IP Library Granted Patent US 12,569,247
Granted Patent B2
US 12,569,247 · App. 19/024,230 · Granted Mar 10, 2026

Systems and methods for controlling a segmented circuit

Inventors: Richard L. Leimbach (Cincinnati, OH); Shane R. Adams (Lebanon, OH); Mark D. Overmyer (Cincinnati, OH); Brett E. Swensgard (West Chester, OH); Thomas W. Lytle, IV (Liberty Township, OH); Frederick E. Shelton, IV (Hillsboro, OH); Kevin L. Houser (Springboro, OH)
Assignee: Cilag GmbH International
A61B17/068A61B17/07207B25F3/00B25F5/00G05F1/563G05F1/61G05F5/00G06F1/3296H02H3/087H02H3/18H02H7/1213H02H11/006A61B2017/00017A61B2017/00022A61B2017/00075A61B2017/00084A61B2017/00115A61B2017/00123A61B2017/00132A61B2017/00199A61B2017/00221A61B2017/00353A61B2017/00398A61B2017/0046A61B2017/00734A61B2017/07285A61B2017/2927A61B2090/0803A61B2090/0808A61B2090/081A61B2090/0811A61B2090/0813H02M1/0067
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,569,247
App. No.
19/024,230
Granted
Mar 10, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present disclosure provides a method for controlling a surgical instrument. The method includes connecting a power assembly to a control circuit, wherein the power assembly is configured to provide a source voltage, energizing, by the power assembly, a voltage boost convertor circuit configured to provide a set voltage greater than the source voltage, and energizing, by the voltage boost convertor, one or more voltage convertors configured to provide one or more operating voltages to one or more circuit components.

Claims (46)

1 . A surgical instrument, comprising:

a motor;

a power source coupled to the motor;

a knife movable by an operation of the motor;

a motor current sensor configured to produce a first signal for monitoring a current draw of the motor from the power source;

a knife position sensor configured to produce a second signal for monitoring a position of the knife;

a primary processor; and

a safety processor coupled to the motor, the motor current sensor, the knife position sensor, and the primary processor, wherein the safety processor is configured to:

indicate to the primary processor that the first signal and the second signal are consistent with a predetermined relationship for the current draw of the motor and the position of the knife; and

indicate an unsafe condition to the primary processor based on detecting that the first signal and the second signal are inconsistent with the predetermined relationship for the current draw of the motor and the position of the knife, wherein the primary processor is configured to prevent the operation of the motor based on the indication of the unsafe condition from the safety processor.

2 . The surgical instrument of claim 1 , wherein the primary processor is configured to prevent the operation of the motor by interrupting a motor segment coupled to the motor.

3 . The surgical instrument of claim 2 , further comprising a switch, wherein the switch is configured to control an operation of the motor segment, and wherein, independent of the primary processor, the safety processor is configured to prevent the operation of the motor by opening the switch to prevent the operation of the motor segment based on the safety processor detecting that the first signal and the second signal are inconsistent with the predetermined relationship.

4 . The surgical instrument of claim 1 , wherein the safety processor and the primary processor are configured to implement a redundant safety check by exchanging periodic status signals at a predetermined interval.

5 . The surgical instrument of claim 4 , wherein the periodic status signals indicate that the first signal and the second signal are consistent with the predetermined relationship.

6 . A surgical instrument, comprising:

a motor;

a power source coupled to the motor;

a firing bar movable by an operation of the motor;

a first sensor configured to measure a first parameter associated with the operation of the motor;

a second sensor configured to measure a second parameter associated with an operation of the firing bar;

a first processor; and

a second processor coupled to the motor, the first sensor, the second sensor, and the first processor, wherein the second processor is configured to:

indicate to the first processor that the first parameter associated with the operation of the motor and the second parameter associated with the operation of the firing bar satisfy a predetermined relationship; and

indicate an unsafe condition to the first processor based on the second processor detecting that the first parameter associated with the operation of the motor and the second parameter associated with the operation of the firing bar do not satisfy the predetermined relationship, wherein the first processor is configured to prevent the operation of the motor based on the indication of the unsafe condition from the second processor.

7 . The surgical instrument of claim 6 , wherein the first processor is configured to prevent the operation of the motor by interrupting a motor segment coupled to the motor.

8 . The surgical instrument of claim 7 , further comprising a switch, wherein the switch is configured to control an operation of the motor segment, and wherein, independent of the first processor, the second processor is configured to prevent the operation of the motor by opening the switch to prevent the operation of the motor segment based on the second processor detecting the first parameter and the second parameter do not satisfy the predetermined relationship.

9 . The surgical instrument of claim 6 , wherein the second processor and the first processor are configured to implement a redundant safety check by exchanging periodic signals at a predetermined interval.

10 . The surgical instrument of claim 9 , wherein the periodic signals indicate that the first parameter and the second parameter satisfy the predetermined relationship.

11 . The surgical instrument of claim 6 , wherein the first parameter measured by the first sensor comprises a current draw of the motor from the power source.

12 . The surgical instrument of claim 6 , wherein the second parameter measured by the second sensor comprises one of a real-time velocity of the firing bar or a real-time position of the firing bar.

13 . A surgical instrument, comprising:

a motor;

a knife movable by an actuation of the motor;

a first sensor configured to monitor a motor speed;

a second sensor configured to monitor a knife position;

a primary processor; and

a safety processor coupled to the motor, the first sensor, the second sensor, and the primary processor, wherein the safety processor is configured to:

determine a knife speed based on the knife position; and

indicate an unsafe condition to the primary processor based on determining the knife speed and the motor speed are inconsistent with a predetermined relationship, wherein the primary processor is configured to prevent the actuation of the motor based on the indication of the unsafe condition from the safety processor.

14 . The surgical instrument of claim 13 , wherein the safety processor is configured to indicate normal condition to the primary processor based on determining the knife speed and the motor speed are consistent with the predetermined relationship.

15 . The surgical instrument of claim 13 , wherein the primary processor is configured to prevent the actuation of the motor by decoupling the motor from a power source.

16 . The surgical instrument of claim 13 , wherein, independent of the primary processor, the safety processor is configured to prevent the actuation of the motor based on determining the knife speed and the motor speed are inconsistent with the predetermined relationship.

17 . The surgical instrument of claim 13 , wherein the primary processor and the safety processor are configured to implement a redundant safety check by exchanging periodic signals at a predetermined interval.

18 . The surgical instrument of claim 17 , wherein the periodic signals indicate that the knife speed and the motor speed are consistent with the predetermined relationship.

19 . The surgical instrument of claim 13 , wherein the primary processor is configured to indicate an intended motor direction to the safety processor, and wherein the safety processor is configured to indicate the unsafe condition to the primary processor based on determining that any one or more of the knife speed, the motor speed, and the intended motor direction are inconsistent with the predetermined relationship.

20 . The surgical instrument of claim 13 , wherein the safety processor is configured to reset the primary processor based on determining the knife speed and the motor speed are inconsistent with the predetermined relationship.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 7, 2025
From: LEIMBACH, RICHARD L.; ADAMS, SHANE R.; OVERMYER, MARK D.; SWENSGARD, BRETT E.; LYTLE, THOMAS W., IV; SHELTON, FREDERICK E., IV; HOUSER, KEVIN L.
To: ETHICON LLC
Reel/Frame 070145/0535 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 7, 2025
From: ETHICON LLC
To: CILAG GMBH INTERNATIONAL
Reel/Frame 070152/0001 →
Continuity (5)
Continuation 17984594 · Nov 10, 2022
Continuation 16017403 · Jun 25, 2018
Continuation 15727332 · Oct 6, 2017
Continuation 14226081 · Mar 26, 2014
Related Publication 20250228558A1 · Jul 17, 2025
References Cited (45)
US 4691703A · Auth et al. · 1987 [cited by applicant]
US 5001649A · Lo et al. · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 6471659B2 · Eggers et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6998816B2 · Wieck et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7202653B2 · Pai · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7249267B2 · Chapuis · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7793812B2 · Moore et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8063619B2 · Zhu et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8085013B2 · Wei et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8179705B2 · Chapuis · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8210411B2 · Yates · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 8228048B2 · Spencer · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8444036B2 · Shelton, IV · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8523043B2 · Ullrich · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8627994B2 · Zemlok et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8808311B2 · Heinrich et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8960520B2 · McCuen · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 8967443B2 · McCuen · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9119657B2 · Shelton, IV et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9123286B2 · Park · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9232979B2 · Parihar et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9265585B2 · Wingardner et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9314291B2 · Schall et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9332987B2 · Leimbach et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9507399B2 · Chien · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9526921B2 · Kimball et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9629629B2 · Leimbach et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9649110B2 · Parihar et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9690362B2 · Leimbach et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9844368B2 · Boudreaux et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9888919B2 · Leimbach et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10524785B2 · Zemlok et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20060176031A1 · Forman et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20090090763A1 · Zemlok et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20110022032A1 · Zemlok et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20130103024A1 · Monson · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130126581A1 · Yates · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130193188A1 · Shelton, IV · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130211397A1 · Parihar · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130214025A1 · Zemlok · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20150277471A1 · Leimbach · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20230309992A1 · Leimbach et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
EP 1558161A1 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
JP 200169758A · 2001 [cited by applicant]
JP 200797252A · 2007 [cited by applicant]