IP Library Granted Patent US 12,355,213
Granted Patent B2
US 12,355,213 · App. 17/058,012 · Granted Jul 8, 2025

Quantum dot lasers and methods for making the same

Inventors: John E. Bowers (Santa Barbara, CA); Arthur Gossard (Santa Barbara, CA); Daehwan Jung (Goleta, CA); Kunal Mukherjee (Goleta, CA); Justin Norman (Goleta, CA); Jennifer Selvidge (Goleta, CA)
Assignee: THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
H01S5/3406H01S5/3412H01S5/34353H01S5/3436
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,355,213
App. No.
17/058,012
Granted
Jul 8, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A quantum dot (QD) laser comprises a semiconductor substrate and an active region epitaxially deposited on the semi-conductor substrate. The active region includes a plurality of barrier layers and a plurality of QD layers interposed between each of the plurality of barrier layers. A net compressive strain associated with the plurality of QD layers is maintained below a maximum allowable strain to prevent formation of misfit dislocations within the active region of the QD laser.

Claims (17)

1. A quantum dot (QD) laser comprising:

a silicon substrate; and

an active region epitaxially deposited on the silicon substrate, wherein the active region is comprised of III-V type semiconductor material that results in one or more misfit dislocations located at a boundary between the silicon substrate and the III-V type semiconductor material, wherein the active region includes a plurality of barrier layers and a plurality of QD layers interposed between each of the plurality of barrier layers, wherein a net compressive strain associated with the plurality of QD layers is maintained below a maximum allowable strain to prevent formation of misfit dislocations within the active region of the QD laser, wherein each barrier layer provides a net tensile strain that offsets the net compressive strain associated with the plurality of QD layers to maintain the net strain below the maximum allowable strain to prevent formation of misfit dislocations within the active region of the QD laser.

2. The QD laser of claim 1 , wherein the active region contains a plurality of threading dislocations originating from the misfit dislocation located at the boundary between the silicon substrate and the III-V type semiconductor material, and wherein the threading dislocations do not terminate at misfit locations within the active layer.

3. The QD laser of claim 1 , wherein the barrier layer comprises Indium-Gallium-Phosphide (InGaP).

4. The QD laser of claim 3 , wherein the InGaP barrier layer is comprised of approximately 90% Gallium.

5. The QD laser of claim 1 , wherein the barrier layer is comprised of Indium-Arsenide-Phosphide (InAsP).

6. The QD laser of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of barrier layers and the plurality of QD layers do not include nitrogen.

7. A quantum dot (QD) laser comprising:

a semiconductor substrate; and

an active region epitaxially deposited on the semiconductor substrate, wherein the active region includes a plurality of barrier layers and a plurality of QD layers interposed between each of the plurality of barrier layers, wherein each barrier layer provides a strain that at least partially offsets a strain introduced by each QD layer, wherein the active region includes a plurality of threading dislocations extending from one or more misfit dislocations formed between the semiconductor substrate and the active region, wherein the strain provided by the barrier layer that at least partially offsets the strain introduced by each QD layer prevents formation of misfit locations within the active region.

8. The QD laser of claim 7 , wherein the semiconductor substrate is comprised of silicon and the active region is comprised of one or more III-V semiconductors.

9. The QD laser of claim 7 , wherein a net strain within the active region is maintained below a maximum allowable strain to prevent formation of misfit dislocations within the active region.

10. The QD laser of claim 7 , further including:

a buffer layer comprised of III-V type semiconductor material epitaxially deposited on the semiconductor substrate, wherein a misfit dislocation is formed between the buffer layer and the semiconductor substrate; and

a cladding layer comprised of III-V type semiconductor material epitaxially deposited on the buffer layer.

11. The QD laser of claim 7 , wherein the plurality of barrier layers and the plurality of QD layers do not include nitrogen.

Assignments (2)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Feb 9, 2024
From: UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARARA
To: US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Reel/Frame 066550/0978 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 14, 2022
From: BOWERS, JOHN E.; NORMAN, JUSTIN; JUNG, DAEHWAN; MUKHERJEE, KUNAL; SELVIDGE, JENNIFER
To: THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Reel/Frame 062092/0494 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62676109 · May 24, 2018
Related Publication 20210218230A1 · Jul 15, 2021
References Cited (37)
US 5562770A · Chen · 1996 [cited by examiner]
US 6566688B1 · Zhang · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20040043523A1 · Bour · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20040135136A1 · Takahashi · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20050157765A1 · Johnson · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20100051900A1 · Huffaker · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100301306A1 · Albo · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110140084A1 · Hatori · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20150244151A1 · Liu · 2015 [cited by examiner]
JP 2005072338A · 2005 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2017210300A1 · 2017 [cited by examiner]
WO 2019227026A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Aug. 19, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Andrekson, et al., “Novel Technique for Determining Internal Loss of Individual Semiconductor Lasers”, Electronics Letters , vol. 28, No. 2, Jan. 16, 1992, pp. 171-172. [cited by applicant]
Casey, et al., “GaAs—AlxGa1—xAs Heterostructure Laser with Separate Optical and Carrier Confinement”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 45, No. 1, Jan. 1974, pp. 322-333. [cited by applicant]
Cassidy, “Technique for Measurement of the Gain Spectra of Semiconductor Diode Lasers”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 56, No. 11, Dec. 1, 1984, pp. 3096-3099. [cited by applicant]
Chen, et al., “Electrically Pumped Continuous-Wave 1.3 μM InAs/GaAs Quantum Dot Lasers Monolithically Grown on On-Axis Si (001) Substrates”, Optics Express vol. 25, No. 5, 2017, pp. 4632-4639. [cited by applicant]
Chen, et al., “Electrically Pumped Continuous-Wave III-V Quantum Dot Lasers on Silicon”, Nature Photonics, vol. 10, Mar. 7, 2016, pp. 307-311. [cited by applicant]
Chen, et al., “Long Lifetime Quantum-Dot Laser Monolithically Grown on Silicon”, 2016 IEEE 13th International Conference on Group IV Photonics (Gfp), 2016, pp. 147-148. [cited by applicant]
Chu, et al., “Antiphase Domains in GaAs Grown by Metalorganic Chemical Vapor Deposition on Silicon-on-insulator”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 64, No. 6, Sep. 15, 1988, pp. 2981-2989. [cited by applicant]
Eliseev, et al., “Ground-State Emission and Gain in Ultralow-Threshold InAs—InGaAs Quantum-Dot Lasers”, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, vol. 7, No. 2, Mar./Apr. 2001, pp. 135-142. [cited by applicant]
Jung, et al., “High Efficiency Low Threshold Current 1.3 μM InAs Quantum Dot Lasers on On-Axis (001) GaP/Si”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 111, 2017, pp. 122107-1-122107-4. [cited by applicant]
KIMERLING “Recombination Enhanced Defect Reactions”, Solid-State Electronics, vol. 21, 1978, pp. 1391-1401. [cited by applicant]
Liu, et al., “Electrically Pumped Continuous-Wave 1.3 μM Quantum-Dot Lasers Epitaxially Grown on On-Axis (001) GaP/Si”, Optics Letters vol. 42, No. 2, Jan. 15, 2017, pp. 338-341. [cited by applicant]
Liu, et al., “High Performance Continuous Wave 1.3 μM Quantum Dot Lasers on Silicon”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 104, 041104, 2014, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Liu, et al., “Reliability of InAs/GaAs Quantum Dot Lasers Epitaxially Grown on Silicon”, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, vol. 21, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2015, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Nemeth, et al., “Heteroepitaxy of GaP on Si: Correlation of Morphology, Anti-Phase-Domain Structure and MOVPE Growth Conditions”, Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 310, 2008, pp. 1595-1601. [cited by applicant]
Norman, et al., “Electrically Pumped Continuous Wave Quantum Dot Lasers Epitaxially Grown on Patterned, On-Axis (001) Si”, Optics Express vol. 25, No. 4, Feb. 20, 2017, pp. 3927-3934. [cited by applicant]
Sahli, et al., “High Efficiency and High Modal Gain InAs/InGaAs/GaAs Quantum Dot Lasers Emitting at 1300 Nm”, Semiconductor Science and Technology, vol. 22, 2007, pp. 396-398. [cited by applicant]
Salhi, et al., “Enhanced Modal Gain of Multilayer in as/in Ga As/Ga As Quantum Dot Lasers Emitting at 1300 Nm”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 100, 2006, pp. 123111-1-123111-4. [cited by applicant]
Salhi, et al., “Enhanced Performances of Quantum Dot Lasers Operating at 1.3 μm”, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, vol. 14, No. 2, Jul./Aug. 2008, pp. 1188-1196. [cited by applicant]
Shchekin, et al., “1.3 μm InAs Quantum Dot Laser with To=161 K from 0 to 80 °C”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 80, No. 18, May 6, 2002, pp. 3277-3279. [cited by applicant]
Shtengel, et al., “Advances in Measurements of Physical Parameters of Semiconductor Lasers”, International Journal of High Speed Electronics and Systems, vol. 9, No. 4, 1998, pp. 901-940. [cited by applicant]
Shtengel, et al., “Internal Optical Loss Measurements in 1.3 μM InGaAsP Lasers”, Electronics Letters , vol. 31, No. 14, Jul. 6, 1995, pp. 1157-1159. [cited by applicant]
Srinivasan, et al., “Reliability of Hybrid Silicon Distributed Feedback Lasers”, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, vol. 19, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 2013, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Thomson, et al., “Roadmap on Silicon Photonics”, Journal of Optics, vol. 18, 073003, 2016, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wan, et al., “1.3 μM Submilliamp Threshold Quantum Dot Micro-Lasers on Si”, Optica, vol. 4, No. 8, Aug. 2017, pp. 940-944. [cited by applicant]