IP Library Granted Patent US 12,433,296
Granted Patent B2
US 12,433,296 · App. 17/807,209 · Granted Oct 7, 2025

Modified antimicrobial peptides

Inventors: Dilip M. Shah (St. Louis, MO); Meenakshi Tetorya (St. Louis, MO)
Assignee: DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER
A01N63/50A01H5/10A01N37/46A01P1/00A01P3/00A61P31/10C07K14/4723C12N15/8282A61K38/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,433,296
App. No.
17/807,209
Granted
Oct 7, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Antimicrobial defensin peptide variants comprising modified C-terminal fragments of a defensin and nucleic acids encoding the same are disclosed. Compositions comprising the defensin variant peptides and methods of their use to control microbial infections of plants and vertebrate subjects as well as contamination of feedstuffs and foodstuffs are also disclosed.

Claims (26)

1. An antifungal peptide comprising a modified C-terminal plant defensin peptide wherein:

(i) the unmodified C terminal plant defensin peptide comprises from N-terminus to C-terminus the conserved amino acid sequence GXCX3-10(C)(X)(C) (SEQ ID NO: 592) and a conserved cysteine residue located at the C-terminus of the unmodified C terminal plant defensin peptide;

(ii) the conserved amino acid sequence GXCX3-10(C)(X)(C) (SEQ ID NO: 592) of the unmodified C terminal plant defensin peptide is replaced with a modified gamma-core consensus sequence GXCX3-10(F/W/Y)(F/W/Y)(F/W/Y) (SEQ ID NO: 587) in the modified C-terminal plant defensin peptide;

(iii) the modified C-terminal plant defensin peptide retains the conserved cysteine residue located at the C-terminus of the unmodified C terminal plant defensin peptide;

(iv) the modified C-terminal plant defensin peptide has a net positive charge of at least 3 at neutral pH and a hydrophobic amino acid content at least 18%, wherein the hydrophobic amino acids are alanine, leucine, isoleucine, valine, proline, phenylalanine, tryptophan, and methionine; and

(v) the modified C-terminal plant defensin peptide exhibits antifungal activity.

2. The antifungal peptide of claim 1 , wherein the modified C-terminal plant defensin peptide comprises a disulfide bond between the cysteine residue in the modified gamma-core consensus sequence and the conserved cysteine residue located at the C-terminus of the modified C-terminal defensin peptide.

3. The antifungal peptide of claim 1 , wherein the modified C-terminal plant defensin peptide consists of 15 to 30 amino acid residues.

4. A composition comprising the antifungal peptide of claim 1 and an agriculturally, pharmaceutically, or veterinary-practicably acceptable carrier, diluent, or excipient.

5. The composition of claim 4 , wherein the antifungal peptide is provided at a concentration of about 0.1 pg/ml to about 100 mg/ml or at a concentration of about 0.1 pg/gram to about 100 mg/gram and optionally wherein the composition comprises a sodium salt at a concentration of at least 100 mM and/or a calcium salt at a concentration of at least 2 mM.

6. A method for preventing or reducing crop damage by a plant pathogenic microbe comprising the step of contacting a plant, a plant seed, or other part of said plant with an effective amount of the composition of claim 4 .

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the plant pathogenic microbe is a Fusarium sp., Alternaria sp., Verticillium sp., Phytophthora sp., Colletotrichum sp., Botrytis sp., Cercospora sp., Phakopsora sp., Rhizoctonia sp., Sclerotinia sp., Pythium sp., Phoma sp., Leptosphaeria sp., Gaeumannomyces sp., Puccinia sp., Septoria sp., Penicillium sp., Lasiodiplodia sp., Phomopsis sp., Mycosphaerella sp., Golovinomyces sp., Erisyphe sp., Albugo sp., Setosphaeria sp., Cochliobolus sp., Helminthosporium sp., Diplodia sp., or Stenocarpella sp.

8. A medical device comprising the device and the composition of claim 4 , wherein the device comprises at least one surface that is topically coated and/or impregnated with the composition.

9. The medical device of claim 8 , wherein said device is a stent, a catheter, a contact lens, a condom, a patch, or a diaphragm.

10. A method for treating, preventing, or inhibiting a fungal Candida species infection in a subject in need thereof comprising administering to said subject an effective amount of the composition of claim 4 .

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein said administration comprises topical, enteral, parenteral, and/or intravenous introduction of the composition.

12. The method of claim 10 , wherein the subject is a human, livestock, poultry, fish, or a companion animal.

13. The method of claim 10 , wherein the fungal or Candida species infection is of a mucosal membrane, eye, skin, and/or a nail and the composition is applied to the mucosal membrane, eye, skin, and/or nail.

14. The method of claim 10 , wherein the fungal infection is by a dermatophyte, and wherein the dermatophyte is optionally selected from the group consisting of Trichophyton rubrum, Trichophyton interdigitale, Trichophyton violaceum, Trichophyton tonsurans, Trichophyton soudanense, Trichophyton mentagrophytes, Microsporum flavum, Epidermophyton floccosum , and Microsporum gypseum.

15. The method of claim 10 , wherein the microbial infection is by an Aspergillus, Cryptococcus, Penicillium, Rhizopus, Apophysomyces, Cunninghamella, Saksenaea, Rhizomucor, Syncephalostrum, Cokeromyces, Actinomucor, Pythium, Fusarium, Histoplasmosis , or Blastomyces species.

16. The method of claim 10 , wherein the microbial infection is by a Candida species and wherein the Candida species is Candida albicans ( C. albicans ), C. auris, C. glabrata, C. parasilosis, C. tropicalis , or C. krusei.

17. A plant part that is at least partly coated with the composition of claim 4 .

18. The plant part of claim 17 , wherein the part is a seed and the seed is optionally a corn, soybean, wheat, rice, cotton, Brassica sp., or tomato seed.

19. The plant part of claim 17 , wherein the plant part is a fruit, vegetable, or flower.

20. A recombinant polynucleotide comprising a polynucleotide encoding a peptide comprising the antifungal peptide of claim 1 , wherein the polynucleotide encoding the antifungal peptide is operably linked to a polynucleotide comprising a promoter which is heterologous to the polynucleotide encoding the antifungal peptide.

21. The peptide of claim 1 , wherein the conserved cysteine residue located at the C-terminus of the modified C-terminal defensin peptide is amidated.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 28, 2022
From: SHAH, DILIP M.; TETORYA, MEENAKSHI
To: DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER
Reel/Frame 061003/0521 →
Continuity (3)
Provisional Application 63365928 · Jun 6, 2022
Provisional Application 63202559 · Jun 16, 2021
Related Publication 20220408731A1 · Dec 29, 2022
References Cited (68)
US 5421839A · Ulbrich et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5538525A · Broekaert et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 6057287A · Markland · 2000 [cited by examiner]
US 6121436A · Liang et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 7521535B2 · Zhang et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7825297B2 · Shah et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 10253328B2 · Shah · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20020077284A1 · Eckert · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20030217382A1 · Anderson et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040064850A1 · Liang et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20060026710A1 · Ali et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20100113342A1 · Yount et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20130117880A1 · Smith et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20150158918A1 · Hulett · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150283204A1 · Van Der Weerden et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150373995A1 · Smith et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20190185877A1 · Boyle et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190194268A1 · Shah et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200060286A1 · Martinez et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20220081475A1 · Li et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220089661A1 · Li et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220408731A1 · Shah et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 200011178A2 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017156457A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020146368A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2023004435A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
Bartlett “Exploiting Chemical Diversity for Drug Discovery” Edited by Paul A Bartlett and Michael Entzeroth, The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2006, pp. 113-118. [cited by examiner]
“Find ETDs Home » Thesis Resources » Find ETDs” Online: “https://ndltd.org/thesis-resources/find-etds/” Accessed Jan. 31, 2023. [cited by examiner]
Irwin “ZINC—A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening” J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005, 45, 177-182. [cited by examiner]
Kim “PubChem in 2021: new data content and improved web interfaces” Nucleic Acids Research, 2021, vol. 49, Database issue Published online Nov. 5, 2020. [cited by examiner]
STN Registry/Zregistry (CAS Registrysm) Sep. 2016 2 pages. [cited by examiner]
Creighton, Thomas E. and Charles, Ian G.; “Sequences of the genes and polypeptide precursors for two bovine protease inhibitors.” J. Mol. Biol. (1987) 194 p. 11-22. [cited by examiner]
The Sigma-Aldrich Amino Acids reference chart, downloaded Nov. 15, 2023. [cited by examiner]
Bauer, Finn et al; “Structure determination of humand and murine beta-defensins reveals structural conservation in the absence of significant sequence similarity.” Prot. Sci. (2001) 10 p. 2470-2479. [cited by examiner]
Zapadka, Karolina L. et al; “Factora affecting the physical stability (aggregation) of peptide therapeutics.” Interface Focus (2017) 7 (0030). [cited by examiner]
Allen et al., “Plant defensins and virally encoded fungal toxin KP4 inhibit plant root growth,” Planta, Jan. 2008, vol. 227, Issue 2, pp. 331-339. [cited by applicant]
Avitabile et al., “Antimicrobial peptides from plants: stabilization of the y core of a tomato defensin by intramolecular disulfide bond,” Journal of Peptide Science, Feb. 2013, vol. 19, Issue 4, 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
El-Mounadi et al., “Antifungal mechanisms of a plant defensin MtDef4 are not conserved between the ascomycete fungi [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2020/012565, mailed Jun. 9, 2020, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kaur et al., “Subcellular targeting of an evolutionarily conserved plant defensin MtDef4.2 determines the outcome of blant-pathogen interaction in transgenic [cited by applicant]
Kerenga et al., “Salt-Tolerant Antifungal and Antibacterial Activities of Corn Defensin ZmD32,” Frontiers in Microbiology, Apr. 2019, vol. 10, Article 795, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “Antifungal Potency and Modes of Action of a Novel Olive Tree Defensin Against Closely Related Ascomycete Fungal Pathogens,” Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 2019, vol. 32, No. 12, pp. 1649-1664. [cited by applicant]
Munoz et al., “Specific domains of plant defensins differentially disrupt colony initiation, cell fusion and calcium homeostasis in Neurospora crassa,” Molecular Microbiology, 2014, vol. 92, No. 6, pp. 1357-1374. [cited by applicant]
Ramamoorthy et al., “Sphingolipid C-9 Methyltransferases Are Important for Growth and Virulence but Not for Sensitivity to Antifungal Plant Defensins in Fusarium graminearum,” Eukaryotic Cell, Feb. 2009, vol. 8, No. 2, … [cited by applicant]
Rigano et al., “A novel synthetic peptide from a tomato defensin exhibits antibacterial activities against Helicobacter pylori,” Journal of Peptide Science, Dec. 2012, vol. 18, No. 12, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Sagaram et al., “Structural and Functional Studies of a Phosphatidic Acid-Binding Antifungal Plant Defensin MtDef4: Identification of an RGFRRR Motif Governing Fungal Cell Entry,” PLoS One, Dec. 2013, vol. 8, Issue 12, … [cited by applicant]
Sagaram et al., “Structure-Activity Determinants in Antifungal Plant Defensins MsDef1 and MtDef4 with Different Modes of Action against Fusarium graminearum,” PLoS One, Apr. 2011, vol. 6, Issue 4, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Sathoff et al., “Plant Defensin Peptides have Antifungal and Antibacterial Activity Against Human and Plant Pathogens,” Phytopathology, 2019, vol. 109, No. 3, pp. 402-408. [cited by applicant]
Shah et al., “Antifungal peptides come of age,” Fungal Biology Reviews, 2013, vol. 26, pp. 107-108. [cited by applicant]
Spelbrink et al., “Differential Antifungal and Calcium Channel-Blocking Activity among Structurally Related Plant Defensins,” Plant Physiology, Aug. 2004, vol. 135, pp. 2055-2067. [cited by applicant]
Velivelli et al., “Modes of Action of a Bi-domain Plant Defensin MtDef5 Against a Bacterial Pathogen Xanthomonas campestris,” Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2018, vol. 9, Article 934, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chan et al., “Tryptophan- and arginine-rich antimicrobial peptides: Structures and mechanisms of action,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, Sep. 2006, vol. 1758, pp. 1184-1202. [cited by applicant]
Dathe et al., “Cyclization Increases the Antimicrobial Activity and Selectivity of Arginine- and Tryptophan-Containing Hexapeptides,” Biochemistry, Jun. 2004, vol. 43, pp. 9140-9150. [cited by applicant]
Deslouches et al., “De Novo Generation of Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides: Influence of Length and Tryptophan Substitution on Antimicrobial Activity,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Jan. 2005, vol. 49, No. 1, pp… [cited by applicant]
Falanga et al., “Cyclic Peptides as Novel Therapeutic Microbicides: Engineering of Human Defensin Mimetics,” Molecules, Jul. 2017, vol. 22, No. 1217, pp. 1-15. [cited by applicant]
Munoz et al., “Concentration-dependent mechanisms of cell penetration and killing by the de novo designed antifungal hexapeptide PAF26,” Molecular Microbiology, Jul. 2012, vol. 85, No. 1, pp. 89-106. [cited by applicant]
Schibli et al., “Tryptophan-rich antimicrobial peptides: comparative properties and membrane interactions,” Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Oct. 2002, vol. 80, pp. 667-677. [cited by applicant]
Shi et al., “Cation-TT Interaction in Model α-Helical Peptides,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, Mar. 2002, vol. 124, pp. 3284-3291. [cited by applicant]
Tetorya et al., “Plant defensin MtDef4-derived antifungal peptide with multiple modes of action and potential as a bio-inspired fungicide,” Molecular Plant Pathology, Apr. 2023, pp. 1-18. [cited by applicant]
Tucker et al., “Discovery of Next-Generation Antimicrobials through Bacterial Self-Screening of Surface-Displayed Peptide Libraries,” Cell, Jan. 2018, vol. 172, pp. 618-628. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US22/72971, mailed on Nov. 3, 2022, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Shah et al., “Defensin-like protein isoform 1 precursor [Glycine max],” NCBI Reference Sequence: NP_001336659.1, Apr. 26, 2021. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/NP_001336659.1>, 2 p… [cited by applicant]
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees in PCT/US22/72971, mailed on Sep. 15, 2022, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Shafee et al., “The Defensins Consist of Two Independent, Convergent Protein Superfamilies” Mol. Biol. Evol. 33(9) pp. 2345-2356 Jun. 2016. [cited by applicant]
Office Action in EA202393236, mailed Jun. 16, 2022, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action in EG/P/2023/01933, mailed Apr. 7, 2025, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action in EA202393236/28, mailed Apr. 1, 2025, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Partial Supplementary European Search Report in EP22826025.3, mailed Jun. 12, 2025, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]