IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,393,094
Granted Patent B2
US 12,393,094 · App. 18/059,624 · Granted Aug 19, 2025

Optical waveguide structure with partially overlapping loops in direction dependent material

Inventors: Daniel Yap (Malibu, CA); Brett Yurash (Venice, CA)
Assignee: The Boeing Company
G02F1/3503G02F1/3536G02F1/365G02F1/395
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,393,094
App. No.
18/059,624
Granted
Aug 19, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

An optical waveguide structure comprises a nonlinear optical waveguide comprising a set of segments, a set of extension optical waveguides, and a set of wavelength selective couplers that couples light between set of segments in the nonlinear optical waveguide and the set of extension optical waveguides based on a wavelength of light.

Claims (23)

1. An optical waveguide structure comprising:

a nonlinear optical waveguide comprising a set of segments;

a set of extension optical waveguides; and

a set of wavelength selective couplers that couples light between the set of segments in the nonlinear optical waveguide and the set of extension optical waveguides based on a wavelength of light, wherein the set of segments comprise:

a first segment in the set of segments in the nonlinear optical waveguide, wherein the light traveling in the first segment comprises a first wavelength light, a second wavelength light, and a third wavelength light and wherein the second wavelength light, and the third wavelength light are produced by a nonlinear optical interaction of the first wavelength light in the first segment;

a second segment in the set of segments in the nonlinear optical waveguide, wherein the second wavelength light and the third wavelength light are produced by the nonlinear optical interaction of the first wavelength light in the second segment;

a third segment in the set of segments in the nonlinear optical waveguide, wherein the second wavelength light and the third wavelength light are produced by the nonlinear optical interaction of the first wavelength light in the third segment;

wherein the set of wavelength selective couplers comprise:

a first wavelength selective coupler in the set of wavelength selective couplers couples the first wavelength light from a first ending point for the first segment to a second starting point for the first segment and couples the second wavelength light and the third wavelength light from the first ending point for the first segment to an extension starting point for an extension optical waveguide in the set of extension optical waveguides; and

a second wavelength selective coupler in the set of wavelength selective couplers couples the second wavelength light and the third wavelength light from an extension ending point for the extension optical waveguide in the set of extension optical waveguides to a third starting point for the third segment in the nonlinear optical waveguide.

2. The optical waveguide structure of claim 1 , wherein the first segment has a first length from a first starting point to the first ending point selected to produce a first phase walk-off that is at least one of from 0 to π radians or from an even-numbered integer of π radians to a next larger odd-numbered integer of π radians for the nonlinear optical interaction in the first segment.

3. The optical waveguide structure of claim 1 , wherein the third segment has a third length from the third starting point to a third ending point selected to produce a third phase walk-off that is at least one of from 0 to π radians or from an even-numbered integer of π radians to a next larger odd-numbered integer of π radians for the nonlinear optical interaction in the third segment.

4. The optical waveguide structure of claim 1 , wherein the first segment has a first cross-sectional structure and a first length from a first starting point to the first ending point produces a first phase walk-off that results in a light generation through the nonlinear optical interaction that is constructive in the first segment.

5. The optical waveguide structure of claim 4 , wherein the third segment has a third cross-sectional structure and a third length from the third starting point to a third ending point selected to produce a third phase walk-off that results in the light generation through the nonlinear optical interaction that is constructive in the third segment.

6. The optical waveguide structure of claim 4 , wherein the extension optical waveguide in the set of extension optical waveguides has an extension cross-sectional structure and an extension length from the extension starting point to the extension ending point that are selected to produce an extension phase walk-off that results in the light generation through the nonlinear optical interaction that is constructive in the third segment.

7. The optical waveguide structure of claim 4 , wherein the extension optical waveguide in the set of extension optical waveguides has an extension cross-sectional structure with an extension length from the extension starting point to the extension ending point that are selected to produce an extension phase walk-off that is at least one of from 0 to π radians or from an even-numbered integer of π radians to a next larger odd-numbered integer for the nonlinear optical interaction that occurs from the first starting point for the first segment to the third starting point for the third segment.

8. The optical waveguide structure of claim 1 , wherein the second segment has a second cross-sectional structure and a second length from the second starting point to a second ending point that are selected to produce a second phase walk-off that results in the light generation through the nonlinear optical interaction that is constructive in the third segment.

9. The optical waveguide structure of claim 1 , wherein the second segment has a second cross-sectional structure with a second length from the second starting point to a second ending point of the nonlinear optical waveguide that are selected to produce a second phase walk-off that is at least one of from 0 to π radians or from an even-numbered integer of π radians to a next larger odd-numbered integer for the nonlinear optical interaction that occurs from a first starting point for the first segment to the third starting point for the third segment.

10. The optical waveguide structure of claim 1 , wherein the first wavelength light is a pump light, the second wavelength light is a signal light, and the third wavelength light is an idler light.

11. The optical waveguide structure of claim 1 , wherein the first segment has a first cross-sectional structure from a first starting point to the first ending point that is selected to produce a first phase walk-off for the light that is at least one of from 0 to π radians or from an even-numbered integer of π radians to a next larger odd-numbered integer of π radians for the nonlinear optical interaction in the first segment.

12. The optical waveguide structure of claim 1 , wherein the second wavelength selective coupler couples the second wavelength light and the third wavelength light from a second ending point for the second segment away from the third segment.

13. The optical waveguide structure of claim 1 , wherein the extension optical waveguide in the set of extension optical waveguides includes an optical wavelength-selective filter.

14. The optical waveguide structure of claim 1 , wherein the extension optical waveguide in the set of extension optical waveguides comprises a set of micro-rings.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 29, 2022
From: YAP, DANIEL; YURASH, BRETT
To: THE BOEING COMPANY
Reel/Frame 061907/0106 →
Continuity (5)
Continuation In Part 17450038 · Oct 5, 2021
Provisional Application 63088220 · Oct 6, 2020
Provisional Application 63201661 · May 7, 2021
Provisional Application 63201664 · May 7, 2021
Related Publication 20230185156A1 · Jun 15, 2023
References Cited (107)
US 3842289A · Yariv et al. · 1974 [cited by applicant]
US 5002349A · Cheung et al. · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 5206868A · Deacon · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5295218A · Agostinelli et al. · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5875272A · Kewitsch et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5999548A · Mori · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6078717A · Nashimoto et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6081632A · Yoshimura et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6269205B1 · Peral et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6438291B1 · Duck et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6445848B1 · Islam et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6483953B1 · McBrien et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6721481B2 · Terahara et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6888667B2 · Nicolaescu · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 7046714B2 · Nicolaescu · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 7262902B2 · Burns et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7266258B2 · Liu et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7489439B2 · Kuo · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 7495823B2 · Kanner et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 8173982B2 · Edamatsu et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 9291837B1 · Yap · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9798219B2 · Pant et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10372014B1 · Vidrighin et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10451951B1 · Yap et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10698292B1 · Nagano · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11003046B2 · Liscidini · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11092875B2 · Xu et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11221540B2 · Srinivasan et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11226538B2 · Marandi · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11307484B2 · Zhang et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11550201B2 · Yap et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11561454B2 · Yap · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20030048527A1 · Kimerling et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20050047702A1 · Parker et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060132901A1 · Miller · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20120093459A1 · Mathai et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20140193155A1 · Popovic · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150016767A1 · Akiyama · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20170199443A1 · Vermeulen et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180031949A1 · Mookherjea et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190361315A1 · Zhou · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200256722A1 · Najafi et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210026222A1 · Nagano · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210157177A1 · Kharel et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220107548A1 · Yap · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220236621A1 · Kashiwazaki et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
CN 110333637A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP H01134309A · 1989 [cited by applicant]
JP H01134310A · 1989 [cited by applicant]
JP H05107577A · 1993 [cited by applicant]
JP H05216079A · 1993 [cited by applicant]
JP H10319444A · 1998 [cited by applicant]
JP 2014222331A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
JP 2017078786A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
JP 7160194B2 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019208582A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Lumerical, “Lithium Niobate Nonlinear Thermal Waveguide,” ANSYS, available at https://optics.ansys.com/hc/en-us/articles/360047509134-Lithium-Niobate-Nonlinear-Thermal-Waveguide, last accessed on Dec. 5, 2022, 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance, dated Nov. 23, 2022, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 17/450,046, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Bosshard, “Cascading of second-order nonlinearities in polar materials,” Advanced Materials, vol. 8, No. 5, May 1, 1996, pp. 385-397. [cited by applicant]
Biaggio, “Coupling-length phase matching for nonlinear optical frequency conversion in parallel waveguides,” Physical Review A, vol. 90, Oct. 13, 2014, pp. 043816, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Boyd, “Nonlinear Optics,” Third Edition, Academic Press, Mar. 28, 2008, pp. 69-133. [cited by applicant]
Cai et al., “Integrated optics on single-crystal lithium niobate thin film: some recent progress,” 18th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks ICTON, Jul. 2016, paper Tu.D5.5, pp. 1-4. [cited by applicant]
Chen et al., “Modal phase matched lithium niobate nanocircuits for integrated nonlinear photonics,” OSA Continuum, vol. 1, No. 1, Sep. 2018, pp. 229-242. [cited by applicant]
Clark et al., “Depositing Light in a Photonic Stop Gap by Use of Kerr Nonlinear Microresonators,” Optics Letters, vol. 28, No. 10, 2003, pp. 1966-1968. [cited by applicant]
Doerr, “Planar Lightwave Devices for WDM,” Optical Fiber Telecommunications, vol. IVA, Jan. 1, 2002, pp. 405-476. [cited by applicant]
Dong et al., “Nonlinear frequency conversion in waveguide directional couplers,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 93, No. 13, Sep. 20, 2004, pp. 133901, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dong et al., “Observation of continuous-wave second-harmonic generation in semiconductor waveguide directional couplers,” Optics Express, vol. 14, No. 6, Mar. 20, 2006, pp. 2256-2262 (2006). [cited by applicant]
Fan et al., “290 Hz intrinsic linewidth from an integrated optical chip-based widely tunable InP-Si3N4 hybrid laser,” Digest 2017 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics CLEO, May 2017, paper JTh5C.9, pp. 1-2. [cited by applicant]
Fejer et al., “Quasi-phase-matched second harmonic generation tuning and tolerances,” IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, vol. 28, No. 11, Nov. 1992, pp. 2631-2654. [cited by applicant]
Gad et al., “Compound ring resonator circuit for integrated optics applications,” Journal Optical Society America A, vol. 26, No. 9, Sep. 9, 2009, pp. 2023-2032. [cited by applicant]
Halir et al., “Compact High-Performance Multimode Interference Couplers in Silicon-on-Insulator,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 21, No. 21, Nov. 1, 2009, pp. 1600-1602. [cited by applicant]
Helt et al., “How does it scale Comparing quantum and classical nonlinear optical processes in integrated devices,” Journal of the Optical Society of America B, vol. 29, No. 8, Aug. 1, 2012, pp. 2199-2212. [cited by applicant]
Huang et al., “A novel quasi-phase-matching frequency doubling technique,” Optics Communications, vol. 150, May 1, 1998, pp. 235-238. [cited by applicant]
Lin et al., “Broadband Quasi-Phase-Matched Harmonic Generation in an On-Chip Monocrystalline Lithium Niobate Microdisk Resonator,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 122, No. 17, May 3, 2019, pp. 173903, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Lin et al., “Characterization of hybrid InP-TriPlex photonic integrate tunable lasers based on silicon nitride (Si3N4/SiO2) microring resonators for optical coherent systems,” IEEE Photonics Journal, vol. 10, No. 3, Jun… [cited by applicant]
Luo et al., “On-chip second-harmonic generation and broadband parametric down-conversion in a lithium niobate microresonator,” Optics Express, vol. 25, No. 20, Oct. 2, 2017, pp. 24531-24539. [cited by applicant]
Luo et al., “Semi-nonlinear nanophotonic waveguides for highly efficient second-harmonic generation,” Sep. 17, 2018, 8 pages, accessed Mar. 30, 2022, available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.06476. [cited by applicant]
Lu et al., “Chip-integrated visible-telecom entangled photon pair source for quantum communication,” Nature Physics, vol. 15, Jan. 21, 2019, pp. 373-381, available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-018-0394-3. [cited by applicant]
Matsushita et al., “Quasi-phase-matched parametric fluorescence in a periodically inverted GaP waveguide,” Applied Physics Express, vol. 2, No. 6, May 22, 2009, pp. 061101. [cited by applicant]
May et al., “Second-harmonic generation in AlGaAs-on-insulator waveguides,” Optics Letters, vol. 44, No. 6, Mar. 15, 2019, pp. 1339-1342. [cited by applicant]
Pasiskevicius et al., “Quasi-phase matched nonlinear media: Progress towards nonlinear optical engineering,” Optical Materials, vol. 34, No. 3, Jul. 22, 2011, pp. 513-523. [cited by applicant]
Pernice et al., “Second harmonic generation in phase matched aluminum nitride waveguides and micro-ring resonators,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 100, No. 22, May 30, 2012, pp. 223501. [cited by applicant]
Rao et al., “Second-harmonic generation in periodically-poled thin film lithium niobate wafer-bonded on silicon,” Optics Express, vol. 24, No. 26, Dec. 26, 2016, pp. 29941-29947. [cited by applicant]
Rao et al., “Second-harmonic generation in single-mode integrated waveguides based on mode-shape modulation,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 110, No. 11, Jan. 19, 2017, pp. 111109. [cited by applicant]
Schunemann et al., “Optical parametric oscillation in quasi-phase-matched GaP,” Proc SPIE, Nonlinear Frequency Generation and Conversion: Materials, Devices, and Applications XIV, vol. 9347, Mar. 24, 2015, pp. 93470J. [cited by applicant]
Spencer et al., “Low kappa, narrow bandwidth Si3N4 Bragg gratings,” Optics Express, vol. 23, No. 23, Nov. 16, 2015, pp. 30329-30336. [cited by applicant]
Thomson et al., “Low Loss MMI Couplers for High Performance MZI Modulators,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 22, No. 20, Oct. 15, 2010, pp. 1485-1487. [cited by applicant]
Tison et al., “Path to increasing the coincidence efficiency of integrated resonant photon sources,” Optics Express, vol. 25, No. 26, Dec. 25, 2017, pp. 33088-33096. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., “Ultrahigh-efficiency wavelength conversion in nanophotonic periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides,” Optica, vol. 5, No. 11, Nov. 7, 2018, pp. 1438-1441. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., “Second harmonic generation in nano-structured thin-film lithium niobate waveguides,” Optics Express, vol. 25, No. 6, Mar. 2017, pp. 6963-6973. [cited by applicant]
Yang et al., “Realization of controllable photonic molecule based on three ultrahigh-Q microtoroid cavities”, Laser Photonics Reviews, vol. 11, No. 2, Jan. 16, 2017, paper 1600178, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Yoo et al., “Wavelength conversion by difference frequency generation in AlGaAs waveguides with periodic domain inversion achieved by wafer bonding,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 68, No. 19, May 6, 1996, pp. 2609-2611. [cited by applicant]
Yu et al., “Efficient continuous wave second harmonic generation pumped at 1.55 m in quasi-phasematched AlGaAs waveguides,” Optics Express, vol. 13, No. 26, Dec. 26, 2005, pp. 10742-10748. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report dated Jan. 11, 2022, regarding application No. PCT/US2021/071721, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jan. 11, 2022, regarding application No. PCT/US2021/071721, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report dated Jan. 14, 2022, regarding application No. PCT/US2021/071722, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jan. 14, 2022, regarding application No. PCT/US2021/071722, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report dated Feb. 8, 2022, regarding application No. PCT/US2021/071723, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Feb. 8, 2022, regarding application No. PCT/US2021/071723, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Feb. 9, 2022, regarding application No. PCT/US2021/071725, 24 pages. 021/071725, 24 pages. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 8, 2022, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 17/450,046, 23 pages. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 10, 2022, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 17/450,031, 29 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action, dated Jun. 11, 2024, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 17/655,930, 33 pages. [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action dated Oct. 10, 2024, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 17/655,930, 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Mar. 28, 2023, regarding Application No. PCT/US2021/071721, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Mar. 28, 2023, regarding Application No. PCT/US2021/071723, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action dated Mar. 5, 2025, regarding U.S. Appl. No. 18/059,605, 29 pages. [cited by applicant]