IP Library Granted Patent US 12,414,482
Granted Patent B2
US 12,414,482 · App. 18/431,342 · Granted Sep 9, 2025

Frequency tuning of multi-qubit systems

Inventors: Jared B. Hertzberg (Ossining, NY); Jason S. Orcutt (Katonah, NY); Hanhee Paik (Danbury, CT); Sami Rosenblatt (White Plains, NY); Martin O. Sandberg (Ossining, NY)
Assignee: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
H10N60/0884G06N10/40H10N60/0661H10N60/0912H10N60/12H10N60/805
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,414,482
App. No.
18/431,342
Granted
Sep 9, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention includes methods, and the structures formed, for multi-qubit chips. The methods may include annealing a Josephson junction of a qubit to either increase or decrease the frequency of the qubit. The conditions of the anneal may be based on historical conditions, and may be chosen to tune each qubit to a desired frequency.

Claims (32)

1. A method of forming a multi-qubit chip, the method comprising:

forming a plurality of qubits on a chip, wherein each qubit comprises a Josephson junction and a capacitor connected in parallel with one another;

determining a respective resonance frequency of each qubit on the chip;

determining a respective set-point frequency for each qubit that achieves a defined collision probability with respect to a probability of frequency collisions between adjacent qubits; and

annealing the Josephson junction of a qubit of the plurality of qubits using a laser, based on data that relates parameters for the annealing to frequency shifts, to change the respective resonance frequency of the qubit to about the respective set-point frequency determined for the qubit.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining the respective resonance frequency for the qubit comprises measuring the respective resonance frequency for the qubit.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining the respective resonance frequency for the qubit comprises determining the respective resonance frequency for the qubit based upon a measured resistance of the qubit.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein annealing the Josephson junction comprises localized laser annealing of the Josephson junction.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein annealing the Josephson junction causes the respective resonance frequency of the qubit to increase.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein annealing the Josephson junction causes the respective resonance frequency of the qubit to decrease.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein a parameter of the parameters for annealing the Josephson junction is selected based on the data relating the parameters to the frequency shifts.

8. A method of forming a multi-qubit chip, the method comprising:

determining a respective set-point frequency for each qubit of a plurality of qubits on the multi-qubit chip that achieves a defined collision probability with respect to a probability of frequency collisions between adjacent qubits;

forming the plurality of qubits on the multi-qubit chip in accordance with the respective set-point frequency for each qubit, wherein each qubit comprises a Josephson junction and a capacitor connected in parallel with one another;

determining a frequency of a qubit of the plurality of qubits; and

annealing the Josephson junction of the qubit, based on data defining pre-determining relationships between parameters for the annealing and frequency shifts, to alter the frequency of the qubit to about the respective set-point frequency determined for the qubit.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the determining the frequency for the qubit comprises measuring the frequency for the qubit.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein the determining the frequency for the qubit comprises determining the frequency for the qubit based upon a measured resistance of the qubit.

11. The method of claim 8 , wherein annealing the Josephson junction comprises localized laser annealing of the Josephson junction.

12. The method of claim 8 , wherein annealing the Josephson junction causes the frequency of the qubit to decrease.

13. The method of claim 8 , wherein annealing the Josephson junction causes the frequency of the qubit to increase.

14. The method of claim 8 , wherein forming the plurality of qubits is based on the respective set-point frequency for each of the plurality of qubits, and wherein a first size and a first shape of the qubit are different from a second size and a second shape of another qubit of the plurality of qubits.

15. A method of forming a multi-qubit chip, the method comprising:

forming a plurality of qubits on a chip, wherein each qubit comprises a trilayer Josephson junction and a capacitor connected in parallel with one another, wherein the trilayer Josephson junction comprises a first aluminum layer, an aluminum-oxide layer, and a second aluminum layer;

determining a respective resonance frequency of each qubit on the chip;

determining a respective set-point frequency for each qubit that achieves a defined collision probability with respect to a probability of frequency collisions between adjacent qubit; and

annealing the trilayer Josephson junction of each of the plurality of qubits using a laser, based on a data structure defining pre-determining relationships between parameters for the annealing and frequency shifts, to cause the respective resonance frequency of each of the plurality of qubits to change to the respective set-point frequency determined for each qubit.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the determining the respective resonance frequency for a qubit comprises measuring the respective resonance frequency for the qubit.

17. The method of claim 15 , wherein the determining the respective resonance frequency for a qubit comprises determining the respective resonance frequency for the qubit based upon a measured resistance of the qubit.

18. The method of claim 15 , wherein the annealing of the trilayer Josephson junction of a qubit of the plurality of qubits causes the respective resonance frequency of the qubit to increase.

19. The method of claim 15 , wherein the annealing of the trilayer Josephson junction of a qubit of the plurality of qubits causes the respective resonance frequency of the qubit to decrease.

20. The method of claim 15 , wherein the annealing of the trilayer Josephson junction of a qubit of the plurality of qubits comprises localized laser annealing of the trilayer Josephson junction.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 5, 2024
From: HERTZBERG, JARED B.; ORCUTT, JASON S.; PAIK, HANHEE; ROSENBLATT, SAMI; SANDBERG, MARTIN O.
To: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 066349/0581 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 15824492 · Nov 28, 2017
Related Publication 20240180046A1 · May 30, 2024
References Cited (171)
US 4163156A · Daetwyler et al. · 1979 [cited by applicant]
US 4220959A · Kroger · 1980 [cited by applicant]
US 4490901A · Clark et al. · 1985 [cited by applicant]
US 4535219A · Sliwa, Jr. · 1985 [cited by applicant]
US 6218214B1 · Panchou et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6232212B1 · Degani et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6495915B1 · Hsieh et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6630723B2 · Hedler et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6730370B1 · Olafsson · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 6999652B2 · Mino et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7002166B2 · Jamieson et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7122837B2 · Linares et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7176066B2 · Brenner et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7343059B2 · Beausoleil et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7394268B2 · Bertin et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7411187B2 · Monroe et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7466725B2 · Ichimura et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7679166B2 · Anderson et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7899092B2 · Malinovsky · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7977668B2 · Nevirkovets et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8054072B2 · Ichimura et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8111083B1 · Pesetski · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 8148715B2 · Hollenberg et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8329556B2 · Yuan et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8440471B2 · Ranjan et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8816325B2 · Schenkel et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9054298B2 · Zhou et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9082637B2 · Taylor · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9208280B2 · Bocharov et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9219298B2 · Abraham et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9350460B2 · Paik · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9355362B2 · Shea et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9443200B2 · Schroff · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9524470B1 · Chow et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9599904B2 · Schubert et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9607271B2 · Papile · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9647662B1 · Abutaleb et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9858531B1 · Monroe et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10134972B2 · Oliver et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10170681B1 · Rosenblatt et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10340438B2 · Rosenblatt et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10355193B2 · Rosenblatt et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10359272B2 · Mower et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10418540B2 · Orcutt · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10423888B1 · Hertzberg et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10424713B2 · Rosenblatt et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10644217B2 · Rosenblatt et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10833242B2 · Orcutt et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11895931B2 · Hertzberg et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20020074544A1 · Sung · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20030193097A1 · Il'ichev et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20050074220A1 · Rey · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050098773A1 · Vion · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050170572A1 · Hongo et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20070272669A1 · Comley et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080258049A1 · Kuzmich et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090041243A1 · Nambu · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090057652A1 · Nevirkovets · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100207034A1 · Moiseyev · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110057169A1 · Harris · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20130003188A1 · Andreasch et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130029848A1 · Gonzalez · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130119351A1 · Shea et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130258595A1 · Tuckerman · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140328116A1 · Guo · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150021726A1 · Min et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150310350A1 · Niskanen et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150316598A1 · Rogge et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160292586A1 · Rigetti et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160321558A1 · Nakamura et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160343934A1 · Chang et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160344414A1 · Naaman et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170001900A1 · Marjanovic et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170059964A1 · Nakamura et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170072504A1 · Abraham et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170076787A1 · Frank · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170077382A1 · Abraham et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170133336A1 · Oliver et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170177534A1 · Mohseni et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180012932A1 · Oliver et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180013052A1 · Oliver et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180102469A1 · Das et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180102470A1 · Das et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180267250A1 · Hosseini et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180337790A1 · Brink et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180356597A1 · Spector et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190051810A1 · Brink et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 101868802A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
CN 103745969A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
CN 105052038A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 111373556A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 111373557A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
DE 102009033566A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
DE 112018006053B4 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
EP 2202545A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
GB 2581311B · 2021 [cited by applicant]
JP H09252026A · 1997 [cited by applicant]
JP 3198655B2 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
JP 2004274567A · 2004 [cited by applicant]
JP 2007193778A1 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019504511A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 7220006B2 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO 9822985A2 · 1998 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017075246A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017105524A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017131831A2 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019059879A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019105716A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Granata et al., “Trimming of Critical Current in Niobium Josephson Devices by Laser Annealing”, 8th European Conference on Applied Superconductivity (EUCAS 2007), Journal of Physics: Conferences Series 97, 2008, Copyrig… [cited by applicant]
Hadden et al., “Waveguide-coupled single NV in diamond enabled by femtosecond laser writing”, Institute for Quantum Science and Technology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada, Apr. 7, 2010, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Knoernschild et al., “Independent individual addressing of multiple neutral atom qubits with a micromirror-based beam steering system”, Applied Physics Letters 97, Sep. 2010, 3 Pages, Copyright 2010 American Institute o… [cited by applicant]
Mehta et al., “Integrated Optical Adressing of an ion quibit”, Nature Nanotechnology, Copyright 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited, Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science and Research Laboratory of Elect… [cited by applicant]
Nale, “Self Aligned, Flip Chip Assembly of Photonic Devices with Electrical and Optical Connections”, Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 1990, IEEE, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Lee et al., “3D Stacked Flip Chip Packaging with Through Silicon Vias and Copper Plating or Conductive Adhesive Filling”, 2005 Electronic Components and Technology Conference, Copyright 2005 IEEE, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Rodin et al., “High Throughput Low Coo Industrial Laser Drilling Tool”, Research Gate, Center for Physical Sciences and Technology, Jul. 2008, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Duocastella et al., “Bessel and annual beams for materials processing,” Laser Photonics Rev., vol. 6, No. 5, 2012, pp. 607-621, DOI 10.1002/lpor.201100031. [cited by applicant]
Chen et al. “Qubit architecture with high coherence and fast tunable coupling.” Physical review letters, vol. 113, No. 22, 2014, 220502, abstract, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Gilabert et al., “Pholoinduced Enhancement of the Josephson Effect in YBaCuO Grain Boundary Junctions”, Journal of Low Temperature Physics, Feb. 1997, vol. 106, Issue. 3, pp. 255-264. [cited by applicant]
Granata et al., “Induced Change of Critical Current Density Profile in Nb/AI-AIOx/Nb Josephson Junctions”, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 507, 2014, 042046, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Granata et al., “Localized Laser Trimming of Critical Current In Niobium Based Josephson Devices”, App. Phys. Lett., vol. 90, 232503, 2007, doi: 10.1063/1.2746060, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Granata et al., “Spatial Modulation Of Critical Current Density In Niobium Based Josephson Junctions Induced By Selective Healing”, Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 102, 222603, 2013, doi: 10.1063/1.4809737, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Hutchings et al., “Tunable Superconducting Qubits with Flux-Independent Coherence”, arXiv preprint arXiv: 1702.02253, 2017, pp. 1-17. [cited by applicant]
Mount et al., “Single Qubit Manipulation In A Microfabricaled Surface Electrode lon Trap”, New Journal of Physics, vol. 15, Sep. 2013, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Shim et al., “Bottom-up Superconducting and Josephson Junction Devices Inside a Group-IV Semiconductor”, Nature Communications, vol. 5, 4225, 2014, arXiv: 1309.0015v3, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Saffman, “Quantum Computing with Atomic Qubils and Rydberg Interactions: Progress and Challenges”, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, OP Publishing Ltd., Copyright 2016, UK, May 17, 2016, 25 pa… [cited by applicant]
Agoudakis et al., “Initialization of a Spin Qubil in A Site-controlled Nanowire Quantum Dot”, New Journal of Physics, Published in a partnership with Deutsche Physlakalsche Gesellschafl and the Institute of Physics, IOP… [cited by applicant]
Rioux et al., “Linear, Annular, and Radial Focusing with Axicons and Applications to Laser Machining”, Applied Optics, vol. 17, Issue 10, https://doi.org/10.1364/A0. 17.001532, Abstract Only, 1978, pp. 1532-1536. [cited by applicant]
Orcutt et al., “Laser Annealing Qubits for Optimized Frequency Allocation”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/823,728, filed Nov. 28, 2017, 35 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Rosenblatt et al., “Laser Annealing of Qubits With Structured Illumination”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/823,713, filed Nov. 28, 2017, 39 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Hertzberg et al., “Frequency Tuning of Multi-Qubit Systems”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/824,492, filed Nov. 28, 2017, 56 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Rosenblatt et al., “Flip Chip Integration on Qubit Chips”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/823,675, filed Nov. 28, 2017, 33 Pages. [cited by applicant]
List of IBM Patents or Patent Applications Treated as Related, dated Jan. 8, 2018, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/824,492 dated Oct. 22, 2018, 97 pages. [cited by applicant]
Pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/251,569, filed Jan. 18, 2019, entitled: “Flip Chip Integration On Qubit Chips”, 33 pages. [cited by applicant]
IBM: List of IBM Patents or Patent Applications Treated as Related (Appendix P), Jan. 28, 2019, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, Date of Mailing Jan. 30, 20192, International application No. PCT/EP20… [cited by applicant]
Braslau et al., “Fabrication of Planar Josephson Junctions by Laser Irradiation”, An IP.com Prior Art Database Technical Disclosure, Original Publication Dale: Apr. 1, 1976, IP.com No. IPCOM000085574D, IP.com Electronic… [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/EP2018/080736, dated Mar. 6, 2019, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/183,376, filed Nov. 7, 2018, entitled: “Laser Annealing of Qubits with Structured Illumination”, 39 pages. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/824,492 dated Apr. 11, 2019, 81 pages. [cited by applicant]
Yu-Lin et al., “Fabrication of AI/AIOx /AI Josephson Junctions and Superconducting Quantum Circuits by Shadow Vaporation and Dynamic Oxidation Process”, 2013 Chinese Phys. B, vol. 22, 060309, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Hutchings et al., “Tunable Superconducting Qubits with Flux-Independent Coherence”, arVix 1702.02253v2, Feb. 21, 2017, pp. 1-17. [cited by applicant]
Brink et al., “Device Challenges For Near Term Superconducting Quantum Processors: Frequency Collisions”, © 2018 IEEE, IEDM18-126, p. 6.1.1-6.1.3. [cited by applicant]
Chamberland et al., “Topological and Subsystem Codes on Low-degree Graphs with Flag Qubits”, arXiv: 1907.09528v1 [quant-ph], Jul. 22, 2019, pp. 1-20. [cited by applicant]
Magesan et al., “Effective Hamiltonian models of the cross-resonance gate”, arXiv: 1804.04073v2 [quant-ph], Feb. 25, 2019, pp. 1-16. [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/824,492 dated Sep. 16, 2019, 66 pages. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/824,492 dated Feb. 20, 2020, 62 pages. [cited by applicant]
Pavlovic, D., “Relating Toy Models of Quantum Computation: Comprehension, Complementarity and Dagger Mix Autonomous Categories”, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1006.1011.pdf, Jun. 5, 2010, 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/824,492 dated Aug. 5, 2020, 30 pages. [cited by applicant]
Cambridge University Press, “Quantum Error Correction”, https://www.google.com/books/edition/Quantum_Error_Correction/XV9sAAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0, Published, Sep. 12, 2013, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/824,492 dated Dec. 24, 2020, 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/824,492 dated Apr. 27, 2021, 52 pages. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/824,492 dated Sep. 20, 2021, 51 pages. [cited by applicant]
Pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/520,490, filed Jul. 24, 2019, entitled: “Adjustment of Qubit Frequency Through Annealing”, 27 pages. [cited by applicant]
IBM: List of IBM Patents or Patent Applications Treated as Related (Appendix P), Jul. 31, 2019, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Reasons for Refusal received for Japanese Patent Application Serial No. 2020-526116 dated Jun. 29, 2022, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action received for Chinese Patent Application Serial No. 201880075209.0 dated Apr. 4, 2023, 8 pages (Original copy only). [cited by applicant]
Office Action received for Chinese Patent Application Serial No. 201880075199.0 dated Apr. 4, 2023, 6 pages (Original copy only). [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/824,492, filed Nov. 28, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/824,492 dated Oct. 12, 2023, 83 pages. [cited by applicant]
Marks et al., “Supreme Court Decides [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/824,492 dated Oct. 20, 2023, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Second Office Action received for Chinese Patent Application Serial No. 201880075209.0 dated Jan. 5, 2024, 8 pages(Including English Translation). [cited by applicant]
Second Office Action received for Chinese Patent Application Serial No. 201880075199.0 dated Dec. 26, 2023, 7 pages(Including English Translation). [cited by applicant]
Decision to Grant a Patent received for Japanese Patent Application Serial No. 2020-526116 dated Jan. 18, 2023, 5 pages(Including English Translation). [cited by applicant]
List of IBM Patents or Applications Treated as Related, 2024. [cited by applicant]
[cited by applicant]
Baek, et al., Thermal Stability Of Nb/A-Nbxsi1-X/Nb Josephson Junctions, Physical Review, vol. B 75, 2007, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kamal, et al., Improved Superconducting Qubit Coherence With High-Temperature Substrate Annealing, arXiv:1606.09262v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] , Jun. 29, 2016, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Pavolotsky, et al., Aging- and Annealing-Induced Variations In Nb/Al-Alox/Nb Tunnel Junction Properties, Journal Of Applied Physics vol. 109, 2011, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Pop, et al., Fabrication Of Stable And Reproducible Sub-Micron Tunnel Junctions, arXiv:1105.6204v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall], May 31, 2011, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]