IP Library Granted Patent US 12,350,030
Granted Patent B2
US 12,350,030 · App. 17/956,189 · Granted Jul 8, 2025

Event detection in an implantable auditory prosthesis

Inventors: Benjamin Peter Johnston (Wollstonecraft, AU); Paul Michael Carter (West Pennant Hills, AU); Stuart John Kay (Marsfield, AU); Andrea Lam (Ryde, AU); Shaun Ashwin Kumar (Rockdale, AU); Joerg Pesch (Mechelen, BE)
Assignee: Cochlear Limited
A61B5/053A61B5/7282A61B2505/05A61N1/0529A61N1/0541A61N1/36038
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,350,030
App. No.
17/956,189
Granted
Jul 8, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Presented herein are techniques for monitoring the physical state of a stimulating assembly to, for example, detect the occurrence of an adverse event. More specifically, an elongate stimulating assembly comprising a plurality of longitudinally spaced contacts is at least partially implanted into a recipient. Electrical measurements are performed at one or more of the plurality of contacts and the electrical measurements are evaluated relative to one another to determine the physical state of the stimulating assembly.

Claims (63)

1. A method, comprising:

at least partially inserting a stimulating assembly into a cochlea of a recipient of an implantable medical device, wherein the stimulating assembly comprises a plurality of electrodes;

successively sourcing current via at least a subset of the plurality of electrodes;

in response to each sourced current via one of the plurality of electrodes, sinking the sourced current via at least one extra-cochlear electrode;

in response to each sourced current, disconnecting other electrodes of the plurality of electrodes that are not used for sourcing the current;

in response to each sourced current via the one of the plurality of electrodes, measuring a voltage at a plurality of the other electrodes of the plurality of electrodes while the other electrodes of the plurality of electrodes are disconnected;

collecting the voltages measured at the other of the plurality of electrodes of the stimulating assembly obtained in response to each sourced current to generate a plurality of voltage sets; and

analyzing relative magnitudes of the voltages within the plurality of voltage sets to detect the at least one of a fold or a buckle in the stimulating assembly.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein measuring the voltage at the plurality of the other electrodes of the plurality of electrodes comprises:

contemporaneously measuring the voltage at each of the plurality of the other electrodes.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein measuring the voltage at the plurality of the other electrodes of the plurality of electrodes comprises:

successively measuring the voltage at each of the plurality of the other electrodes.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein analyzing the relative magnitudes of the voltages within the plurality of voltage sets to detect the at least one of a fold or buckle in the stimulating assembly further comprises:

analyzing the relative magnitudes of the voltages to determine a location of the at least one of a fold or buckle the stimulating assembly.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein analyzing the relative magnitudes of the voltages within the plurality of voltage sets to detect the at least one of a fold or buckle in the stimulating assembly further comprises:

detecting a global maximum and a local maximum in the relative magnitudes of the voltages indicative of a presence of a fold in the stimulating assembly.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

generating feedback to a user that indicates a presence of the at least one of a fold or buckle in the stimulating assembly.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein generating feedback to a user that indicates the presence of the at least one of a fold or buckle in the stimulating assembly comprises:

displaying an image of an estimated shape of the stimulating assembly at a display screen.

8. The method of claim 6 , wherein generating feedback to a user that indicates the presence of the at least one of a fold or buckle in the stimulating assembly comprises:

providing an audible cue indicating the presence of the at least one of a fold or buckle in the stimulating assembly.

9. The method of claim 6 , wherein generating feedback to a user that indicates the presence of the at least one of a fold or buckle in the stimulating assembly comprises:

providing a tactile cue indicating the presence of the at least one of a fold or buckle in the stimulating assembly.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining, based on the relative magnitudes of the voltages within the plurality of voltage sets, a relative proximity of each electrode of the stimulating assembly to one another; and

estimating a shape of the stimulating assembly based on the relative proximity of each electrode of the stimulating assembly to one another.

11. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

displaying an image of an estimated shape of the stimulating assembly at a display screen.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein analyzing the relative magnitudes of the voltages comprises:

analyzing the relative magnitudes of the voltages to determine a proximity of the one of the plurality of electrodes that sourced the current to one of the other electrodes of the plurality of electrodes that measured the voltage.

13. A system comprising:

a stimulating assembly configured to be at least partially inserted into a cochlea of a recipient of an implantable medical device, wherein the stimulating assembly comprises a plurality of electrodes; and

an event detection processor configured to:

successively source current via at least a subset of the plurality of electrodes;

in response to each sourced current via one of the plurality of electrodes, sink the sourced current via at least one extra-cochlear electrode;

in response to each sourced current, disconnect other electrodes of the plurality of electrodes that are not used for sourcing the current;

in response to each sourced current via the one of the plurality of electrodes, measure a voltage at a plurality of the other electrodes of the plurality of electrodes while the other electrodes of the plurality of electrodes are disconnected;

collect the voltages measured at the other of the plurality of electrodes of the stimulating assembly obtained in response to each sourced current to generate a plurality of voltage sets; and

analyze relative magnitudes of the voltages within the plurality of voltage sets to detect the at least one of a fold or a buckle in the stimulating assembly.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein, when measuring the voltage at the plurality of the other electrodes of the plurality of electrodes, the event detection processor is further configured to:

contemporaneously measure the voltage at each of the plurality of the other electrodes.

15. The system of claim 13 , wherein, when measuring the voltage at the plurality of the other electrodes of the plurality of electrodes, the event detection processor is further configured to:

successively measure the voltage at each of the plurality of the other electrodes.

16. The system of claim 13 , wherein, when analyzing the relative magnitudes of the voltages within the plurality of voltage sets to detect the at least one of a fold or buckle in the stimulating assembly further, the event detection processor is further configured to:

analyze the relative magnitudes of the voltages to determine a location of the at least one of a fold or buckle the stimulating assembly.

17. The system of claim 13 , wherein, when analyzing the relative magnitudes of the voltages within the plurality of voltage sets to detect the at least one of a fold or buckle in the stimulating assembly further, the event detection processor is further configured to:

detect a global maximum and a local maximum in the relative magnitudes of the voltages indicative of a presence of a fold in the stimulating assembly.

18. The system of claim 13 , wherein the event detection processor is further configured to:

generate feedback to a user that indicates a presence of the at least one of a fold or buckle in the stimulating assembly.

19. The system of claim 18 , wherein, when generating feedback to a user that indicates the presence of the at least one of a fold or buckle in the stimulating assembly, the event detection processor is further configured to:

generate an audible cue indicating the presence of the at least one of a fold or buckle in the stimulating assembly.

20. The system of claim 18 , wherein, when generating feedback to a user that indicates the presence of the at least one of a fold or buckle in the stimulating assembly, the event detection processor is further configured to:

generate a tactile cue indicating the presence of the at least one of a fold or buckle in the stimulating assembly.

21. The system of claim 18 , wherein, when generating feedback to a user that indicates the presence of the at least one of a fold or buckle in the stimulating assembly, the event detection processor is further configured to:

display an image of an estimated shape of the stimulating assembly at a display screen.

22. The system of claim 13 , wherein the event detection processor is further configured to:

determine, based on the relative magnitudes of the voltages within the plurality of voltage sets, a relative proximity of each electrode of the stimulating assembly to one another; and

estimate a shape of the stimulating assembly based on the relative proximity of each electrode of the stimulating assembly to one another.

23. The system of claim 13 , wherein the event detection processor is further configured to:

display an image of an estimated shape of the stimulating assembly at a display screen.

24. The system of claim 13 , wherein, when analyzing the relative magnitudes of the voltages, the event detection processor is further configured to:

analyze the relative magnitudes of the voltages to determine a proximity of the one of the plurality of electrodes that sourced the current to one of the other electrodes of the plurality of electrodes that measured the voltage.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 3, 2022
From: JOHNSTON, BENJAMIN PETER; CARTER, PAUL MICHAEL; KAY, STUART JOHN; LAM, ANDREA; KUMAR, SHAUN ASHWIN; PESCH, JOERG
To: COCHLEAR LIMITED
Reel/Frame 061289/0811 →
Continuity (5)
Continuation 16725434 · Dec 23, 2019
Continuation 15679644 · Aug 17, 2017
Continuation 14843255 · Sep 2, 2015
Provisional Application 62044595 · Sep 2, 2014
Related Publication 20230100626A1 · Mar 30, 2023
References Cited (88)
US 4990845A · Gord · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 5626629A · Faltys et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 6068652A · Cohen et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 8073547B2 · Hong et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8401665B2 · Bradley et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8498699B2 · Wells et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8532781B1 · Vanpoucke · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8554330B2 · Bradley et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8594799B2 · Haller et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8644944B2 · Capcelea · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 8788057B2 · Stevenson · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9242067B2 · Shore et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9320887B2 · Kals · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 10099054B2 · Laudanski · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10278610B2 · Tsampazis · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20050015133A1 · Ibrahim et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060025833A1 · Daly · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060149337A1 · John · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060217782A1 · Boveja et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060247684A1 · Halperin · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20080125833A1 · Bradley et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090030485A1 · Mishra et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090118795A1 · Ibrahim et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090312817A1 · Hogle et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100106232A1 · Dadd et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100114288A1 · Heller · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100198301A1 · Smith · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100222857A1 · Halperin et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100268302A1 · Botros · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100292759A1 · Hahn et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100324639A1 · Stevenson et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110022140A1 · Stevenson et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110066160A1 · Simaan et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110087085A1 · Tsampazis et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110106101A1 · Tortonese et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110144719A1 · Perkins et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110166627A1 · Carter · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110201944A1 · Higgins et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110213444A1 · Stoffaneller et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110245714A1 · Volckaerts · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110264155A1 · Van den Heuvel et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110306860A1 · Halperin et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120029593A1 · Calle et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120065705A1 · Kats · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120071956A1 · Stevenson et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120078319A1 · De Ridder · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120109274A1 · Simaan et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120143284A1 · Capcelea · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120188027A1 · Halperin et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120226200A1 · Wagner et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120226332A1 · Chambers et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120245666A1 · Jolly et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120316454A1 · Carter · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130073021A1 · Halperin et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130138117A1 · Abbott et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130204326A1 · Vanpoucke · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130253297A1 · Johnson et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130331779A1 · Dhanasingh et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140012351A1 · Calle et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140046402A1 · Saoji · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140058478A1 · Fruhauf et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140288619A1 · Johnson et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140330345A1 · John · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140350640A1 · Patrick et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150005845A1 · Fruhauf et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150018897A1 · Laudanski · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150066107A1 · Richter et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150088212A1 · De Ridder · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150112408A1 · Kals · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150207484A1 · Stevenson et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150224313A1 · Smith et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150258337A1 · Long · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150290453A1 · Tyler et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150314122A1 · Kabot et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150335890A1 · Fredelake et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160015291A1 · Tsampazis · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160038738A1 · Naylor · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160059014A1 · Johnston et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160059015A1 · Risi et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160199648A1 · Richter et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20180304076A1 · Lehmann · 2018 [cited by examiner]
CN 103815988A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013152077A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015168388A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) in counterpart European Application No. 15 837 396.9-1122, mailed Nov. 6, 2024, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Vanpoucke et al., Assessing the Placement of a Cochlear Electrode Array by Multidimensional Scaling, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 59, No. 2, Feb. 12, pp. 307-310. [cited by applicant]
B. Escudé et al., “The Size of the Cochlea and Predictions of Insertion Depth Angles for Cochlear Implant Electrodes”, Audiology & Neurotology, www.karger.com/aud, Audiol Neurotol 2006; 11 (suppl 1):27-33, DOI: 10.1159/… [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion in counterpart International Application No. PCT/IB2015/056667, mailed Dec. 17, 2015, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]