IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,458,472
Granted Patent B2
US 12,458,472 · App. 18/566,628 · Granted Nov 4, 2025

Root-analog dental implants and systems, devices, and methods for designing and manufacturing same

Inventors: David Sanderson (Burlingame, CA); Michael Collins (San Marcos, CA); Brian Bowman (Carlsbad, CA); Colin Murphy (San Diego, CA); Brandon Duquesnel (Temecula, CA)
Assignee: iDentical, Inc.
A61C13/0004A61C8/0036A61C8/0037A61C8/0075A61C13/0019A61C2008/0046
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,458,472
App. No.
18/566,628
Granted
Nov 4, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A root portion of a root-analog dental implant may include a core positioned in an approximate center of the root portion of the dental implant. The core may provide mechanical strength and/or support for the dental implant and may include one or more struts. The root-analog dental implant may further include a porous surface positioned on a portion of a vertically oriented exterior surface of the core. The struts may be configured and arranged to provide mechanical strength and/or support for the root-analog dental implant.

Claims (26)

1 . A root portion of a root-analog dental implant, the root portion of the root-analog dental implant being configured to fit within an alveolar socket of an extracted tooth root, the root portion comprising:

a core configured to provide mechanical strength for the root-analog dental implant, a curvature of a centerline of the core being configured to follow a curvature of a centerline of the extracted tooth root, the centerline of the core being positioned in an approximately vertically oriented center of the core and the centerline of the extracted tooth root being positioned in an approximately vertically oriented center of the tooth root;

a porous surface positioned on a portion of the core, wherein an exterior geometry of the porous surface is configured to fit within the alveolar socket; and

a strut configured to provide mechanical strength for the root-analog dental implant, the strut extending from an external surface of the core into the porous surface along a portion of a length of the core.

2 . The root portion of a root-analog dental implant of claim 1 , wherein an external surface of the strut fits within the exterior geometry of the porous surface.

3 . The root portion of a root-analog dental implant of claim 1 , wherein the porous surface includes a plurality of interconnected and overlapping elements.

4 . The root portion of a root-analog dental implant of claim 1 , wherein the porous surface includes a plurality of interconnected and overlapping elements at least some of the plurality of interconnected and overlapping elements having a surface roughness.

5 . The root portion of a root-analog dental implant of claim 1 , wherein the porous surface includes a plurality of protrusions.

6 . The root portion of a root-analog dental implant of claim 1 , wherein the porous surface includes a plurality of cavities.

7 . The root portion of a root-analog dental implant of claim 1 , wherein a thickness of the porous surface varies along a length of the core.

8 . The root portion of a root-analog dental implant of claim 1 , wherein a thickness of the strut is variable along a length of the core.

9 . The root portion of a root-analog dental implant of claim 1 , further comprising a plurality of struts.

10 . The root portion of a root-analog dental implant of claim 1 , wherein a shape of the strut is responsive to a shape of curvature of a centerline of the core.

11 . The root portion of a root-analog dental implant of claim 1 , wherein root portion of the root-analog dental implant includes a plurality of struts and the core has a lingual side, a buccal side, a mesial side, and a distal side, further wherein more struts of the plurality of struts extend from the lingual side and the distal side than extend from the mesial side and the distal side.

12 . The root portion of a root-analog dental implant of claim 1 , wherein the alveolar socket is unmodified when the root-analog dental implant is inserted therein.

13 . The root portion of a root-analog dental implant of claim 1 , wherein the core is designed using a template core.

14 . The root portion of a root-analog dental implant of claim 1 , wherein the implant is manufactured using an additive manufacturing process.

15 . The root portion of a root-analog dental implant of claim 1 , further comprising a coronal section positioned proximate to the core, the coronal section having surface texturing configured to engage with a crest of the alveolar socket.

16 . A root portion of a root-analog dental implant configured to fit within an alveolar socket of an extracted tooth root, the root portion comprising:

a core configured to provide structural and mechanical support for the root-analog dental implant, a curvature of a centerline of the core being configured to follow a curvature of a centerline of the extracted tooth root the centerline of the core being positioned in an approximately vertically oriented center of the core and the centerline of the extracted tooth root being positioned in an approximately vertically oriented center of the tooth root;

a porous surface positioned on a portion of the core, wherein an exterior geometry of the porous surface is configured to fit within an unmodified alveolar socket; and

a plurality of vertically oriented struts extending from the core into the porous surface.

17 . The root portion of a root-analog dental implant of claim 16 , wherein the porous surface includes a plurality of interconnected overlapping elements.

18 . The root portion of a root-analog dental implant of claim 16 , wherein the porous surface includes a plurality of cavities.

19 . The root portion of a root-analog dental implant of claim 16 , wherein the porous surface thickness varies both circumferentially and along the centerline of the core.

20 . The root portion of a root-analog dental implant of claim 16 , wherein a thickness of the porous surface is responsive to a shape of curvature of a centerline of the core.

Assignments (5)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 9, 2025
From: BOWMAN, BRIAN
To: IDENTICAL, INC.
Reel/Frame 072531/0405 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 9, 2025
From: COLLINS, MICHAEL
To: IDENTICAL, INC.
Reel/Frame 072531/0433 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 9, 2025
From: DUQUESNEL, BRANDON
To: IDENTICAL, INC.
Reel/Frame 072531/0439 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 9, 2025
From: MURPHY, COLIN
To: IDENTICAL, INC.
Reel/Frame 072531/0446 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 9, 2025
From: SANDERSON, DAVID
To: IDENTICAL, INC.
Reel/Frame 072531/0487 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 17573606 · Jan 11, 2022
Provisional Application 63251623 · Oct 2, 2021
Provisional Application 63213192 · Jun 21, 2021
Related Publication 20240261067A1 · Aug 8, 2024
References Cited (81)
US 4186486A · Gordon · 1980 [cited by examiner]
US 4252525A · Child · 1981 [cited by examiner]
US 4492577A · Farris · 1985 [cited by examiner]
US 5199873A · Schulte et al. · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5449370A · Vaitekunas · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5527182A · Willoughby · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 6039568A · Hinds · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6095817A · Wagner · 2000 [cited by examiner]
US 6168633B1 · Shoher · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 6273722B1 · Phillips · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6921264B2 · Mayer et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7708557B2 · Rubbert · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7718100B2 · Soler · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 8287279B2 · Pirker · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8430668B2 · Bassett et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8454362B2 · Rubbert · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8457930B2 · Schroeder · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8562346B2 · Collins · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8602780B2 · Rubbert · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8684734B1 · Lyren · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 8911234B2 · Mayer et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9226784B2 · Lehmann et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9433480B2 · Pelote · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 9539062B2 · Rubbert et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9707058B2 · Bassett et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9730771B2 · Westover · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9801697B2 · Rubbert et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10449019B2 · Nesbit et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20030235805A1 · Lax · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040241621A1 · Lax · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050079469A1 · Akagawa · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050142517A1 · Frysh et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20080020343A1 · Mount · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080020349A1 · Dricot · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080090208A1 · Rubbert · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090092944A1 · Pirker · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090215007A1 · Caterini · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100105009A1 · Karkar et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100203478A1 · Rubbert · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100240009A1 · Gogarnoiu · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100316970A1 · Shih et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110008754A1 · Bassett · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110123951A1 · Lomicka · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120129132A1 · Lomicka · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120214128A1 · Collins · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120237898A1 · Palti et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130209961A1 · Rubbert · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130323677A1 · Pearson · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130344459A1 · Collins · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140023992A1 · Willis · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140038134A1 · Nguyen · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160015483A1 · Kumar et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160022332A1 · Baehre et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160166363A1 · Varsano · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160270887A1 · Pearson · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160361150A1 · Berndt et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170156824A1 · Rubbert et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170172712A1 · Rubbert et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180250102A1 · Schulter et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180280121A1 · Zhang et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180344894A1 · Kay et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20220008172A1 · Wedeking · 2022 [cited by examiner]
CN 202724012U · 2013 [cited by examiner]
CN 106037965A · 2016 [cited by examiner]
EP 3421006A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2005079696A1 · 2005 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2010146383A1 · 2010 [cited by examiner]
WO 2011132006A2 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018011604A2 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Evans et al., “Anatomic Customization of Root-Analog Dental Implants With Cone-Beam CT and CAD/CAM Fabrication: A Cadaver-Based Pilot Evaluation”, Journal of Oral Implantology, vol. XLIV/No. One, 2018, pp. 15-25. [cited by applicant]
Figliuzzi et al., “A Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) Root Analogue Implant Placed in the Anterior Maxilla: Case Report”, iMedPub Journals, vol. 2 No. 1: Jan. 11, 2016, pp. 1-5. [cited by applicant]
Figliuzzi et al., “A Novel Root Analogue Dental Implant using CT Scan and CAD/CAM: Selective Laser Melting Technology”, Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012, vol. 41, pp. 858-862. [cited by applicant]
Heydecke et al., “Optimal Esthetics in Single-Tooth Replacement with the Re-Implant System: A Case Report”, The International Journal of Prosthodontics vol. 12, No. 2, 1999, pp. 184-189. [cited by applicant]
Identical, Inc.; PCT/US2022/034388 filed Jun. 21, 2022; International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed Aug. 3, 2022; ISA/US; 8 pp. [cited by applicant]
Lee et al., “Biomechanical Evaluation of Initial Stability of a Root Analogue Implant Design with Drilling Protocol: A 3D Finite Element Analysis”, Applied Science, vol. 10 (4104), Jun. 15, 2020, pp. 1-13. [cited by applicant]
Mangano et al., “Custom-made, Root-Analogue Direct Laser Metal Forming Implant: a Case Report”, Lasers Med Science, vol. 27, Jun. 15, 2012, pp. 1241-1245. [cited by applicant]
Moin et al., “A Patient Specific Biomechanical Analysis of Custom Root Analogue Implant Designs on Alveolar Bone Stress: A Finite Element Study”, International Journal of Dentistry, vol. 2016, Article ID 8242535, Mar. 2… [cited by applicant]
Pirker et al., “Immediate, Non-Submerged, Root-Analogue Zirconia Implants Placed into Single-Rooted Extraction Sockets: 2-year follow-up of a Clinical Study”, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol… [cited by applicant]
Pour et al., “Historical development of root analogue implants: a review of published papers” British journal of oral and Maxillofacial surgery, 2019, pp. 1-9. [cited by applicant]
Pour et al., “Innovative Single-Tooth Replacement with an Individual Root-Analog Hybrid Implant in the Esthetic Zone: Case Report”, The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 32, No. 3, 2017, pp. 1… [cited by applicant]
Roestam Banai, “Current State of Root Analogue Implants (RAI): A Systemic Review”, 2017, pp. 1-35. [cited by applicant]