IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,392,623
Granted Patent B2
US 12,392,623 · App. 17/725,645 · Granted Aug 19, 2025

Vehicle consumption monitoring system and method

Inventors: Aaron Craig Mellinger (San Diego, CA); Henry Todd Young (Erie, PA); Jason Daniel Kuttenkuler (Erie, PA); Jeffrey John Wolff (Lawrence Park, PA); Lindsay Short (Erie, PA)
Assignee: Transportation IP Holdings, LLC
G01C21/3469B60W20/12B60W30/188B60W40/076B60W40/1005B60W40/13B60W50/12B60W50/14B60W2510/242B60W2530/10B60W2530/16B60W2530/18B60W2552/15
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,392,623
App. No.
17/725,645
Granted
Aug 19, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A monitoring system and method determine a consumption metric representative of one or more of an amount of fuel consumed or an amount of energy consumed by a vehicle during travel over a route. The consumption metric is independent of one or more of vehicle load or elevation change over the route. The system and method optionally can determine a route condition metric representative of a condition of a route traveled upon by a vehicle. The route condition metric is based on a comparison between an actual grade of the route at one or more locations along the route and an estimated grade of the route at the one or more locations.

Claims (51)

1. A control method comprising:

comparing a measured energy consumption amount of a vehicle for travel from a first location to a second location along a route segment to a predetermined energy consumption amount associated with the route segment;

monitoring input from an operator of the vehicle for one or more operating parameters selected from a throttle setting, a vehicle speed, and an engine power output; and

preventing the operator from changing a setting of the one or more operating parameters at a rate that exceeds a threshold limit rate that is based at least in part on the predetermined energy consumption amount.

2. The control method of claim 1 , further comprising determining the predetermined energy consumption amount based on one or more of an unloaded weight of the vehicle, a weight of a vehicle load carried by the vehicle, a moving resistance of the vehicle, or a distance that the vehicle is to travel.

3. The control method of claim 2 , wherein the unloaded weight of the vehicle is a designated weight of the vehicle without cargo or materials being carried by the vehicle.

4. The control method of claim 2 , further comprising determining the predetermined energy consumption amount needed for the vehicle to travel over the route based on the moving resistance of the vehicle, wherein the moving resistance of the vehicle represents one or more forces that resist movement of the vehicle along the route.

5. The control method of claim 1 , further comprising calculating the measured energy consumption amount based on power generated by a powertrain of the vehicle and one or more efficiency estimates of the vehicle.

6. The control method of claim 1 , further comprising determining a consumption metric based on the measured energy consumption amount and the predetermined energy consumption amount, wherein the consumption metric represents how efficiently the operator controls the vehicle.

7. The control method of claim 6 , further comprising determining one or more comparison metrics based on the consumption metric, the one or more comparison metrics including one or more of:

an operator-specific consumption metric representative of several consumption metrics associated with operation of the vehicle by the same operator;

a location-specific consumption metric representative of several consumption metrics associated with operation of the vehicle and one or more other vehicles at a common location;

an operational mode-specific consumption metric representative of several consumption metrics associated with different operational modes or settings of the vehicle;

a grade-specific consumption metric representative of several consumption metrics associated with different grades of the route; or

a vehicle loading-specific consumption metric representative of several consumption metrics associated with one or more of different cargos, different weights of the cargos, or an absence of the cargos in the vehicle.

8. The control method of claim 7 , further comprising determining the one or more comparison metrics as including the operational mode-specific consumption metric representative of the several consumption metrics associated with the different operational modes or settings of the vehicle, wherein the different operational modes of the vehicle include one or more different throttle settings of the vehicle, different speeds of the vehicle, or different powers generated by a powertrain of the vehicle.

9. The control method of claim 7 , further comprising generating a warning signal based on the one or more comparison metrics, the warning signal directing one or more of an inspection, repair, or maintenance of the vehicle.

10. The control method of claim 1 , further comprising determining a route condition metric representative of a condition of the route traveled upon by the vehicle, the route condition metric based on a comparison between an actual grade of the route at one or more locations along the route and an estimated grade of the route at the one or more locations.

11. The control method of claim 1 , wherein the measured energy consumption amount is a consumption metric representative of one or more of an amount of fuel consumed or an amount of energy consumed by the vehicle during travel over the route segment.

12. A control system, configured to:

compare a measured energy consumption amount of an off-highway vehicle for travel from a first location to a second location along a route segment to a predetermined energy consumption amount associated with the route segment,

monitor input from an operator of the off-highway vehicle for one or more operating parameters selected from a throttle setting, a vehicle speed, and an engine power output, and

prevent the operator from changing a setting of the one or more operating parameters at a rate that exceeds a threshold limit rate that is based at least in part on the predetermined energy consumption amount.

13. The control system of claim 12 , wherein the control system is configured to determine the predetermined energy consumption amount based on one or more of an unloaded weight of the off-highway vehicle, a weight of a vehicle load carried by the off-highway vehicle, a moving resistance of the off-highway vehicle, or a distance that the off-highway vehicle is to travel.

14. The control system of claim 13 , wherein the unloaded weight of the off-highway vehicle is a designated weight of the off-highway vehicle without cargo or materials being carried by the off-highway vehicle.

15. The control system of claim 13 , wherein the control system is configured to determine the predetermined energy consumption amount needed for the off-highway vehicle to travel over the route based on the moving resistance of the off-highway vehicle, wherein the moving resistance of the off-highway vehicle represents one or more forces that resist movement of the off-highway vehicle along the route.

16. The control system of claim 12 , wherein the control system is configured to calculate the measured energy consumption amount based on power generated by a powertrain of the off-highway vehicle and one or more efficiency estimates of the off-highway vehicle.

17. The control system of claim 12 , wherein the control system is configured to determine a consumption metric based on the measured energy consumption amount and the predetermined energy consumption amount, wherein the consumption metric represents how efficiently the operator controls the off-highway vehicle.

18. The control system of claim 17 , wherein the control system is configured to determine one or more comparison metrics based on the consumption metric, the one or more comparison metrics including one or more of:

an operator-specific consumption metric representative of several consumption metrics associated with operation of the off-highway vehicle by the same operator;

a location-specific consumption metric representative of several consumption metrics associated with operation of the off-highway vehicle and one or more other vehicles at a common location;

an operational mode-specific consumption metric representative of several consumption metrics associated with different operational modes or settings of the off-highway vehicle;

a grade-specific consumption metric representative of several consumption metrics associated with different grades of the route; or

a vehicle loading-specific consumption metric representative of several consumption metrics associated with one or more of different cargos, different weights of the cargos, or an absence of the cargos in the off-highway vehicle.

19. The control system of claim 18 , wherein the control system is configured to determine the one or more comparison metrics as including the operational mode-specific consumption metric representative of the several consumption metrics associated with the different operational modes or settings of the off-highway vehicle, wherein the different operational modes of the off-highway vehicle include one or more different throttle settings of the off-highway vehicle, different speeds of the off-highway vehicle, or different powers generated by a powertrain of the off-highway vehicle.

20. The control system of claim 18 , wherein the control system is configured to generate a warning signal based on the one or more comparison metrics, the warning signal directing one or more of an inspection, repair, or maintenance of the off-highway vehicle.

21. The control system of claim 12 , wherein the control system is configured to determine a route condition metric representative of a condition of the route traveled upon by the off-highway vehicle, the route condition metric based on a comparison between an actual grade of the route at one or more locations along the route and an estimated grade of the route at the one or more locations.

22. The control system of claim 12 , wherein the measured energy consumption amount is a consumption metric representative of one or more of an amount of fuel consumed or an amount of energy consumed by the off-highway vehicle during travel over the route segment.

23. A control system, configured to:

determine a consumption metric value that is representative of (i) one or both of an amount of fuel consumed and an amount of energy consumed by a vehicle during travel over a route segment and (ii) a predetermined consumption level of fuel or energy associated with the route segment, wherein the consumption metric value is representative of how efficiently an operator controls the vehicle and is based at least in part on:

a historic average of previous trips,

a calculated value that includes cargo weight and traversed elevation of the route segment, and

route segment conditions;

determine a route condition metric representative of a condition of the route traveled upon by the vehicle, the route condition metric based on a comparison between an actual grade of the route at one or more locations along the route and an estimated grade of the route at the one or more locations;

communicate the consumption metric value and the route condition metric to the operator or to an off-vehicle system; and

control the vehicle based on at least one of the consumption metric or the route condition metric.

24. The control system of claim 23 , further configured to prevent, based on the consumption metric, the operator from changing a setting of one or more operating parameters.

25. The control system of claim 23 , further configured to determine a health of the vehicle based on the consumption metric value.

26. The control system of claim 23 , further configured to determine an operator-specific comparison metric value by comparing the consumption metric value with one or more previously determined consumption metric values for the operator.

27. The control system of claim 23 , further configured to determine a vehicle-specific comparison metric value by comparing the consumption metric value with one or more previously determined consumption metric values for the vehicle while being controlled by one or more other operators.

28. The control system of claim 23 , further configured to determine a location-specific comparison metric value by comparing the consumption metric value with one or more previously determined consumption metric values for the vehicle and one or more other vehicles traveling over the same route segment.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 8, 2022
From: MELLINGER, AARON CRAIG; YOUNG, HENRY TODD; KUTTENKULER, JASON DANIEL; WOLFF, JEFFREY JOHN; SHORT, LINDSAY
To: TRANSPORTATION IP HOLDINGS, LLC
Reel/Frame 060134/0058 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation In Part 14860782 · Sep 22, 2015
Provisional Application 62067238 · Oct 22, 2014
Related Publication 20220244061A1 · Aug 4, 2022
References Cited (51)
US 3203501A · Carter · 1965 [cited by applicant]
US 8577530B2 · Ruth et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8700283B2 · Lammers · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8857542B2 · Hendrickson et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8868302B2 · Everett et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8893830B2 · Ruth · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9650233B2 · Medwin et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 11318951B2 · Mellinger et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20070118502A1 · Aragones et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080297335A1 · Yeh et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090177335A1 · Young et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090265059A1 · Medwin · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100006377A1 · McCabe · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100256848A1 · Sasaki et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110032093A1 · Miller · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110112710A1 · Meyer-Ebeling et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110148614A1 · Wagner · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120215379A1 · Sprock et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120221216A1 · Chauncey et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130018583A1 · Miura et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130069803A1 · Mccormick et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130126251A1 · Ruth · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130151046A1 · Choi et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130151142A1 · Choi et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130164712A1 · Hunt et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130164714A1 · Hunt · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130261846A1 · McQuade et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130261874A1 · McQuade et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130261907A1 · McQuade et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140277971A1 · Oshiro · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150046132A1 · Papajewski et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150314793A1 · Papajewski et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150329102A1 · Yoshikawa · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160025508A1 · Meyer et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160082905A1 · Hsu et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160244067A1 · Hunt et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160281621A1 · Nakade et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170177002A1 · Ogura et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180001788A1 · Geub et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180111503A1 · Araki et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 200429000 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
JP 2005132225A · 2005 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010052722A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010208636A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013087259A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
Decision of Rejection mailed Oct. 10, 2021 for corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-215718 (8 pages). [cited by applicant]
English Translation of Decision of Rejection mailed Oct. 10, 2021 for corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-215718 (7 pages). [cited by applicant]
First Office Action mailed Mar. 10, 2021 for corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-215718 (9 pages). [cited by applicant]
English translated version of First Office Action mailed Mar. 10, 2021 for corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-215718 (11 pages). [cited by applicant]
Brazilian Search Report and Written Opinion published in the Official Gazette #2581 of Jun. 23, 2020 for corresponding application No. BR102015026697.9 (4 pages). [cited by applicant]
Examiner's Requisition for Canadian Application No. 2,907,387, dated Dec. 11, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Cited By (1)
US 12,679,326