IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,473,417
Granted Patent B2
US 12,473,417 · App. 17/291,291 · Granted Nov 18, 2025

Method for the enzymatic degradation of polyethylene terephthalate

Inventor: Alain Marty (Toulouse, FR)
Assignee: CARBIOS
C08J11/105C12N9/18C08J2367/02C12Y301/01074
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,473,417
App. No.
17/291,291
Filed
May 5, 2021
Granted
Nov 18, 2025
Kind
B2
Art Unit
1655
USPC
435/135
Abstract

The present invention relates to a process for enzymatic depolymerization of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), in particular contained in a plastic material. The process according to the invention can in particular be implemented on an industrial or semi-industrial scale.

Claims (26)

1 . A process for enzymatic depolymerization of semi-crystalline polyethylene terephthalate (PET) comprising bringing said semi-crystalline PET into contact with an enzyme capable of depolymerizing said semi-crystalline PET, said enzyme selected from cutinases comprising an amino acid sequence having at least 75% identity with SEQ ID NO:1, and further comprising at least one mutation combination selected from: (i) F208I+D203C+S248C+Y92G, (ii) F208W+D203C+S248C+Y92G, or (iii) F208I+D203C+S248C+V170I+Y92G, corresponding to the residues of SEQ ID NO:1, wherein:

a) the semi-crystalline PET has an initial degree of crystallinity of at most 25%;

b) the depolymerization step is carried out at a temperature T equal to the Tg+10° C. of said semi-crystalline PET; and

c) the enzyme has a depolymerization time (tD) of the semi-crystalline PET that is less than the crystallization time (tR) of said semi-crystalline PET, wherein the time tD represents the time required for said enzyme to depolymerize at least 80% of said semi-crystalline PET at said temperature T, and the time tR represents the time required for said semi-crystalline PET to reach a degree of crystallinity of at most 35% at said temperature T.

2 . The depolymerization process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the temperature T is between the Tg−10° C. and the Tg+5° C. of the semi-crystalline PET.

3 . The depolymerization process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the temperature T is between 66° C. and 80° C.

4 . The depolymerization process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the crystallization time of the semi-crystalline PET is measured prior to the depolymerization step, on a sample of said semi-crystalline PET.

5 . The depolymerization process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the selected enzyme has a time tD less than or equal to 20 h.

6 . The depolymerization process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the enzyme is selected from enzymes having a melting temperature (Tm) strictly higher than the temperature T.

7 . The depolymerization process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the initial degree of crystallinity of the semi-crystalline PET is less than 20%.

8 . The depolymerization process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the depolymerization time (tD) is between 1 h and 16 h.

9 . The depolymerization process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the semi-crystalline PET is subjected to an amorphization step prior to the depolymerization step.

10 . The depolymerization process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the time tD represents the time required for said enzyme to depolymerize at least 90% of said semi-crystalline PET at said temperature T, and the time tR represents the time required for said semi-crystalline PET to reach a degree of crystallinity of at most 30% at said temperature T.

11 . The depolymerization process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein:

a) the semi-crystalline PET has an initial degree of crystallinity of at most 25% and a Tg between 65° C.±1° C. and 80° C.±1° C.;

b) the depolymerization step is carried out at a temperature T of 72° C.±1° C.; and

c) the enzyme has a depolymerization time (tD) of the semi-crystalline PET that is less than the crystallization time (tR) of said semi-crystalline PET, wherein the time tD represents the time required for the selected enzyme to depolymerize at least 80% of said semi-crystalline PET at said temperature T, and the time tR represents the time required for said semi-crystalline PET to reach a degree of crystallinity of at most 35% at said temperature T.

12 . The depolymerization process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein:

a) a plastic material is selected from fibers and/or fiber and/or textile waste comprising semi-crystalline PET with an initial degree of crystallinity of at most 25% and a Tg between 60° C.±1° C. and 75° C.±1° C.;

b) the depolymerization step is carried out at a temperature T of 65° C.±1° C.; and

c) the enzyme capable of degrading semi-crystalline PET has a depolymerization time (tD) of the semi-crystalline PET that is less than the crystallization time (tR) of said semi-crystalline PET, wherein the time tD represents the time required for the selected enzyme to depolymerize at least 80% of said semi-crystalline PET at said temperature T, and the time tR represents the time required for said semi-crystalline PET to reach a degree of crystallinity of at most 35% at said temperature T.

13 . The depolymerization process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the temperature T is between 68° C. and 73° C.

14 . The depolymerization process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the depolymerization time (tD) is between 1 h and 10 h.

15 . The depolymerization process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the cutinase has at least 75% identity with SEQ ID NO:1 and comprises the mutation combination F208I+D203C+S248C+Y92G, corresponding to the residues of SEQ ID NO:1.

16 . The depolymerization process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the cutinase has at least 75% identity with SEQ ID NO:1 and comprises the mutation combination F208W+D203C+S248C+Y92G, corresponding to the residues of SEQ ID NO: 1.

17 . The depolymerization process as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the cutinase has at least 75% identity with SEQ ID NO:1 and comprises the mutation combination selected from: (i) F208I+D203C+S248C+Y92G, or (iii) F208I+D203C+S248C+V170I+Y92G, corresponding to the residues of SEQ ID NO:1.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 15, 2021
From: MARTY, ALAIN
To: CARBIOS
Reel/Frame 056549/0432 →
Priority Claims (1)
FR 1860222 · Nov 6, 2018 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220363861A1 · Nov 17, 2022
References Cited (53)
US 10124512B2 · Boisart et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10287561B2 · Alvarez et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10385183B2 · Maille · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10508269B2 · Li et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10584320B2 · Topham · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10590401B2 · Tournier et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10626242B2 · Ferreira et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10717996B2 · Dusseaux et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10723848B2 · Chateau et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10767026B2 · Desrousseaux · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10829598B2 · Ferreira et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10829754B2 · Marty et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11072784B2 · Tournier · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11198767B2 · Guemard et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11345906B2 · Marty et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11370890B2 · Ferreira et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11377533B2 · Desrousseaux · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11384218B2 · Guemard et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11414651B2 · Topham · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11535832B2 · David et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11851689B2 · Duquesne · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20170114205A1 · Maille · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180142097A1 · Guemard et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20200190279A1 · Guemard et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200339766A1 · Chateau et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200385698A1 · Marty et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200392303A1 · Desrousseaux et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210009980A1 · Marty et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210163906A1 · David et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210171921A1 · Andre et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210180037A1 · Duquesne et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210261931A9 · Topham et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220002516A1 · Chateau · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220177697A1 · Guillamot et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220227957A1 · Guemard et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220251327A1 · Marty et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220282232A1 · Tournier · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220282235A1 · Duquesne et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012099018A1 · 2012 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2017198786 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018011284 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021123299 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021123301 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021123328 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Gamerith et al. 2017. “Enzymatic recovery of polyester building blocks from polymer blends”. Process Biochemistry, 59, 58-64 (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
Thomsen et al., 2023. Significance of poly (ethylene terephthalate)(PET) substrate crystallinity on enzymatic degradation. New Biotechnology, 78, 162-172 (Year: 2023). [cited by examiner]
Ronkvist, Åsa M., et al. “Cutinase-catalyzed hydrolysis of poly (ethylene terephthalate).” Macromolecules 42.14 (2009): 5128-5138. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma9005318 (Year: 2009). [cited by examiner]
Machine-generated English translation of WO2012099018. 20 pages total. (Year: 2012). [cited by examiner]
Acero, E. H. et al. “Enzymatic Surface Hydrolysis of PET: Effect of Structural Diversity on Kinetic Properties of Cutinases from [cited by applicant]
Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/EP2019/080253, Nov. 29, 2019, pp. 1-6. [cited by applicant]
Claims as filed in U.S. Appl. No. 17/786,566, corresponding to WO 2021/123299, Jun. 17, 2022, pp. 1-4. [cited by applicant]
Claims as filed in U.S. Appl. No. 17/786,580, corresponding to WO 2021/123301, Jun. 17, 2022, pp. 1-4. [cited by applicant]
Claims as filed in U.S. Appl. No. 17/786,588, corresponding to WO 2021/123328, Jun. 17, 2022, pp. 1-4. [cited by applicant]