IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,560,636
Granted Patent B2
US 12,560,636 · App. 19/169,418 · Granted Feb 24, 2026

Characterizing radio frequency sources based on data from a vapor cell sensor system

Inventors: Mohammad Noaman (Waterloo, CA); Kent Arnold Nickerson (Waterloo, CA); Donald Booth (Kitchener, CA); James P. Shaffer (Kitchener, CA)
Assignee: Quantum Valley Ideas Laboratories
G01R29/0885G01R29/0892G01R33/26
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,560,636
App. No.
19/169,418
Granted
Feb 24, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

In a general aspect, data from a vapor cell sensor system is used to characterize radio frequency sources. In some aspects, a vapor cell sensor system generates output signals by operating one or more vapor cells at an array of locations in a radiating near-field region of an RF field produced by an RF source. Based on the output signals, a signal processing system generates measurement data that represents measured intensities of the RF field in the radiating near-field region. Based on the measurement data, the signal processing system generates a model of the RF field produced by the RF source. The model includes modeled intensities of the RF field in the radiating near-field region and a far-field region of the RF field.

Claims (59)

1 . A signal processing system, comprising:

one or more processors; and

memory storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations that comprise:

receiving output signals from a vapor cell sensor system that comprises one or more vapor cells, the output signals generated by operating the one or more vapor cells at an array of locations in a radiating near-field region of an RF field produced by an RF source;

generating, based on the output signals, measurement data representing measured intensities of the RF field in the near-field region; and

generating, based on the measurement data, a model of the RF field produced by the RF source, the model comprising modeled intensities of the RF field in the radiating near-field region and a far-field region of the RF field.

2 . The signal processing system of claim 1 ,

wherein the array of locations corresponds to first and second measurement domains in a Fresnel region of the RF field, the Fresnel region being part of the radiating near-field region; and

wherein the measurement data represent measured intensities of the RF field on the first and second measurement domains.

3 . The signal processing system of claim 2 ,

wherein the first measurement domain corresponds to a first surface, and the second measurement domain corresponds to a second surface; and

wherein the first and second surfaces are separated by a distance greater than or equal to a wavelength of the RF field.

4 . The signal processing system of claim 3 , wherein the first and second surfaces are planar surfaces.

5 . The signal processing system of claim 3 , wherein the first and second surfaces are planar surfaces that are parallel to each other.

6 . The signal processing system of claim 3 ,

wherein generating the model comprises projecting the measured intensities to a third surface in a Fraunhofer region of the RF field, the Fraunhofer region being part of the far-field region; and

wherein the model comprises modeled intensities of the RF field at a plurality of locations on the third surface.

7 . The signal processing system of claim 3 ,

wherein the model comprises modeled phases of the RF field on the first and second surfaces; and

wherein generating the model comprises using a phase retrieval algorithm to generate the modeled phases based on the measurement data.

8 . The signal processing system of claim 7 , wherein generating the model comprises:

selecting boundary data comprising the measured intensities and the modeled phases of the RF field on at least one of the first and second surfaces; and

using an RF diffraction model to generate the modeled intensities of the RF field in one or both of the radiating near-field region and the far-field region based on the boundary data.

9 . The signal processing system of claim 1 , wherein the model comprises modeled intensities of the RF field at a plurality of points that represent an emission pattern of the RF source.

10 . The signal processing system of claim 1 ,

wherein the one or more vapor cells is a first vapor cell;

wherein the vapor cell sensor system comprises an actuator system that is configured to move the first vapor cell; and

wherein the operations comprise transmitting a control signal to the actuator system to move the first vapor cell to each location in the array of locations.

11 . The signal processing system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more vapor cells is a plurality of vapor cells, and the vapor cell sensor system comprises a mount that is configured to hold the plurality of vapor cells at respective locations of at least a portion of the array of locations.

12 . The signal processing system of claim 1 , wherein the output signals are received from an optical detector of the vapor cell sensor system.

13 . The signal processing system of claim 1 , comprising one or more field programmable gate array (FPGAs), one or more graphics processing units (GPUs), or a combination of one or more FPGAs and GPUs.

14 . A signal processing method, comprising:

receiving output signals from a vapor cell sensor system that comprises one or more vapor cells, the output signals generated based on operating the one or more vapor cells at an array of locations in a radiating near-field region of an RF field produced by an RF source;

generating, based on the output signals, measurement data representing measured intensities of the RF field in the radiating near-field region; and

generating, based on the measurement data, a model of the RF field produced by the RF source, the model comprising modeled intensities of the RF field in the radiating near-field region and a far-field region of the RF field.

15 . The signal processing method of claim 14 ,

wherein the array of locations corresponds to first and second measurement domains in a Fresnel region of the RF field, the Fresnel region being part of the radiating near-field region; and

wherein the measurement data represent measured intensities of the RF field on the first and second measurement domains.

16 . The signal processing method of claim 15 ,

wherein the first measurement domain corresponds to a first surface, and the second measurement domain corresponds to a second surface; and

wherein the first and second surfaces are separated by a distance greater than or equal to a wavelength of the RF field.

17 . The signal processing method of claim 16 , wherein the first and second surfaces are planar surfaces.

18 . The signal processing method of claim 16 , wherein the first and second surfaces are planar surfaces that are parallel to each other.

19 . The signal processing method of claim 16 ,

wherein generating the model comprises projecting the measured intensities to a third surface in a Fraunhofer region of the RF field, the Fraunhofer region being part of the far-field region; and

wherein the model comprises modeled intensities of the RF field at a plurality of locations on the third surface.

20 . The signal processing method of claim 16 ,

wherein the model comprises modeled phases of the RF field on the first and second surfaces; and

wherein generating the model comprises using a phase retrieval algorithm to generate the modeled phases based on the measurement data.

21 . The signal processing method of claim 20 , wherein generating the model comprises:

selecting boundary data comprising the measured intensities and the modeled phases of the RF field on at least one of the first and second surfaces; and

using an RF diffraction model to generate the modeled intensities of the RF field in one or both of the radiating near-field region and the far-field region based on the boundary data.

22 . The signal processing method of claim 14 , wherein the model comprises modeled intensities of the RF field at a plurality of points that represent an emission pattern of the RF source.

23 . The signal processing method of claim 14 ,

wherein the one or more vapor cells is a first vapor cell;

wherein the vapor cell sensor system comprises an actuator system that is configured to move the first vapor cell; and

wherein the signal processing method comprises transmitting a control signal to the actuator system to move the first vapor cell to each location in the array of locations.

24 . The signal processing method of claim 14 , wherein the one or more vapor cells is a plurality of vapor cells, and the vapor cell sensor system comprises a mount that is configured to hold the plurality of vapor cells at respective locations of at least a portion of the array of locations.

25 . The signal processing method of claim 14 , wherein receiving the output signals comprises receiving the output signals from an optical detector of the vapor cell sensor system.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 4, 2025
From: NOAMAN, MOHAMMAD; NICKERSON, KENT ARNOLD; BOOTH, DONALD; SHAFFER, JAMES P.
To: QUANTUM VALLEY IDEAS LABORATORIES
Reel/Frame 070737/0013 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63575170 · Apr 5, 2024
Related Publication 20250314684A1 · Oct 9, 2025
References Cited (65)
US 9970973B2 · Anderson et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10509065B1 · Shaffer · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10564201B1 · Shaffer · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10605840B1 · Amarloo et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10802066B1 · Keaveney et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10859981B1 · Ramirez-serrano et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11054453B2 · Amarloo et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11112298B2 · Amarloo et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11209473B2 · Amarloo et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11300599B1 · Amarloo · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11366430B2 · Ramirez-serrano et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11681016B1 · Bohaichuk · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11874311B1 · Dixon et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 11885842B1 · Pandiyan et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 11885904B2 · Bohaichuk et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 11899051B1 · Pandiyan · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20070247241A1 · Braun et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20160363617A1 · Anderson · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20190187198A1 · Anderson et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20210250101A1 · Holloway et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210286063A1 · Amarloo · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220196716A1 · Anderson · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220252685A1 · Popescu · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220276293A1 · Compton et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220326289A1 · Anderson et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230152362A1 · Tilles · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230296658A1 · Bohaichuk et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
CA 3085935 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CA 3157522 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CA 3159327 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CA 3178752 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Holloway, Christopher L., et al. “Atom-based RF electric field metrology: from self-calibrated measurements to subwavelength and near-field imaging.” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility 59.2 (2017): 717-7… [cited by examiner]
Abbey, et al., “Keyhole coherent diffractive imaging”, Nature Physics, Mar. 9, 2008, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Bauschke, et al., “Phase retrieval, error reduction algorithm, and Fienup variants: a view from convex optimization”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A/vol. 19, No. 7/Jul. 2002, 1334-1345, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Bohaichuk, et al., “A Three-Photon Rydberg Atom-Based Radio Frequency Sensing Scheme with Narrow Linewidth”, arXiv:2304.07409 [physics.atom-ph] (2023), 2023, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Bohaichuk, et al., “The Origins of Rydberg Atom Electrometer Transient Response and its Impact on Radio Frequency Pulse Sensing”, arXiv:2203.01733, Mar. 3, 2022, 21 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Chen, et al., “Advances in Phase Retrieval by Transport of Intensity Equation”, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Photonics, Optics and Laser Technology (Photoptics 2019), pp. 168-173, 2019, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chen, et al., “Multiple wavelength diffractive imaging”, Physical Review A 79, 023809 (2009), Feb. 6, 2009, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chubar, et al., “Memory and CPU efficient computation of the Fresnel free-space propagator in Fourier optics simulations”, Optics Express 28750, vol. 27, No. 20, Sep. 23, 2019, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dixon, Katelyn, “Rydberg atom-based Electrometry Using a Self-Heterodyne Frequency Comb Readout and Preparation Scheme”, Physical Review Applied 19, 034078 (2023)., 2023, 8 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Eisebitt, et al., “Lensless imaging of magnetic nanostructures by X-ray spectro-holography”, Nature vol. 432, 885-888, Dec. 16, 2004, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Fan, et al., “Atom based RF electric field sensing”, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 48 202001 (2015), Sep. 9, 2015, 17 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Fienup, Jr. , “Phase retrieval algorithms: a comparison”, Applied Optics, vol. 21, 2758-2769, Aug. 1, 1982, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Fienup, Jr. , “Reconstruction of an object from the modulus of its Fourier transform”, Optics Letters, vol. 3, No. 1, Jul. 1978, 27-29, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Gerchberg, et al., “A practical algorithm for the determination of the phase from image and diffraction plane pictures”, Optik 35, 1972, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Goodman, “Introduction to Fourier Optics”, McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1968, 457 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Kelly, et al., “Numerical calculation of the Fresnel transform”, J. Opt. Soc. Am., vol. 31, No. 4, 755-764, 2014, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Noaman, et al., “Rydberg-Atom Sensors in Bichromatic Radio-Frequency Fields”, Phys. Rev. Applied 20, 024068., Aug. 28, 2023, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Noaman, et al., “Vapor Cell Characterization and Optimization for Applications in Rydberg Atom-Based Radio Frequency Sensing”, Proceedings vol. 12447, Quantum Sensing, Imaging, and Precision Metrology; 124470V (2023), M… [cited by applicant]
Pham, Minh, “New Algorithms in Computational Microscopy”, Ph.D. thesis, UCLA, 2020, 126 pages. [cited by applicant]
Rensburg, Danielj. , “Limitations of Near-Field Back Projection for Phased Array Tuning Applications”, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Rodriguez, et al., “Oversampling smoothness (OSS): an effective algorithm for phase retrieval of noisy diffraction intensities”, J Appl Crystallography 46(Pt 2), 312 (2013)., 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Schmidt, et al., “Rydberg atom-based radio frequency sensors: amplitude regime sensing”, arXiv:2307.00121v1 [physics.atom-ph], retrieved on Jun. 30, 2023, 33 pages. [cited by applicant]
Schwettmann, et al., “Field-programmable gate array based locking circuit for external cavity diode laser frequency stabilization”, Rev.Sci.Instrum. 82, Oct. 7, 2011, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Sedlacek, et al., “Atom Based Vector Microwave Electrometry Using Rubidium Rydberg Atoms in a Vapor Cell”, arXiv:1304.4299v1 [physics.atom-ph], Apr. 15, 2023, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Sedlacek, et al., “Microwave electrometry with Rydberg atoms in a vapour cell using bright atomic resonances”, Nature Physics, vol. 8, 819-824 (2012), Sep. 16, 2012, 6 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Shaffer, et al., “A read-out enhancement for microwave electric field sensing with Rydberg atoms”, Proc. SPIE vol. 10674, Quantum Technologies 2018, 2018, 12 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Shapira, et al., “Complete Modal Decomposition for Optical Waveguides”, Physical Review Letters 94, 143902, Apr. 14, 2005, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Shechtman, et al., “Phase Retrieval with Application to Optical Imaging”, arXiv:1402.7350v1, accessed Feb. 28, 2014, 25 pages. [cited by applicant]
Shechtman, et al., “Sparsity-based super-resolution and phase-retrieval in waveguide arrays”, Optics Express 24015, Oct. 1, 2013, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Williams, et al., “Fresnel Coherent Diffractive Imaging”, Physical Review Letters 97, 025506, Jul. 14, 2006, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Yoshida, et al., “On the Sample Complexity of Phase-Retrieval Receiver Based on 2-D Arrayed Photodetectors”, OFC 2020, 2020, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Holloway, et al., “Atom-based RF Electric Field Metrology: From Self-Calibrated Measurements to Subwavelength and Near-Field Imaging”, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 59 No. 2, Apr. 2017, pp. 71… [cited by applicant]
ISA, International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in Application No. PCT/CA2025/050488 on Aug. 5, 2025, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
ISA, International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in Application No. PCT/CA2025/050489 on Aug. 5, 2025, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]