IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,546,727
Granted Patent B2
US 12,546,727 · App. 18/244,749 · Granted Feb 10, 2026

Calibration of parametric measurement models based on in-line wafer measurement data

Inventors: Brian C. Lin (Zhubei, TW); David Wu (Zhubei, TW); Song Wu (Shanghai, CN); Tianrong Zhan (Shanghai, CN); Emily Chiu (Zhubei, TW); Andrew Lagodzinski (Livermore, CA)
Assignee: KLA Corporation
G01N21/9505G01N21/31G01N21/4738G01N2201/127
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,546,727
App. No.
18/244,749
Granted
Feb 10, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and systems for calibrating simulated measurement signals generated by a parametric measurement model are described herein. Regression on real measurement signals is performed using a parametric model. The residual fitting error between the real measurement signals and simulated measurement signals generated by the parametric model characterizes the error of the parametric model at each set of estimated values of the one or more floating parameters. Simulated measurement signals are generated by the parametric model at specified values of the floating parameters. A residual fitting error associated with the simulated measurement signals generated at the specified values of the floating parameters is derived from the residual fitting errors calculated by the regression on the real measurement signals. The simulated measurement signals are calibrated by adding the residual fitting error to the uncalibrated, simulated measurement signals. The calibrated, simulated measurement signals improve the accuracy of measurements and measurement recipe development.

Claims (64)

1 . A method comprising:

receiving real measurement signals associated with measurements of each of a plurality of instances of one or more structures fabricated on one or more semiconductor wafers;

determining a set of estimated values of one or more floating parameters of a parametric measurement model associated with each of the measurements of the plurality of instances of the one or more structures, wherein each set of estimated values of the one or more floating parameters minimizes a residual error, each residual error characterizing a difference between the corresponding real measured signals and a corresponding set of simulated measurement signals generated by the parametric measurement model at each of the sets of estimated values of the one or more floating parameters;

determining a set of simulated measurement signals by evaluating the parametric measurement model at a set of specified values of the one or more floating parameters;

estimating a residual error associated with the specified values of the one or more floating parameters based on the residual errors associated with each of the measurements of the plurality of instances of the one or more structures;

calibrating the set of simulated measurement signals by adding the residual error associated with the specified values of the floating parameters to the set of simulated measurement signals;

receiving real measurement signals associated with a measurement of another instance of the one or more structures;

estimating a value of a parameter of interest characterizing the one or more structures based on the real measurement signals associated with the measurement of another instance of the one or more structures and the calibrated set of simulated measurement signals; and

communicating an indication of the estimated value of the parameter of interest to a semiconductor fabrication tool that causes the semiconductor fabrication tool to adjust one or more parameters of a fabrication process of the semiconductor fabrication tool to achieve a desired output from the semiconductor fabrication tool.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more semiconductor wafers are inline, production wafers.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the measurements of each of a plurality of instances of one or more structures fabricated on one or more semiconductor wafers are optically based spectroscopic measurements or image based scatterometry measurements.

4 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining a variation of values of each of the one or more floating parameters of the parametric measurement model across the sets of estimated values of the one or more floating parameters of the parametric measurement model associated with the measurements of the plurality of instances of the one or more structures.

5 . The method of claim 4 , further comprising:

generating an expanded set of values of each of the one or more floating parameters based on the determined variations, wherein each expanded set of values is larger than the corresponding set of estimated values.

6 . The method of claim 5 , further comprising:

generating an expanded set of simulated measurement signals by evaluating the parametric measurement model at each of the values of the expanded set of values of each of the one or more floating parameters.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the estimating of the residual error associated with the specified values of the one or more floating parameters involves:

selecting one or more sets of real measurement signals that most closely match the set of simulated measurement signals corresponding to the specified values of the one or more floating parameters; and

estimating the residual error associated with the specified values of the one or more floating parameters based on the residual errors corresponding to the one or more selected sets of real measurement signals.

8 . The method of claim 7 , wherein the selecting of the one or more sets of real measurement signals that most closely match the set of simulated measurement signals involves a K-nearest neighbor search of the sets of real measurement signals.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the estimating of the residual error associated with the specified values of the one or more floating parameters involves:

generating a statistical model of the residual errors characterizing the difference between the corresponding real measured signals and the corresponding set of simulated measurement signals as a function of values of the real measurement signals; and

evaluating the statistical model at the set of simulated measurement signals associated with the specified values of the one or more floating parameters to determine the residual error associated with the specified values of the one or more floating parameters.

10 . A metrology system comprising:

an illumination source configured to generate an amount of illumination light directed to one or more structures fabricated on a semiconductor wafer;

a detector configured to detect an amount of light from the one or more structures in response to the amount of illumination light and generate real measurement signals indicative of the detected light; and

one or more computer systems configured to:

receive real measurement signals associated with measurements of each of a plurality of instances of the one or more structures fabricated on one or more semiconductor wafers;

determine a set of estimated values of one or more floating parameters of a parametric measurement model associated with each of the measurements of the plurality of instances of the one or more structures, wherein each set of estimated values of the one or more floating parameters minimizes a residual error, each residual error characterizing a difference between the corresponding real measured signals and a corresponding set of simulated measurement signals generated by the parametric measurement model at each of the sets of estimated values of the one or more floating parameters;

determine a set of simulated measurement signals by evaluating the parametric measurement model at a set of specified values of the one or more floating parameters;

estimate a residual error associated with the specified values of the one or more floating parameters based on the residual errors associated with each of the measurements of the plurality of instances of the one or more structures;

calibrate the set of simulated measurement signals by adding the residual error associated with the specified values of the floating parameters to the set of simulated measurement signals;

receive real measurement signals associated with a measurement of another instance of the one or more structures;

estimate a value of a parameter of interest characterizing the one or more structures based on the real measurement signals associated with the measurement of another instance of the one or more structures and the calibrated set of simulated measurement signals; and

communicate an indication of the estimated value of the parameter of interest to a semiconductor fabrication tool that causes the semiconductor fabrication tool to adjust one or more parameters of a fabrication process of the semiconductor fabrication tool to achieve a desired output from the semiconductor fabrication tool.

11 . The metrology system of claim 10 , wherein the one or more semiconductor wafers are inline, production wafers.

12 . The metrology system of claim 10 , wherein the measurements of each of a plurality of instances of one or more structures fabricated on one or more semiconductor wafers are optically based spectroscopic measurements or image based scatterometry measurements.

13 . The metrology system of claim 10 , the one or more computing systems further configured to:

determine a variation of values of each of the one or more floating parameters of the parametric measurement model across the sets of estimated values of the one or more floating parameters of the parametric measurement model associated with the measurements of the plurality of instances of the one or more structures.

14 . The metrology system of claim 13 , the one or more computing systems further configured to:

generate an expanded set of values of each of the one or more floating parameters based on the determined variations, wherein each expanded set of values is larger than the corresponding set of estimated values.

15 . The metrology system of claim 14 , the one or more computing systems further configured to:

generate an expanded set of simulated measurement signals by evaluating the parametric measurement model at each of the values of the expanded set of values of each of the one or more floating parameters.

16 . The metrology system of claim 10 , wherein the estimating of the residual error associated with the specified values of the one or more floating parameters involves:

selecting one or more sets of real measurement signals that most closely match the set of simulated measurement signals corresponding to the specified values of the one or more floating parameters; and

estimating the residual error associated with the specified values of the one or more floating parameters based on the residual errors corresponding to the one or more selected sets of real measurement signals.

17 . The metrology system of claim 16 , wherein the selecting of the one or more sets of real measurement signals that most closely match the set of simulated measurement signals involves a K-nearest neighbor search of the sets of real measurement signals.

18 . The metrology system of claim 10 , wherein the estimating of the residual error associated with the specified values of the one or more floating parameters involves:

generating a statistical model of the residual errors characterizing the difference between the corresponding real measured signals and the corresponding set of simulated measurement signals as a function of values of the real measurement signals; and

evaluating the statistical model at the set of simulated measurement signals associated with the specified values of the one or more floating parameters to determine the residual error associated with the specified values of the one or more floating parameters.

19 . A metrology system comprising:

an illumination source configured to generate an amount of illumination light directed to one or more structures fabricated on a semiconductor wafer;

a detector configured to detect an amount of light from the one or more structures in response to the amount of illumination light and generate real measurement signals indicative of the detected light; and

a non-transitory, computer-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to:

receive real measurement signals associated with measurements of each of a plurality of instances of the one or more structures fabricated on one or more semiconductor wafers;

determine a set of estimated values of one or more floating parameters of a parametric measurement model associated with each of the measurements of the plurality of instances of the one or more structures, wherein each set of estimated values of the one or more floating parameters minimizes a residual error, each residual error characterizing a difference between the corresponding real measured signals and a corresponding set of simulated measurement signals generated by the parametric measurement model at each of the sets of estimated values of the one or more floating parameters;

determine a set of simulated measurement signals by evaluating the parametric measurement model at a set of specified values of the one or more floating parameters;

estimate a residual error associated with the specified values of the one or more floating parameters based on the residual errors associated with each of the measurements of the plurality of instances of the one or more structures;

calibrate the set of simulated measurement signals by adding the residual error associated with the specified values of the floating parameters to the set of simulated measurement signals;

receive real measurement signals associated with a measurement of another instance of the one or more structures;

estimating a value of a parameter of interest characterizing the one or more structures based on the real measurement signals associated with the measurement of another instance of the one or more structures and the calibrated set of simulated measurement signals; and

communicate an indication of the estimated value of the parameter of interest to a semiconductor fabrication tool that causes the semiconductor fabrication tool to adjust one or more parameters of a fabrication process of the semiconductor fabrication tool to achieve a desired output from the semiconductor fabrication tool.

20 . The metrology system of claim 19 , wherein the one or more semiconductor wafers are inline, production wafers, and wherein the measurements of each of a plurality of instances of one or more structures fabricated on one or more semiconductor wafers are optically based spectroscopic measurements or image based scatterometry measurements.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 21, 2024
From: LIN, BRIAN C.; WU, DAVID; WU, SONG; ZHAN, TIANRONG; CHIU, EMILY; LAGODZINSKI, ANDREW
To: KLA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 066190/0443 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63409842 · Sep 26, 2022
Related Publication 20240102941A1 · Mar 28, 2024
References Cited (84)
US 5608526A · Piwonka-Corle et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5859424A · Norton et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6023338A · Bareket · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6429943B1 · Opsal et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6716646B1 · Wright et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6778275B2 · Bowes · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6787773B1 · Lee · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6992764B1 · Yang et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7242477B2 · Mieher et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7321426B1 · Poslavsky et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7406153B2 · Berman · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7478019B2 · Zangooie et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7626702B2 · Ausschnitt et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7656528B2 · Abdulhalim et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7826071B2 · Shchegrov et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7842933B2 · Shur et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7873585B2 · Izikson · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7929667B1 · Zhuang et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7933026B2 · Opsal et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8068662B2 · Zhang et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8138498B2 · Ghinovker · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 9291554B2 · Kuznetsov et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9826614B1 · Bakeman et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9857291B2 · Kwak et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9885962B2 · Veldman et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9915522B1 · Jiang et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10006865B1 · Shaughnessy et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10013518B2 · Bakeman et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10101670B2 · Pandev et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10152678B2 · Pandev et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10295329B2 · Brill · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10302414B2 · Wainreb · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10324050B2 · Hench et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10345721B1 · Cao et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10352695B2 · Dziura et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10545104B2 · Hench et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10605722B2 · Kwak et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10775323B2 · Gellineau et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20030021465A1 · Adel et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040073398A1 · Nikoonahad et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20070176128A1 · Van Bilsen et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070221842A1 · Morokuma et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20090152463A1 · Toyoda et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20110080585A1 · Rabello et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110266440A1 · Boughorbel et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120292502A1 · Langer et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130208279A1 · Smith · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130304424A1 · Bakeman et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140019097A1 · Bakeman et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140064445A1 · Adler · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140111791A1 · Manassen et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140172394A1 · Kuznetsov et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140195194A1 · Boaz et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140222380A1 · Kuznetsov et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140297211A1 · Pandev et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150046121A1 · Dziura et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150110249A1 · Bakeman et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150117610A1 · Veldman et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150134286A1 · Chao · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150204664A1 · Bringoltz et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150285749A1 · Moncton et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150300965A1 · Sezginer et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160202193A1 · Hench et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160282105A1 · Pandev · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160320319A1 · Hench et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170023491A1 · Cao et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170127983A1 · Spegazzini · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170167862A1 · Dziura et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180100796A1 · Kwak et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180106735A1 · Gellineau et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180113084A1 · Hench et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180232630A1 · Chen et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180328868A1 · Bykanov et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190017946A1 · Wack et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190293578A1 · Gellineau · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200335406A1 · Liman et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210072163A1 · Simkhovich et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210207956A1 · Shchegrov et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 107408519A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 113677983A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
TW 201502461A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report mailed on Jan. 8, 2024, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2023/033132 filed on Sep. 19, 2023 by KLA Corporation, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Lemaillet, Germer, Kline et al., “Intercomparison between optical and x-ray scatterometry measurements of FinFET structures” by Proc. SPIE, v.8681, p. 86810Q (2013). [cited by applicant]
Kline et al., “X-ray scattering critical dimensional metrology using a compact x-ray source for next generation semiconductor devices,” J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS 16(1), 014001 (Jan.-Mar. 2017). [cited by applicant]