IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,200,794
Granted Patent B2
US 12,200,794 · App. 17/054,013 · Granted Jan 14, 2025

Handling re-establishment rejection

Inventors: Oumer Teyeb (Solna, SE); Gunnar Mildh (Sollentuna, SE); Alessio Terzani (Stockholm, SE); Icaro L. J. Da Silva (Solna, SE)
Assignee: TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
H04W76/18H04W76/19
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,200,794
App. No.
17/054,013
Granted
Jan 14, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method by a network node is provided for handling a re-establishment request. The method includes receiving, from a wireless device, a first request for re-establishment of a connection with the network node in a first cell. The network node determines that a load on the network node exceeds a threshold amount. In response to determining that the load on the network node exceeds the threshold amount, the network node ignores the first request for re-establishment.

Claims (28)

1. A method by a network node for handling a re-establishment request, the method comprising:

receiving, from a wireless device, a first request for re-establishment of a failed connection with the network node in a first cell:

determining that a load on the network node exceeds a threshold amount; and

in response to determining that the load on the network node in the first cell exceeds the threshold amount, determining not to re-establish the failed connection with the network node in the first cell and abstaining from sending a signal to the wireless device.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first request comprises an indication of a cause of failure of the failed connection with the network node.

3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising ignoring the first request for re-establishment in accordance with the indication of the cause of failure.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining that the load on the network node exceeds a threshold amount comprises determining that the load exceeds the threshold amount at the expiration of a timer.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

prior to receiving the first request for re-establishment of the failed connection, transmitting, to the wireless device, information indicating a timer configuration indicating a threshold amount of time the wireless device is to wait before attempting another reestablishment of the failed connection with the network node in the first cell.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the information is broadcasted via system information.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

prior to receiving the first request for re-establishment of the failed connection, transmitting, to the wireless device, information indicating an access barring class and associated reject probability for handling re-establishments in case of failure of the failed connection in the first cell.

8. A computer program comprising instructions which when executed on a computer perform the methods of claim 1 .

9. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions which when executed by a computer perform to the method of claim 1 .

10. A network node comprising:

memory storing instructions; and

processing circuitry configured to execute the instructions to cause the network node to:

receive, from a wireless device, a first request for re-establishment of a failed connection with the network node in a first cell:

determine that a load on the network node exceeds a threshold amount; and

in response to determining that the load on the network node in the first cell exceeds the threshold amount, determine not to re-establish of the failed connection with the network node in the first cell and abstain from sending a signal to the wireless device.

11. The network node of claim 10 , wherein the first request comprises an indication of a cause of failure of the failed connection with the network node.

12. The network node of claim 11 , wherein the processing circuitry is configured to execute the instructions to cause the network node to ignore the first request for re-establishment in accordance with the indication of the cause of failure.

13. The network node of claim 11 , wherein, when determining that the load on the network node exceeds a threshold amount, the processing circuitry is configured to execute the instructions to cause the network node to determine that the load exceeds the threshold amount at the expiration of a timer.

14. The network node of claim 11 , wherein the processing circuitry is configured to execute the instructions to cause the network node to:

prior to receiving the first request for re-establishment of the failed connection, transmit, to the wireless device, information indicating a timer configuration indicating a threshold amount of time the wireless device is to wait before attempting another reestablishment of the failed connection with the network node in the first cell.

15. The network node of claim 14 , wherein the information is broadcasted via system information.

16. The network node of claim 11 , wherein the processing circuitry is configured to execute the instructions to cause the network node to:

prior to receiving the first request for re-establishment of the failed connection, transmit, to the wireless device, information indicating an access barring class and associated reject probability for handling re-establishments in case of failure of the failed connection in the first cell.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 9, 2020
From: TEYEB, OUMER; DA SILVA, ICARO L.J.; MILDH, GUNNAR; TERZANI, ALESSIO
To: TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
Reel/Frame 054315/0539 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62669891 · May 10, 2018
Related Publication 20210243832A1 · Aug 5, 2021
References Cited (35)
US 8565099B2 · Lindstrom · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8868080B2 · Wang · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 10334653B2 · Hahn · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20050124353A1 · Cave · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20080008127A1 · Choi · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080039106A1 · Wallentin · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20090312007A1 · Kallio · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090318199A1 · Barreto · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20110096671A1 · Lindstrom · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110207485A1 · Dimou · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120040669A1 · Boley · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120236707A1 · Larsson et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120264416A1 · Pica · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20150173074A1 · Zhao · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150249950A1 · Teyeb · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150304904A1 · Li · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160255458A1 · Huang · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170063595A1 · Ma · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170171784A1 · Mitsui · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170238198A1 · Shibayama · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170273007A1 · Jung · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170367047A1 · Fujishiro · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180092006A1 · Sitton · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180167839A1 · Jung · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190037635A1 · Guo · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190200265A1 · Yu · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190387566A1 · Huang · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200383162A1 · Cai · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210168678A1 · Deenoo · 2021 [cited by examiner]
EP 3258735A1 · 2017 [cited by examiner]
WO 2013077622A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
A post-failure recovery scheme over pre-allocated backup resource for elastic optical networks , Singh et al., Optical Fiber Technology, Materials, Devices and Systems. (Year: 2018). [cited by examiner]
3GPP TR 37.868 v1.1.0; Technical Report; 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Study on RAN Improvements for Machine-type Communications; (Release 10)—Aug. 2011. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report issued for International application No. PCT/IB2019/053779—Sep. 11, 2019. [cited by applicant]
PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued for International application No. PCT/IB2019/053779—Sep. 11, 2019. [cited by applicant]