IP Library Granted Patent US 12,471,997
Granted Patent B2
US 12,471,997 · App. 18/046,085 · Granted Nov 18, 2025

Systems and methods for automatically detecting anatomical features for preoperative cardiac implant simulations

Inventors: Kilian Michiels (Oostduinkerke, BE); Eva Heffinck (Kortrijk, BE); Patricio Astudillo (Drongen, BE)
Assignee: FEops NV
A61B34/10A61B6/5205G06T7/55G06T19/003G06V10/26G06V10/44G06V10/774G06V20/64G16H30/20G16H30/40A61B2034/105A61B2034/107G06T2200/24G06T2207/30048G06T2210/41G06T2219/012G06V2201/031
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,471,997
App. No.
18/046,085
Granted
Nov 18, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for fully automated anatomical analysis of an anatomical structure are provided to facilitate pre-operative planning. The computerized method may include obtaining a plurality of images, e.g., MSCT images, of patient-specific cardiovascular anatomy, and analyzing the MSCT images with a trained artificial intelligence module to identify one or more anatomical landmarks and to construct a virtual three-dimensional model of the anatomical structure. For example, the trained artificial intelligence module may execute segmentation, point detection, curve detection, or plane detection deep learning modules, independently or in combination, to identify the anatomical landmarks. The method further may include deriving anatomical measurements of the one or more identified anatomical landmarks, and displaying the virtual three-dimensional model alongside the anatomical measurements of the one or more identified anatomical landmarks.

Claims (83)

1 . A computerized method for automated anatomical analysis of an anatomical structure, the method comprising:

obtaining a plurality of images of patient-specific cardiovascular anatomy, said plurality of images comprising a plurality of voxels;

analyzing the plurality of images with a trained artificial intelligence module to identify one or more anatomical landmarks and to construct a virtual three-dimensional model of the anatomical structure, wherein analyzing the plurality of images with the trained artificial intelligence module comprises:

generating a probability mask, the probability mask comprising a probability value for each voxel of the plurality of voxels, the probability value indicating a probability that said voxel corresponds to the anatomical structure;

converting the probability mask to a segmentation mask by comparing each probability value to a threshold value on a voxel-by-voxel basis to assign each voxel of the plurality of voxels a predetermined label corresponding to the anatomical structure if such probability value exceeds the threshold value; and

generating a segmentation mask comprising each voxel of the plurality of voxels assigned the predetermined label; and

constructing the virtual three-dimensional model of the anatomical structure based on the segmentation mask;

deriving anatomical measurements based on the one or more identified anatomical landmarks;

obtaining specifications of a plurality of implantable devices associated with the anatomical structure;

displaying a sizing chart based on the specifications of the plurality of implantable devices and on the anatomical measurements;

receiving input from a user comprising a selection of an implantable device from the plurality of implantable devices; and

displaying the virtual three-dimensional model of the anatomical structure alongside the anatomical measurements of the one or more identified anatomical landmarks and a virtual model of the selected implantable device.

2 . The computerized method of claim 1 , wherein the anatomical structure is a left atrium and left atrial appendage.

3 . The computerized method of claim 2 , wherein the one or more anatomical landmarks comprise an ostium and a predetermined landing zone within the anatomical structure for a cardiac implantable device.

4 . The computerized method of claim 3 , wherein deriving anatomical measurements based on the one or more identified anatomical landmarks comprises identifying 3D planes defining the ostium and the predetermined landing zone, and performing measurements in the 3D planes.

5 . The computerized method of claim 3 , wherein deriving anatomical measurements based on the one or more identified anatomical landmarks comprises measuring a depth of the left atrial appendage.

6 . The computerized method of claim 2 , wherein the one or more anatomical landmarks further comprise a fossa ovalis, such that the fossa ovalis is identified as a 3D curve on an interatrial septum via the trained artificial intelligence module.

7 . The computerized method of claim 6 , further comprising planning a transseptal puncture site based on the identified fossa ovalis.

8 . The computerized method of claim 2 , wherein the one or more anatomical landmarks further comprise a mitral valve annulus.

9 . The computerized method of claim 1 , wherein the anatomical structure is an aortic root.

10 . The computerized method of claim 9 , wherein the one or more anatomical landmarks comprise an aortic annulus, a left ventricular outflow tract, a sino-tubular junction, or a sinus of Valsalva.

11 . The computerized method of claim 10 , wherein deriving anatomical measurements based on the one or more identified anatomical landmarks comprises measuring at least one of left coronary distance, right coronary distance, sino-tubular junction distance, aortic arch angulation, or membranous septum length.

12 . The computerized method of claim 1 , wherein obtaining the plurality of images of patient-specific cardiovascular anatomy comprises obtaining a plurality of multi-slice computed tomography images of patient-specific cardiovascular anatomy.

13 . The computerized method of claim 12 , further comprising pre-processing the plurality of multi-slice computed tomography images by resampling a volume of the multi-slice computed tomography images to an isotropic resolution and voxel size.

14 . The computerized method of claim 1 , wherein analyzing the plurality of images with the trained artificial intelligence module to identify one or more anatomical landmarks comprises executing at least one deep learning module selected from a list consisting of: segmentation, point detection, curve detection, and plane detection.

15 . The computerized method of claim 1 , wherein assigning the predetermined label to each voxel of the plurality of voxels if the probability value exceeds the threshold value comprises binarizing the probability mask for a predefined class such that each voxel with a probability value below the threshold value is set to label zero and each voxel with a probability value above the threshold value is set to label one, and wherein the segmentation mask comprises each voxel having label one.

16 . The computerized method of claim 1 , further comprising combining the segmentation mask with one or more second segmentation masks obtained using an image analysis technique.

17 . The computerized method of claim 16 , wherein the image analysis technique is flooding.

18 . The computerized method of claim 14 , wherein executing the point detection deep learning module comprises:

generating a second probability mask indicative of a second probability value that each voxel of a plurality of voxels of the plurality of images is a predetermined label defined by a predefined spherical region around a predefined point;

assigning the predetermined label to each voxel if the second probability value exceeds a second threshold; and

obtaining a 3D point by taking a centroid of all voxels having the predetermined label to identify the one or more anatomical landmarks.

19 . The computerized method of claim 18 , wherein identifying the one or more anatomical landmarks further comprises cropping the plurality of images around the 3D point.

20 . The computerized method of claim 14 , wherein executing the curve detection deep learning module comprises:

generating a second probability mask indicative of a second probability value that each voxel of a plurality of voxels of the plurality of images is a predetermined label defined by a curve formed by sweeping a sphere having a predetermined radius along the curve for one of the one or more anatomical landmarks;

assigning the predetermined label to each voxel if the second probability value exceeds a second threshold; and

identifying a 3D curve by using a graph-based technique on all voxels having the predetermined label.

21 . The computerized method of claim 14 , wherein executing the plane detection deep learning module comprises:

assigning each voxel of a plurality of voxels one of two or more predetermined labels; and

extracting a connecting boundary between each voxel based on the assigned predetermined labels of each voxel using an image processing technique to fit a plane.

22 . The computerized method of claim 21 , wherein deriving anatomical measurements based on the one or more identified anatomical landmarks comprises deriving a closed curve indicative of a boundary of the anatomical structure in the plane to calculate at least one of area-based, perimeter-based, minimum, and maximum diameters of the one or more identified anatomical landmarks.

23 . The computerized method of claim 1 , wherein deriving anatomical measurements based on the one or more identified anatomical landmarks comprises deriving anatomical measurements of the one or more identified anatomical landmarks from the virtual three-dimensional model of the anatomical structure.

24 . The computerized method of claim 1 , wherein the identified anatomical landmarks are overlaid on the anatomical structure in the virtual three-dimensional model of the anatomical structure.

25 . The computerized method of claim 1 , further comprising:

receiving user input feedback based on the displayed virtual three-dimensional model; and

adjusting the anatomical measurements based on the user input feedback.

26 . A system for automated anatomical analysis of an anatomical structure, the system comprising:

a memory having instructions that when executed by a processor operatively coupled to a computer, cause the computer to:

obtain a plurality of images of patient-specific cardiovascular anatomy, said plurality of images comprising a plurality of voxels;

analyze the plurality of images with a trained artificial intelligence module to identify one or more anatomical landmarks and to construct a virtual three-dimensional model of the anatomical structure, wherein to analyze the plurality of images with the trained artificial intelligence module comprises:

(i) generate a probability mask, the probability mask comprising a probability value for each voxel of the plurality of voxels, the probability value indicating a probability that said voxel corresponds to the anatomical structure;

(ii) convert the probability mask to a segmentation mask by comparing each probability value to a threshold value on a voxel-by-voxel basis to assign each voxel of the plurality of voxels a predetermined label corresponding to the anatomical structure if such probability value exceeds the threshold value; and

(iii) generate a segmentation mask comprising each voxel of the plurality of voxels assigned the predetermined label; and

(iv) construct the virtual three-dimensional model of the anatomical structure based on the segmentation mask;

derive anatomical measurements based on the one or more identified anatomical landmarks;

obtain specifications of a plurality of implantable devices associated with the anatomical structure;

display a sizing chart based on the specifications of the plurality of implantable devices and on the anatomical measurements;

receive input from a user comprising a selection of an implantable device from the plurality of implantable devices; and

display the virtual three-dimensional model of the anatomical structure alongside the anatomical measurements of the one or more identified anatomical landmarks and a virtual model of the selected implantable device.

27 . A non-transitory computer readable medium programmed with instructions that, when executed by a processor of a computer, cause the computer to:

obtain a plurality of images of patient-specific cardiovascular anatomy, said plurality of images comprising a plurality of voxels;

analyze the plurality of images with a trained artificial intelligence module to identify one or more anatomical landmarks and to construct a virtual three-dimensional model of the anatomical structure, wherein to analyze the plurality of images with the trained artificial intelligence module comprises:

generate a probability mask, the probability mask comprising a probability value for each voxel of the plurality of voxels, the probability value indicating a probability that said voxel corresponds to the anatomical structure;

convert the probability mask to a segmentation mask by comparing each probability value to a threshold value on a voxel-by-voxel basis to assign each voxel of the plurality of voxels a predetermined label corresponding to the anatomical structure if such probability value exceeds the threshold value; and

generate a segmentation mask comprising each voxel of the plurality of voxels assigned the predetermined label; and

construct the virtual three-dimensional model of the anatomical structure based on the segmentation mask;

derive anatomical measurements based on the one or more identified anatomical landmarks;

obtain specifications of a plurality of implantable devices associated with the anatomical structure;

display a sizing chart based on the specifications of the plurality of implantable devices and on the anatomical measurements;

receive input from a user comprising a selection of an implantable device from the plurality of implantable devices; and

display the virtual three-dimensional model of the anatomical structure alongside the anatomical measurements of the one or more identified anatomical landmarks and a virtual model of the selected implantable device.

28 . A computer program product comprising code portions with instructions that, when executed by a processor of a computer, cause the computer to:

obtain a plurality of images of patient-specific cardiovascular anatomy, said plurality of images comprising a plurality of voxels;

analyze the plurality of images with a trained artificial intelligence module to identify one or more anatomical landmarks and to construct a virtual three-dimensional model of the anatomical structure, wherein to analyze the plurality of images with the trained artificial intelligence module comprises:

generate a probability mask, the probability mask comprising a probability value for each voxel of the plurality of voxels, the probability value indicating a probability that said voxel corresponds to the anatomical structure;

convert the probability mask to a segmentation mask by comparing each probability value to a threshold value on a voxel-by-voxel basis to assign each voxel of the plurality of voxels a predetermined label corresponding to the anatomical structure if such probability value exceeds the threshold value; and

generate a segmentation mask comprising each voxel of the plurality of voxels assigned the predetermined label; and

construct the virtual three-dimensional model of the anatomical structure based on the segmentation mask;

derive anatomical measurements based on the one or more identified anatomical landmarks;

obtain specifications of a plurality of implantable devices associated with the anatomical structure;

display a sizing chart based on the specifications of the plurality of implantable devices and on the anatomical measurements;

receive input from a user comprising a selection of an implantable device from the plurality of implantable devices; and

display the virtual three-dimensional model of the anatomical structure alongside the anatomical measurements of the one or more identified anatomical landmarks and a virtual model of the selected implantable device.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 12, 2022
From: MICHIELS, KILIAN; HEFFINCK, EVA; ASTUDILLO, PATRICIO
To: FEOPS NV
Reel/Frame 061401/0447 →
Continuity (3)
Provisional Application 63265557 · Dec 16, 2021
Provisional Application 63255900 · Oct 14, 2021
Related Publication 20230119535A1 · Apr 20, 2023
References Cited (119)
US 8126234B1 · Edwards et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8315812B2 · Taylor · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8548778B1 · Hart et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8594950B2 · Taylor · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8682626B2 · Ionasec et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9757073B2 · Goshen et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9805463B2 · Choi et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9839399B2 · Fonte et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10258303B2 · Grass et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10275876B2 · Reicher et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10456094B2 · Fonte et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10600181B2 · Petersen et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10695131B2 · Weber et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10789772B2 · Mortier et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10803592B2 · Grady et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11045256B2 · Mortier et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11051885B2 · Mortier et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11069136B2 · Mortier et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11238587B2 · Min et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11288813B2 · Grady et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11331149B2 · Mortier et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 12186021B2 · De Beule et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20040225212A1 · Okerlund et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050043609A1 · Murphy et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20070135707A1 · Redel et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080319448A1 · Lavallee et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090082660A1 · Rahn et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100042105A1 · Park et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110153286A1 · Zaeuner · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110182492A1 · Grass et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110222750A1 · Liao · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120053466A1 · Bianchi et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20140219537A1 · Carelsen et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150051884A1 · Grady et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150112659A1 · Mortier · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150112901A1 · Singer · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150178938A1 · Gorman, III et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150178939A1 · Bradski et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150182255A1 · Shivkumar · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150223773A1 · John et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150235569A1 · Babiker et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150370995A1 · Wakai · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160038246A1 · Wang · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160128786A1 · Weber · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160166332A1 · Wang · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160199198A1 · Dietz et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160267673A1 · Grbic · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160270859A1 · Park et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170000562A1 · Frank et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170150928A1 · Del Alamo De Pedro et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170216062A1 · Armstrong et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170258527A1 · Wang et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170270663A1 · Hoffmann et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170323481A1 · Tran et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170360510A1 · Bischoff et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180116725A1 · Ashikaga et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180289422A1 · Mortier et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180289488A1 · Orth et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180365838A1 · Lorenz et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190000551A1 · Sone · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190090951A1 · Camus · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190298450A1 · Dasi et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190357981A1 · Mortier et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190392942A1 · Sorenson et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20210022806A1 · De Beule · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210346097A1 · Dasi et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220172848A1 · De Bock et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220273369A1 · Mortier et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220392642A1 · Dasi et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230310080A1 · Lee · 2023 [cited by examiner]
CN 102346811A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 106037931A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 108766539A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
DE 102012205504A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013156546A2 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013171039A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014009294A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016038169A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016177647A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018141927A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019179793A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020182651A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2022241425A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2022241432A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2023152326A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
Aguado, et al., In Silico Optimization of Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Implantation Using Interactive and Modeling Tools, Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 10, Article 237 (Mar. 2019). [cited by applicant]
Antiga, et al., An Image-Based Modeling Framework for Patient-Specific Computational Hemodynamics, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 46(11):1097-1112 (Nov. 2008). [cited by applicant]
Auricchio, et al., Carotid Artery Stenting Simulation: From Patient-Specific Images to Finite Element Analysis, Medical Engineering and Physics, 33(3):281-289 (Apr. 2011). [cited by applicant]
Basri, et al., The Hemodynamic Effects of Paravalvular Leakage Using Fluid Structure Interaction; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Patient, Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics, 6(5):1513-1518 (Oct. … [cited by applicant]
Capelli et al., “Patient-Specific Simulations of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Stent Implantation,” Med. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 2012, 50(2):183-192 (Feb. 2012). [cited by applicant]
De Santis, et al., Patient-Specific Computational Fluid Dynamics: Structured Mesh Generation from Coronary Angiography, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 48(4):371-380 (Apr. 2010). [cited by applicant]
European Search Report dated Jul. 11, 2017 in EP Patent Appl. Serial No. 17154648.4. [cited by applicant]
European Search Report dated Oct. 2, 2018 in EP Patent Appl. Serial No. 18163655.6. [cited by applicant]
Extended EP Search Report dated Sep. 24, 2019 in EP Patent Appl. Serial No. 19161587.7. [cited by applicant]
Ghadimi, M.D., et al., Perioperative Conduction Disturbances After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement, Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 27(6):1414-1420 (Dec. 2013). [cited by applicant]
Grbic, et al., Complete Valvular Heart Apparatus Model from 4D Cardiac CT, International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp. 218-226 (Dec. 2010). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report & Written Opinion dated Jun. 5, 2020 in Int'l PCT Patent Appl. Serial No. PCT/EP2020/056000. [cited by applicant]
International Search report and written opinion dated Jul. 15, 2016 in Int'l PCT Patent Application Serial No. PCT/EP2016/059688. [cited by applicant]
International Search report and written opinion dated Jul. 30, 2013 in Int'l PCT Patent Application Serial No. PCT/EP2013/058392. [cited by applicant]
International Search report and written opinion dated Jun. 4, 2018 in Int'l PCT Patent Application Serial No. PCT/EP2018/052701. [cited by applicant]
International Search report and written opinion dated May 31, 2019 in Int'l PCT Patent Application Serial No. PCT/EP2019/055907. [cited by applicant]
Lenoir, et al., Physics-Based Models for Catheter, Guidewire and Stent Simulation, Studies in health technology and informatics, 119:305-310 (2006). [cited by applicant]
Mill, et al., Sensitivity Analysis of In Silico Fluid Simulations to Predict Thrombus Formation After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion, Mathematics, 9(18):2304-2323 (Jan. 2021). [cited by applicant]
Morganti, et al., Simulation of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation through Patient-Specific Finite Element Analysis: Two Clinical Cases, Journal of Biomechanics, 47(11):2547-2555 (Aug. 2014). [cited by applicant]
Morlacchi, et al., Sequential Structural and Fluid Dynamic Numerical Simulations of a Stented Bifurcated Coronary Artery, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 133, 11 pages (Dec. 2011). [cited by applicant]
Mortier, et al., A Novel Simulation Strategy for Stent Insertion and Deployment in Curved Coronary Bifurcations: Comparison of Three Drug-Eluting Stents, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 38(1):88-99 (Jan. 2010). [cited by applicant]
Nucifora, et al., Evaluation of the Left Atrial Appendage With Real-Time 3-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography, Implications for Catheter-Based Left Atrial Appendage Closure, Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging… [cited by applicant]
Rocatello et al., “Patient-Specific Computer Simulation to Elucidate the Role of Contact Pressure in the Development of New Conduction Abnormalities After Catheter-Based Implantation of a Self-Expanding Aortic Valve”, C… [cited by applicant]
Russ, et al., Simulation of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Under Consideration of Leaflet Calcification, 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), pp. … [cited by applicant]
Schneider, et al., Modeling Mitral Valve Leaflets from Three-Dimensional Ultrasound, International Conference on Functional Imaging and Modeling of the Heart, pp. 215-222 (May 2011). [cited by applicant]
Sirois, et al., [cited by applicant]
Steinberg, Cardiac Conduction System Disease After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement, American Heart Journal, 164(5):664-671 (Nov. 2012). [cited by applicant]
Sun, et al., Simulated Elliptical Bioprosthetic Valve Deformation: Implications for Asymmetric Transcatheter Valve Deployment, Journal of Biomechanics, 43(16):3085-3090 (Dec. 2010). [cited by applicant]
Viscardi, et al., Comparative Finite Element Model Analysis of Ascending Aortic Flow in Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valve, Artificial Organs, 34(12):1114-1120 (Dec. 2010). [cited by applicant]
Vy, et al., Review of Patient-Specific Simulations of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation, International Journal of Advances in Engineering Sciences and Applied Mathematics, 8(1):2-4 (Mar. 2016). [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., “Patient-specific modeling of biomechanical interaction in transcatheter aortic valve deployment,” Journal of Biomechanics, 45(11):1965-1971 (Jul. 2012). [cited by applicant]
Astudillo, et al., Automatic Detection of the Aortic Annula Plane and Coronary Ostia from Multidetector Computed Tomography, Journal of Interventional Cardiology, vol. 2020, Article ID 9843275, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report & Written Opinion dated Feb. 21, 2023 in Int'l PCT Patent Appl. Serial No. PCT/EP2022/0784256 (0610). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report & Written Opinion dated Apr. 18, 2023 in Int'l PCT Patent Appl. No. PCT/EP2023/053366 (091001). [cited by applicant]