IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,379,668
Granted Patent B2
US 12,379,668 · App. 18/136,764 · Granted Aug 5, 2025

Methods and systems for measurement of semiconductor structures with multi-pass statistical optimization

Inventors: John J. Hench (Los Gatos, CA); Daniel J. Haxton (Lake Forest Park, WA)
Assignee: KLA Corporation
G03F7/70625G01B11/24G03F7/705G01B2210/56
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,379,668
App. No.
18/136,764
Granted
Aug 5, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and systems for measuring physical properties of a specimen by iterative solution of an optimization function including both current and prior measurement information are described herein. In one aspect, a Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) estimation approach is employed to integrate prior measurement information with current measurement information in the optimization function. In some examples, prior measurement information associated with the measurement of a semiconductor structure is available from a number of exogenous sources. In a further aspect, prior measurement information includes current measurements of a semiconductor structure under measurement as part of a multiple pass measurement. Prior statistics are determined based on an initial set of values of parameters of interest. The prior statistics are included in a subsequent MAP analysis of the same measurement data set employed in a first measurement pass. In another aspect, prior statistics are tracked to determine their impact on current measurements.

Claims (46)

1. A system comprising:

an illumination source configured to provide an amount of illumination radiation directed to a measurement site on a surface of a semiconductor wafer;

a detector configured to detect an amount of radiation collected from one or more structures disposed on the semiconductor wafer at the measurement site in response to the amount of illumination radiation; and

a computing system configured to:

generate an amount of measurement data characterizing the detected amount of radiation from the measurement site; and

estimate values of one or more parameters of interest characterizing the one or more structures based on the amount of measurement data and an amount of prior measurement information, wherein the estimating of the values of the one or more parameters of interest involves a first iterative solution of an optimization function including a first term associated with the amount of measurement data and a term associated with the amount of prior measurement information.

2. The system of claim 1 , the computing system further configured to:

estimate prior values of at least one of the one or more parameters of interest characterizing the one or more structures based on the amount of measurement data, wherein the estimating of the prior values of at least one of the one or more parameters of interest involves second iterative solution of a prior optimization function including a second term associated with the amount of measurement data, and wherein the amount of prior measurement information includes the prior values of at the least one of the one or more parameters of interest.

3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the iterative solution of the optimization function is based on a Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) analysis, and the iterative solution of the prior optimization function is based on a Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) analysis.

4. The system of claim 3 , wherein the optimization function is a negated log likelihood function, wherein the first term associated with the amount of measurement data is a likelihood function, and wherein the term associated the amount of prior measurement information includes a positive function characterized by a statistical model of the amount of prior measurement information.

5. The system of claim 4 , wherein the statistical model of the amount of prior measurement information is parameterized by wafer location.

6. The system of claim 4 , wherein the statistical model of the amount of prior measurement information characterizes a statistical spread in a measurement ensemble of the amount of prior measurement information and a measurement error of an exogenous measurement employed to measure the amount of prior measurement information.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the first term associated with the amount of measurement data includes a statistical model of measurement noise, and wherein the statistical model assumes a Gaussian distribution of the measurement noise.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the term associated with the amount of prior measurement information includes a positive function characterized by a statistical model of the amount of prior measurement information, wherein the statistical model assumes a Gaussian distribution of prior values of at the least one of the one or more parameters of interest.

9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the first term associated with the amount of measurement data includes a statistical model of measurement noise, and wherein the statistical model assumes a Poisson distribution of the measurement noise.

10. The system of claim 1 , wherein the term associated with the amount of prior measurement information includes a positive function characterized by a statistical model of the amount of prior measurement information, wherein the statistical model assumes a generalized bullseye distribution of normed values, wherein the normed values are determined from prior values of at least two parameters of interest.

11. The system of claim 10 , the computing system further configured to:

determine a value of a dimensionality of the generalized bullseye distribution such that the statistical model best matches a mean and standard deviation of an ensemble of normed values.

12. The system of claim 1 , wherein the amount of prior measurement information incorporated in the optimization function is derived from one or more of exogenous sources.

13. The system of claim 1 , the computing system further configured to:

track values of one or more statistical measures characterizing prior wafer statistics characterizing the amount of prior measurement information; and

update the prior measurement information based on the values of the one or more statistical measures.

14. The system of claim 1 , wherein the illumination source and the detector comprise an optical metrology system or an X-Ray based metrology system.

15. The system of claim 1 , wherein the amount of prior measurement information includes assumed values of the one or more parameters of interest, wherein the assumed values are within an expected range of values of the one or more parameters of interest, and wherein the assumed values are characterized by an assumed statistical distribution.

16. A method comprising:

providing an amount of illumination radiation directed to a measurement site on a surface of a semiconductor wafer;

detecting an amount of radiation collected from one or more structures disposed on the semiconductor wafer at the measurement site in response to the amount of illumination radiation;

generating an amount of measurement data characterizing the detected amount of radiation from the measurement site; and

estimating values of one or more parameters of interest characterizing the one or more structures based on the amount of measurement data and an amount of prior measurement information, wherein the estimating of the values of the one or more parameters of interest involves a first iterative solution of an optimization function including a first term associated with the amount of measurement data and a term associated with the amount of prior measurement information.

17. The method of claim 16 , further comprising:

estimating prior values of at least one of the one or more parameters of interest characterizing the one or more structures based on the amount of measurement data, wherein the estimating of the prior values of at least one of the one or more parameters of interest involves an second iterative solution of a prior optimization function including a second term associated with the amount of measurement data, and wherein the amount of prior measurement information includes the prior values of at the least one of the one or more parameters of interest.

18. The method of claim 16 , wherein the optimization function is a negated log likelihood function, wherein the first term associated with the amount of measurement data is a likelihood function, and wherein the term associated the amount of prior measurement information includes a positive function characterized by a statistical model of the amount of prior measurement information.

19. The method of claim 18 , wherein the statistical model is parameterized by wafer location.

20. The method of claim 16 , wherein the first term associated with the amount of measurement data includes a statistical model of measurement noise, and wherein the statistical model assumes a Poisson distribution of the measurement noise.

21. The method of claim 16 , wherein the term associated with the amount of prior measurement information includes a positive function characterized by a statistical model of the amount of prior measurement information, wherein the statistical model assumes a generalized bullseye distribution of normed values, wherein the normed values are determined from prior values of at least two parameters of interest.

22. The method of claim 16 , further comprising:

tracking values of one or more statistical measures characterizing prior wafer statistics characterizing the amount of prior measurement information; and

updating the prior measurement information based on the values of the one or more statistical measures.

23. A system comprising:

an illumination source configured to provide an amount of illumination radiation directed to a measurement site on a surface of a semiconductor wafer;

a detector configured to detect an amount of radiation collected from one or more structures disposed on the semiconductor wafer at the measurement site in response to the amount of illumination radiation; and

a non-transient, computer-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to:

generate an amount of measurement data characterizing the detected amount of radiation from the measurement site; and

estimate values of one or more parameters of interest characterizing the one or more structures based on the amount of measurement data and an amount of prior measurement information, wherein the estimating of the values of the one or more parameters of interest involves a first iterative solution of an optimization function including a first term associated with the amount of measurement data and a term associated with the amount of prior measurement information.

24. The system of claim 23 , the non-transient, computer-readable medium further storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to:

estimate prior values of at least one of the one or more parameters of interest characterizing the one or more structures based on the amount of measurement data, wherein the estimating of the prior values of at least one of the one or more parameters of interest involves an second iterative solution of a prior optimization function including a second term associated with the amount of measurement data, and wherein the amount of prior measurement information includes the prior values of at the least one of the one or more parameters of interest.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 13, 2023
From: HAXTON, DANIEL J.; HENCH, JOHN J.
To: KLA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 063635/0549 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240353760A1 · Oct 24, 2024
References Cited (70)
US 5608526A · Piwonka-Corle et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5859424A · Norton et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6023338A · Bareket · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6429943B1 · Opsal et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6716646B1 · Wright et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6778275B2 · Bowes · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6787773B1 · Lee · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6992764B1 · Yang et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7242477B2 · Mieher et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7321426B1 · Poslavsky et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7406153B2 · Berman · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7478019B2 · Zangooie et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7626702B2 · Ausschnitt et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7656528B2 · Abdulhalim et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7826071B2 · Shchegrov et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7842933B2 · Shur et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7873585B2 · Izikson · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7929667B1 · Zhuang et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7933026B2 · Opsal et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8068662B2 · Zhang et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8138498B2 · Ghinovker · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 9291554B2 · Kuznetsov et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9826614B1 · Bakeman et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9885962B2 · Veldman et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9915522B1 · Jiang et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9939250B2 · Pisarenco et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10013518B2 · Bakeman et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10101670B2 · Pandev et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10132763B2 · Cramer et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10152678B2 · Pandev et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10324050B2 · Hench et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10345721B1 · Cao et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10352695B2 · Dziura et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10545104B2 · Hench et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10775323B2 · Gellineau et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20030021465A1 · Adel et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20070176128A1 · Van Bilsen et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070221842A1 · Morokuma et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20090152463A1 · Toyoda et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20110266440A1 · Boughorbel et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120292502A1 · Langer et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130208279A1 · Smith · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130304424A1 · Bakeman et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140019097A1 · Bakeman et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140064445A1 · Adler · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140111791A1 · Manassen et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140172394A1 · Kuznetsov et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140222380A1 · Kuznetsov et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140297211A1 · Pandev et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150046121A1 · Dziura et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150110249A1 · Bakeman et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150117610A1 · Veldman et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150204664A1 · Bringoltz et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150285749A1 · Moncton et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150300965A1 · Sezginer et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160202193A1 · Hench et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160320319A1 · Hench et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170069080A1 · Sezginer · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170167862A1 · Dziura et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180106735A1 · Gellineau et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180113084A1 · Hench et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180328868A1 · Bykanov et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190017946A1 · Wack et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190293578A1 · Gellineau · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20210207956A1 · Shchegrov et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020126816A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Lemaillet, Germer, Kline et al., “Intercomparison between optical and x-ray scatterometry measurements of FinFET structures” by Proc. SPIE, v.8681, p. 86810Q (2013). [cited by applicant]
Kline et al., “X-ray scattering critical dimensional metrology using a compact x-ray source for next generation semiconductor devices,” J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS 16(1), 014001 (Jan.-Mar. 2017). [cited by applicant]
Mazor, E. et al., “Interacting multiple model methods in target tracking: a survey,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 34, Issue 1, (Jan. 1998). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report mailed on Aug. 1, 2024, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2024/022570 filed on Apr. 2, 2024 by KLA Corporation, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]