IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,210,107
Granted Patent B2
US 12,210,107 · App. 17/448,387 · Granted Jan 28, 2025

Satellite navigation receiver for relative positioning with bias estimation

Inventors: Michael A. Zeitzew (Torrance, CA); Liwen L Dai (Torrance, CA); Min Wang (Tustin, CA); David S. Chiu (Los Angeles, CA)
Assignee: Deere & Company
G01S19/51G01S19/43G01S19/29
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,210,107
App. No.
17/448,387
Granted
Jan 28, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A tracking module processes the determined correlations to track a carrier of the received composite signal for estimation of a change in phase over a time period between a receiver antenna and one or more satellite transmitters that transmit the received signal as the receiver changes position with respect to an initial position during the time period. A relative position estimator estimates the relative position of the navigation receiver with respect to an initial position over the time period time by time-differencing of the phase measurements of the one or more tracked carrier signals. Bias estimators can estimate or compensate for errors in initial position and temporal changes in receiver clock and tropospheric delay.

Claims (106)

1. A mobile satellite navigation receiver comprising:

a receiver antenna;

a receiver module coupled to an electronic data processing system, the receiver module for receiving a set of carrier signals from satellite transmitters;

a measurement module to determine correlations of each carrier signal in the set to a local reference carrier signal, the measurement module for observing carrier phase measurements of the carrier signals;

a tracking module of the measurement module to process the determined correlations to track the carrier signals for estimation of respective changes in the phase measurements over time between the receiver antenna, of the satellite navigation receiver, and the satellite transmitters that transmit the carrier signals as the satellite navigation receiver changes position with respect to an initial position of the satellite navigation receiver;

a relative position estimator configured to estimate a relative position, a receiver clock bias of the satellite navigation receiver with respect to a reference time, and an atmospheric propagation delay bias of the satellite navigation receiver with respect to the initial position by time-differencing of the phase measurements of the tracked carrier signals for each satellite from an initial time t 0 an observation time and by determining a product of a change in the relative position from the initial time t 0 the observation time and a transpose of the receiver to satellite line-of-site vector for each satellite, where the relative position is estimated independently of convergence of any precise position estimate;

a cycle slip detector for detecting a cycle slip in the tracking of the received carrier signals, where the cycle slip detector is configured to eliminate or remove respective phase measurements associated with the cycle slip or to eliminate or remove the respective phase measurements of a particular satellite associated with the cycle slip;

the relative position estimator configured to model or to estimate an initial position bias in the initial position of the satellite navigation receiver, the receiver clock bias with respect to the reference time, and the atmospheric propagation delay bias between the satellite navigation receiver and a respective satellite, the relative position estimator comprising a relative position continuity module to support a relative position estimation framework that allows relative navigation over a time interval exceeding multiple epochs or an arbitrarily long time interval by establishing a series of chained relative position vectors from a next initial position that is established or coextensive with a last known relative position of the relative position estimator prior to detection of the cycle slip or an appearance of a new satellite;

the relative position estimator adapted to compensate for the biases to provide a compensated relative position of the satellite navigation receiver with respect to the initial position.

2. The receiver according to claim 1 wherein the carrier phase measurements of each satellite are adjusted by a chaining correction factor based on an estimated position change vector that is dot-product multiplied by the transpose of the receiver to a respective satellite line-of-sight vector for a corresponding satellite.

3. The receiver according to claim 1 wherein:

the relative position estimator or the relative position continuity module comprises a software instructions configured to update the reference initial position x ref,t0 to a new reference initial position x ref,t0′ at time t 0 ′>t 0 such that

x

_

ref

,

t

⁢

⁢

0

′

⁢

=

def

⁢

x

ref

,

t

⁢

⁢

0

+

Δ

⁢

⁢

x

t

⁢

⁢

0

′

,

t

⁢

⁢

0

,

where time t 0 ′ is a transition time associated with the last known relative position for the series of a chained relative position vectors, where x ref,t0 is the reference initial position at time t 0 , and where Δx t0′ to, is the position change from time t 0 to time t 0 ′;

the relative position estimator adjusts an observation equation of the carrier phase measurements of each satellite to account for changes in the reference initial position at time t 0 by subtracting an updated vector dot product of the change in an estimated relative position from time t 0 to time t 0 ′ and a transpose of the receiver to satellite line-of-site vector, which is represented as −e t i Δ{circumflex over (x)} t0′t0 , inclusive of said subtraction, from the carrier phase measurements such that the initial position bias at t 0 , x bias,t0 , retains its original meaning in subsequent relative position vectors after the initial relative position vector associated with the reference initial position; and

the relative position estimator can subsequently recover the estimated relative position as {circumflex over (x)} t = x ref,t0′ +Δ{circumflex over (x)} t,t0′ , where {circumflex over (x)} t is the estimated relative position at time t, where x ref,t0 , is the measured initial position at time t 0 ′, where Δ{circumflex over (x)} t,t0 , is the estimated position change or relative position vector from time t 0 ′ to time t, where e t iT is a transpose of the receiver to satellite line-of-sight vector.

4. A mobile satellite navigation receiver comprising: a receiver antenna;

a receiver module coupled to an electronic data processing system, the receiver module for receiving a set of carrier signals from satellite transmitters;

a measurement module to determine correlations of each carrier signal in the set to a local reference carrier signal, the measurement module for observing carrier phase measurements of the carrier signals;

a tracking module of the measurement module to process the determined correlations to track the carrier signals for estimation of respective changes in the phase measurements over time between the receiver antenna, of the satellite navigation receiver, and the satellite transmitters that transmit the carrier signals as the satellite navigation receiver changes position with respect to an initial position of the satellite navigation receiver;

a relative position estimator configured to estimate a relative position, a receiver clock bias of the satellite navigation receiver with respect to a reference time, and an atmospheric propagation delay bias of the satellite navigation receiver with respect to the initial position by time-differencing of the phase measurements of the tracked carrier signals for each satellite from an initial time t 0 an observation time and by determining a product of a change in the relative position from the initial time t 0 the observation time and a transpose of the receiver to satellite line-of-site vector for each satellite, where the relative position is estimated independently of convergence of any precise position estimate;

the relative position estimator configured to model or to estimate an initial position bias in the initial position of the satellite navigation receiver, the receiver clock bias with respect to the reference time, and the atmospheric propagation delay bias between the satellite navigation receiver and a respective satellite;

the relative position estimator adapted to compensate for the biases to provide a compensated relative position of the satellite navigation receiver with respect to the initial position; and

a precise position estimator configured to provide predefined or a priori estimates of one or more of the following: an absolute position (x ref,t ) of the satellite navigation receiver, an atmospheric propagation delay bias or tropospheric delay bias (T ref,t ), the receiver clock bias (dτ ref,t ) to aid in accurately determining a relative position estimate or compensated relative position estimate of the relative position estimator.

5. The receiver according to claim 4 comprising:

the precise position estimator configured to utilize constraints or constraint measurements that tie the relative position estimator to the precision position estimator over time so that with a given error variance: x bias,t0 +Δ{circumflex over (x)} t,t0 ≈0, where:

Δ{circumflex over (x)} t,t0 is the change in reference trajectory position offset from the initial time, t 0 , to the observation time, t, and

x bias,t0 is the initial position bias at the initial time, t 0 .

6. The receiver according to claim 4 comprising:

the precise position estimator configured to utilize constraint measurements that tie the relative position estimate of tropospheric delay to that of the precise position estimator so that with a given error variance: T t −T ref,t ≈0, where:

T t is zenith tropospheric delay, and

T ref,t is bias-related data on the atmospheric delay.

7. A mobile satellite navigation receiver comprising:

a receiver antenna;

a receiver module coupled to an electronic data processing system, the receiver module configured for receiving a set of carrier signals from satellite transmitters;

a measurement module to determine correlations of each carrier signal in the set to a local reference carrier signal, the measurement module for observing carrier phase measurements of the carrier signals;

a tracking module of the measurement module to process the determined correlations to track the carrier signals for estimation of respective changes in the phase measurements over time between the receiver antenna, of the satellite navigation receiver, and the satellite transmitters that transmit the carrier signals as the satellite navigation receiver changes position with respect to an initial position of the satellite navigation receiver;

a relative position estimator configured to estimate a relative position, a receiver clock bias of the satellite navigation receiver with respect to a reference time, and an atmospheric propagation delay bias of the satellite navigation receiver with respect to the initial position by time-differencing of the phase measurements of the tracked carrier signals for each satellite from an initial time t 0 an observation time and by determining a product of a change in the relative position from the initial time t 0 the observation time and a transpose of the receiver to satellite line-of-site vector for each satellite, where the relative position is estimated independently of convergence of any precise position estimate;

the relative position estimator configured to model or to estimate an initial position bias in the initial position of the satellite navigation receiver, the receiver clock bias with respect to the reference time, and the atmospheric propagation delay bias between the satellite navigation receiver and a respective satellite;

the relative position estimator adapted to compensate for the biases to provide a compensated relative position of the satellite navigation receiver with respect to the initial position; and

a precise position estimator for determining a precise position estimate based on carrier phase measurements of the received carrier signal §, the precise position estimator running simultaneously with the relative position estimator, the precise position estimator determining a reference trajectory of the receiver, the reference trajectory representing a defined target path or reference position vector of the receiver or a heading/yaw that is consistent with a time series of reference points indicative of the past and current positions of the receiver;

the relative position estimator adapted to determine a correction or offsets to position estimates provided by the precise position estimator in accordance with the following equations, where the position estimates comprise relative position estimates or absolute position estimates:

{circumflex over (x)} t =x ref,t0 +Δx ref,t,t0 +Δ{circumflex over (x)} t,t0 or x t ={circumflex over (x)} t +x bias,t0 ;

and

Δ{circumflex over (φ)} t,t0 i =−e t i T Δ{circumflex over (x)} t,t0 −Δe t,t0 i T x bias,t0 +Δ t,t0 +M t i T t −M t0 i T t0 +Δε {circumflex over (φ)},t,t0 i ; where:

{circumflex over (x)} t is the estimated relative position vector from time 0 to t;

x t is the estimated absolute position at time t;

x ref,t0 is the measured initial position at time t 0 ;

Δx ref,t,t0 is the estimated change in reference position from time t 0 to time t;

Δx t,t0 , is the absolute position change from time t 0 to time t;

Δ{circumflex over (x)} t,t0 is the change in reference trajectory position offset from the initial time, t 0 , to the observation time, t;

Δ{circumflex over (x)} t,t0 is a correction to the relative position with respect to the reference trajectory of the precise position estimator, Δx t,t0 =Δx ref,t,t0 +Δ{circumflex over (x)} t,t0 ;

Δ{circumflex over (φ)} t,t0 i is a time-difference of carrier phase measurements or observations between the mobile receiver and the satellite transmitter of satellite i at times t and to (t>t 0 ) along the reference trajectory;

e t i is the receiver to satellite line-of-sight vector;

e t iT is the transpose of the receiver to satellite line-of-sight vector;

Δe t,t0 i T is the transpose in the change in the receiver to satellite line-of-site vector between time t and t 0 ;

T is a residual zenith tropospheric delay constant or time-varying function;

Δ t,t0 is the difference in receiver clock error at times t and t 0 ;

Mį is the elevation mapping function at time t that maps zenith tropospheric delay to a line-of-sight delay between the mobile receiver and the satellite i;

T t is the residual zenith tropospheric delay at time t;

M t0 i is the mapping function at time t 0 ;

T t0 is the residual zenith tropospheric delay at t 0 ; and

Δε {circumflex over (φ)},t,t0 i is the difference in carrier-phase observation noise and other unmodeled errors between times t and t 0 along the reference trajectory.

8. The receiver according to claim 1 in which the relative position estimator comprises a predictive filter for modeling or estimating the initial position bias in the initial position of the satellite navigation receiver, the receiver clock bias with respect to the reference time, and the atmospheric propagation delay bias between the satellite navigation receiver and each respective satellite.

9. The receiver according to claim 4 in which the relative position estimator comprises a predictive filter for modeling or estimating the initial position bias in the initial position of the satellite navigation receiver, the receiver clock bias with respect to the reference time, and the atmospheric propagation delay bias between the satellite navigation receiver and each respective satellite.

10. The receiver according to claim 7 in which the relative position estimator comprises a predictive filter for modeling or estimating the initial position bias in the initial position of the satellite navigation receiver, the receiver clock bias with respect to the reference time, and the atmospheric propagation delay bias between the satellite navigation receiver and each respective satellite.

11. The receiver according to claim 1 wherein the cycle slip detector is coupled to the carrier tracking module.

12. The receiver according to claim 4 wherein the precise position estimator comprises a precise point position (PPP) estimator, including a wide area differential global navigation satellite system (GNSS) position estimator, where the precise position estimator is capable of receiving correction data from a correction wireless device.

13. The receiver according to claim 1 wherein the receiver comprises a data storage device for storing the modules and wherein an electronic data processor is configured to execute software instructions within the modules.

14. The receiver according to claim 4 wherein the receiver comprises a data storage device for storing the modules and wherein an electronic data processor is configured to execute software instructions within the modules.

15. The receiver according to claim 7 wherein the receiver comprises a data storage device for storing the modules and wherein an electronic data processor is configured to execute software instructions within the modules.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 30, 2021
From: ZEITZEW, MICHAEL A.; DAI, LIWEN L.; WANG, MIN; CHIU, DAVID S.
To: DEERE & COMPANY
Reel/Frame 057660/0976 →
Continuity (3)
Division 14857109 · Sep 17, 2015
Provisional Application 62185987 · Jun 29, 2015
Related Publication 20220003879A1 · Jan 6, 2022
References Cited (120)
US 5757646A · Talbot et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5914685A · Kozlov et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5916300A · Kirk et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5999123A · Disselkoen et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6266584B1 · Hur-Diaz et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6373432B1 · Rabinowitz et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6456233B1 · Zhodzishky et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6810324B1 · Nadkarni · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6943728B2 · Han et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6961018B2 · Heppe et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7071870B2 · Sharpe et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7119741B2 · Sharpe et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7212155B2 · Hatch et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7247950B2 · Fujisawa et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7248211B2 · Hatch et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7298319B2 · Han et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7427950B2 · Eslinger et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7511661B2 · Hatch et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7663539B2 · Han et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7670555B2 · Hoover et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7679555B2 · Dai et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7924104B2 · Huang et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7961143B2 · Dai et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8140223B2 · Whitehead et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8170796B2 · Liu · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 8368590B2 · Vollath et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8368591B2 · Talbot et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8427365B2 · Dai et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8542146B2 · Vollath · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8600601B2 · Kellar et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8766848B2 · Dai et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8849481B1 · Gavrilets et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9057780B2 · Bar-Sever et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9116228B2 · Ellum et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9128176B2 · Seeger · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9146319B2 · Leandro · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 10605926B2 · Lie et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10627528B2 · Lie et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10809391B2 · Lie et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20050151683A1 · Sharpe et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060017611A1 · Hatch et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060290566A1 · Syrjarinne et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070001900A1 · Heppe et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080074319A1 · Han et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090102708A1 · Dai et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20110187590A1 · Leandro · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110210889A1 · Dai et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110267226A1 · Talbot et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110307138A1 · Kellar et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120029810A1 · Dai · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120163419A1 · Seeger · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120306694A1 · Chen et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130271318A1 · Doucet et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130335266A1 · Vollath · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140015712A1 · Leandro et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140062778A1 · Ashjaee · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140378171A1 · Rudow et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150161872A1 · Beaulieu et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160377736A1 · Zeitzew et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170269216A1 · Dai et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170269231A1 · Dai et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170299728A1 · Lie et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170299731A1 · Lie et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180113473A1 · Webber et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180210091A1 · Di Federico et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190120973A1 · Martin et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 102124371A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
EP 2759849A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009281737A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010074777A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
European Examination Report issued in European Patent Application No. 16818482.8, dated Dec. 6, 2021, in 06 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion, re PCT Application No. PCT/US16/38610 dated Aug. 20, 2016 (14 pages). [cited by applicant]
Trimble RTX Technology for Infrastructure Applications, An Innovative New Approach for Worldwide Precise Point Positioning [online], Trimble, 2012 [retrieved on Jun. 20, 2016]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https:/… [cited by applicant]
Beran, Tomas, Sunil B. Bisnath, and Richard B. Langley. “Evaluation of high-precision, single-frequency GPS point positioning models.” In Ion GNSS 17th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division, Sep. 21-… [cited by applicant]
Chassagne, Olivier. “The Future of Satellite Navigation, One-Centimeter Accuracy with PPP”, GNSS Forum, pp. 51-54, Mar.-Apr. 2012 [online] [retrieved on Aug. 31, 2016]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.insi… [cited by applicant]
Choy, Suelynn. “GNSS Precise Point Positioning: A Fad or the Future of Satellite Navigation and Positioning?” Lecture slides [online].School of Mathematical and Geospatial Sciences Royal Melbourne Institute of Technolog… [cited by applicant]
Murfin, Tony. “Hexagon's Acquisition of Veripos: Why Did This Go Down?” GPS World [online], Apr. 16, 2014 [retrieved on Aug. 31, 2016]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://gpsworld.com/hexagons-acquisition-of-veri… [cited by applicant]
Murfin, Tony. “Look, No Base-Station!—Precise Point Positioning (PPP).” GPS World [online], Mar. 20, 2013 [retrieved Aug. 31, 2016]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://gpsworld.com/look-no-base-station-precise-po… [cited by applicant]
Laurichesse, Denis. “Innovation: Carrier-Phase Ambiguity Resolution, Handling the Biases for Improved Triple-Frequency PPP Convergence.” GPS World, Apr. 3, 2015 [online], [retrieved Aug. 31, 2016]. Retrieved from the In… [cited by applicant]
Dixon, Kevin. “StarFire: A Global SBAS for Sub-Decimeter Precise Point Positioning.” NavCom Technology Inc., Ion GNSS 19th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division [online], Sep. 26-29, 2006 [retrieved … [cited by applicant]
Shi, J. and Gao, Y. “A Comparison of Three PPP Integer Ambiguity Resolution Methods.” GPS Solutions 18.4 [online], 2013, pp. 519-528 [retrieved on Aug. 31, 2016]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://link.springer.… [cited by applicant]
Leandro, R., et al. “RTX Positioning: The Next Generation of cm-accurate Real-Time GNSS Positioning.” Trimble Terrasat GmbH [online brochure], Sep. 2012 [retrieved on Aug. 31, 2016]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: h… [cited by applicant]
Goode, Matthew. “New Developments In Precise Offshore Positioning.” Ocean Business / Offshore Survey [online presentation], Apr. 15-16, 2015, Southampton, United Kingdom [retrieved on Aug. 31, 2016]. Retrieved from the … [cited by applicant]
Ott, Lee. “Use of Four GNSS Systems in Operational Precise Point Positioning Service.” Furgo Satellite Positioning [online presentation], 2015 [retrieved on Aug. 31, 2016]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.… [cited by applicant]
Toor, Pieter. “Munich Satellite Navigation Summit 2014.” Veripos, Ltd. [online presentation], Mar. 26, 2014 [retrieved on Aug. 31, 2016]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.terrastar.net/files/docs/Munich_Sum… [cited by applicant]
Jokinen, AS. “Enhanced Ambiguity Resolution and Integrity Monitoring Methods for Precise Point Positioning.” Centre for Transport Studies, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London [onli… [cited by applicant]
“Real-time Service.” International GNSS Service [online article], 2015 [retrieved on Aug. 31, 2016]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.igs.org/rts>. [cited by applicant]
“Introducing the IGS Real-Time Service (RTS).” International GNSS Service [online], 2015 [retrieved on Aug. 31, 2016]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL: ftp://igs.org/pub/resource/pubs/IGS_Real_Time_Service-131031.pdf>. [cited by applicant]
Schrock, Gavin, “PPP: IGS Announces The Launch Of RTS-IGS.” xyHt [online], Apr. 20, 2015 [retrieved on Aug. 31, 2016]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.xyht.com/professional-surveyor-archives/ppp-igs-announ… [cited by applicant]
Laurichesse, D., Mercier, F., and Berthias, JP. “Real-time PPP with Undifferenced Integer Ambiguity Resolution, Experimental Results.” Proceedings of the Ion GNSS [online] Sep. 21-24, 2010 [retrieved on Aug. 31, 2016]. … [cited by applicant]
Blewitt, Geoffrey. “Carrier Phase Ambiguity Resolution for the Global Positioning System Applied to Geodetic Baselines up to 2000 km.” Journal of Geophysical Research [online], vol. 94, No. B8, pp. 10187-10203, Aug. 10,… [cited by applicant]
Banville, Simon. “Ambiguity Resolution.” BlackDot GNSS [online], Apr. 25, 2015 [retrieved on Sep. 6, 2016]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL: http://www.blackdotgnss.com/2015/04/25/ambiguity-resolution/>. [cited by applicant]
Teunissen, PJG. “Towards a Unified Theory of GNSS Ambiguity Resolution.” Journal of Global Positioning Systems [online], vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1-12, 2003 [retrieved on Sep. 6, 2016]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL: http:… [cited by applicant]
Teunissen, PJG. “Least-Squares Estimation of the Integer GPS Ambiguities.” International Association of Geodesy General Meeting, Section IV: Theory and methodology, Beijing, China, 1993 [online] retrieved on Sep. 6, 201… [cited by applicant]
“Hemisphere GNSS Debuts Atlas GNSS Correction Service.” GPS World Staff. GPS World [online], Jun. 15, 2015 [retrieved on Sep. 6, 2016]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://gpsworld.com/hemisphere-gnss-debuts-atlas… [cited by applicant]
Teunissen, PJG. “GNSS Ambiguity Bootstrapping: Theory and Application.” Proceedings of International Symposium on Kinematic Systems in Geodesy, Geomatics and Navigation [online], pp. 246-254, Jun. 2001 [retrieved on Nov… [cited by applicant]
Teunissen, PJG. “Theory of Integer Equivariant Estimation with Application to GNSS.” Journal of Geodesy [online], vol. 77, No. 7-8, pp. 402-410, 2003 [retrieved on Nov. 16, 2016]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL: http:… [cited by applicant]
Wen, Zhibo, et al. “Best Integer Equivariant Estimation for Precise Point Positioning.” Institute for Communications and Navigation 2012 Proceedings [online], pp. 279-282, Sep. 12-14, 2012 [retrieved on Sep. 6, 2016]. R… [cited by applicant]
Shi, J. and Gao, Y. “A Fast Integer Ambiguity Resolution Method for PPP.” Proceedings of the Ion GNSS [online], Nashville, TN, pp. 3728-3734, Sep. 17-21, 2012 [retrieved on Nov. 16, 2016]. Retrieved from the Internet <U… [cited by applicant]
Teunissen, PJG. “The Least-squares Ambiguity Decorrelation Adjustment: A Method for Fast GPS Integer Ambiguity Estimation.” Journal of Geodesy [online], vol. 70, No. 1-2 pp. 65-82, 1995 [retrieved on Nov. 16, 2016]. Ret… [cited by applicant]
De Jonge, P. and Tiberius, C. “The LAMBDA Method for Integer Ambiguity Estimation: Implementation Aspects.” Publications of the Delft Computing Centre [online], LGR-Series No. 12, pp. 1-47, Aug. 1996 [retrieved on Sep. … [cited by applicant]
Chang, XW., Yang, X. and Zhou, T. “MLAMBDA: A Modified LAMBDA Method for Integer Least-squares Estimation.” Journal of Geodesy [online], vol. 79, No. 9, pp. 552-565, Dec. 2005 [retrieved on Sep. 6, 2016]. Retrieved from… [cited by applicant]
Baroni, L. and Kuga, HK. “Evaluation of Two Integer Ambiguity Resolution Methods for Real Time GPS Positioning.” WSEAS Transactions on Systems 8.3, pp. 323-333, Mar. 2009 [retrieved on Sep. 6, 2016]. Retrieved from the … [cited by applicant]
Verhagen, Sandra. “The GNSS Integer Ambiguities: Estimation and Validation.” Delft Institute of Earth Observation and Space Systems, Delft University of Technology, Jan. 31, 2005 [retrieved on Sep. 6, 2016]. Retrieved f… [cited by applicant]
Li, P. and Zhang, X. “Precise Point Positioning With Partial Ambiguity Fixing.” Sensors [online journal], vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 13627-13643, Jun. 10, 2015 [retrieved on Sep. 6, 2016]. Retrieved from the Internet :<URL: ht… [cited by applicant]
Verhagen, Sandra. et al. “GNSS Ambiguity Resolution: Which Subset to Fix?” IGNSS Symposium 2011, International Global Navigation Satellite Systems Society, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, Nov. 15-17, 2… [cited by applicant]
Pan, L., Cai, C., Santerre, R. and Zhu, J. “Combined GPS/GLONASS Precise Point Positioning with Fixed GPS Ambiguities.” Sensors [online journal], vol. 14, No. 9, pp. 17530-17547, Sep. 18, 2014 [retrieved on Sep. 6, 2016… [cited by applicant]
Gratton, L., Joerger, M. and Pervan, B. “Carrier Phase Relative RAIM Algorithms and Protection Level Derivation.” Journal of Navigation [online], vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 215-231, Apr. 1, 2010 [retrieved on Sep. 6, 2016]. Re… [cited by applicant]
“Trimble XFill RTK.” Trimble Navigation Limited [online white paper], Sep. 2012 [retrieved on Sep. 6, 2016]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://trl.trimble.com/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-630776/022543-551_Trimb… [cited by applicant]
NovAtelCORRECT. NovAtel Inc. [online brochure], Nov. 2015 [retrieved on Sep. 6, 2016]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.novatel.com/assets/Documents/Papers/NovAtelCORRECT-Brochure.pdf>. [cited by applicant]
Reußnerr, N. and Wanniger, L. “GLONASS Inter-frequency Code Biases and PPP Carrier-Phase Ambiguity Resolution.” Geodetic Institute, Technische Universität Dresden, IGS Workshop, Jul. 2012 [retrieved Aug. 31, 2016]. Retr… [cited by applicant]
Sleewagen, J. et al. “Digital versus Analog: Demystifying GLONASS Inter-Frequency Carrier Phase Biases.” Inside GNSS [online], May/Jun. 2012 [retrieved Aug. 31, 2016]. Retrieved from the Internet :<URL: http://www.insid… [cited by applicant]
Carcanague, S. et al. “Finding the Right Algorithm Low-Cost, Single-Frequency GPS/GLONASS RTK for Road Users.” Inside GNSS [online], vol. 8 No. 6, pp. 70-80, Nov./Dec. 2013 [retrieved Aug. 31, 2016]. Retrieved from the … [cited by applicant]
Wang, J. and Feng, Y. “Reliability of Partial Ambiguity Fixing with Multiple GNSS Constellations.” Journal of Geodesy [online], vol. 87, No. 1, pp. 1-14, Jun. 12, 2012 [retrieved Aug. 31, 2016]. Retrieved from the Inter… [cited by applicant]
Petovello, Mark. “GNSS Solutions: Absolutely Relative Positioning”, Solutions, InsideGNSS [online], p. 36, May-Jun. Ed., 2011, [retrieved Jan. 20, 2017]. [Retrieved from the Internet: URL <http://www.insidegnss.com/auto… [cited by applicant]
Ding, W. and Wang, J. “Precise Velocity Estimation with a Stand-Alone GPS Receiver”, Journal of Navigation, 64(2), pp. 311-325, 2011, DOI: 10.1017/S0373463310000482. [cited by applicant]
Kirkko-Jaakkola, M. et al. “A RAIM Approach to GNSS Outlier and Cycle Slip Detection Using L1 Carrier Phase Time-differences”, IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Systems [online], 2009, pp. 273-278, DOI: 10.1109/SIPS.20… [cited by applicant]
Elsobeiey, M. and El-Rabbany, M. “Convergence Time Improvement of Precise Point Positioning”, TS04J—Geodetic Applications in Various Situations, 5249 [online], [retrieved on Jan. 20, 2017].[Retrieved from the Internet: … [cited by applicant]
Geng, J. et al., “Towards PPP-RTK: Ambiguity resolution in real-time precise point positioning”, Advances in Space Research, vol. 47, Issue 10, pp. 1664-1673, GNSS Remote Sensing—2, Institute of Engineering Surveying an… [cited by applicant]
Traugott, JP. “Precise flight trajectory reconstruction based on time-differential GNSS carrier phase processing” [online] Verlag Dr. Hut; 2011, [retrieved on Jan. 20, 2017]. [Retrieved from the Internet: URL <https://m… [cited by applicant]