IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,370,413
Granted Patent B2
US 12,370,413 · App. 18/398,319 · Granted Jul 29, 2025

Golf ball

Inventors: Hideo Watanabe (Saitamaken, JP); Akira Kimura (Saitamaken, JP)
Assignee: BRIDGESTONE SPORTS CO., LTD.
A63B37/00922A63B37/0047A63B37/0063A63B37/0064A63B37/0065A63B37/0075A63B37/009A63B37/0096
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,370,413
App. No.
18/398,319
Granted
Jul 29, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

In a golf ball for professional golfers and skilled amateurs which has a single-layer core, a cover and at least one intermediate layer therebetween, the intermediate layer has a specific gravity of at least 1.05, the sphere the sphere obtained by encasing the core with the intermediate layer (intermediate layer-encased sphere) and the ball have a surface hardness relationship which satisfies the condition: (surface hardness of intermediate layer-encased sphere)>(surface hardness of ball). The core has a diameter of from 35.5 to 39.5 mm and a distinctive hardness profile that satisfies specific conditions. The ball is endowed with both an excellent flight performance and excellent durability to repeated impact.

Claims (62)

1. A golf ball comprising a single-layer core, a cover and at least one intermediate layer interposed between the core and the cover, wherein the intermediate layer has a specific gravity of at least 1.05, the sphere obtained by encasing the core with the intermediate layer (intermediate layer-encased sphere) and the ball have a surface hardness relationship therebetween which satisfies the condition:

(surface hardness of intermediate layer-encased sphere)>(surface hardness of ball);

the core has a diameter of from 35.5 to 39.5 mm and a corresponding radius; and the core has a hardness profile which satisfies the following conditions:

( H 75 −H 50)>( H 25 −H 0)

( H 100 −H 87.5)>( H 50 −H 25)

30.0≥( H 100 −H 0)≥20.0

absolute value of( H 87.5 −H 0)/( H 50 −H 0)≥3.0,

4.0≤( H 75− H 50)≤9.0

where H100 is the Shore C hardness at a surface of the core, H87.5 is the Shore C hardness at a position 87.5% of the core radius outward from a center of the core, H75 is the Shore C hardness at a position 75% of the core radius outward from the core center, H62.5 is the Shore C hardness at a position 62.5% of the core radius outward from the core center, H50 is the Shore C hardness at a position 50% of the core radius outward from the core center, H37.5 is the Shore C hardness at a position 37.5% of the core radius outward from the core center, H25 is the Shore C hardness at a position 25% of the core radius outward from the core center, H12.5 is the Shore C hardness at a position 12.5% of the core radius outward from the core center and H0 is the Shore C hardness at the core center.

2. The golf ball of claim 1 which satisfies the condition:

0≤( H 100 −H 87.5)≤3.0.

3. The golf ball of claim 1 which satisfies the condition:

3.0≤( H 25− H 0)≤6.0.

4. The golf ball of claim 1 which satisfies the condition:

( H 75− H 50)>( H 25− H 0)>( H 100− H 87.5)>( H 50− H 25).

5. The golf ball of claim 1 which satisfies the condition:

23.0≥( H 87.5− H 0)≥17.0.

6. The golf ball of claim 1 which satisfies the condition:

70≥ H 0≥62.

7. The golf ball of claim 1 , wherein the core has a deflection of from 2.5 to 3.5 mm when compressed under a final load of 1,275 N (130 kgf) from an initial load of 98 N (10 kgf) and the ball has a deflection of from 2.1 to 2.8 mm when compressed under a final load of 1,275 N (130 kgf) from an initial load of 98 N (10 kgf).

8. The golf ball of claim 1 wherein, letting CLI be the coefficient of lift measured at a Reynolds number of 80,000 and a spin rate of 2,000 rpm and CL2 be the coefficient of lift measured at a Reynolds number of 70,000 and a spin rate of 1,900, CL1 and CL2 satisfy the condition:

0.900≤ CL 2/ CL 1.

9. The golf ball of claim 1 wherein, letting CL3 be the coefficient of lift measured at a Reynolds number of 200,000 and a spin rate of 2,500 rpm and CL4 be the coefficient of lift measured at a Reynolds number of 120,000 and a spin rate of 2,250, CL3 and CL4 satisfy the condition:

1.250≤ CL 4/ CL 3≤1.300.

10. The golf ball of claim 1 , wherein the core is a material molded under heat from a rubber composition comprising:

(A) a base rubber,

(B) an organic peroxide,

(C) water or a metal monocarboxylate or both, and

(D) sulfur.

11. The golf ball of claim 10 , wherein components (C) and (D) have a weight ratio (D)/(C) therebetween which is from 0.02 to 0.20.

12. The golf ball of claim 1 , wherein the intermediate layer comprises an ionomer resin as a base resin and an inorganic granular filler.

13. A golf ball comprising a single-layer core, a cover and at least one intermediate layer interposed between the core and the cover, wherein the intermediate layer has a specific gravity of at least 1.05, the sphere obtained by encasing the core with the intermediate layer (intermediate layer-encased sphere) and the ball have a surface hardness relationship therebetween which satisfies the condition:

(surface hardness of intermediate layer-encased sphere)>(surface hardness of ball);

the core has a diameter of from 35.5 to 39.5 mm and a corresponding radius; and the core has a hardness profile which satisfies the following conditions:

( H 75− H 50)>( H 25− H 0)

( H 100− H 87.5)>( H 50− H 25)

0≥( H 100 −H 0)≥20.0

absolute value of( H 87.5− H 0)/( H 50− H 0)≥3.0,

−1.0≤( H 50 −H 25)≤1.0

where H100 is the Shore C hardness at a surface of the core, H87.5 is the Shore C hardness at a position 87.5% of the core radius outward from a center of the core, H75 is the Shore C hardness at a position 75% of the core radius outward from the core center, H62.5 is the Shore C hardness at a position 62.5% of the core radius outward from the core center, H50 is the Shore C hardness at a position 50% of the core radius outward from the core center, H37.5 is the Shore C hardness at a position 37.5% of the core radius outward from the core center, H25 is the Shore C hardness at a position 25% of the core radius outward from the core center, H12.5 is the Shore C hardness at a position 12.5% of the core radius outward from the core center and H0 is the Shore C hardness at the core center.

14. The golf ball of claim 13 which satisfies the condition:

0≤( H 100 −H 87.5)≤3.0.

15. The golf ball of claim 13 which satisfies the condition:

3.0≤( H 25 −H 0)≤6.0.

16. The golf ball of claim 13 which satisfies the condition:

( H 75− H 50)>( H 25− H 0)>( H 100− H 87.5)>( H 50− H 25).

17. The golf ball of claim 13 which satisfies the condition:

23.0≥( H 87.5 −H 0)≥17.0.

18. The golf ball of claim 13 which satisfies the condition:

70≥ H 0≥62.

19. The golf ball of claim 13 , wherein the core has a deflection of from 2.5 to 3.5 mm when compressed under a final load of 1,275 N (130 kgf) from an initial load of 98 N (10 kgf) and the ball has a deflection of from 2.1 to 2.8 mm when compressed under a final load of 1,275 N (130 kgf) from an initial load of 98 N (10 kgf).

20. The golf ball of claim 13 wherein, letting CLI be the coefficient of lift measured at a Reynolds number of 80,000 and a spin rate of 2,000 rpm and CL2 be the coefficient of lift measured at a Reynolds number of 70,000 and a spin rate of 1,900, CL1 and CL2 satisfy the condition:

0.900≤ CL 2/ CL 1.

21. The golf ball of claim 13 wherein, letting CL3 be the coefficient of lift measured at a Reynolds number of 200,000 and a spin rate of 2,500 rpm and CL4 be the coefficient of lift measured at a Reynolds number of 120,000 and a spin rate of 2,250, CL3 and CL4 satisfy the condition:

1.250≤ CL 4/ CL 3≤1.300.

22. The golf ball of claim 13 , wherein the core is a material molded under heat from a rubber composition comprising:

(A) a base rubber,

(B) an organic peroxide,

(C) water or a metal monocarboxylate or both, and

(D) sulfur.

23. The golf ball of claim 22 , wherein components (C) and (D) have a weight ratio (D)/(C) therebetween which is from 0.02 to 0.20.

24. The golf ball of claim 13 , wherein the intermediate layer comprises an ionomer resin as a base resin and an inorganic granular filler.

Priority Claims (1)
JP 2021-137782 · Aug 26, 2021 · national
Continuity (2)
Continuation In Part 17881997 · Aug 5, 2022
Related Publication 20240123293A1 · Apr 18, 2024
References Cited (53)
US 20110143861A1 · Watanabe et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110201453A1 · Kasashima · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110250991A1 · Isogawa et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110319193A1 · Isogawa et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120010021A1 · Fushihara et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130005506A1 · Isogawa et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130005508A1 · Matsuyama et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130157781A1 · Sullivan et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130296072A1 · Nakajima et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130296075A1 · Kimura et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130296076A1 · Kimura et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130296077A1 · Kimura et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130324318A1 · Isogawa et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140100059A1 · Kimura et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140357407A1 · Shindo et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160175660A1 · Watanabe et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160175661A1 · Watanabe et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160279484A1 · Watanabe et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160354644A1 · Watanabe et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160361605A1 · Watanabe et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170106245A1 · Kimura et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170113100A1 · Watanabe et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170304684A1 · Isogawa et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20190351293A1 · Watanabe et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190375917A1 · Shindo · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20210106878A1 · Watanabe et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210106879A1 · Watanabe et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210170238A1 · Kuwahara · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220370858A1 · Watanabe · 2022 [cited by examiner]
JP 2011120898A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
JP 2011217857A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
JP 201210726A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 201219820A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 20139814A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 201331640A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013230361A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013230362A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013230363A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013230365A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013248298A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 20156314A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
JP 201577405A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
JP 2016112308A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
JP 2016116627A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
JP 2016179052A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
JP 2017183A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
JP 2017470A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
JP 201777355A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
JP 201779905A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019198465A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019213606A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 202162026A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
JP 202162036A · 2021 [cited by applicant]