IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,475,278
Granted Patent B2
US 12,475,278 · App. 18/319,291 · Granted Nov 18, 2025

Systems and methods for augmented reality for disaster simulation

Inventors: Timothy Joel Davis (Chicago, IL); Amy Engelhorn (Normal, IL)
Assignee: State Farm Automobile Insurance Company, Inc.
G06F30/20G06T19/006G06Q40/08
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,475,278
App. No.
18/319,291
Granted
Nov 18, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

An augmented reality (AR) system for generating and displaying a pre-disaster Enhanced Situation Visualization (ESV) is provided. The AR system may include an ESV computing device, a user computing device operated by a user and a reference database. The user computing device may transmit a reference request message to the ESV device, the reference request message including an image and/or GPS location of a property. The ESV computing device may determine the subject of the image is the property, retrieve reference information including peril maps associated with the property from the reference database, and determine situation information specific to the subject. The reference and situation information including a loss estimate may be displayed on the user computing device to provide an ESV of the property. The ESV may be used for insurance-related activities, such as handling, adjusting, and/or generating an insurance policy, premium, and/or discount, and/or generating insurance-related recommendations.

Claims (35)

1 . An Enhanced Situation Visualization (ESV) computing device comprising a memory and at least one processor communicatively coupled to the memory, wherein the at least one processor is configured to:

determine potential damage to a property due to an occurrence of an event;

generate a reference response message including the determined potential damage to the property; and

cause to be displayed on a user computing device the potential damage to the property overlaid upon a current view of the property as viewed through the user computing device.

2 . The ESV computing device of claim 1 , wherein the event includes a potential future event or a hypothetical event.

3 . The ESV computing device of claim 1 , wherein the event includes a natural event or a mechanical failure event.

4 . The ESV computing device of claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to:

retrieve, from a reference database, reference information that includes a peril map indicating a risk level associated with the event; and

determine the potential damage based upon the peril map.

5 . The ESV computing device of claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to cause to be displayed, using the reference response message on the user computing device, at least one effect at the property due to the event, the at least one effect overlaid upon the current view of the property as viewed through the user computing device.

6 . The ESV computing device of claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to receive a reference request message from the user computing device, the reference request message including (i) an image representative of the current view of the property as viewed through the user computing device and (ii) at least one user-input variable associated with a characteristic of the event.

7 . The ESV computing device of claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to transmit the reference response message to the user computing device.

8 . A computer-implemented method using an Enhanced Situation Visualization (ESV) computing device including a memory and at least one processor communicatively coupled to the memory, the method comprising:

determining potential damage to a property due to an occurrence of an event;

generating a reference response message including the determined potential damage to the property; and

causing to be displayed on a user computing device the potential damage to the property overlaid upon a current view of the property as viewed through the user computing device.

9 . The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein the event includes a potential future event or a hypothetical event.

10 . The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein the event includes a natural event or a mechanical failure event.

11 . The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein the method further comprises:

retrieving, from a reference database, reference information that includes a peril map indicating a risk level associated with the event; and

determining the potential damage based upon the peril map.

12 . The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein the method further comprises causing to be displayed, using the reference response message on the user computing device, at least one effect at the property due to the event, the at least one effect overlaid upon the current view of the property as viewed through the user computing device.

13 . The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein the method further comprises receiving a reference request message from the user computing device, the reference request message including (i) an image representative of the current view of the property as viewed through the user computing device and (ii) at least one user-input variable associated with a characteristic of the event.

14 . The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein the method further comprises transmitting the reference response message to the user computing device.

15 . At least one non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having computer-executable instructions embodied thereon, wherein when executed by at least one processor, the computer-executable instructions cause the at least one processor to:

determine potential damage to a property due to an occurrence of an event;

generate a reference response message including the determined potential damage to the property; and

cause to be displayed on a user computing device the potential damage to the property overlaid upon a current view of the property as viewed through the user computing device.

16 . The computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 , wherein the event includes a potential future event or a hypothetical event.

17 . The computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 , wherein the event includes a natural event or a mechanical failure event.

18 . The computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 , wherein the computer-executable instructions further cause the at least one processor to:

retrieve, from a reference database, reference information that includes a peril map indicating a risk level associated with the event; and

determine the potential damage based upon the peril map.

19 . The computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 , wherein the computer-executable instructions further cause the at least one processor to cause to be displayed, using the reference response message on the user computing device, at least one effect at the property due to the event, the at least one effect overlaid upon the current view of the property as viewed through the user computing device.

20 . The computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 , wherein the computer-executable instructions further cause the at least one processor to receive a reference request message from the user computing device, the reference request message including (i) an image representative of the current view of the property as viewed through the user computing device and (ii) at least one user-input variable associated with a characteristic of the event.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 18, 2023
From: DAVIS, TIMOTHY JOEL
To: STA GROUP, LLC
Reel/Frame 063687/0416 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 18, 2023
From: STA GROUP, LLC
To: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Reel/Frame 063687/0599 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 18, 2023
From: ENGELHORN, AMY
To: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Reel/Frame 063687/0663 →
Continuity (6)
Continuation 17476382 · Sep 15, 2021
Continuation 16748460 · Jan 21, 2020
Continuation 15184886 · Jun 16, 2016
Provisional Application 62193987 · Jul 17, 2015
Provisional Application 62185359 · Jun 26, 2015
Related Publication 20230306158A1 · Sep 28, 2023
References Cited (39)
US 7809587B2 · Dorai et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8760285B2 · Billman et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8805707B2 · Schumann, Jr. et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9053516B2 · Stempora · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9082015B2 · Christopulos et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9654679B1 · Veliche · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10032225B1 · Fox et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10529028B1 · Davis et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10579749B1 · Davis et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20020055861A1 · King et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20110137685A1 · Tracy et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110153368A1 · Pierre · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110213628A1 · Peak et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120059676A1 · King · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120065944A1 · Nielsen et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120076437A1 · King · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120253852A1 · Pourfallah et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20140244318A1 · Drake et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140257862A1 · Billman et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140257864A1 · Billman · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140270492A1 · Christopulos et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140278585A1 · Zerbib · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140350970A1 · Schumann, Jr. et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150046194A1 · Waddell et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150073834A1 · Gurenko et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150106133A1 · Smith, Jr. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150343947A1 · Bemnico et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160063635A1 · Collazo et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160093000A1 · Pevzner et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160171622A1 · Perkins et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
“GlassUp,” Home and Features, accessed Jun. 23, 2016 at: http://www.glassup.net/en/. [cited by applicant]
“Google Glass may help firms Save $1bn by making Employees ‘More Efficient’.” South Asian Media Lahore: HT Digital Streams Limited. Nov. 14, 2013 (Year: 2013). [cited by applicant]
“Google Glass,” accessed Jun. 23, 2016 at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Glass. [cited by applicant]
“Magic Leap,” accessed Jun. 23, 2016 at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_Leap. [cited by applicant]
“Meta,” Home, accessed Jun. 23, 2016 at: https://www.metavision.com/. [cited by applicant]
“Optinvent: ORA Data Sheet,” accessed Jun. 23, 2016 at http://www.optinvent.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Flyer-ORA-2-0616.pdf. [cited by applicant]
“Vuzix M100 Smart Glasses,” Overview, Features, and Specifications, accessed Jun. 23, 2016 at: https://www.vuzix.com/Products/m100-smart-glasses. [cited by applicant]
Leskens, Johannes G., et al. “An interactive simulation and Visualization Tool for Flood Analysis Usable for Practitioners,” Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 22(2), 307-324; May 29, 2015. (Year: 2… [cited by applicant]
Abolfazli et al., “Cloud-Based Augmentation for Mobile Devices: Motivation, Taxonomies, and Open Challenges,” in EEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 16., No. 1, pp. 337-368, First Quarter 2014, doi: 10.1109/SUR… [cited by applicant]