IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,324,747
Granted Patent B2
US 12,324,747 · App. 18/643,287 · Granted Jun 10, 2025

Side pocket spinal fusion cage

Inventor: Seth Neubardt (Rye, NY)
A61F2/4465A61F2/4455
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,324,747
App. No.
18/643,287
Granted
Jun 10, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A spinal implant is provided including an upper surface, a lower surface, a front surface and a back surface, two side surfaces extending between the upper surface and the lower surface, the two side surfaces extending between the front surface and the back surface and an opening positioned closer to the back surface than the front surface. The opening is provided to contain graft material that spans between a cortical rim of the upper vertebral body and the cortical rim of the lower vertebral body. The method includes packing the opening with graft material, wherein the graft material spans between the decorticated cortical rim of the upper vertebral body and the decorticated cortical rim of the lower vertebral body.

Claims (30)

1. A spinal implant comprising:

an upper surface, wherein at least a portion of the upper surface is configured to contact an endplate of an upper vertebral body;

a lower surface, wherein at least a portion of the lower surface is configured to contact an endplate of a lower vertebral body;

a front end and a back end, wherein the front end is configured for insertion into a space between the upper vertebral body and the lower vertebral body;

a first side extending between the upper surface and the lower surface;

a second side extending between the upper surface and the lower surface;

a pocket located at the front end, wherein the pocket is partially enclosed by a first flange projecting from the first side and a second flange projecting from the second side, wherein the pocket fully extends from the upper surface to the lower surface to contain graft material from the upper surface to the lower surface,

wherein, during insertion of the spinal implant, the pocket is configured to contain graft material that spans between a cortical rim of the upper vertebral body and a cortical rim of the lower vertebral body.

2. The spinal implant of claim 1 , further comprising a second pocket located at the back end, wherein the second pocket is partially enclosed by a third flange projecting from the first side and a fourth flange projecting from the second side.

3. The spinal implant of claim 2 , wherein the spinal implant between the pocket and the second pocket forms a continuous solid body.

4. The spinal implant of claim 1 , further comprising a second opening fully enclosed at the back end.

5. The spinal implant of claim 4 , wherein the spinal implant between the pocket and the opening forms a continuous solid body.

6. The spinal implant of claim 1 , wherein the pocket is offset from a center of the spinal implant.

7. The spinal implant of claim 1 , wherein the pocket comprises at least 10% of a surface area of the top surface.

8. The spinal implant of claim 1 , wherein the pocket comprises at least 10% of a length of the spinal implant.

9. The spinal implant of claim 1 , wherein the pocket extends vertically through the spinal implant.

10. The spinal implant of claim 1 , wherein the spinal implant comprises a radiolucent material.

11. The spinal implant of claim 1 , wherein the cortical rim of the upper vertebral body and the cortical rim of the lower vertebral body are configured to apply a compressive force to the graft material in the pocket.

12. The spinal implant of claim 1 , wherein the spinal implant comprises a bullet shape to conform to a curvature of the endplate of the upper vertebral body and the endplate of the lower vertebral body.

13. The spinal implant of claim 1 , wherein the upper surface, the lower surface, or both the upper surface and the lower surface comprise projections.

14. A method of spinal fusion comprising:

providing the spinal implant of claim 1 ,

inserting the spinal implant into a space between an upper vertebral body and a lower vertebral body, wherein at least a portion of the upper surface contacts an endplate of the upper vertebral body and at least a portion of the lower surface contacts an endplate of the lower vertebral body; and

packing the pocket with graft material, wherein the graft material spans between a cortical rim of the upper vertebral body and a cortical rim of the lower vertebral body.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the cortical rim of the upper vertebral body and the cortical rim of the lower vertebral body apply a compressive force to the graft material in the pocket.

16. The method of claim 14 , wherein inserting the front end of the spinal implant further comprises an anterior approach.

17. The method of claim 14 , wherein inserting the front end of the spinal implant further comprises a posterior approach.

18. The method of claim 14 , wherein inserting the front end of the spinal implant further comprises a lateral approach.

19. The method of claim 14 , wherein the upper vertebral endplate and the lower vertebral endplate remain intact.

20. The method of claim 14 , further comprising scraping the cortical rim of the upper vertebral body and the cortical rim of the lower vertebral body.

Continuity (5)
Continuation 18051673 · Nov 1, 2022
Continuation 17101746 · Nov 23, 2020
Continuation 16219202 · Dec 13, 2018
Provisional Application 62623067 · Jan 29, 2018
Related Publication 20240341974A1 · Oct 17, 2024
References Cited (46)
US 5609635A · Michelson · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5645084A · McKay · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 6264656B1 · Michelson · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 8303879B2 · Bertele et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8343224B2 · Lynn · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8545568B2 · Ulrich, Jr. et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8845733B2 · O'Neil et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8900312B2 · McLean et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9314348B2 · Emstad · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9480576B2 · Pepper · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 9532883B2 · McLuen · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9668881B1 · Greenhalgh · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10478313B1 · Sweeney, III · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10893953B2 · Neubardt · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11529242B2 · Neubardt · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11992419B2 · Neubardt · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20030023306A1 · Liu · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20030125739A1 · Bagga · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20030153975A1 · Byrd, III · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20070208343A1 · Magerl · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20080154377A1 · Voellmicke · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20100256760A1 · Hansell · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110276142A1 · Niemiec · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120095559A1 · Woods · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120303128A1 · Ullrich, Jr. · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130006365A1 · Pepper · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140058512A1 · Petersheim · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140135930A1 · Georges · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140288655A1 · Parry · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150305881A1 · Bal · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160030194A1 · Ledet · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160296343A1 · Bost · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170020680A1 · Cheng · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170156888A1 · Neubardt · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170367840A1 · Martynova · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180078386A1 · Kieser · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180200063A1 · Kahmer · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180303629A1 · Lauf · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190231555A1 · Neubardt · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200229939A1 · To · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210137702A1 · Neubardt · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20230112129A1 · Neubardt · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240341974A1 · Neubardt · 2024 [cited by examiner]
A. L. Williams, et al., “CT Evaluation of Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Current Concepts,” American Journal of Neuroradiology (Sep. 2005), vol. 26, No. 8, at pp. 2057-2066. [cited by applicant]
T. Sato et al., Use of Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Bone Density to Investigate the Biomechanical Effect in the Bone around Intervertebral Cages in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Journal of Biomedical Scienc… [cited by applicant]
J. Rihn et al., Disc Space Preparation in Transforaminal Lumbar Fusion: A Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Aproaches, Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., (Jun. 2014) at pp. 1800-1805. [cited by applicant]