IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,269,861
Granted Patent B2
US 12,269,861 · App. 18/164,417 · Granted Apr 8, 2025

Chimeric ILT receptor compositions and methods

Inventors: Joseph Henri Bayle (West University Place, TX); MyLinh Thi Duong (Sugar Land, TX)
Assignee: NKILT Therapeutics, Inc.
C07K14/7051A61P35/00C12N15/63C07K2319/02C07K2319/03
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,269,861
App. No.
18/164,417
Granted
Apr 8, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Provided are chimeric ILT receptors (CIRs) that include a targeting region from ILT2 or ILT4, a transmembrane domain, and an intracellular domain (ICD). The ICD includes a signaling region (e.g., CD3 zeta (CD3ζ)) and optionally a costimulatory region (e.g., CD28, 4-1BB, OX40, and the like). Also provided are nucleic acids (e.g., expression vectors) encoding a subject CIR, and genetically modified cells (e.g., immune cells such as NK cells, T cells, iNKT cells, macrophages, and the like) expressing a subject CIR. For example, provided are genetically modified immune cells such as NK cells that include a nucleic acid encoding an ILT2 or ILT4 CIR. The subject CIRs are designed to activate cytotoxicity by immune cells such as NK cells, T cells, iNKT cells and macrophages against HLA-G expressing cancers.

Claims (26)

1. A chimeric receptor protein, comprising:

(a) a targeting region, that targets HLA-G, comprising an immunoglobulin-like transcript 4 (ILT4) D1-D2 extracellular domain that comprises an amino acid sequence that is 90% or more identical to SEQ ID NO: 57, wherein the targeting region lacks an ILT4 D3-D4 extracellular domain;

(b) a CD8α stalk domain;

(c) a CD8α transmembrane domain; and

(d) an intracellular domain (ICD), comprising:

(i) a signaling region capable of transducing a signal, upon binding of said targeting region to HLA-G, into the interior of an immune effector cell to elicit effector cell function, wherein the signaling region comprises a CD3ζ signaling domain; and

(ii) a costimulatory region comprising a 4-1BB costimulatory domain.

2. The chimeric receptor protein of claim 1 , wherein the targeting region comprises an amino acid mutation at a position corresponding to Y96 of the ILT4 amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 57.

3. An isolated nucleic acid, comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding the chimeric receptor protein of claim 1 .

4. The isolated nucleic acid of claim 3 , wherein said nucleic acid is an expression vector.

5. An isolated genetically modified cell, expressing the chimeric receptor protein of claim 1 .

6. The isolated genetically modified cell of claim 5 , wherein the genetically modified cell is a natural killer (NK) cell, a T cell, an iNKT cell, or a macrophage.

7. A method of treatment, comprising administering the genetically modified cell of claim 5 to an individual in need, wherein the individual has diseased cells that express HLA-G.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the individual has a cancer with HLA-G expressing cancer cells.

9. A method of producing an isolated genetically modified cell, the method comprising:

introducing the nucleic acid of claim 3 into an isolated cell or an isolated population of cells, thus producing an isolated genetically modified cell.

10. The chimeric receptor protein of claim 1 , wherein the CD8α stalk domain comprises the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 107; the CD8α transmembrane domain comprises the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 100; the CD3ζ signaling domain comprises the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 33; and the 4-1BB costimulatory domain comprises the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 35.

11. The chimeric receptor protein of claim 1 , wherein the ILT4 D1-D2 extracellular domain comprises an amino acid sequence that is 95% or more identical to SEQ ID NO: 57.

12. The chimeric receptor protein of claim 10 , wherein the ILT4 D1-D2 extracellular domain comprises an amino acid sequence that is 95% or more identical to SEQ ID NO: 57.

13. The chimeric receptor protein of claim 1 , wherein the ILT4 D1-D2 extracellular domain comprises the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 57.

14. The chimeric receptor protein of claim 10 , wherein the ILT4 D1-D2 extracellular domain comprises the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 57.

15. The isolated nucleic acid of claim 3 , wherein said nucleic acid is a plasmid, a viral vector, or a transposon.

16. The isolated nucleic acid of claim 3 , wherein the nucleotide sequence encoding the chimeric receptor protein is operably linked to a constitutive promoter or to an inducible promoter.

17. The method of claim 7 , wherein the individual is a human.

18. The method of claim 7 , wherein the genetically modified cell is autologous to the individual.

19. The method of claim 7 , wherein the genetically modified cell is allogeneic to the individual.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 6, 2023
From: BAYLE, JOSEPH HENRI; DUONG, MYLINH THI
To: NKILT THERAPEUTICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 064173/0731 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63306514 · Feb 4, 2022
Related Publication 20230348560A1 · Nov 2, 2023
References Cited (56)
US 10005845B2 · Loustau et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10139662B2 · Lee et al. · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 11111302B2 · Demoyen et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11117971B2 · Loustau et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11312774B2 · Demoyen et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11325977B2 · Loustau et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20150093401A1 · Pule · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160272724A1 · Loustau et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20190233520A1 · Demoyen et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200291087A1 · Zhang · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210040217A1 · Loustau et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210054081A1 · Demoyen et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210403574A1 · Loustau et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220056140A1 · Demoyen et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220251216A1 · Demoyen et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220281981A1 · Loustau et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016065329 · 2016 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2020087054A1 · 2020 [cited by examiner]
WO 2021030149 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/518,976, filed Apr. 13, 2017, Maute et al. [cited by examiner]
Wall et al., Theriogenology, vol. 45, p. 57-68, 1996 (Year: 1996) (Year: 1996). [cited by examiner]
Baxenvanis, Antibody- based cancer therapy, Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 3(4):441-452 (Year: 2008). [cited by examiner]
J Cuzick et al, Overview of the main outcomes of breast cancer, p. 296-300 (Year: 2003). [cited by examiner]
Evans et al, Vaccine therapy for Cancer- fact or fiction, pp. 299-307 (Year: 1999). [cited by examiner]
Komenaka et al, Immunotherapy for Melanoma, pp. 251-265, (Year: 2004). [cited by examiner]
B. Hernández-Ledesma et al. / Peptides 30 (2009) 426-430 (Year: 2008). [cited by examiner]
Schiffman et al. The promise of Global Cervical- Cancer Prevention, pp. 2101-2104 (Year: 2005). [cited by examiner]
Burgess et al, Possible Dissociation of the Heparin-binding and Mitogenic Activities of Heparin-binding (Acidic Fibroblast) Growth Factor-1 from Its Receptor-binding Activities by Site-directed Mutagenesis of a Single L… [cited by examiner]
Iazar et al, Transforming Growth Factor ox: Mutation of Aspartic Acid 47 and Leucine 48 Results in Different Biological Activities, vol. 8, No. 3, p. 1247-1252 (Year: 1987). [cited by examiner]
Baker et al, Conversion of a T Cell Antagonist into an Agonist by Repairing a Defect in the TCR/Peptide/MHC Interface: Implications for TCR Signaling, Immunity, vol. 13, 475-484, Oct. 2000 (Year: 2000). [cited by examiner]
Shuan Shian Huang et al, J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272:27155-27159. (Year: 1997). [cited by examiner]
Martindale et al, Nature genetics, vol. 18 (Year: 1998). [cited by examiner]
James U. Bowie et al, Deciphering the Message in Protein Sequences: Tolerance to Amino Acid Substitutions, Science, vol. 247 (Year: 1990). [cited by examiner]
Ju et al, Conversion of the interleukin 1 receptor antagonist into an agonist by site-specific mutagenesis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA vol. 88, pp. 2658-2662, Apr. 1991 Immunology (Year: 1991). [cited by examiner]
Freiss et al., Cancer Res 2005; 65: (22). Nov. 15, 2005. [cited by examiner]
Montrase et al, J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272:21201-21206 (Year: 1997). [cited by examiner]
Nonaka et al, Human Molecular Genetics, 2009, vol. 18, No. 18 3353-3364 (Year: 2009). [cited by examiner]
Shiroishi et al, Human inhibitory receptors Ig-like transcript 2 (ILT2) and ILT4 compete with CD8 for MHC class I binding and bind preferentially to HLA-G, PNA, Jul. 22, 2003, vol. 100. [cited by examiner]
Deng et al (Blood, Aug. 7, 2014, vol. 124). [cited by examiner]
Borges et al (The Journal of Immunology, 1997, 159(11): 5192-5196). [cited by examiner]
Yazdanifar et al (Cells, 2019, 8, 1070, 1-23). [cited by examiner]
Anna et al. (2021) “First immunotherapeutic CAR-T cells against the immune checkpoint protein HLA-G”, J Immunother Cancer, 9(3): 1-14. [cited by applicant]
Altenschmidt et al. (1996) “Cytolysis of Tumor Cells Expressing the Neu/erbB-2, erbB-3, and erbB-4 Receptors by Genetically Targeted Naive T Lymphocytes”, Clin. Cancer Res., 2:1001-1008. [cited by applicant]
Muniappan et al. (2000) “Ligand-mediated cytolysis of tumor cells: Use of heregulin-ζ chimeras to redirect cytotoxic T lymphocytes”, Cancer Gene Ther., 7:128-134. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al. (2012) “An NKp30-based chimeric antigen receptor promotes T-cell effector functions and anti-tumor efficacy in vivo”, J Immunol., 189:2290-2299. [cited by applicant]
Ramírez-Chacón et al., (2022) “Ligand-based CAR-T cell: Different strategies to drive T cells in future new treatments”, Frontiers in Immunology, pp. 1-17. [cited by applicant]
Shiroishi et al., (2003) “Human inhibitory receptors Ig-like transcript 2 (ILT2) and ILT4 compete with CD8 for MHC class I binding and bind preferentially to HLA-G”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 100:1… [cited by applicant]
Wong et al., (2003) “Stalk Region of beta-Chain Enhances the Coreceptor Function of CD81”, The Journal of Immunology, 171(2):867-874. [cited by applicant]
Invectys Inc., [cited by applicant]
Invectys Inc., [cited by applicant]
Invectys Inc., [cited by applicant]
Invectys Inc., [cited by applicant]
Invectys Inc., [cited by applicant]
Apps et al., (2007) “A homodimeric complex of HLA-G on normal trophoblast cells modulates antigen-presenting cells via LILRB1”, Eur. J. Immunol., 37:1924-1937. [cited by applicant]
Giles, (2012) “HLA-B27 Homodimers and Free H Chains Are Stronger Ligands for Leukocyte Ig-like Receptor B2 than Classical HLA Class I”, J Immunol. 188(12):6184-6193. [cited by applicant]
Shiroishi et al., (2006) “Structural basis for recognition of the nonclassical MHC molecule HLA-G by the leukocyte Ig-like receptor B2 (LILRB2/LIR2/ILT4/CD85d)”, PNAS, 103(4): 16412-16417. [cited by applicant]