IP Library Granted Patent US 12,529,558
Granted Patent B2
US 12,529,558 · App. 18/254,626 · Granted Jan 20, 2026

Method and detector for identifying a moment of plastic deformation of material

Inventors: Lukasz Bednarski (Kielce, PL); Rafal Marek Sienko (Cracow, PL)
Assignee: SHM SYSTEM SPOLKA Z O.O. SPOLKA KOMANDYTOWA
G01B21/32G01B11/18G01B7/16
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,529,558
App. No.
18/254,626
Granted
Jan 20, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Method for identifying a plastic deformation of material of an object in situ using strain sensors operating on the principle of electrical resistive strain gauging, fibre optic measurements using fibre Bragg gratings (FBG), vibrating wire sensors ( )VW, distributed fibre optic sensors (DFOS), inductive, capacitive, or piezoresistive sensors, in which in the monitored area (W) subjected to any load condition, there are placed at least four strain sensors (εs) constituting at least two rosettes (I), (II) turned with respect to each other by any angle (α) other than zero and freely shifted with respect to each other by a vector (V) for measuring any plane strain condition, the rotation angle and the displacement of the rosettes (I), (II) are chosen so that no more than two sensors (εs) between the rosettes are parallel to each other or lie on the same straight line, at least two principal strain states (ε 1, ε2 ) and principal stresses (σ 1, σ2 ) respectively are determined for the monitored area (A), and by monitoring the object, increments of principal strains (Δε 1 ), (Δε 2 ) and/or increments of principal stresses (Δσï), (Δσ 2 ) are calculated, in successive moments of time, for each separated rosette, which below the yield point of the monitored area are proportional between the rosettes, on this basis, the plastic deformation of material indices are determined, and by monitoring the area the yield point is detected at the moment of disappearance of the proportionality of the increments, i.e. a sudden change in the value of the determined yield indices normal to the state below the yield point of a given area.

Claims (13)

1 . Method for identifying a plastic deformation of material of an object, the method comprising:

in a monitored area (W) subjected to any load condition, there are placed at least four strain sensors (εs) constituting at least two strain gauge rosettes (I), (II) for measuring any plane strain condition, turned with respect to each other by any angle (α) other than zero and freely shifted with respect to each other by a vector (V) so to define different measurement coordinate systems by an asymmetric arrangement of rosettes,

the rotation angle and the displacement of the rosettes (I), (II) are chosen so that no more than two sensors (εs) between the rosettes are parallel to each other or lie on the same straight line,

at least two principal strain states (ε 1 , ε 2 ) and principal stresses (σ 1 , σ 2 ) respectively are determined for the monitored area (W),

by monitoring the object, increments of principal strains (Δε 1 ), (Δε 2 ) and/or increments of principal stresses (Δσ 1 ), (Δσ 2 ) are calculated, in successive moments of time, for each separated rosette, which below the yield point of the monitored area are proportional between the rosettes,

on this basis, the plastic deformation of material indices are determined, and by monitoring the area, and

the yield point is detected at the moment of disappearance of the proportionality of the increments.

2 . Method according to claim 1 , characterized in that for a plurality of sensors (εs) constituting more strain gauge rosettes turned and offset from each other, the plastic deformation of material indices are determined for arbitrarily selected combinations of rosette pairs or for all rosettes simultaneously.

3 . Detector for identifying a plastic deformation of an object, the detector comprising:

at least four strain sensors (εs) mutually positioned asymmetrically at different angles such that the strain sensors (εs) constitute at least two strain gauge rosettes (I), (II) for determining a plane strain and/or stress state at a measurement location, each strain rosette being three strain sensors (εs) positioned on the material to be monitored in different but known asymmetrically positioned directions, one strain sensor (εs) is a part of one or more strain rosettes but two rosettes, used to detect the plastic deformation, formed from the strain sensors, does not have more than two sensors in common and furthermore the strain rosettes formed by the strain sensors are turned relative to each other by any angle α other than zero and freely shifted with respect to each other by a vector (V) and the turning angle (α) and displacement (V) of the rosettes (I), (II) are chosen so that no more than two sensors (εs) between the rosettes are parallel to each other or lie on the same straight line.

4 . Detector according to claim 3 , characterised in that the directions on which the strain sensors (εs) are placed intersect at one or any points (O 1 , O 2 , O 3 ).

5 . Detector according to claim 3 , characterised in that the strain sensors (εs) are placed on a common carrier (M) after installation of the detector on the monitored object.

6 . Detector according to claim 3 , characterized in that it is additionally provided with one or more sensors (T 1 ) designed to measure temperature changes of the monitored material in order to compensate for temperature effects on the readings of the strain sensors (εS).

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 1, 2023
From: BEDNARSKI, LUKASZ; SIENKO, RAFAL MAREK
To: SHM SYSTEM SPOLKA Z O.O. SPOLKA KOMANDYTOWA
Reel/Frame 063828/0353 →
Priority Claims (1)
PL P.436145 · Nov 27, 2020 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240295397A1 · Sep 5, 2024
References Cited (19)
US 10612911B1 · Pena, III et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20030029252A1 · Hiebert · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20180195547A1 · Demeocq · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20200309626A1 · Mukai · 2020 [cited by examiner]
CN 104374499A · 2015 [cited by examiner]
JP S6275327A · 1987 [cited by examiner]
JP H0610645 · 1994 [cited by applicant]
KR 20000056288A · 2000 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2021068998A1 · 2021 [cited by examiner]
ZA 200002042 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
ZA 200002042A · 2001 [cited by examiner]
KR_20000056288 (Year: 2000). [cited by examiner]
Translation JP_S627532 (Year: 1987). [cited by examiner]
PCT/ISA/210 Search Report issued on PCT/PL2021/000087, Apr. 5, 2022 pp. 4. [cited by applicant]
PCT/ISA/237 Written Opinion issued on PCT/PL2021/000087, Apr. 5, 2022 pp. 6. [cited by applicant]
Anonymous, “E-94 Practical Strain Gage Measurements Introduction”, Jan. 1, 1999 (Jan. 1, 1999), pp. 94-130, XP055903713, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://www.omega.co.uk/techref/pfd/StrainGage_Measurement.pdf, … [cited by applicant]
Megson, T H G, “Complex Stress and Strain” In: “Structural and Stress Analysis”, Feb. 17, 2005 (Feb. 17, 2005), Elsevier Science and Technology, XP055903747, pp. 383-420, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://freeit.… [cited by applicant]
Karl Hoffmann, “An Introduction to Measurements using Strain Gages”, 1989, 273 pages. [cited by applicant]
Robert M. Jones, “Deformation Theory of Plasticity”, 2009, 641 pages. [cited by applicant]