IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,504,422
Granted Patent B2
US 12,504,422 · App. 17/794,277 · Granted Dec 23, 2025

Method and system for tracer-aided determination and classification of intoxicating substance in breath sample

Inventors: Jonas Ljungblad (Stockholm, SE); Bertil Hök (Västerås, SE); Martin Åhlenius (Västerås, SE)
Assignee: Automotive Coalition for Traffic Safety, Inc.
G01N33/4972A61B5/4845A61B5/7239A61B5/7264A61B5/742B60K28/06G01N21/3504
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,504,422
App. No.
17/794,277
Granted
Dec 23, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present invention relates to a breath analyzing system and method. In particular the invention relates to a breath analyzing system and method arranged to provide tracer-aided classification of the presence of a breath intoxicating substance above a limit concentration and providing status to a user about the progression of the classification. The method/system detects a peak in the tracer signal and defines an evaluation period corresponding to the duration of the peak. Measurements classification of the concentration of the intoxicating substance is used for the evaluation period, and if required to achieve a result, for a plurality of evaluation periods.

Claims (92)

1 . A method for determining a concentration of an intoxicating substance in the exhaled breath of a user and classifying the determined concentration, the method comprising:

providing a breath analysis system comprising:

a measuring unit in connection with, and under the control of, a control unit comprising a central processing unit (CPU) and associated memory;

using the control unit to control the measuring unit, and using the measuring unit to repetitively sample (i) a sensor signal representing the instantaneous concentration of the intoxicating substance, and (ii) a sensor signal representing the instantaneous concentration of a tracer substance;

using the control unit to perform the following steps:

analyze the tracer substance signal samples;

determine if a peak in the tracer substance signal is detected and, if a peak in the tracer substance signal is detected, define an evaluation period relating to the duration of the tracer substance peak and not exceeding the duration of the tracer substance peak;

calculate, using the tracer signal samples and the intoxicating substance signal samples sampled during the evaluation period, a running average of the breath concentration of the intoxicating substance and a standard deviation representing an estimate of the associated statistical spread of the running average of the breath concentration of the intoxicating substance;

classify the concentration of the intoxicating substance using the average of the breath concentration of the intoxicating substance and the estimate of the associated statistical spread and comparing with a predetermined concentration limit, L; and

determine that the concentration of the intoxicating substance is acceptable if the concentration of the intoxicating substance is below the predetermined concentration limit, L;

wherein the breath analysis system further comprises a vehicle drivability control unit in connection with the control unit, and wherein the control unit is arranged to, if the classification result is that the concentration of the intoxicating substance user is not acceptable, instruct the vehicle drivability control unit to not allow the user to drive the vehicle.

2 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the method comprises the further step, to be taken during the evaluation period, of:

if the estimate of the associated statistical spread indicates that the comparison can not be performed with a predetermined level of accuracy within the evaluation period, return to the sampling step to await a further peak in the tracer substance signal detection having an associated further evaluation period, and during which further evaluation period, the calculation of the running average of the breath concentration of the intoxicating substance and the associated statistical spread includes the tracer signal samples and the intoxicating substance signal samples associated with the present evaluation period and with at least the previous evaluation period.

3 . The method according to claim 2 , wherein the calculation of the running average of the breath concentration of the intoxicating substance and the associated statistical spread includes the tracer signal samples and the intoxicating substance signal samples associated with the present evaluation period and all previous evaluation periods.

4 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the step of analyzing the tracer substance signal samples evaluation period comprises:

analyzing a running set of the tracer substance signal samples and if an increasing slope is detected, the increasing slope indicative of a possible peak in the tracer substance signal, initiate an evaluation period; and

wherein, in the calculating step, the classification is performed only if the analysis of the running set of the tracer substance signal samples shows that the increasing slope was followed by a subsequent decreasing slope indicative of a peak in the tracer substance signal during the evaluation period.

5 . The method according to claim 4 , wherein if no decreasing slope could be detected in the running set of the tracer substance signal samples within a predetermined time period, the running average of the breath concentration of the intoxicating substance and the associated statistical spread are discarded and the process returns to the sampling step to await a further increasing slope.

6 . The method according to claim 5 , wherein the evaluation period comprises the steps of:

calculating a running average breath concentration, S Br-av , of said intoxicating substance signal for the increasing number of intoxicating substance signal samples of the evaluation period, the breath concentration calculation based on the relative magnitude between the intoxicating substance signal and the tracer substance signal and calculating a statistical variance, S Br- σ, of the breath concentration as the estimate of the associated statistical spread;

calculating a gap value, G, indicating if a reliable classification can be performed, the gap value being a function of at least the current calculated running average breath concentration S Br-av , and the statistical variance, S Br- σ,

repeating the steps of calculating for increasing number of sensor signal samples until the gap value indicates that a classification can be performed,

performing the classification by comparing the running average breath concentration with the predetermined concentration limit, L,

analyzing the slope of the tracer signal samples, and

if a decreasing slope in consecutive tracer signal samples is detected within the evaluation period the existence of a peak is determines as verified and the classification is determined to be correct and the classification result is outputted and the classification process is ended, and

if no decreasing slope in consecutive tracer signal samples is detected within the evaluation period, the evaluation period is ended, the calculated running average breath concentration, S Br-av , the statistical variance of the breath concentration, S Br- σ, the gap value, G and the classification are discarded and the method returns to the steps of sampling the sensor signals and analyzing the tracer substance signal samples.

7 . The method according to claim 6 , wherein the step of calculating further comprises the step of:

calculating a running total measurement error estimate, E est , the running total measurement error estimate being a function of at least the standard deviation of the breath concentration, a predetermined multiplicative error component, E mult , multiplied with the average breath concentration, and a predetermined additive error component, E add ; and wherein the gap value, G, is a function of at least the predetermined concentration limit, the running average breath concentration and the running total measurement error estimate.

8 . The method according to claim 6 , comprising a further substep of displaying a representation of the gap value.

9 . The method according to claim 8 , further comprising calculating a rate of change of the gap value, and estimating from the rate of change the remaining time to perform a classification and displaying a representation of the remaining time.

10 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the step of analyzing the tracer substance signal to detect a peak comprises calculating and analyzing the first and/or second time derivative of the tracer signal.

11 . The method according to claim 10 , wherein the peak onset time corresponds to a first zero crossing in the second derivative and the peak decline time corresponds to a consecutive zero crossing in the second derivative of the tracer signal.

12 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the evaluation period is terminated after a time corresponding to a predetermined average exhalation time period of a human respiratory cycle.

13 . The method according to claim 6 , wherein the running average breath concentration over m time samples, S Br-av , is calculated according to

S Br-av ( m )=Σ m S Br-i /m,

wherein S Br-i is equal to the instantaneous breath concentration for each of the m time samples, and the associated statistical spread, S Br- σ, is the standard deviation calculated according to

S

Br

-

σ

(

m

)

=

√

(

1

m

-

1

⁢

∑

m

(

S

Br

-

i

-

S

Br

-

av

)

2

)

,

wherein, m, is the number of time samples and the total measurement error estimate, E est , is calculated according to

E est =M*S Br-σ ( m )+ E add +E mult *S Br-av

wherein M is a predetermined multiple of the standard deviation, S Br- σ, E add is a predetermined additive error component, and E mult is a predetermined multiplicative error component.

14 . The method according to claim 9 , wherein the gap value, G, is calculated according to

±( L−S Br-av )+ E est

wherein the addition of (L−S Br-av ) and E est is used when S Br-av is greater than L, and the difference of (L−S Br-av ) and E est is used when S Br-av is smaller than L, and

wherein the classification is determined as reliable then the condition G<0 is fulfilled.

15 . The method according to claim 6 , wherein if no peak is detected in the tracer signal during a first predetermined time period a warning of missing data is issued.

16 . The method according to claim 2 , wherein if no decreasing slope is detected in the tracer signal during a second predetermined time period a warning or an instruction is issued to direct the user to take action.

17 . A breath analysis system for determining a concentration of an intoxicating substance in the exhaled breath of a user and classifying the determined concentration, the breath analysis system comprising:

a measuring unit in connection to, and under control of, a control unit comprising a central processing unit (CPU) and associated memory, the measuring unit being in connection with a human/machine interface unit, the measuring unit comprising an inlet which is arranged to direct a breath sample from a user into a measurement cell of the measuring unit, the inlet being provided in a position that, during use, is in front of the user, wherein the control unit is configured to:

control the measuring unit, whereby to sample repetitively sample (i) a sensor signal representing the instantaneous concentration of the intoxicating substance, and (ii) a sensor signal representing the instantaneous concentration of a tracer substance;

determine if a peak in the tracer substance signal is detected, and if a peak in the tracer substance signal is detected, define an evaluation period relating to the duration of the tracer substance peak and not exceeding the duration of the tracer substance peak;

calculate, using the tracer signal samples and the intoxicating substance signal samples sampled from the measuring unit during the evaluation period, a running average of the breath concentration of the intoxicating substance and a standard deviation representing an estimate of the associated statistical spread of the running average of the breath concentration of the intoxicating substance;

classify the concentration of the intoxicating substance using the average of the breath concentration of the intoxicating substance and the estimate of the associated statistical spread and comparing with a predetermined concentration limit, L; and

determine that the concentration of the intoxicating substance is acceptable if the concentration of the intoxicating substance is below the predetermined concentration limit, L; and

a vehicle drivability control unit in connection with the control unit, and wherein the control unit is arranged to, if the classification result is that the concentration of the intoxicating substance user is not acceptable, instruct the vehicle drivability control unit to not allow the user to drive the vehicle.

18 . The breath analysis system according to claim 17 , wherein the control unit is further arranged to:

if the estimate of the associated statistical spread indicates that the comparison can not be performed with a predetermined level of accuracy within the evaluation period, store the calculated running average of the breath concentration of the intoxicating substance and the estimate of the associated statistical spread in the memory associated with the control unit, and

control the measuring unit to continue sampling to await a further peak in the tracer substance signal having an associated further evaluation period, and during which further evaluation period, the calculation of the running average of the breath concentration of the intoxicating substance and the standard deviation representing the estimate of the associated statistical spread includes the tracer signal samples and the intoxicating substance signal samples associated with the present evaluation period and with at least the previous evaluation period.

19 . The breath analysis system according to claim 18 , wherein the control unit is arranged to include the tracer signal samples and the intoxicating substance signal samples associated with the present evaluation period and all previous evaluation periods in the calculation of the running average of the breath concentration of the intoxicating substance and the standard deviation representing the estimate of the associated statistical spread.

20 . The breath analysis system according claim 17 , wherein the control unit is further arranged to in the step of analyzing the tracer substance signal samples evaluation period:

analyze a running set of the tracer substance signal samples and if an increasing slope is detected, the increasing slope indicative of a possible peak in the tracer substance signal, initiate an evaluation period; and

wherein, in the calculating step, the classification is performed only if the analysis of the running set of the tracer substance signal samples shows that the increasing slope was followed by a subsequent decreasing slope indicative of a peak in the tracer substance signal during the evaluation period.

21 . The breath analysis system according to claim 17 , wherein the control unit is arranged to forward the classification result to the human/machine interface unit, which is arranged to output a representation of the classification result to a user.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 1, 2025
From: SENSEAIR AB
To: AUTOMOTIVE COALITION FOR TRAFFIC SAFETY, INC.
Reel/Frame 071147/0974 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 8, 2022
From: LJUNGBLAD, JONAS; HÖK, BERTIL; ÅHLENIUS, MARTIN
To: SENSEAIR AB
Reel/Frame 061687/0197 →
Priority Claims (1)
SE 2050105-2 · Jan 31, 2020 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230051132A1 · Feb 16, 2023
References Cited (245)
US 3283563A · Turner et al. · 1966 [cited by applicant]
US 3301482A · Bullen · 1967 [cited by applicant]
US 3780311A · Brown · 1973 [cited by applicant]
US 3792272A · Harte et al. · 1974 [cited by applicant]
US 3792351A · Ireland · 1974 [cited by applicant]
US 3830630A · Kiefer et al. · 1974 [cited by applicant]
US 3897659A · Henry · 1975 [cited by applicant]
US 4090078A · Heim · 1978 [cited by applicant]
US 4294327A · Howard · 1981 [cited by applicant]
US 4535620A · Cunningham · 1985 [cited by applicant]
US 4678057A · Elfman et al. · 1987 [cited by applicant]
US 4749553A · Lopez et al. · 1988 [cited by applicant]
US 4843377A · Fuller et al. · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 4868545A · Jones · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 4916435A · Fuller · 1990 [cited by applicant]
US 4975581A · Robinson et al. · 1990 [cited by applicant]
US 4996161A · Conners et al. · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 5006315A · Maroulis et al. · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 5303575A · Brown et al. · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5426415A · Prachar et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5458853A · Porter et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5485850A · Dietz · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5544276A · Loux et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5652398A · Johnson · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5655530A · Messerschmidt · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5693944A · Rich · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5731581A · Fischer et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5746973A · Naraqhi · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5823951A · Messerschmidt · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5830112A · Wanq et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5877345A · Bauer et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5906203A · Klockseth et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5955886A · Cohen et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5971937A · Ekstrom · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6123674A · Rich · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6129680A · Mottram · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6142951A · Park · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6152876A · Robinson et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6157041A · Thomas et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6229908B1 · Edmonds et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6266353B1 · Freitas et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6441388B1 · Thomas et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6468222B1 · Mault et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6488635B1 · Mottram · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6528809B1 · Thomas et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6608399B2 · McConnell et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6622032B1 · Robinson et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6684099B2 · Ridder et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6726636B2 · Der Ghazarian et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6748301B1 · Ryu · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6794988B1 · Weiss et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6862091B2 · Johnson · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6983176B2 · Gardner et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7016713B2 · Gardner et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7092832B2 · Brown · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7098037B2 · Haas et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7173524B2 · Ponziani · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7202091B2 · Jones et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7386152B2 · Rowe et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7446878B2 · Ridder et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7671752B2 · Sofer · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7736903B2 · Lambert et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7764982B2 · Dalke et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7848605B2 · Ridder et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7855027B2 · Bayer et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7919754B2 · Hok et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7993281B2 · Stock et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8183527B2 · Taguchi et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8285010B2 · Rowe · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8306595B2 · Osaki et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8377705B2 · Lambert et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8469134B2 · Osaki et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8605959B2 · Kangas · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8773390B1 · Clark · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9068885B2 · Kluczynski et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9073431B2 · Takahashi · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9163718B2 · Nelson · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9746454B2 · Hok et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9758039B2 · Hannon · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9823237B2 · Martin et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10151744B2 · Hok et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 11104227B2 · Hök · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11391724B2 · Hok et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20020084130A1 · Der Ghazarian et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020140289A1 · McConnell et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030039299A1 · Horovitz · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030048000A1 · Harter · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030085284A1 · Bremer et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040093957A1 · Buess et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040260194A1 · Baver · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050241871A1 · Stewart et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060058697A1 · Mochizuki et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060153740A1 · Sultan et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060154377A1 · Lambert et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060167349A1 · Gardner et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060206034A1 · Stock et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060210120A1 · Rowe et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060253711A1 · Kallmann · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070077176A1 · Lambert et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070142720A1 · Ridder et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070144812A1 · Stewart et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070245801A1 · Stock · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080006077A1 · Crabtree et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080045806A1 · Keppler · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080061238A1 · Hok et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080107309A1 · Carni · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080171947A1 · Ruffert · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080228098A1 · Popov et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080252412A1 · Larsson et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080319286A1 · Ridder et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080319288A1 · Ochiai et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090007634A1 · Mitchell · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090039267A1 · Arndt et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090087920A1 · Pettersson et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090248260A1 · Flanagan · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090293589A1 · Freund et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100010325A1 · Ridder et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100028210A1 · Ozaki et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100031718A1 · Heil · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100036592A1 · Osaki et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100063409A1 · Hok · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100068673A1 · Yamada et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100188232A1 · Lambert · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100252737A1 · Fournel et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100268425A1 · Pettersson et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100327167A1 · Koop et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110178420A1 · Ridder et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110283770A1 · Hok · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110302992A1 · Robbins et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110308297A1 · Tsuzuki et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110309932A1 · Arrinqdale et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120112879A1 · Ekchian et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130110311A1 · Ver Steeg · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130231871A1 · Hok · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140002237A1 · Infante et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140156149A1 · Feit · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140260537A1 · Nash · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140297061A1 · Takahashi · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140318293A1 · Nelson · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140377877A1 · Bürgi et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150066238A1 · Todd et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150219620A1 · Hok · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150233897A1 · Hök · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160356764A1 · Martin et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170050518A1 · Steeg et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170074857A1 · Dennis et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170274768A1 · Hök et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180153440A1 · Lee · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20200148231A1 · Hassani · 2020 [cited by examiner]
CN 1586944 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
CN 101292158 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
CN 101334399A · 2008 [cited by applicant]
CN 101624015 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
CN 101631497 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
CN 102316801A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 101354394 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 102854303 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
CN 103692912A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
CN 104737015A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 104816692 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 105109338B · 2018 [cited by applicant]
DE 4127599A1 · 1993 [cited by applicant]
DE 19811872 · 1999 [cited by applicant]
DE 19938064 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
DE 10157907 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
DE 102006018970B3 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
DE 102011106410 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
EP 0752584 · 1997 [cited by applicant]
EP 0791899 · 1997 [cited by applicant]
EP 1441212 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
EP 1688741 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
EP 3304045 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
EP 3433611 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
GB 2431470 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
GB 2442980 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
JP 11104112 · 1999 [cited by applicant]
JP 2000098191 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
JP 2001057440 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
JP 2001503524 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
JP 2002116141 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
JP 2004245799 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
JP 2004287181 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
JP 2004305494 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
JP 2005157599 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
JP 2005227553 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
JP 2005296252 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
JP 200698058 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
JP 2006352009 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
JP 2007147592 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
JP 2007333848 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
JP 2008177473 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
JP 2008192733 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
JP 2008203774 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
JP 2008253455 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
JP 2008291710 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
JP 2008302915 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
JP 2008308037 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009217633 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009257768 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010036799 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010139319 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010241369 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 2011153956 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
JP 2012517276 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 2012198648 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 5141524B2 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2016538193 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
JP 6496244 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
KR 20080110567 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
KR 20130107738A · 2012 [cited by examiner]
SE 536782 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
SE 536784 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO9222813 · 1992 [cited by applicant]
WO WO9526889 · 1995 [cited by applicant]
WO WO97000443 · 1997 [cited by applicant]
WO WO9820346 · 1998 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2001008554 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2004090786 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2005051700 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2007046745 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2008108714 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2009048809 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010067144 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010085716 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010093317 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012064252 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013081519 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014031071 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014031072 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016195803 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017164953 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
Hök et al., “Breath Analyzer for Alcolocks and Screening Devices”, IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 10, No. 1, Jan. 2010, pp. 10-15. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 22, 2021, issued in corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/SE2021/050061. [cited by applicant]
Blincoe, L. J. et al., The Economic and Societal Impact Of Motor Vehicle Crashes, 2010 (Revised), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, May 2015 (Revised), DOT HS 812 013. [cited by applicant]
Dhokalia et al., Resting End-Tidal CO2 Association With Age, Gender, and Personailty, Psychosomatic Medicine, vol. 60, 1998, pp. 33-37. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report EP 13 83 0956 dated Jul. 13, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report EP 13 83 1692 dated Jul. 13, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Giebel, Brian M., Thesis and Dissertation, “Advancement and Application of Gas Chromatography Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry Techniques for Atmospheric Trace Gas Analysis,” Published 2011, 252 total pages. [cited by applicant]
Hok, B. et al., Breath Analyzer for Alcolocks and Screening Devices, IEEE Sensors Journal, Dec. 2010, vol. 10. No. 1, pp. 10-15. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report dated Feb. 3, 2014 for PCT/SE2013/050991. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report dated Jan. 31, 2014 for PCT/SE2013/050990. [cited by applicant]
Lambert et al., Passive Sensing of Driver Intoxication, SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-1321, 2006, SAE International. [cited by applicant]
Ljungblad, J. et al., Development and Evaluation of Algorithms for Breath Alcohol Screening, Sensors, Apr. 2016, vol. 16, No. 469, pp. 1-7. [cited by applicant]
Talbert, Bruce, et al., “A Study of Regulators for Delivering Gases Containing Low Concentrations of Hydrogen Sulfide,” LCGC North America, 22(6):562, 564, 567-568 (2004). [cited by applicant]
Traffic Safety Facts, 2013 Data: Alcohol-Impaired Driving, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Dec. 2014, DOT HS 812 102. [cited by applicant]