IP Library Granted Patent US 12,580,733
Granted Patent B2
US 12,580,733 · App. 18/610,045 · Granted Mar 17, 2026

Secure re-use of private key for dynamic group of nodes

Inventors: John Fletcher (London, GB); Thomas Trevethan (London, GB); Marco Bardoscia (London, GB)
Assignee: NCHAIN LICENSING AG
H04L9/0618G06F21/64G06Q20/065G06Q20/36G06Q20/3829G06Q20/389H04L9/0637H04L9/0825H04L9/0833H04L9/3239H04L9/3247H04L9/3252H04L9/3255G06Q2220/00H04L9/50H04L2209/463H04L2209/56
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,580,733
App. No.
18/610,045
Granted
Mar 17, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Provided herein are a process, an apparatus, and an article of manufacture for confiscating a digital asset due to malicious members or malicious attacks. A process in the form of a computer-implemented method includes: i) detecting malicious activity by a malicious party, wherein the malicious party is one of the other members of the a congress; and ii) confiscating at least a portion of digital assets previously transferred to the a public group address by the malicious party. Security mechanisms disclosed herein for confiscating a digital asset leverage the use of a congress that is secured, in part, through distributed generation of private key share. The security mechanisms further allow a self-governing, decentralized group to be formed, with the threshold signature scheme allowing the group to control digital assets encumbered by a public key associated with the group.

Claims (23)

1 . A computer-implemented method of confiscating a digital asset, the method implemented by a processing resource, the computer-implemented method comprising:

i) detecting malicious activity by a malicious party, wherein the malicious party is one of other members of a congress; and

ii) confiscating at least a portion of digital assets previously transferred to a public group address by the malicious party.

2 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein confiscating at least the portion of digital assets comprises transferring to an unspendable address.

3 . The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein transferring to the unspendable address comprises using a private key share in cooperation with the other members of the congress to generate a valid signature for a transaction to the unspendable address.

4 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein detecting the malicious activity comprises determining that a node associated with the malicious party is in breach of a pre-defined protocol or criteria.

5 . The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , wherein the malicious activity is detected at a node that reports faulty information to other members of the congress.

6 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein confiscating the portion of digital assets comprises transferring to an unspendable address.

7 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein confiscating comprises using a private key share in cooperation with the other members of the congress to generate a valid signature for a transaction to a spendable address.

8 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein malicious behaviour is detected using verifiable secret sharing.

9 . The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein detecting the malicious activity comprises determining that a node provides inconsistent key shares.

10 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the method further includes:

i) detecting a redistribution request;

ii) collaborating with other congress members to transfer all digital assets in the public group address to a new public address associated with a new public key; and

iii) generating a new private key share.

11 . A computer-readable storage medium comprising computer-executable instructions that, when executed, configure a processor to perform the method of claim 1 .

12 . An electronic device comprising:

an interface device;

a processor coupled to the interface device; and

a memory coupled to the processor, the memory having stored thereon computer-executable instructions that, when executed, configure the processor to perform the method of claim 1 .

13 . The electronic device of claim 12 , wherein:

the processor includes a trusted execution environment; and

the computer-executable instructions are executed within the trusted execution environment.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 20, 2024
From: FLETCHER, JOHN; TREVETHAN, THOMAS; BARDOSCIA, MARCO
To: NCHAIN HOLDINGS LTD
Reel/Frame 066839/0852 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 20, 2024
From: FLETCHER, JOHN; TREVETHAN, THOMAS; BARDOSCIA, MARCO
To: NCHAIN HOLDINGS LTD
Reel/Frame 066840/0260 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 20, 2024
From: FLETCHER, JOHN; TREVETHAN, THOMAS; BARDOSCIA, MARCO
To: NCHAIN HOLDINGS LTD
Reel/Frame 066840/0271 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Mar 20, 2024
From: NCHAIN HOLDINGS LIMITED
To: NCHAIN LICENSING AG
Reel/Frame 066840/0731 →
Priority Claims (3)
GB 1705867 · Apr 11, 2017 · national
GB 1705868 · Apr 11, 2017 · national
GB 1705869 · Apr 11, 2017 · national
Continuity (3)
Continuation 17877119 · Jul 29, 2022
Continuation 16604961
Related Publication 20240235812A1 · Jul 11, 2024
References Cited (68)
US 10269009B1 · Winklevoss et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10805090B1 · Poelstra et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10984470B1 · Winklevoss et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20050021740A1 · Bar · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20140156711A1 · Sharan · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150227883A1 · Murphy, Jr. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150287026A1 · Yang et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150304736A1 · Lal et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160012424A1 · Simon et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160052416A1 · Wietfeld et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160134593A1 · Gvili · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160321751A1 · Creighton, IV et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160330034A1 · Back et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160335533A1 · Davis et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160342977A1 · Lam · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160344550A1 · Anton et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160379212A1 · Bowman et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170046638A1 · Chan et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170220815A1 · Ansari et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170331896A1 · Holloway et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180227275A1 · Russinovich et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180276626A1 · Laiben · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190394047A1 · Karame et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200341689A1 · Smith · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 105488675A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 106503992A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
JP 2002288555A · 2002 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010506312A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 7012741B2 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
Teutsch et al.: “A scalable verification solution for blockchains,” [online], Mar. 7, 2017, pp. 1-44, on the Internet <URL:https://allquantor.at/blockchainbib/pdf/teutsch2017scalable.pdf>, [searched on Mar. 29, 2022]. [cited by applicant]
Jain et al.: “How to verify computation with a rational network,” Jun. 19, 2016, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Antonopoulos et al., “Bitcoin Book,” GitHub, retrieved from https://github.com/bitcoinbook/bitcoinbook, Jun. 8, 2017, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Antonopoulos, “Mastering Bitcoin—Unlocking Digital Cryptocurrencies,” O'Reilly Media, Inc., Dec. 20, 2014, 282 pages. [cited by applicant]
Bitfury Group, “Proof of Stake Versus Proof of Work,” White Paper, Sep. 13, 2015, 26 pages. [cited by applicant]
Bitshares, “Delegated Proof-of-Stake Consensus,” Bitshares.org, retrieved via the waybackmachine: http://web.archive.org/web/20161102133058/https://bitshares.org/technology/delegated-proof-of-stake-consensus/, Nov. 2, 2… [cited by applicant]
Bitslog, “Drivechains vs Sidechains,” Bitslog, retrieved from https://bitslog.com/2016/10/07/drivechains-vs-sidechains/, 2021, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Boneh et al., “Aggregate and Verifiably Encrypted Signatures from Bilinear Maps,” retrieved from http://crypto.stanford.edu/˜dabo/papers/aggreg.pdf, 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
Buterin, “Chain Interoperability,” Sep. 9, 2016, 25 pages. [cited by applicant]
Casper, “How does the Casper proof of stake algorithm work?” retrieved from https://ethereum.stackexchange.com/questions/102/how-does-the-casper-proof-of-stakealgorithm-work, Apr. 28, 2017, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dilley et al., “Strong Federations: A Interoperable Blockhain Solution to Centralized Third-Party Risks”, Jan. 30, 2017, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Fuchita, “Special Topic: Innovation and Finance, Blockchain and Financial Transaction Innovation,” Nomura Capital Market Quarterly 19-2(74):11-35, Nov. 1, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Goldfeder et al., “Securing Bitcoin Wallets via a New DSA/ECDSA threshold signature scheme,” manuscript, https://www.cs.princeton.edu/˜stevenag/threshold_sigs.pdf, 2015 [retrieved Jun. 21, 2018], 26 pages. [cited by applicant]
Higashikado et al., “A Study on Certificate Management in Consortium Chain”, A Study on certificate management in consortium chain, proceedings of 2017 Symposium on Cryptography and Information Security, Japan, Jan. 24,… [cited by applicant]
Ibrahim, “SecureCoin: A Robust Secure and Efficient Protocol for Anonymous Bitcoin Ecosystem,” International Journal of Network Security 19(2):295-312, http://ijns.jalaxy.com.tw/contents/ijns-v19-n2/ijns-2017-v19-n2-p29… [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2018/052470, mailed Jun. 11, 2018, filed Apr. 9, 2018, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2018/052471, mailed Jun. 12, 2018, filed Apr. 9, 2018, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2018/052472, mailed Jun. 11, 2018, filed Apr. 9, 2018, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Lerner, “Rootstock White Paper” retrieved from http://www.theblockchain.com/docs/Rootstock-WhitePaper-Overview.pdf, Nov. 19, 2015, 24 pages. [cited by applicant]
Lewis, “Orisi White Paper,” GitHub, retreived from https://github.com/orisi/wiki/wiki/Orisi-White-Paper, Nov. 29, 2014, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Maxwell, “The First Successful Zero-Knowledge Contingent Payment,” Bitcoin Core, retrieved from https:// bitcoincore.org/en/2016/02/26/zero-knowledge-contingent-payments-announcement/, Feb. 26, 2016, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Nakamoto, “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System,” Bitcoin, Oct. 31, 2008, https://bitcoin. org/bitcoin.pdf, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Narayanan et al., “Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Technologies,” Princeton University Press, Feb. 9, 2016, 308 pages. [cited by applicant]
Pratyush et al., “Efficient weighted threshold ECDSA for securing bitcoin wallet,” 2017 ISEA Asia Security and Privacy (ISEASP), http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7976994/, Jan. 29, 2017, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Reddit, “How an Anchored Proof of Stake Sidechain Can Help the Bitcoin Main Chain,” retireved from https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/5vy4qc/how_an_anchored_proof_of_stake_sidec hain_can_help/, Feb. 24, 2017, 9 p… [cited by applicant]
Rootstock FAQ, “Roodstock FAQ,” retreived from https://www.rsk.co/faqs, 2018, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Satoshi et al., “Connection Limits,” Bitcoin Forum, Aug. 9, 2010, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=741.0;prev_next=prev, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Stathakopoulou et al., “Threshold Signatures for Blockchain Systems,” retrieved from https://domino.research.ibm.com/library/cyberdig.nsf/papers/CA80E201DE9C8A0A852580FA004D412F/$File/rz3910.pdf, Apr. 4, 2017, 42 pages. [cited by applicant]
UK Commercial Search Report mailed Apr. 28, 2017, Patent Application No. GB1705869.4, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
UK Commercial Search Report mailed Jun. 2, 2017, Patent Application No. GB1705867.8, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
UK Commercial Search Report mailed Jun. 5, 2017, Patent Application No. GB1705868.6 , 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
UK IPO Search Report mailed Sep. 15, 2017, Patent Application No. GB1705868.6, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
UK IPO Search Report mailed Sep. 15, 2017, Patent Application No. GB1705869.4, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
UK IPO Search Report mailed Sep. 6, 2017, Patent Application No. GB1705867.8, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wikipedia, “Zero Knowledge Contingent Payment,” Bitcoin Wiki, retrieved from https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Zero_Knowledge_Contingent_Payment, Apr. 8, 2020, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wood et al., “Polkadot: Vision for A Heterogeneous Multi-Chain Framework,” retrieved from https://github.com/ polkadot-io/polkadotpaper, Sep. 10, 2016, 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
Higashikado et al., “A Study on Certificate Management in Consortium Chain”, A Study on certificate management in consortium chain, proceedings of 2017 Symposium on Cryptography and Information Security, Japan, (with En… [cited by applicant]
Learner, Sergio Demain, “Drivechains, Sidechains and Hybrid 2-Way Peg Designs,” RSK Labs Ltd, Revision 9, Apr. 1, 2016, 31 pages. [cited by applicant]
elastos.org, “Elastos Sidechain White Paper,” Smartweb Powered by Blockchain, Mar. 25, 2017, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]