IP Library Granted Patent US 12,411,206
Granted Patent B2
US 12,411,206 · App. 17/659,313 · Granted Sep 9, 2025

Utilization of wireless communication reference signal measurement resources for co-channel radar operation

Inventors: Boon Loong Ng (Plano, TX); Vutha Va (Plano, TX); Jianhua Mo (Allen, TX); Hongbo Si (Plano, TX)
Assignee: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
G01S7/02H04L5/0048H04L5/006
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,411,206
App. No.
17/659,313
Granted
Sep 9, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method includes obtaining a first set of signal quality measurements (SQMs) from among a plurality of reference signals received at an electronic device. The SQMs correspond to reference signals, respectively. The reference signals correspond to candidate time slots (CTS), respectively. The method includes identifying a first set of reference signals in the plurality of reference signals based on the first set of SQMs satisfying a first quality condition. The method includes identifying a second set of reference signals in the plurality of reference signals based on the first set of SQMs satisfying a second quality condition. The method includes identifying, as first CTS for an electronic device to use for a radar operation, candidate time slots corresponding to the first set of reference signals. The method includes identifying, as second CTSs for the electronic device to use for wireless communication, CTSs corresponding to the second set of reference signals.

Claims (98)

1. A method comprising:

obtaining a first set of signal quality measurements, the signal quality measurements corresponding to reference signals, respectively, from among a plurality of reference signals received at an electronic device, the reference signals corresponding to candidate time slots, respectively;

identifying a first set of reference signals in the plurality of reference signals based on the first set of signal quality measurements satisfying a first quality condition;

identifying a second set of reference signals in the plurality of reference signals based on the first set of signal quality measurements satisfying a second quality condition;

identifying, as first candidate time slots for an electronic device to use for a radar operation, candidate time slots corresponding to the first set of reference signals;

identifying, as second candidate time slots for the electronic device to use for wireless communication, candidate time slots corresponding to the second set of reference signals; and

controlling the electronic device to perform or suspend the radar operation based on the identified first candidate time slots.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the reference signals corresponding to candidate time slots are reference signals corresponding to a Synchronization Signal Block (SSB) time period, respectively;

satisfying the first quality condition comprises having a signal quality measurement that is less than a threshold; and

satisfying the second quality condition comprises having a signal quality measurement that is greater than or equal to the threshold.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

identifying the first set of reference signals comprises identifying the first set of signal quality measurements that do not satisfy a proximity condition with respect to a strongest signal quality measurement from among the first set of signal quality measurements; and

identifying the second set of reference signals comprises identifying the first set of signal quality measurements satisfying the proximity condition with respect to the strongest signal quality measurement.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

identifying, as the first candidate time slots, candidate time slots that correspond to the first set of reference signals and that satisfy a temporal condition for the radar operation; and

identifying, as the second candidate time slots, candidate time slots that correspond to the first set of reference signals and that do not satisfy the temporal condition.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

identifying, as the first candidate time slots, candidate time slots that correspond to the first set of reference signals and that do not satisfy a frequency condition; and

identifying, as the second candidate time slots, candidate time slots that correspond to the first set of reference signals and that satisfy the frequency condition.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining whether to update the first candidate time slots based on an update-triggering condition by, in response to determining a subsequently obtained second set of signal quality measurements satisfies the update-triggering condition, determining to update the first candidate time slots (radar SSB ); and

in response to the determination to update the first candidate time slots:

suspending the electronic device from using the radar operation during the first candidate time slots which are obsolete;

while the radar operation is suspended, obtaining a third set of signal quality measurements; and

updating the first candidate time slots by repeating the identifying of first candidate time slots based on the third set of signal quality measurements satisfying the first quality condition; and

enabling the electronic device to resume using the radar operation during the updated first candidate time slots.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

identifying, as third candidate time slots for the electronic device to use for the radar operation, candidate time slots corresponding to the first set of reference signals that satisfy an operational condition for the radar operation, the third candidate time slots being a subset of the first candidate time slots; and

identifying, as second candidate time slots, a remainder of the first candidate time slots that correspond to the first set of reference signals that do not satisfy the operational condition for the radar operation.

8. The method of claim 7 , further comprising:

determining whether to update the third candidate time slots based on an update-triggering condition by, in response to determining a subsequently obtained second set of signal quality measurements satisfies the update-triggering condition, determining to update the third candidate time slots; and

in response to the determination to update the third candidate time slots:

suspending the electronic device from using the radar operation during the third candidate time slots which are obsolete;

while the radar operation is suspended, obtaining a third set of signal quality measurements;

updating the first candidate time slots based on the third set of signal quality measurements satisfying the first quality condition; and

updating the third candidate time slots by identifying, from among the updated first candidate time slots, candidate time slots corresponding to updated first set of reference signals that satisfy the operational condition for the radar operation; and

enabling the electronic device to resume using the radar operation during the updated third candidate time slots.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein:

the third candidate time slots comprise a number K of Synchronization Signal Block (SSB) time periods, which collectively define duration of an SSB time interval;

updating the third candidate time slots comprises selecting K subsequent SSB time periods in a cyclical manner; and

the update-triggering condition includes expiry of the SSB time interval after the third candidate time slots is determined or updated.

10. An electronic device comprising:

a radar circuit configured for the electronic device to operate using radar operations;

a wireless communication circuit configured for the electronic device to operate using a wireless communication protocol different from the radar operations; and

a processor configured to:

obtain a first set of signal quality measurements, the signal quality measurements corresponding to reference signals, respectively, from among a plurality of reference signals received at the electronic device, the reference signals corresponding to candidate time slots, respectively;

identify a first set of reference signals in the plurality of reference signals based on the first set of signal quality measurements satisfying a first quality condition;

identify a second set of reference signals in the plurality of reference signals based on the first set of signal quality measurements satisfying a second quality condition;

identify, as first candidate time slots for the electronic device to use for a radar operation, candidate time slots corresponding to the first set of reference signals;

identify, as second candidate time slots for the electronic device to use for wireless communication, candidate time slots corresponding to the second set of reference signals; and

control the radar circuit to perform or suspend the radar operation based on the identified first candidate time slots.

11. The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein:

the reference signals corresponding to candidate time slots are reference signals corresponding to a Synchronization Signal Block (SSB) time period, respectively; and

satisfying the first quality condition comprises having a signal quality measurement that is less than a threshold; and

satisfying the second quality condition comprises having a signal quality measurement that is greater than or equal to the threshold.

12. The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

identify the first set of reference signals by identifying the first set of signal quality measurements that do not satisfy a proximity condition with respect to a strongest signal quality measurement from among the first set of signal quality measurements; and

identify the second set of reference signals by identifying the first set of signal quality measurements satisfying the proximity condition with respect to the strongest signal quality measurement.

13. The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

identify, as the first candidate time slots, candidate time slots that correspond to the first set of reference signals and that satisfy a temporal condition for the radar operation; and

identify, as the second candidate time slots, candidate time slots that correspond to the first set of reference signals and that do not satisfy the temporal condition.

14. The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

identify, as the first candidate time slots, candidate time slots that correspond to the first set of reference signals and that do not satisfy a frequency condition; and

identify, as the second candidate time slots, candidate time slots that correspond to the first set of reference signals and that satisfy the frequency condition.

15. The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

determine whether to update the first candidate time slots based on an update-triggering condition by, in response to determining a subsequently obtained second set of signal quality measurements satisfies the update-triggering condition, determining to update the first candidate time slots (radar SSB ); and

in response to the determination to update the first candidate time slots:

suspend the electronic device from using the radar operation during the first candidate time slots which are obsolete;

while the radar operation is suspended, obtain a third set of signal quality measurements; and

update the first candidate time slots by repeating the identifying of first candidate time slots based on the third set of signal quality measurements satisfying the first quality condition; and

enable the electronic device to resume using the radar operation during the updated first candidate time slots.

16. The electronic device of claim 10 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

identify, as third candidate time slots for the electronic device to use for the radar operation, candidate time slots corresponding to the first set of reference signals that satisfy an operational condition for the radar operation, the third candidate time slots being a subset of the first candidate time slots; and

identify, as second candidate time slots, a remainder of the first candidate time slots that correspond to the first set of reference signals that do not satisfy the operational condition for the radar operation.

17. The electronic device of claim 16 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

determine whether to update the third candidate time slots based on an update-triggering condition by, in response to determining a subsequently obtained second set of signal quality measurements satisfies the update-triggering condition, determining to update the third candidate time slots; and

in response to the determination to update the third candidate time slots:

suspend the electronic device from using the radar operation during the third candidate time slots which are obsolete;

while the radar operation is suspended, obtain a third set of signal quality measurements;

update the first candidate time slots based on the third set of signal quality measurements satisfying the first quality condition; and

update the third candidate time slots by identifying, from among the updated first candidate time slots, candidate time slots corresponding to updated first set of reference signals that satisfy the operational condition for the radar operation; and

enable the electronic device to resume using the radar operation during the updated third candidate time slots.

18. The electronic device of claim 17 , wherein:

the third candidate time slots comprise a number K of Synchronization Signal Block (SSB) time periods, which collectively define duration of an SSB time interval;

the processor is further configured to update the third candidate time slots by selecting K subsequent SSB time periods in a cyclical manner; and

the update-triggering condition includes expiry of the SSB time interval after the third candidate time slots is determined or updated.

19. A non-transitory computer readable medium embodying a computer program, the computer program comprising computer readable program code that when executed causes at least one processor to:

obtain a first set of signal quality measurements, the signal quality measurements corresponding to reference signals, respectively, from among a plurality of reference signals received at an electronic device, the reference signals corresponding to candidate time slots, respectively;

identify a first set of reference signals in the plurality of reference signals based on the first set of signal quality measurements satisfying a first quality condition;

identify a second set of reference signals in the plurality of reference signals based on the first set of signal quality measurements satisfying a second quality condition;

identify, as first candidate time slots for an electronic device to use for a radar operation, candidate time slots corresponding to the first set of reference signals;

identify, as second candidate time slots for the electronic device to use for wireless communication, candidate time slots corresponding to the second set of reference signals; and

control the electronic device to perform or suspend the radar operation based on the identified first candidate time slots.

20. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 19 , wherein:

the reference signals corresponding to candidate time slots are reference signals corresponding to a Synchronization Signal Block (SSB) time period, respectively;

satisfying the first quality condition comprises having a signal quality measurement that is less than a threshold; and

satisfying the second quality condition comprises having a signal quality measurement that is greater than or equal to the threshold.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 14, 2022
From: NG, BOON LOONG; VA, VUTHA; MO, JIANHUA; SI, HONGBO
To: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 059605/0621 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63194272 · May 28, 2021
Related Publication 20220381876A1 · Dec 1, 2022
References Cited (25)
US 8068877B1 · Mansour · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 10009782B2 · Kazmi · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10892789B2 · Abdelmonem · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 10951285B2 · Sang · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 10979979B1 · Kong et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20150085686A1 · Chande · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20180139673A1 · Peisa · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190293781A1 · Bolin · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200107249A1 · Stauffer et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200382172A1 · Sethuraman et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210067978A1 · Cheraghi · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210105644A1 · Mo · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210105708A1 · Islam et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220095319A1 · Duan · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230189315A1 · Haustein · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230266434A1 · Kalantari · 2023 [cited by examiner]
EP 3799508A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020057748A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021030685A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021067784A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021184242A1 · 2021 [cited by examiner]
M. Kiviranta, I. Moilanen and J. Roivainen, “5G Radar: Scenarios, Numerology and Simulations,” 2019 International Conference on Military Communications and Information Systems (ICMCIS), Budva, Montenegro, 2019, pp. 1-6,… [cited by examiner]
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued Jul. 25, 2022 regarding International Application No. PCT/KR2022/005756, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report issued Apr. 10, 2024 regarding Application No. 22811491.4, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kiviranta et al., “5G Radar: Scenarios, Numerology and Simulations”, 2019 International Conference on Military Communications and Information Systems (ICMCIS), May 2019, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]