IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,234,717
Granted Patent B2
US 12,234,717 · App. 17/278,444 · Granted Feb 25, 2025

Effective wellbore compressibility determination apparatus, methods, and systems

Inventors: Dinesh Ananda Shetty (Sugar Land, TX); Vladimir Nikolayevich Martysevich (Spring, TX)
Assignee: Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
E21B47/06E21B2200/20
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,234,717
App. No.
17/278,444
Granted
Feb 25, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

An apparatus includes a pressure sensor for measuring a pressure in a wellbore of a formation, a processor communicably coupled with the pressure sensor, and a machine-readable medium. The machine-readable medium has program code executable by the processor to cause the apparatus to obtain a set of measurements with the pressure sensor, determine an effective wellbore compressibility coefficient based on the set of measurements, and determine an effective wellbore diameter based on an initial wellbore diameter and the effective wellbore compressibility coefficient.

Claims (53)

1. An apparatus comprising:

a pressure sensor for measuring a pressure in a wellbore of a formation;

a processor communicably coupled with the pressure sensor; and

a non-transitory machine-readable medium having program code executable by the processor to cause the apparatus to,

obtain a set of measurements with the pressure sensor;

determine an effective wellbore compressibility coefficient based on the set of measurements;

determine at least one of: a fluid parameter or a wellbore parameter, or modify a well operation, based on the effective wellbore compressibility coefficient;

generate a dataset comprising a set of wellbore compressibility values and a set of formation measurements, each of the set of wellbore compressibility values corresponding with at least one of the set of formation measurements; and

train a machine learning algorithm using the dataset.

2. The apparatus of claim 1 , further comprising program code to modify the effective wellbore compressibility coefficient based on at least one of a change in fluid mass flow rate over time and a change in flow rate over distance.

3. The apparatus of claim 1 , further comprising program code to determine an effective wellbore diameter based on the effective wellbore compressibility coefficient.

4. The apparatus of claim 1 , further comprising program code to:

determine a tube diameter corresponding to a tube in the wellbore; and

determine the initial wellbore diameter based on the tube diameter.

5. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the program code to determine the effective wellbore compressibility coefficient further comprises program code to determine the effective wellbore compressibility coefficient as varying with respect to the set of measurements.

6. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the program code to determine the effective wellbore compressibility coefficient further comprises program code to:

generate a compressibility coefficient prediction;

perform a wellbore simulation based on the compressibility coefficient prediction;

determine whether a match comparison satisfies a match threshold, wherein the match comparison is based on a difference between results of the wellbore simulation and the set of measurements; and

set the compressibility coefficient prediction as the effective wellbore compressibility coefficient based on the match comparison satisfying the match threshold.

7. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the set of measurements are taken prior to a first stage fracturing of the formation.

8. A method comprising:

obtaining a set of measurements with a pressure sensor in a wellbore of a formation;

determining an effective wellbore compressibility coefficient based on the set of measurements;

determining at least one of: a fluid parameter or a wellbore parameter, or modifying a well operation, based on the effective wellbore compressibility coefficient;

generating a dataset comprising a set of wellbore compressibility values and a set of formation measurements, each of the set of wellbore compressibility values corresponding with at least one of the set of formation measurements; and

training a machine learning algorithm using the dataset.

9. The method of claim 8 , further comprising modifying the effective wellbore compressibility coefficient based on at least one of a change in fluid mass flow rate over time and a change in flow rate over distance.

10. The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

determining a tube diameter corresponding to a tube in the wellbore; and

determining the initial wellbore diameter based on the tube diameter.

11. The method of claim 8 , wherein determining the effective wellbore compressibility coefficient comprises determining the effective wellbore compressibility coefficient as varying with respect to the set of measurements.

12. The method of claim 8 , wherein determining the effective wellbore compressibility coefficient further comprises:

generating a compressibility coefficient prediction;

performing a wellbore simulation based on the compressibility coefficient prediction;

determining whether a match comparison satisfies a match threshold, wherein the match comparison is based on a difference between results of the wellbore simulation and the set of measurements; and

setting the compressibility coefficient prediction as the effective wellbore compressibility coefficient based on the match comparison satisfying the match threshold.

13. One or more non-transitory machine-readable media comprising program code executable by a processor to:

obtain a set of measurements with a pressure sensor in a wellbore of a formation;

determine an effective wellbore compressibility coefficient based on the set of measurements;

determine at least one of: a fluid parameter or a wellbore parameter, or modify a well operation, based on the effective wellbore compressibility coefficient;

generate a dataset comprising a set of wellbore compressibility values and a set of formation measurements, each of the set of wellbore compressibility values corresponding with at least one of the set of formation measurements; and

train a machine learning algorithm using the dataset.

14. The machine-readable media of claim 13 , further comprising program code to modify the effective wellbore compressibility coefficient based on at least one of a change in fluid mass flow rate over time and a change in flow rate over distance.

15. The machine-readable media of claim 13 , further comprising program code to:

determine a tube diameter corresponding to a tube in the wellbore; and

determine the initial wellbore diameter based on the tube diameter.

16. The machine-readable media of claim 13 , wherein the program code to determine the effective wellbore compressibility coefficient further comprises program code to determine the effective wellbore compressibility coefficient as varying with respect to the set of measurements.

17. The machine-readable media of claim 13 , wherein the program code to determine the effective wellbore compressibility coefficient further comprises program code to:

generate a compressibility coefficient prediction;

perform a wellbore simulation based on the compressibility coefficient prediction;

determine whether a match comparison satisfies a match threshold, wherein the match comparison is based on a difference between results of the wellbore simulation and the set of measurements; and

set the compressibility coefficient prediction as the effective wellbore compressibility coefficient based on the match comparison satisfying the match threshold.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 22, 2021
From: SHETTY, DINESH ANANDA; MARTYSEVICH, VLADIMIR NIKOLAYEVICH
To: HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
Reel/Frame 055667/0898 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20210355814A1 · Nov 18, 2021
References Cited (17)
US 4597290A · Bourdet et al. · 1986 [cited by applicant]
US 8271248B2 · Pomerantz · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 9176255B2 · Wiener et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20070175273A1 · Follini et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20090165548A1 · Pop et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100169019A1 · Zhan et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20120150515A1 · Hariharan et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20150107898A1 · Leuchtenberg · 2015 [cited by examiner]
CN 101560879B · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014148924A1 · 2014 [cited by examiner]
WO 2016192077A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
Joshi (Augmentation of Well Productivity With Slant and Horizontal Wells, pp. 1-13). (Year: 1988). [cited by examiner]
Yang et al. (Experimental Study on Fracture Initiation by Pressure Pulses, pp. 1-14). (Year: 2000). [cited by examiner]
PCT Application Serial No. PCT/US2018/059821, International Search Report, mailed Aug. 7, 2019, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT Application Serial No. PCT/US2018/059821, International Written Opinion, mailed Aug. 7, 2019, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Jung, et al., “Re-Examining Interpretations of Non-Ideal Behavior During Diagnostic Fracture Injection Tests”, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Sep. 1, 2016, pp. 114-136. [cited by applicant]
McClure, et al., “The Effect of Changing Fracture Compliance on Pressure Transient Behavior During Diagnostic Fracture Injection Testes”, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2014. [cited by applicant]