IP Library Granted Patent US 12,443,870
Granted Patent B2
US 12,443,870 · App. 18/152,638 · Granted Oct 14, 2025

High-speed spatial light modulation and quantum control

Inventors: Artur Hermans (Boston, MA); Adrian Johannes Menssen (Cambridge, MA); Christopher Louis Panuski (Somerville, MA); Ian Robert Christen (Cambridge, MA); Dirk Robert Englund (Brookline, MA)
Assignee: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
G06N10/40G02B2006/12061G02B2006/12142G02F2203/12G02F2203/15
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,443,870
App. No.
18/152,638
Granted
Oct 14, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

An atom control architecture based on VIS-IR photonic integrated circuit (PIC) technology is characterized by (1) visible (VIS) and near-infrared (IR) wavelength operation, (2) channel counts extensible beyond 1000s of individually addressable atoms, (3) high intensity modulation extinction and (4) repeatability compatible with low gate errors, and (5) fast switching times. A 16-channel SiN-based APIC with (5.8±0.4) ns response times and <−30 dB extinction ratio at a wavelength of 780 nm. Based on a complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) fabrication process, this atom-control PIC (APIC) technology can be used for atomic, molecular, and optical physics and emerging applications, from quantum computers with cold atoms or ions to quantum networks with solid-state color centers. This APIC technology is especially suitable for scalable quantum information processing based on optically programmable atomic systems.

Claims (42)

1. A method of addressing a qubit in an array of qubits, the method comprising:

coupling an excitation beam in a first polarization state into a resonator in an array of resonators integrated into a chip;

modulating the excitation beam with the resonator;

coupling the excitation beam from the resonator out of the chip and into free space in a second polarization state orthogonal to the first polarization state; and

illuminating the qubit with the excitation beam.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, before illuminating the qubit with the excitation beam, combining the excitation beam with a reference beam.

3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising, before combining the excitation beam with the reference beam, spatially modulating the reference beam.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein combining the excitation beam with the reference beam causes destructive interference between the excitation beam and the reference beam.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the reference beam has an amplitude and/or a phase selected to suppress the excitation beam by at least 30 dB.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, before coupling the excitation beam into the resonator, spatially modulating the excitation beam.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein modulating the excitation beam with the resonator comprises driving the resonator at a mechanical resonance frequency of the resonator.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

coupling the excitation beam into the resonator comprises directing the excitation beam through a first port of a polarizing beam splitter towards the resonator, and

illuminating the qubit with the excitation beam comprises directing the excitation beam from the resonator through a second port of a polarizing beam splitter towards the qubit.

9. A system for controlling an array of qubits, the system comprising:

a spatial light modulator (SLM) to fan out an excitation beam into an array of excitation beams in a first polarization state;

a polarizing beam splitter (PBS), in optical communication with the SLM, to direct the array of excitation beams; and

an atom-control photonic integrated circuit (APIC), in optical communication with the PBS, to generate an array of pulses in a second polarization state orthogonal to the first polarization state from the array of excitation beams and to project the array of pulses onto the array of qubits via the PBS.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the APIC comprises:

an array of modulators, formed in the APIC, to produce the array of pulses from the array of excitation beams;

an array of input couplers, formed in the APIC in optical communication with the array of modulators, to couple the array of excitation beams into the array of modulators; and

an array of output couplers, formed in the APIC in optical communication with the array of modulators, to couple the array of pulses out of the APIC.

11. The system of claim 10 , wherein each modulator in the array of modulators comprises a dual-ring Mach-Zehnder modulator (DRMZM) having ring resonators with resonant frequencies tuned by respective piezoelectric elements and respective integrated heaters.

12. The system of claim 10 , wherein the APIC further comprises:

a complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) substrate supporting the array of modulators and containing electronic components, operably coupled to the array of modulators, to drive the array of modulators.

13. The system of claim 9 , wherein the SLM is a first SLM, and further comprising:

a second SLM to fan out a reference beam into an array of reference beams; and

a beam splitter, in optical communication with the APIC and the second SLM, to combine the array of reference beams with the array of pulses.

14. The system of claim 9 , wherein the SLM comprises:

an array of pixels, each pixel in the array of pixels comprising:

a resonant photonic structure to reflect incident light at a resonance frequency; and

a piezoelectric actuator, in mechanical communication with the resonant photonic structure, to strain the resonant photonic structure, thereby changing a reflectance of the resonant photonic structure.

15. The system of claim 14 , wherein the resonant photonic structure comprises at least one of a grating, a dielectric structure defining a cavity, a nanoantenna, a photonic crystal, or a plasmonic structure.

16. The system of claim 14 , wherein the piezoelectric actuator comprises a layer of piezoelectric material and the resonant photonic structure is disposed on the layer of piezoelectric material.

17. The system of claim 14 , wherein the piezoelectric actuator is a first piezoelectric actuator on a first side of the resonant photonic structure and further comprises:

a second piezoelectric actuator, on a second side of the resonant photonic structure, to laterally strain the resonant photonic structure with the first piezoelectric actuator.

18. The system of claim 14 , further comprising:

a layer of liquid crystal material, in electromagnetic communication with the resonant photonic structure, to tune the resonance frequency of the resonant photonic structure.

19. The system of claim 14 , further comprising:

a heater, in thermal communication with the resonant photonic structure, to tune the resonance frequency of the resonant photonic structure.

20. The system of claim 14 , further comprising:

a complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) substrate supporting the array of pixels and containing electronic components, operably coupled to the array of pixels, to drive the array of pixels.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 27, 2023
From: HERMANS, ARTUR; PANUSKI, CHRISTOPHER LOUIS; MENSSEN, ADRIAN JOHANNES; CHRISTEN, IAN ROBERT; ENGLUND, DIRK ROBERT
To: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Reel/Frame 063466/0375 →
Continuity (3)
Provisional Application 63318636 · Mar 10, 2022
Provisional Application 63318725 · Mar 10, 2022
Related Publication 20230288637A1 · Sep 14, 2023
References Cited (42)
US 5285308A · Jenkins et al. · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 6396083B1 · Ortiz et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 8472103B2 · Reichelt · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 10466495B2 · Liu et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20060262378A1 · Machida et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20180180897A1 · Liu et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20210270596A1 · Pupeza · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220374756A1 · Doherty · 2022 [cited by examiner]
WO 2020236574A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
“Benchmarking an 11-qubit quantum computer” by Wright et al, Nature Communications, 10:5464, pp. 1-6 (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
“High-frequency, resonant acousto-optic modulators fabricated in a MEMS foundry platform” by Valle et al, Optics Letters, vol. 44, No. 15, pp. 3777-3780 (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
“Integrated optical addressing of an ion qubit” by Mehta et al, Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 11, pp. 1066-1070 (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
“Hybrid integration methods for on-chip quantum Photonics” by Kim et al, Optica, vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 291-308 (Year: 2020). [cited by examiner]
Arbabi et al. “MEMS-tunable dielectric metasurface lens.” Nature Communications 9.1 (2018): 1-9. [cited by applicant]
Benea-Chelmus et al. “Electro-optic spatial light modulator from an engineered organic layer.” Nature Communications 12.1 (2021): 1-10. [cited by applicant]
Block et al. “Optimizing the spatial resolution of photonic crystal label-free imaging.” Applied Optics 48.34 (2009): 6567-6574. [cited by applicant]
Bogaerts et al., “Silicon microring resonators.” Laser & Photonics Reviews 6.1 (2012): 47-73. [cited by applicant]
Chang et al. “Toward the next-generation VR/AR optics: a review of holographic near-eye displays from a human-centric perspective.” Optica 7.11 (2020): 1563-1578. [cited by applicant]
Cicek et al. “Integrated optical vortex beam receivers.” Optics Express 24.25 (2016): 28529-28539. [cited by applicant]
Dong et al., “High-Speed Programmable Photonic Circuits in a Cryogenically Compatible, Visible-NIR 200 Mm CMOS Architecture,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.12531 (2021), 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ebadi et al. “Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom programmable quantum simulator.” Nature 595.7866 (2021): 227-232, 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
Elshaari et al., “Thermo-Optic Characterization of Silicon Nitride Resonators for Cryogenic Photonic Circuits,” IEEE Photonics Journal 8.3 (2016): 1-9, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Guarino et al. “Electro-optically Tunable Microring Resonators in Lithium Niobate.” Nature Photonics 1, 407 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2007.93, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Horie et al. “High-speed, phase-dominant spatial light modulation with silicon-based active resonant antennas.” ACS Photonics 5.5 (2017): 1711-1717. [cited by applicant]
Hornbeck “Digital light processing for high-brightness high-resolution applications.” Projection Displays III. vol. 3013. SPIE, 1997, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Lee et al. “Back-end deposited silicon photonics for monolithic integration on CMOS.” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 19.2 (2012): 8200207-8200207, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Li et al. “Phase-only transmissive spatial light modulator based on tunable dielectric metasurface.” Science 364.6445 (2019): 1087-1090. [cited by applicant]
Lin et al. All-optical machine learning using diffractive deep neural networks. Science 361, 1004-1008 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Liu et al. “S4: A free electromagnetic solver for layered periodic structures.” Computer Physics Communications 183.10 (2012): 2233-2244, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Menssen et al., “Scalable photonic integrated circuits for programmable control of atomic systems,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.03100 (2022), 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Moreno et al. “Complete polarization control of light from a liquid crystal spatial light modulator.” Optics Express 20.1 (2012): 364-376. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.000364. [cited by applicant]
Park et al. “All-solid-state spatial light modulator with independent phase and amplitude control for three-dimensional LiDAR applications.” Nature Nanotechnology 16.1 (2021): 69-76. [cited by applicant]
Peña et al. “Complete polarization and phase control with a single spatial light modulator for the generation of complex light fields.” Laser Physics 28.7 (2018): 076201, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Petraru et al. “Ferroelectric BaTiO 3 thin-film optical waveguide modulators.” Applied Physics Letters 81.8 (2002): 1375-1377. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1498151. [cited by applicant]
Poulton et al. “Coherent solid-state LIDAR with silicon photonic optical phased arrays.” Optics Letters 42.20 (2017): 4091-4094. [cited by applicant]
Stanfield et al. “CMOS-compatible, piezo-optomechanically tunable photonics for visible wavelengths and cryogenic temperatures.” Optics Express 27.20 (2019): 28588-28605 (18 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al “Theory and applications of guided-mode resonance filters.” Applied Optics 32.14 (1993): 2606-2613, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al. “Nanophotonic lithium niobate electro-optic modulators.” Optics Express 26.2 (2018): 1547-1555. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al. “Optically reconfigurable metasurfaces and photonic devices based on phase change materials.” Nature Photonics 10.1 (2016): 60-65. [cited by applicant]
Wu et al. “Dynamic beam steering with all-dielectric electro-optic III-V multiple-quantum-well metasurfaces.” Nature Communications 10.1 (2019): 1-9. [cited by applicant]
Zeng et al. “Hybrid graphene metasurfaces for high-speed mid-infrared light modulation and single-pixel imaging.” Light: Science & Applications 7.1 (2018): 1-8. [cited by applicant]
Zhu et al. “Arbitrary manipulation of spatial amplitude and phase using phase-only spatial light modulators.” Scientific Reports 4.1 (2014): 1-7. [cited by applicant]