IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,336,759
Granted Patent B2
US 12,336,759 · App. 17/330,327 · Granted Jun 24, 2025

Selection of intraocular lens based on a predicted subjective outcome score

Inventors: John Alfred Campin (Southlake, TX); Brant Gillen (Southlake, TX); Martin Gründig (Rangsdorf, DE); Robert Moore (Tannay, CH); George Hunter Pettit (Fort Worth, TX); Mark Andrew Zielke (Lake Forest, CA)
Assignee: ALCON INC.
A61B3/10A61B3/0025A61B3/103G06N3/08G16H10/20G16H10/60A61B2034/108G16H50/20G16H50/30
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,336,759
App. No.
17/330,327
Granted
Jun 24, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method for selecting an intraocular lens, for implantation into an eye, includes a controller having a processor and a tangible, non-transitory memory on which instructions are recorded. The controller is configured to selectively execute a machine learning model trained with a training dataset. Execution of the instructions by the processor causes the controller to obtain pre-operative objective data for the patient, including one or more anatomic eye measurements. The controller is configured to obtain pre-operative questionnaire data for the patient, including at least one personality trait. The pre-operative objective data and the pre-operative questionnaire data are entered as respective inputs to the machine learning model. A predicted subjective outcome score for the patient is generated as an output of the machine learning model. The intraocular lens is selected based in part on the predicted subjective outcome score.

Claims (47)

1. A system for selecting an intraocular lens for implantation into an eye of a patient, the system comprising:

a controller having a processor and a tangible, non-transitory memory on which instructions are recorded;

wherein the controller is configured to selectively execute at least one machine learning model, the at least one machine learning model being trained with a training dataset which includes respective historical sets comprising each of respective pre-operative objective data, respective pre-operative personality data, respective intra-operative data, respective post-operative objective data, and respective subjective outcome data;

wherein execution of the instructions by the processor causes the controller to:

obtain pre-operative objective data for the patient, including one or more anatomic eye measurements;

obtain pre-operative questionnaire data for the patient, including at least one personality trait;

enter the pre-operative objective data and the pre-operative questionnaire data as respective inputs to the at least one machine learning model and generate a predicted subjective outcome score for the patient as an output of the at least one machine learning model; and

select the intraocular lens based in part on the predicted subjective outcome score.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein:

the at least one machine learning model includes a neural network.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein:

the at least one personality trait of the patient is represented as at least one of a numerical scale of agreeability or as a binary result, the binary result being either predominantly agreeable or predominantly non-agreeable.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein:

the pre-operative questionnaire data further includes a lifestyle needs assessment for the patient.

5. The system of claim 1 , further comprising:

an integrated diagnostic device configured to obtain the pre-operative objective data; and

wherein the pre-operative objective data further includes refractive eye measurements and physiologic eye measurements.

6. The system of claim 1 , further comprising:

a data management module accessible to the controller, the data management module being configured to collect the respective historical sets from a plurality of electronic medical record units.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein:

the respective subjective outcome data in the respective historical sets includes a numerical satisfaction scale.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the controller is configured to:

quantify a correlation of the respective post-operative objective data to the respective subjective outcome score in the respective historical sets; and

identify the respective post-operative objective data most strongly correlating with the respective subjective outcome score.

9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the controller is configured to:

identify and screen out the respective historical sets having at least one variable in the respective pre-operative objective data matching with a predefined confounding parameter.

10. A method of selecting an intraocular lens for implantation in an eye, the method comprising:

receiving, via a controller, pre-operative objective data for a patient, including one or more anatomic eye measurements;

receiving, via the controller, pre-operative questionnaire data for the patient, including at least one personality trait;

executing an at least one machine learning model with the preoperative objective data and the pre-operative questionnaire data as respective inputs, via the controller, the at least one machine learning model being trained with a training dataset which includes each of respective historical sets composed of respective pre-operative objective data, respective pre-operative personality data, respective intra-operative data, respective post-operative objective data, and respective subjective outcome data;

generating, as an output of the at least one machine learning model, a predicted subjective outcome score for the patient; and

selecting the intraocular lens based in part on the predicted subjective outcome score.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein:

representing the at least one personality trait of the patient as at least one of a numerical scale of agreeability or as a binary result, the binary result being either predominantly agreeable or predominantly non-agreeable.

12. The method of claim 10 , wherein:

the pre-operative questionnaire data further includes a lifestyle needs assessment for the patient.

13. The method of claim 10 , further comprising:

obtaining, from an integrated diagnostic device, the pre-operative objective data; and

wherein the pre-operative objective data further includes refractive eye measurements and physiologic eye measurements.

14. The method of claim 10 , further comprising:

collecting, via a data management module, the respective historical sets from a plurality of electronic medical record units; and

delivering the respective historical sets to the at least one machine learning module.

15. The method of claim 10 , wherein:

the respective subjective outcome data in the respective historical sets includes a numerical satisfaction scale.

16. The method of claim 10 , further comprising:

assessing a respective correlation of the respective post-operative objective data to the respective subjective outcome score in the respective historical sets, via the controller; and

identifying the respective post-operative objective data most strongly correlating with the respective subjective outcome score, via the controller.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 1, 2021
From: CAMPIN, JOHN ALFRED; GILLEN, BRANT; MOORE, ROBERT; PETTIT, GEORGE HUNTER; ZIELKE, MARK ANDREW
To: ALCON RESEARCH, LLC
Reel/Frame 056404/0561 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 1, 2021
From: GRUENDIG, MARTIN
To: WAVELIGHT GMBH
Reel/Frame 056404/0605 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 1, 2021
From: ALCON RESEARCH, LLC
To: ALCON INC.
Reel/Frame 056404/0632 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 1, 2021
From: WAVELIGHT GMBH
To: ALCON INC.
Reel/Frame 056404/0678 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63032195 · May 29, 2020
Related Publication 20210369106A1 · Dec 2, 2021
References Cited (11)
US 20090281552A1 · Hiramatsu et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20150316788A1 · Holden et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20190209242A1 · Padrick · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200015894A1 · Bor et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200315783A1 · Rosen · 2020 [cited by examiner]
EP 3491996A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009034451A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2016505885A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2009064911A2 · 2009 [cited by examiner]
WO 2020012434A2 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020047224A1 · 2020 [cited by examiner]