IP Library Granted Patent US 12,430,768
Granted Patent B2
US 12,430,768 · App. 18/113,533 · Granted Sep 30, 2025

Method and system for computer-aided triage of stroke

Inventors: Christopher Mansi (San Francisco, CA); David Golan (San Francisco, CA); Gil Levi (San Francisco, CA); Yuval Duchin (San Francisco, CA)
Assignee: Viz.ai Inc.
G06T7/11A61B5/7264G06T5/50G06T7/0012G16H10/20G06T2207/20084G06T2207/30016
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,430,768
App. No.
18/113,533
Granted
Sep 30, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system for computer-aided triage includes a router, a remote computing system, and a client application. A method for computer-aided triage includes receiving a data packet associated with a patient and taken at a point of care; checking for a suspected condition associated with the data packet; in an event that the suspected condition is detected, determining a recipient based on the suspected condition; and transmitting information to a device associated with the recipient.

Claims (40)

1. A method for the automated triaging of a patient based on a vessel occlusion type, the method comprising:

retrieving a data packet associated with the patient from a data collection device;

processing the data packet with a set of multiple trained machine learning algorithms comprising a first and a second trained machine learning algorithm, the second trained machine learning algorithm separate and distinct from the first;

detecting a vessel occlusion and categorizing the vessel occlusion type based on outputs of the set of multiple trained machine learning algorithms, wherein the outputs comprise at least a location of the vessel occlusion relative to a set of anatomical landmarks;

based on the vessel occlusion type, selecting an automated alert from a set of multiple automated alerts;

transmitting the automated alert to a set of user devices associated with a set of users; and

prompting treatment of the patient based on at least one input received from the set of user devices in response to the automated alert.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second trained machine learning algorithm receives additional inputs relative to the first trained machine learning algorithm.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the first trained machine learning algorithm is configured to detect a large vessel occlusion, wherein the large vessel occlusion comprises an occlusion at an M 1 segment of a middle cerebral artery.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein each of the first and second trained machine learning algorithms comprises a convolutional neural network.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein:

the first trained machine algorithm receives a set of images of a brain of the patient; and

the second trained machine learning algorithm receives the set of images and a mirror image version of the set of images.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the first trained machine algorithm receives a set of images of a brain of the patient; and

the second trained machine learning algorithm receives the set of images and a processed version of the set of images.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising calculating a severity score associated with the patient based on the outputs, wherein selecting the automated alert is further performed based on the severity score.

8. The method of claim 7 , further comprising calculating an irreversibly damaged volume of brain with the second trained machine learning algorithm, wherein the severity score is further calculated based on the irreversibly damaged volume.

9. The method of claim 7 , further comprising adjusting a place of the patient in a queue of multiple patients based on the severity score, wherein at least one of a timing of the automated alert or a subset of devices in the set of devices is adjusted in response to the adjusted place of the patient.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the data packet is retrieved at a processor operable as a virtual machine.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the data collection device is located at a first point of care and wherein treatment of the patient is performed at a second point of care separate and distinct from the first point of care.

12. A system for the automated triaging of a patient based on a vessel occlusion severity, the system comprising:

a set of multiple trained machine learning algorithms;

a processing subsystem operable, at least in part, as a virtual machine, wherein the processing subsystem:

receives a first data packet associated with the patient from a data collection device;

produces a second data packet with the first data packet;

retrieves a trained machine learning algorithm from the set;

evaluates the trained machine learning algorithm with the first and second data packets;

detects a vessel occlusion and categorizes the vessel occlusion severity based on outputs of the trained machine learning algorithm;

based on the vessel occlusion severity, selects an automated alert from a set of multiple automated alerts;

transmits the automated alert to a set of user devices associated with a set of users; and

prompts treatment of the patient based on at least one input received from the set of user devices in response to the automated alert.

13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the outputs comprise a calculated irreversibly damaged volume of brain, wherein the vessel occlusion severity is determined at least in part based on the irreversibly damaged volume.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein the outputs further comprise a location of the vessel occlusion relative to a set of anatomical landmarks.

15. The system of claim 12 , wherein the treatment comprises initiating a transfer of the patient to a second point of care, wherein the first data packet is collected at a first point of care remote from the second point of care.

16. The system of claim 12 , wherein the second data packet is a mirror image version of the first data packet.

17. The system of claim 12 , further comprising processing the data packet with a second trained machine learning algorithm of the set, wherein the second trained machine learning algorithm is evaluated with the first data packet and is not evaluated with the second data packet.

18. The system of claim 17 , wherein the second trained machine learning algorithm is configured to detect a large vessel occlusion, wherein the large vessel occlusion comprises an occlusion at an M 1 segment of a middle cerebral artery.

19. The system of claim 17 , wherein each of the first and second trained machine learning algorithms comprises a convolutional neural network.

20. The system of claim 12 , wherein the processing subsystem further adjusts a place of the patient in a queue of multiple patients based on the vessel occlusion severity, wherein at least one of a timing of the automated alert or a subset of devices in the set of devices is adjusted in response to the adjusted place of the patient.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 19, 2024
From: VIZ.AI, INC.
To: CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE
Reel/Frame 068640/0585 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 23, 2023
From: MANSI, CHRISTOPHER; GOLAN, DAVID; LEVI, GIL; DUCHIN, YUVAL
To: VIZ.AI INC.
Reel/Frame 062789/0273 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 17122871 · Dec 15, 2020
Continuation 16938598 · Jul 24, 2020
Provisional Application 62880227 · Jul 30, 2019
Related Publication 20230206452A1 · Jun 29, 2023
References Cited (108)
US 6349330B1 · Bernadett et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 8374414B2 · Tang et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9307918B2 · Kinrot et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9439622B2 · Case et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 10346979B2 · Mansi et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10373315B2 · Mansi et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10599984B1 · Wubbels et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10733730B2 · Mansi et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10835257B2 · Ferrera et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10853449B1 · Nguyen · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10902602B1 · Mansi et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11462318B2 · Mansi et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11694807B2 · Golan et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20040161137A1 · Aben et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20060140473A1 · Brooksby et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070019846A1 · Bullitt et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080021502A1 · Imielinska et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090028403A1 · Bar-Aviv et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090129649A1 · Djeridane · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090279752A1 · Sirohey et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100106002A1 · Sugiyama et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110028825A1 · Douglas et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110052024A1 · Nowinski · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110116702A1 · Bredno et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110172550A1 · Martin et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120065987A1 · Farooq et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120201446A1 · Yang et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120237103A1 · Hu · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130172691A1 · Tran · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130185096A1 · Giusti et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130208955A1 · Zhao et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130208966A1 · Zhao et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140142982A1 · Janssens · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140142983A1 · Backhaus et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140222444A1 · Cerello et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140257854A1 · Becker et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140348408A1 · Zhu et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150011902A1 · Wang · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150104102A1 · Carreira et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150208994A1 · Rapoport · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150320365A1 · Schulze et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160012192A1 · Radhakrishnan et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160037057A1 · Westin et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160063191A1 · Vesto · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160100302A1 · Barash et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160110890A1 · Smith · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160135706A1 · Sullivan et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160180042A1 · Menon et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160188829A1 · Southerland et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170007167A1 · Kostic et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170143428A1 · Raffy et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170147765A1 · Mehta · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170181657A1 · Jin et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170228501A1 · Turner et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170228516A1 · Sampath et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170258433A1 · Gulsun et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170300654A1 · Stein et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170340260A1 · Chowdhury et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180025255A1 · Poole · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180046759A1 · Barral · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180085001A1 · Berger et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180110475A1 · Shaya · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180116620A1 · Chen et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180235482A1 · Fonte et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180253530A1 · Goldberg et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180365824A1 · Yuh · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180365828A1 · Mansi et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180366225A1 · Mansi et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190130228A1 · Fu et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190156484A1 · Nye · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190156937A1 · Shimomura et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190198160A1 · Barral · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190380643A1 · Kochura et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200058410A1 · Khouri et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200090331A1 · Mansi et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200279624A1 · Rao · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200294241A1 · Wu · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200359981A1 · Straka · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200364587A1 · Kapur et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210057112A1 · Mansi et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210137384A1 · Robinson et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210275025A1 · Hickle · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210334958A1 · Siow et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220087631A1 · d'Esterre · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220130547A1 · Grady et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220180518A1 · Agus et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
CN 109003299A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 2004243117A · 2004 [cited by applicant]
JP 4854717B2 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
JP 2012027565A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016086289A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016134125A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
Cai, Zhaowei , et al., “Cascade R-CNN: High Quality Object Detection and Instance Segmentation”, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.09756.pdf, Jun. 24, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Gupta, Akshat , et al., “Delineation of Ischemic Core and Penumbra Volumes from MRI using MSNet Architecture”, Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. Jul. 2019;2019:6730-6733. [cited by applicant]
He, Kaiming , et al., “Mask R-CNN”, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.06870.pdf, Jan. 24, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Ker, Justin , et al., “Image Thresholding Improves 3-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network 1-21 Diagnosis of Different Acute Brain Hemorrhages on Computed Tomography Scans”, Sensors 2019, 2167,May 10, 2019, www.mdpi.… [cited by applicant]
Keshavamurthy, K. , et al., “Machine learning algorithm for automatic detection of CT-identifiable hyperdense lesions associated with traumatic brain injury”, Mar. 23, 2017, SPIE Medical Imaging, Orlando, Florida. [cited by applicant]
Kirisil, H.A. , et al., “Standardized evaluation framework for evaluating coronary artery stenosis detection, stenosis quantification and lumen segmentation algorithms in computed tomography angiography”, Elsevier, 2013… [cited by applicant]
Kuang, Hulin , et al., “Segmenting Hemorrhagic and Ischemic Infarct Simultaneously From Follow-Up Non-Contrast CT Images in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke”, IEEE Access, vol. 7, 22, May 2019. [cited by applicant]
Lewis, Thomas L., et al., “Ambulance smartphone tool for field triage of ruptured aortic aneurysms (FILTR): study protocol for a prospective observational validation of diagnostic accuracy”, BMJ Open 2016, pp. 1-5 , htt… [cited by applicant]
Lidayova, Kristina , et al., “Skeleton-based 1-3,6-15 fast, fully automated generation of vessel tree structure for clinical evaluation of blood vessel systems”, In: Skeletonization : theory, methods and applications, J… [cited by applicant]
Liu, Liyuan , et al., “On the Variance of the Adaptive Learning Rate and Beyond”, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1908.03265.pdf, Apr. 17, 2020, Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2020. [cited by applicant]
Madhuripan, Nikhil , et al., “Computed Tomography Angiography in Head and Neck Emergencies”, Seminars in Ultrasound and CT and MRI, US, vol. 38, No. 4, 2017. Feb. 20, 2017 (Feb. 20, 2017), pp. 345-356. [cited by applicant]
Mittal, Sushil , et al., “Fast Automatic Detection of Calcified Coronary Lesions in 3D Cardiac CT Images”, MLMI 2010, pp. 1-9. [cited by applicant]
Smith, Wade S., et al., “Prognostic Significance of Angiographically Confirmed Large Vessel Intracranial Occlusion in Patients Presenting With Acute Brain Ischemia”, Neurocritical Care, vol. 4, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Yu, Y. , et al., “Use of Deep Learning to Predict Final Ischemic Stroke Lesions From Initial Magnetic Resonance Imaging”, Mar. 1, 2020, https:/europepmc.org/article/med/32163165. [cited by applicant]
Zerna, C. , et al., “Imaging, Intervention, and Workflow in Acute Ischemic Strike: The Calgary Approach”, AJNR M J Neuroradiol 37.978-84, Jun. 2016, pp. 978-984. [cited by applicant]
Keshavamurthy, Krishna , “Machine learning algorithm for automatic detection of CT-identifiable hyperdense lesions associated with traumatic brain injury”, Proc. of SPIE vol. 10134 2017. [cited by applicant]