IP Library Granted Patent US 12,509,067
Granted Patent B2
US 12,509,067 · App. 18/305,500 · Granted Dec 30, 2025

Vehicle for performing minimum risk maneuver and method of operating the vehicle

Inventors: Cheol Hwan Yun (Seoul, KR); Jong Sung Park (Hwaseong-si, KR); Yong Bin Min (Busan, KR); Chan Jong Jang (Daegu, KR); Bong Sob Song (Seongnam-si, KR)
Assignees: Hyundai Motor Company; Kia Corporation
B60W30/09B60W30/0956B60W30/18163B60W60/0015B60W2552/10B60W2554/802
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,509,067
App. No.
18/305,500
Filed
Apr 24, 2023
Granted
Dec 30, 2025
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3661
USPC
701/23
Abstract

An embodiment method for operating a vehicle includes monitoring a state of the vehicle, determining a type of a minimum risk maneuver based on the state of the vehicle, wherein the type of the minimum risk maneuver comprises a straight-ahead stopping type in which the vehicle stops after driving straight ahead only and a lane change stopping type in which the vehicle stops after changing a lane, and executing the determined type of the minimum risk maneuver.

Claims (93)

1 . A method for operating a vehicle, the method comprising:

obtaining a request to execute a minimum risk maneuver function;

monitoring a state of the vehicle;

determining a type of a minimum risk maneuver based on the state of the vehicle, wherein the type of the minimum risk maneuver comprises a straight-ahead stopping type in which the vehicle stops after driving straight ahead only and a lane change stopping type in which the vehicle stops after changing a lane; and

executing the determined type of the minimum risk maneuver,

wherein monitoring the state of the vehicle comprises detecting a neighboring vehicle, and

wherein determining the type of the minimum risk maneuver based on the state of the vehicle comprises:

determining whether or not the neighboring vehicle exists within a region of interest,

in response to a determination that the neighboring vehicle does not exist within the region of interest, determining the straight-ahead stopping type as the type of the minimum risk maneuver, and

in response to a determination that the neighboring vehicle exists within the region of interest, determining the lane change stopping type as the type of the minimum risk maneuver.

2 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein:

monitoring the state of the vehicle further comprises detecting a number of lanes in a road on which the vehicle travels; and

determining the straight-ahead stopping type as the type of the minimum risk maneuver in response to the determination that the neighboring vehicle does not exist within the region of interest comprises determining the straight-ahead stopping type as the type of the minimum risk maneuver when the neighboring vehicle does not exist within the region of interest and the number of lanes is equal to or less than a predetermined number.

3 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein:

determining the type of the minimum risk maneuver based on the state of the vehicle comprises:

determining whether or not a lane change is necessary; and

determining the lane change stopping type as the type of the minimum risk maneuver in response to a determination that the lane change is necessary, and

determining whether or not the lane change is necessary comprises determining that the lane change is necessary when a longitudinal distance between the vehicle and a front vehicle is less than a first minimum safety distance, a longitudinal distance between the vehicle and a right front driving vehicle is greater than a second minimum safety distance, and a longitudinal distance between the vehicle and a right rear driving vehicle is greater than a third minimum safe distance.

4 . The method according to claim 3 , wherein determining the type of the minimum risk maneuver based on the state of the vehicle further comprises determining the straight-ahead stopping type as the type of the minimum risk maneuver in response to a determination that the lane change is not necessary.

5 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein monitoring the state of the vehicle, determining the type of the minimum risk maneuver, and executing the determined type of the minimum risk maneuver are performed only after obtaining the request to execute the minimum risk maneuver function.

6 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein:

monitoring the state of the vehicle comprises detecting the neighboring vehicle, the lane, and a shoulder adjacent to the vehicle;

the method further comprises:

determining a risk of collision with the neighboring vehicle; and

determining the type of the minimum risk maneuver comprises determining the type of the minimum risk maneuver based on the risk of collision and the state of the vehicle.

7 . The method according to claim 6 , wherein the lane change stopping type comprises:

a one-lane change stopping type in which the vehicle stops after changing one lane;

a full-shoulder stopping type in which the vehicle stops completely on the shoulder after changing the lane to the shoulder; and

a half-shoulder stopping type in which the vehicle stops across the shoulder after changing the lane to the shoulder.

8 . The method according to claim 6 , wherein determining the type of the minimum risk maneuver based on the state of the vehicle further comprises:

determining whether or not a next lane is the shoulder when the neighboring vehicle is within the region of interest;

analyzing a shoulder condition and a route when the next lane is the shoulder;

in response to a determination that a half-shoulder stopping is possible, determining a half-shoulder stopping type as the type of the minimum risk maneuver;

in response to a determination that a full-shoulder stopping is possible, determining a full-shoulder stopping type as the type of the minimum risk maneuver; and

in response to a determination that the shoulder stopping is not possible, analyzing the shoulder condition and the route again after a predetermined time has elapsed.

9 . The method according to claim 6 , wherein determining the type of the minimum risk maneuver based on the state of the vehicle comprises:

determining the straight-ahead stopping type as the type of the minimum risk maneuver when it is determined that the neighboring vehicle does not exist within the region of interest;

determining whether or not a next lane is the shoulder when the neighboring vehicle exists within the region of interest;

determining whether or not the a lane change is necessary when the next lane is not the shoulder;

determining the straight-ahead stopping type as the type of the minimum risk maneuver when it is determined that the lane change is not necessary;

determining a one-lane change stopping type as the type of the minimum risk maneuver when it is determined that the lane change is necessary;

analyzing a shoulder condition and a route when the next lane is the shoulder;

in response to a determination that a half-shoulder stopping is possible, determining a half-shoulder stopping type after changing the lane as the type of the minimum risk maneuver;

in response to a determination that a full-shoulder stopping is possible, determining a full-shoulder stopping type after changing the lane as the type of the minimum risk maneuver; and

in response to a determination that a shoulder stopping is impossible, determining whether or not the lane change is necessary again.

10 . The method according to claim 6 , wherein determining the type of the minimum risk maneuver based on the state of the vehicle comprises:

generating a simple bird's eye view image including the detected neighboring vehicle, the lane, the shoulder, and the risk of collision; and

determining the type of the minimum risk maneuver using an artificial intelligence that receives the generated simple bird's eye view image as an input.

11 . The method according to claim 10 , wherein generating the simple bird's eye view image comprises changing and displaying brightness of the neighboring vehicle included in the simple bird's eye view image according to the risk of collision to contain the risk of collision.

12 . A vehicle comprising:

a sensor;

a processor configured to control an automated drive of the vehicle based on state information and neighboring environment information detected by the sensor; and

a controller configured to control operation of the vehicle according to control of the processor, wherein the processor is configured to:

obtain a request to execute a minimum risk maneuver function;

monitor a state of the vehicle based on the state information detected by the sensor;

determine a type of a minimum risk maneuver based on the state of the vehicle, wherein the type of the minimum risk maneuver comprises a straight-ahead stopping type in which the vehicle stops after driving straight ahead only and a lane change stopping type in which the vehicle stops after changing a lane; and

execute the determined type of the minimum risk maneuver by controlling the controller, and

wherein the processor is further configured to:

detect a neighboring vehicle of the vehicle,

determine whether or not the neighboring vehicle exists within a region of interest,

in response to a determination that the neighboring vehicle does not exist within the region of interest, determine the straight-ahead stopping type as the type of the minimum risk maneuver, and

in response to a determination that the neighboring vehicle exists within the region of interest, determine the lane change stopping type as the type of the minimum risk maneuver.

13 . The vehicle according to claim 12 , wherein the processor is configured to:

detect a number of lanes of a road on which the vehicle travels; and

determine the straight-ahead stopping type as the type of the minimum risk maneuver when the neighboring vehicle does not exist within the region of interest and the number of lanes is equal to or less than a predetermined number.

14 . The vehicle according to claim 12 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

determine whether or not a lane change is necessary;

determine that the lane change is necessary when a longitudinal distance between the vehicle and a front vehicle is less than a first minimum safety distance, a longitudinal distance between the vehicle and a right front driving vehicle is greater than a second minimum safety distance, and a longitudinal distance between the vehicle and a right rear driving vehicle is greater than a third minimum safe distance; and

in response to a determination that the lane change is necessary, determine the lane change stopping type as the type of the minimum risk maneuver.

15 . The vehicle according to claim 12 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

in response to obtaining the request to execute the minimum risk maneuver function, determine the type of the minimum risk maneuver and execute the determined type of the minimum risk maneuver.

16 . The vehicle according to claim 12 , wherein the processor is configured to:

detect the neighboring vehicle, the lane, and a shoulder adjacent to the vehicle;

determine a risk of collision with the neighboring vehicle; and

determine the type of the minimum risk maneuver based on the risk of collision and the state of the vehicle.

17 . The vehicle according to claim 16 , wherein the type of the minimum risk maneuver comprises:

a one-lane change stopping type in which the vehicle stops after changing one lane;

a full-shoulder stopping type in which the vehicle completely stops on the shoulder after changing the lane to the shoulder; and

a half-shoulder stopping type in which the vehicle stops across the shoulder after changing the lane to the shoulder.

18 . The vehicle according to claim 16 , wherein the processor is configured to:

generate a simple bird's eye view image including the detected neighboring vehicle, the lane, the shoulder, and the risk of collision; and

determine the type of the minimum risk maneuver using an artificial intelligence that receives the generated simple bird's eye view image as an input.

19 . A method for operating a vehicle, the method comprising:

obtaining a request to execute a minimum risk maneuver function;

monitoring a state of the vehicle comprising detecting a neighboring vehicle, a lane, and a shoulder adjacent to the vehicle;

determining a type of a minimum risk maneuver based on the state of the vehicle, wherein the type of the minimum risk maneuver comprises a straight-ahead stopping type in which the vehicle stops after driving straight ahead only and a lane change stopping type in which the vehicle stops after changing the lane; and

determining a risk of collision with the neighboring vehicle,

wherein determining the type of the minimum risk maneuver comprises determining the type of the minimum risk maneuver based on the risk of collision and the state of the vehicle,

wherein the lane change stopping type comprises:

a one-lane change stopping type in which the vehicle stops after changing one lane,

a full-shoulder stopping type in which the vehicle stops completely on the shoulder after changing the lane to the shoulder, and

a half-shoulder stopping type in which the vehicle stops across the shoulder after changing the lane to the shoulder, and

executing the determined type of the minimum risk maneuver.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 4, 2026
From: YUN, CHEOL HWAN; PARK, JONG SUNG; MIN, YONG BIN; JANG, CHAN JONG; SONG, BONG SOB
To: AJOU UNIVERSITY INDUSTRY-ACADEMIC COOPERATION FOUNDATION
Reel/Frame 073682/0126 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 24, 2023
From: YUN, CHEOL HWAN; PARK, JONG SUNG; MIN, YOUNG BIN; JANG, CHAN JONG; SONG, BONG SOB
To: HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY; KIA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 063414/0169 →
Priority Claims (1)
KR 10-2022-0079856 · Jun 29, 2022 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240001915A1 · Jan 4, 2024
References Cited (3)
US 20210229658A1 · Tsuji · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220348227A1 · Foster · 2022 [cited by examiner]
Yu, Jing, and Feng Luo. “Fallback strategy for level 4+ automated driving system.” 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC). IEEE, 2019. (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]