Granted Patent B1

US 12,392,322 · App. 19/050,435 · Granted Aug 19, 2025

Inventors: Kouroush Nayebi (Ikast, DK); Jacob Jensen (Skødstrup, DK)

Assignee: VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS A/S

F03D7/0276F03D7/043F05B2270/101F05B2270/335

Abstract

Claims (43)

1. A method, comprising:

operating a wind turbine in a spinning reserve mode to provide a spinning reserve, the spinning reserve being an extra power generating capacity of the wind turbine that is available by increasing a power output of the wind turbine;

calculating an available power of the wind turbine when operating in the spinning reserve mode;

defining a reliability band around the calculated available power based on data of real available power and calculated available power such that the real available power lies within an upper bound and a lower bound of the reliability band;

selecting a reliability factor, wherein the reliability factor defines a probability that a reliable available power within the reliability band is below the real available power;

determining the reliable available power based on the selected reliability factor and the reliability band;

determining a power setpoint for the wind turbine based on a difference between a desired spinning reserve and the determined reliable available power; and

controlling the wind turbine to operate in the spinning reserve mode in accordance with the power setpoint.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the reliability factor is selected so that the reliable available power is determined at a power level that lies within the reliability band and is different than a power level corresponding to the calculated available power.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the reliability factor is selected so that the power setpoint is determined at a power level that is greater than a baseline power level, with the baseline power level being determined based on a difference between the desired spinning reserve and the calculated available power.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the reliability factor is selected so that the power setpoint is determined at a power level that is less than a baseline power level, with the baseline power level being determined based on a difference between the desired spinning reserve and the calculated available power.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the reliability factor is selectable as a value on a predefined scale, with a lowest value of the predefined scale corresponding to the upper bound and a highest value of the predefined scale corresponding to the lower bound, or vice versa, and with a middle value of the predefined scale corresponding to the calculated available power, and wherein the reliable available power is determined based on the selected value on the predefined scale.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the upper bound and the lower bound of the reliability band are determined so as to be above and below the calculated available power, respectively, and wherein the reliable available power is determined so as to correspond to a power level associated with the upper bound, the lower bound, or some power level therebetween.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the reliable available power is determined based at least in part on the selected reliability factor and a width of the defined reliability band.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the upper bound, the lower bound, or both are fixed relative to the calculated available power at least for a predetermined time period.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the upper bound, the lower bound, or both are dynamically adjustable based at least in part on a feedback loop dependent on a measured power production of the wind turbine.

10. The method of claim 9 , further comprising:

determining whether the measured power production of the wind turbine falls outside of an expected power production range determined based at least in part on operating conditions at the wind turbine and a current power setpoint; and

dynamically adjusting the upper bound, the lower bound, or both.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the data is historical data of the real available power and the calculated available power.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein defining the reliability band comprises:

determining a difference between the historical real available power and the historical calculated available power, wherein the historical data is based on measurements from at least one of:

the wind turbine over a previous time period with the wind turbine being operated at full power in which the wind turbine operates in a full power mode to output a maximum possible power under conditions present at the wind turbine; and

one or more other wind turbines each being operated at full power, with each one of the one or more other wind turbines being operated at full power so that, for a given other wind turbine of the one or more other wind turbines, the given other wind turbine operates in a full power mode to output a maximum possible power under conditions present at the given other wind turbine, wherein the one or more other wind turbines are of a similar type with respect to the wind turbine.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein defining the reliability band comprises:

determining a set of operating conditions presently associated with the wind turbine; and

selecting a predefined reliability band that corresponds with the set of operating conditions, the predefined reliability band being selected from a library of predefined reliability bands that each correspond with a predefined set of operating conditions, and

wherein the reliability band is defined as the selected predefined reliability band.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein defining the reliability band comprises:

determining a phase offset between the calculated available power and a real available power of the wind turbine over a time period, as calculated when the wind turbine is operated at full power,

wherein the upper and lower bounds are determined with a phase offset corresponding to the phase offset between the calculated available power and the real available power of the wind turbine over the time period, as calculated when the wind turbine is operated at full power.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the power setpoint for the wind turbine is determined by a power plant controller, and wherein the method further comprises:

providing, by the power plant controller, the power setpoint to a wind turbine controller of the wind turbine, and

wherein the wind turbine is controlled by the wind turbine controller to operate in the spinning reserve mode in accordance with the power setpoint provided by the power plant controller.

16. A power plant controller associated with a wind turbine, comprising:

one or more processors;

one or more non-transitory memory devices storing a program, which, when executed by any combination of the one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform an operation, the operation comprising:

calculating an available power of a wind turbine operating in a spinning reserve mode to provide a spinning reserve, the spinning reserve being an extra power generating capacity of the wind turbine that is available by increasing a power output of the wind turbine;

defining a reliability band around the calculated available power based on data of real available power and calculated available power such that the real available power lies within an upper bound and a lower bound of the reliability band;

selecting a reliability factor, wherein the reliability factor defines a probability that a reliable available power within the reliability band is below the real available power;

determining the reliable available power based on the selected reliability factor and the reliability band;

determining a power setpoint for the wind turbine based on a difference between a desired spinning reserve and the determined reliable available power; and

providing the power setpoint to the wind turbine so that the wind turbine is operated in the spinning reserve mode according to the power setpoint.

Assignments (1)

Priority Claims (1)

References Cited (19)