IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,253,568
Granted Patent B2
US 12,253,568 · App. 17/738,197 · Granted Mar 18, 2025

Charge time estimating method and system

Inventors: Charles Everett Badger, II (Westland, MI); Dima Alame (Windsor, CA)
Assignee: Ford Global Technologies, LLC
G01R31/387B60L58/12G01R31/3646B60L2240/54
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,253,568
App. No.
17/738,197
Granted
Mar 18, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A strategy selection method for estimating a charge time includes, when a target state of charge for a traction battery is a full charge, establishing an estimated time required to charge the traction battery using a first strategy, and when a target state of charge for the traction battery is less than a full charge, establishing the estimated time required to charge the traction battery using a different, second strategy.

Claims (39)

1. A strategy selection method for estimating a charge time, comprising:

when a target state of charge for a traction battery is a full charge, establishing an estimated time required to charge the traction battery using a first strategy;

when a target state of charge for the traction battery is less than a full charge, establishing the estimated time required to charge the traction battery using a different, second strategy; and

adjusting a charging of the traction battery of the vehicle based on the estimated charge time.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the full charge is a one-hundred percent state of charge.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first strategy includes:

estimating an amount of energy required to charge a traction battery;

subtracting calibrated energy losses from an amount of incoming charging power to establish an available charging power; and

dividing the amount of energy by the available charging power.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the second strategy includes:

communicating the target state of charge from a first control module to a second control module that is different than the first control module;

using the second control module to establish an estimated amount of energy that is needed to charge the traction battery to the target state of charge;

communicating the estimated amount of energy from the second control module to the first control module; and

using the first control module to establish the estimated time required to charge the traction battery to the target state of charge, the estimated time at least partially based on the estimated amount of energy.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the first control module is a powertrain control module.

6. The method of claim 4 , wherein the second control module is a battery energy control module.

7. The method of claim 4 , wherein the second control module is configured to calculate a state of charge of the traction battery.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second strategy includes:

communicating the target state of charge from a first control module to a second control module that is different than the first control module;

using the second control module to establish an estimated amount of energy that is needed to charge the traction battery to the target state of charge;

communicating the estimated amount of energy from the second control module to the first control module; and

using the first control module to establish the estimated time required to charge the traction battery to the target state of charge, the estimated time at least partially based on the estimated amount of energy.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the adjusting comprises charging to reach the target state of charge as a certain time.

10. A charge time estimating system, comprising:

a traction battery; and

at least one control module that establishes an estimated time required to charge the traction battery using a first strategy when a target state of charge for a traction battery is a full charge, and that establishes the estimated time required to charge the traction battery using a different, second strategy when the target state of charge for the traction battery is less than a full charge, the at least one control module configured to control a charge of the traction battery based on the estimated charge time.

11. The system of claim 10 , wherein the full charge is a one-hundred percent state of charge.

12. The system of claim 10 , wherein, when using the first strategy, the at least one control module establishes the estimated time required to charge the traction battery by estimating an amount of energy required to charge a traction battery, subtracting calibrated energy losses from an amount of incoming charging power to establish an available charging power, and dividing the amount of energy by the available charging power.

13. The system of claim 10 , wherein the at least one control module is a first control module and further comprising a second control module,

wherein, when using the second strategy, the first control module establishes the estimated time based on an estimated amount of energy that is needed to charge the traction battery to the target state of charge,

wherein the estimated amount of energy is communicated to the first control module from the second control module,

wherein the second control module establishes the estimated amount of energy based on the target state of charge.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein, when using the second strategy, the first control module communicates the target state of charge to the second control module.

15. The system of claim 13 , wherein the first control module is outside an enclosure of the traction battery, and the second control module is inside the traction battery.

16. The system of claim 13 , wherein the first control module is a hybrid powertrain control module.

17. The system of claim 13 , wherein the second control module is a battery energy control module.

18. The system of claim 13 , wherein the target state of charge is less than a full charge.

19. The system of claim 13 , further comprising a display that shows an actual state of charge of the traction battery.

20. The system of claim 13 , further comprising an electrified vehicle having the traction battery and the at least one control module.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 6, 2022
From: BADGER, CHARLES EVERETT, II; ALAME, DIMA
To: FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 059837/0763 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230358820A1 · Nov 9, 2023
References Cited (15)
US 10444290B2 · Kawamura · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 11840157B2 · Bennett · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20090212745A1 · Kelty · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20110175452A1 · Hoshino · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20150326037A1 · Borhan · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160047862A1 · Shimizu · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160129803A1 · Grewal · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20180345800A1 · Beer · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20200373779A1 · Arizono · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210362616A1 · Stichowski · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220271557A1 · Tseng · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230001818A1 · Shaotran · 2023 [cited by examiner]
CN 107240728A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 108646190B · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 111999660B · 2021 [cited by applicant]