IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,461,171
Granted Patent B2
US 12,461,171 · App. 18/503,273 · Granted Nov 4, 2025

Single phase broken conductor detection

Inventors: Yanfeng Gong (Dublin, OH); Normann Fischer (Colfax, WA); Gandhali P Juvekar (Mountlake Terrace, WA); Kanchanrao Gangadhar Dase (Pullman, WA)
Assignee: Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc.
G01R31/54H02H1/0007H02H6/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,461,171
App. No.
18/503,273
Granted
Nov 4, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present disclosure relates to systems and methods to detect a fault in an electric power system. One embodiment may detect a single phase broken conductor in a multi-phase electric power system. An intelligent electronic device (IED) may receive a plurality of measurements over time of a current through an electrical conductor in the electric power system. Based on the measurements of the current, a fault detection subsystem may determine a zero-sequence current, a negative-sequence current, and a positive-sequence current. The fault detection subsystem may determine a ratio of the zero-sequence current, the negative-sequence current, and the positive-sequence current, and may monitor the ratio over time. The fault detection subsystem may identify the broken conductor condition based on the ratio and a fault detection region. A protective action subsystem may implement a protective action based on identification of the broken conductor condition.

Claims (66)

1 . A system to detect a fault in an electric power system, the system comprising:

an intelligent electronic device (IED) to receive a plurality of measurements over time of a current through an electrical conductor in the electric power system;

a fault detection subsystem to monitor for a broken conductor condition and configured to:

determine a zero-sequence current based on the measurements of the current;

determine a negative-sequence current based on the measurements of the current;

determine a positive-sequence current based on the measurements of the current;

determine a ratio of the zero-sequence current, the negative-sequence current, and the positive-sequence current;

monitor the ratio over a time; and

identify the broken conductor condition based on the ratio; and

a protective action subsystem to implement a protective action based on identification of the broken conductor condition.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the fault detection subsystem is further configured to:

determine a real component and an imaginary component of the ratio; and

identify the broken conductor condition when:

the real component of the ratio falls between a minimum ratio threshold and a maximum ratio threshold; and

the imaginary component of the ratio falls between a maximum angle threshold and a minimum angle threshold.

3 . The system of claim 2 , wherein the minimum ratio threshold and the maximum ratio threshold are defined between one of a fixed minimum real value and a fixed maximum real value, and a minimum radius and a maximum radius.

4 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the ratio comprises a sum of the zero-sequence current and the negative-sequence current, divided by the positive-sequence current.

5 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of measurements comprise only measurements from a local node.

6 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the electrical conductor comprises a suspended conductor and the protective action subsystem is configured to implement the protective action within a window defined by a time for the suspended conductor to fall to the ground.

7 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the electric power system comprises multiple phases, and the fault detection subsystem is further configured to monitor each phase.

8 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the fault detection subsystem is further configured to:

identify a phase with a minimum current; and

confirm that the phase with the minimum current corresponds to a phase associated with the broken conductor condition prior to implementation of the protective action.

9 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the fault detection subsystem is further configured to compare the positive-sequence current to a minimum current requirement, and to implement the protective action only when the positive-sequence current exceeds the minimum current requirement.

10 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the fault detection subsystem is further configured to identify at least one of a single-phase-ground fault, a phase-phase fault, a phase-phase-ground fault, and a 3-phase fault based on the ratio, and the protective action subsystem is further configured to implement the protective action based on identification of such a fault.

11 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the fault detection subsystem is further configured to:

identify a minimum phase current;

determine a magnitude of a phasor corresponding to the minimum phase current

determine an angle of the phasor corresponding to an angle of positive sequence voltage advanced by 90 degrees;

determine a refined ratio by subtracting the phasor from the ratio.

12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the refined ratio compensates for the charging current of the electrical conductor.

13 . A method of detecting a fault in an electric power system, the method comprising:

receiving, using an intelligent electronic device (IED) a plurality of measurements over time of a current through an electrical conductor in the electric power system to monitor for a broken conductor condition;

determining, using a fault detection subsystem, a zero-sequence current based on a measurement of the current;

determining, using the fault detection subsystem, a negative-sequence current based on the measurement of the current;

determining, using the fault detection subsystem, a positive-sequence current based on the measurement of the current;

determining, using the fault detection subsystem, a ratio of the zero-sequence current, the negative-sequence current, and the positive-sequence current;

monitoring, using the fault detection subsystem, the ratio over a time;

identifying, using the fault detection subsystem, the broken conductor condition based on the ratio; and

implementing, using a protective action subsystem, a protective action based on identification of the broken conductor condition.

14 . The method of claim 13 , further comprising:

determining, using the fault detection subsystem, a real component and an imaginary component of the ratio;

identifying, using the fault detection subsystem, the broken conductor condition when:

the real component of the ratio falls between a minimum ratio threshold and a maximum ratio threshold; and

the imaginary component of the ratio falls between a maximum angle threshold and a minimum angle threshold.

15 . The method of claim 14 , wherein the minimum ratio threshold and the maximum ratio threshold are defined between one of a fixed minimum real value and a fixed maximum real value, and a minimum radius from an origin and a maximum radius from an origin.

16 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the ratio comprises a sum of the zero-sequence current and the negative-sequence current, divided by the positive-sequence current.

17 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the plurality of measurements comprise only measurements from a local node.

18 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the electrical conductor comprises a suspended conductor and the protective action subsystem is configured to implement the protective action within a window defined by the time for the suspended conductor to fall to the ground.

19 . The method of claim 13 , further comprising:

monitoring, using the fault detection subsystem, a plurality of phases.

20 . The method of claim 19 , further comprising:

identifying, using the fault detection subsystem, a phase with a minimum current; and

confirming, using the fault detection subsystem, that the phase with the minimum current corresponds to a phase associated with the broken conductor condition prior to implementing the protective action.

21 . The method of claim 13 , further comprising:

comparing, using the fault detection subsystem, the positive-sequence current to a minimum current requirement; and

implementing the protective action only when the positive-sequence current exceeds the minimum current requirement.

22 . The method of claim 13 , further comprising:

identifying, using the fault detection subsystem, at least one of a single-phase-ground fault, a phase-phase fault, a phase-phase-ground fault, and a 3-phase fault based on the ratio, and

implementing, using the protective action subsystem, the protective action based on identification of such a fault.

23 . The method of claim 13 , further comprising:

identifying, using the fault detection subsystem, a minimum phase current;

determining, using the fault detection subsystem, a magnitude of a phasor corresponding to the minimum phase current

determining, using the fault detection subsystem, an angle of the phasor corresponding to an angle of positive sequence voltage advanced by 90 degrees;

determining, using the fault detection subsystem, a refined ratio by subtracting the phasor from the ratio.

24 . The method of claim 23 , wherein the refined ratio compensates for the charging current of the electrical conductor.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 7, 2023
From: GONG, YANFENG; FISCHER, NORMANN; JUVEKAR, GANDHALI P; DASE, KANCHANRAO GANGADHAR
To: SCHWEITZER ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 065478/0236 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250147123A1 · May 8, 2025
References Cited (66)
US 4297740A · Hagberg · 1981 [cited by applicant]
US 4347542A · Calhoun · 1982 [cited by applicant]
US 4357644A · Schmidt · 1982 [cited by applicant]
US 4600961A · Bishop · 1986 [cited by applicant]
US 5883578A · Roberts · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6453248B1 · Hart · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6573726B1 · Roberts · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6833711B1 · Hou · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 7720619B2 · Hou · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7945400B2 · Hou · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8289668B2 · Kasztenny · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8321162B2 · Labuschagne · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8581723B2 · Schweitzer · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8942954B2 · Gong · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9160158B2 · Schweitzer · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9413156B2 · O'Brien · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9509399B2 · Kasztenny · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9568516B2 · Gubba Ravikumar · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10340684B2 · Sridharan · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10823777B2 · Dase · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10910826B2 · Sridharan · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11143715B2 · Bell · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11946966B1 · Chowdhury · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 12362556B2 · Juvekar · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20050057212A1 · Harbaugh · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050231871A1 · Karimi · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20070055889A1 · Henneberry · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080031520A1 · Hou · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080211511A1 · Choi · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20110075304A1 · Hamer · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120063040A1 · Rostron · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120068717A1 · Gong · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120161684A1 · Tiwari · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120330582A1 · Wiszniewski · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130107405A1 · Blumschein · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130221976A1 · Blumschein · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140028116A1 · O'Brien · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150124358A1 · Hulse · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160041216A1 · Tang · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160091537A1 · Gaarder · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160266193A1 · Ennis · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160299187A1 · Liang · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160308349A1 · Sridharan · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170315168A1 · Benmouyal · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180106851A1 · Schweitzer, III · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180284180A1 · Ha · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190317143A1 · Dase · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20210048486A1 · Bell · 2021 [cited by examiner]
CN 1601848 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
CN 101699301 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
CN 102608491 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 102694375 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 102696161 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 103308823 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
CN 104730410 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 204462305 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 105738751 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 106908692 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 105207176 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 109324269 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 109975661 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2007086944 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014018909 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019229638 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
William O'Brien, et al. “Catching Falling Conductors in Midair—Detecting and Tripping Broken Distribution Circuit Conductors at Protection Speeds” Presented at the 42nd Annual Western Protective Relay Conference, Oct. 2… [cited by applicant]
Kanchanrao Dase and Normann Fischer, “Computationally Efficient Methods for Improved Double-Ended Transmission Line Fault Locating” Originally Presented at the 45th Annual Western Protective Relay Conference, Oct. 2018. [cited by applicant]