, based on the obtained first set of measurements for the first substrate mapped to the obtained second set of measurements for the first substrate, whether to modify the second process recipe associated with the second substrate by at least one of:

modifying an operation of the second process recipe, or

generating an instruction to prevent completion of execution of one or more operations of the second process recipe; and

providing, via a user interface of a client device connected to the manufacturing system, a notification of the modification to the one or more operations of the second process recipe.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the first set of measurements for the substrate comprises at least one of spectral data, positional data, or property data and wherein the second set of measurements for the substrate comprises at least one of spectral data, temperature data, pressure data, or power data.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the at least one of the spectral data of the first set of measurements or the spectral data of the second set of measurements comprises at least one of reflectometry spectral data, ellipsometry spectral data, hyperspectral imaging data, chemical imaging data, thermal spectral data or conductive spectral data.

12. The method of claim 9 , further comprising:

storing at least one of the first set of measurements or the second set of measurements fat a data store for the manufacturing system, wherein the data store is inaccessible to an operator of the manufacturing system.

13. The method of claim 9 , wherein determining, based on the obtained first set of measurements for the first substrate and the obtained second set of measurements for the first substrate, whether to modify the second process recipe associated with the second substrate comprises:

calculating a difference between a first measurement of the first set of measurements and a second measurement of the second set of measurements; and

determining whether the difference between the first measurement and the second measurement exceeds a difference threshold.

14. The method of claim 9 , wherein determining, based on the obtained first set of measurements for the first substrate and the obtained second set of measurements for the first substrate, whether to modify the second process recipe associated with the second substrate comprises:

determining a target value associated with a first measurement of the first set of measurement;

calculating a difference between the target value and the first measurement; and

determining whether the difference between the target value and the first measurement exceeds a difference threshold.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the notification of the modification to the process recipe comprises a request to modify the process recipe, and wherein the method further comprises:

detecting a user interaction with the user interface in response to the request; and

modifying the process recipe in accordance with the detected user interaction.

16. The method of claim 9 , wherein the chamber is a processing chamber of the manufacturing system.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 16, 2023
From: UMMETHALA, UPENDRA V.; ERICKSON, BLAKE; KUMAR, PRASANTH; KUTNEY, MICHAEL; TINDEL, STEVEN TREY; ZHU, ZHAOZHAO
To: APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
Reel/Frame 063979/0495 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 17379653 · Jul 19, 2021
Provisional Application 63055239 · Jul 22, 2020
Related Publication 20230326773A1 · Oct 12, 2023
References Cited (134)
US 5238354A · Volovich · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5427878A · Corliss · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5452521A · Niewmierzycki · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 6162008A · Perkins et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6304999B1 · Toprac et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6342705B1 · Li et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6625497B2 · Fairbairn et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6708075B2 · Sonderman et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 7012684B1 · Hunter · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7065239B2 · Maayah et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US D605652S · Plaisted et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7642102B2 · Funk · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US D618695S · Bennett et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7904275B2 · Sugimoto · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8072578B2 · Yasuda et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8179530B2 · Levy · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8257546B2 · Davis et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US D756371S · Bertnick et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9347879B2 · Adel et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US D766940S · Napper et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US D767612S · Hemsley · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US D781300S · Rhodes et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US D819066S · Anderson et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US D829749S · Kang et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10132757B2 · Okuno · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10262910B2 · Feng · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10388549B2 · Paul et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10490462B2 · Pandev et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US D874481S · Kumar et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US D884015S · Walfridsson et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US D890799S · Heffernan et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10727057B2 · Clark et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10727142B2 · Gellineau et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US D892143S · Dascola et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10886155B2 · Zhu et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US D914703S · Capela et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11029673B2 · Honda et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US D928818S · Yuk et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US D937861S · Torrance · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US D938465S · Shen et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US D940169S · Boutros · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US D941851S · Anderson et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US D948543S · Friedland et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US D960913S · Kiikkala et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US D961605S · Starr et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20020018217A1 · Weber-Grabau et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030020889A1 · Takahashi · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20050041255A1 · Hyun · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050187649A1 · Funk et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20070134829A1 · Wilke et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080013089A1 · Ishii et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090132078A1 · Sakano · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100312374A1 · Tsai et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100332011A1 · Venugopal et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110172952A1 · Ummethala et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110232569A1 · Olgado · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120185813A1 · Kaushal et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120285621A1 · Tan · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130059403A1 · Lee · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20150004721A1 · Akimoto et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160077025A1 · Zhang et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160313658A1 · Marciano et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160341544A1 · Foad · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170024509A1 · Hu et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170038201A1 · Bozdog · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170109646A1 · David · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170160648A1 · Tel et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170213750A1 · Khaja · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180150052A1 · Cherian · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190064751A1 · Ohmori et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190121928A1 · Wu et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190147127A1 · Su et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190286075A1 · Yennie et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190295874A1 · Bieli et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190347527A1 · Bhaviripudi et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200019067A1 · Kou et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200050180A1 · Kou et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200083070A1 · Clark et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200083080A1 · Clark et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200110341A1 · Mossavat et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200110390A1 · Banna · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200243359A1 · Hao et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200264335A1 · Bhatia et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210035833A1 · Feng et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210166121A1 · Tsutsui · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220026817A1 · Ummethala · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220028716A1 · Ummethala · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220066411A1 · Ummethala · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220111529A1 · Pehlivan · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220165593A1 · Panda · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220246457A1 · Sundar et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220318987A1 · Ophir et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
CN 305860013 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 306604020 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
JP H11186204A · 1999 [cited by applicant]
JP 2001110806A · 2001 [cited by applicant]
JP 2004165365A · 2004 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009534854A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009295700A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 4467761B2 · 2010 [cited by examiner]
JP 6270952B1 · 2018 [cited by examiner]
JP 2018037559A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 2018524821A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 2018522393A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP D1644619S · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2020004817A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
JP D1651220S · 2020 [cited by applicant]
JP D1659894 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
JP 2020517093A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
JP D1664109S · 2020 [cited by applicant]
KR 101910268B1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
KR 20190071016A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 9945340A1 · 1999 [cited by applicant]
WO 2007124294A2 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
WO 0229393A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO 2012099907A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016182965A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018067885A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019200015A1 · 2019 [cited by examiner]
WO 2019239380A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020094325A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021021501A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021061541A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021067239A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Zalusky, Sarah et al. “Developing a Non-destructive Manufacturing Test to Detect Crystal Defects in Semiconductor Wafers” Apr. 8, 2020, JKI, site visited Sep. 2, 2022: https://www.jki.net/femtometrix-case-study (Year: 2… [cited by applicant]
“Production-centric Yield Management for Wafer Manufacturing” Jan. 5, 2018, Synopisis, site visited Jan. 6, 2022: https://www.synopsys.com/content/dam/synopsys/silicon/datasheets/odyssey-ds .pdf (Year: 2018). [cited by applicant]
Ronald L. Allen et al.,“Application of neural networks to plasma etch end point detection”, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Processing, Measurement, and Phenomena 14, … [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2021/042646 mailed Nov. 2, 2021,10 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2021/042639 mailed Nov. 11, 2021,10 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2021/042643 mailed Nov. 11, 2021, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2021/048061 mailed Dec. 17, 2021, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Taiwan Search report of Taiwan Application No. 110300382 dated Sep. 27, 2021, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2023/076657 mailed Feb. 6, 2024, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kang P., et al., “Virtual Metrology for Run-to-run Control in Semiconductor Manufacturing,” Expert Systems with Applications, Mar. 2011, vol. 38(3), pp. 2508-2522. [cited by applicant]