IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,626,833
Granted Patent B2
US 12,626,833 · App. 18/320,708 · Granted May 12, 2026

Topological qubits in a quantum spin liquid

Inventors: Mikhail D. Lukin (Cambridge, MA); Vladan Vuletic (Cambridge, MA); Markus Greiner (Cambridge, MA); Ruben Verresen (Cambridge, MA); Ashvin Vishwanath (Cambridge, MA); Alexander Keesling Contreras (Cambridge, MA); Harry Jay Levine (Cambridge, MA); Giulia Semeghini (Cambridge, MA); Tout Taotao Wang (Cambridge, MA); Ahmed Omran (Cambridge, MA); Dolev Bluvstein (Cambridge, MA); Sepehr Ebadi (Cambridge, MA)
Assignees: President and Fellows of Harvard College; Massachusetts Institute of Technology
G21K1/003G06N10/20G06N10/40G06N10/70
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,626,833
App. No.
18/320,708
Granted
May 12, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Topological qubits are provided in a quantum spin liquid. In various embodiments, a device is provided comprising a two-dimensional array of particles, each particle disposed at a vertex of a ruby lattice having a parameter ρ greater than 1 2 ; each particle having a first state and an excited state; each particle that belongs to at least three unit cells of the ruby lattice having a blockade radius, when in the excited state, sufficient to blockade each of at least six nearest neighboring particles in the ruby lattice from transitioning from its first state to its excited state, and wherein the array has at least one outer edge configured to be in a first boundary condition.

Claims (132)

1 . A device, comprising:

a two-dimensional array of particles,

each particle disposed at a vertex of a ruby lattice having a parameter ρ greater than

1

2

;

each particle having a first state and an excited state;

each particle that belongs to at least three unit cells of the ruby lattice having a blockade radius, when in the excited state, sufficient to form a blockade of each of at least six nearest neighboring particles in the ruby lattice from transitioning from its first state to its excited state,

and wherein the two-dimensional array has at least one outer edge configured to be in a first boundary condition.

2 . The device of claim 1 , wherein each particle is an atom, an ion, or a molecule.

3 . The device of claim 1 , wherein the blockade is a dipole blockade.

4 . The device of claim 1 , wherein the blockade is a Rydberg blockade.

5 . The device of claim 1 wherein each particle is an atom, the first state is ground state, and the blockade is a Rydberg blockade.

6 . The device of claim 1 , wherein the two-dimensional array comprises at least a first outer edge and a third outer edge, each being in the first boundary condition, and at least a second outer edge and a fourth outer edge, each being in a second boundary condition, different from the first boundary condition.

7 . The device of claim 1 , wherein the two-dimensional array has a plurality of outer edges, each outer edge being either in the first boundary condition or a second boundary condition, each outer edge being in a different boundary condition than any adjacent outer edge.

8 . The device of claim 6 , wherein the outer edges configured to be in the first boundary condition are e-condensed, and the outer edges configured to be in the second boundary condition are m-condensed.

9 . The device of claim 7 , wherein the two-dimensional array comprises at least one interior edge.

10 . The device of claim 9 , wherein each vertex enclosed by the at least one interior edge is not particle-occupied.

11 . The device of claim 10 , wherein the at least one interior edge is at a same boundary condition as at least one outer edge of the plurality of outer edges.

12 . The device of claim 9 , wherein the at least one interior edge encloses at least four vertices.

13 . The device of claim 9 , wherein the at least one interior edge encloses particle-occupied vertices.

14 . The device of claim 13 , wherein the at least one interior edge is in the first boundary condition, different from at least one outer edge of the plurality of outer edges.

15 . The device of claim 9 , wherein the two-dimensional array has a plurality of interior edges, each interior edge enclosing a corresponding plurality of vertices, each of which is not particle-occupied.

16 . The device of claim 9 , wherein the two-dimensional array has a plurality of interior edges, each interior edge enclosing a corresponding plurality of vertices, wherein at least one enclosed vertex is particle-occupied.

17 . The device of claim 16 , wherein an interior edge enclosing the at least one enclosed vertex that is particle-occupied is at a boundary condition different from at least one outer edge of the plurality of outer edges.

18 . The device of claim 17 , wherein edges configured to be at different boundary conditions are selected from e-condensed or m-condensed edges.

19 . The device of claim 1 , wherein the two-dimensional array comprises at least 96 particles.

20 . The device of claim 1 , wherein the two-dimensional array comprises at least 200 particles.

21 . A system comprising:

a confinement system for arranging particles in a two-dimensional array, wherein:

each particle is disposed at a vertex of a ruby lattice;

each particle has a first state and an excited state;

each particle that belongs to at least three unit cells of the ruby lattice has a blockade radius, when in the excited state, sufficient to blockade each of at least six nearest neighboring particles in the ruby lattice from transitioning from its first state to its excited state, and wherein two-dimensional the array has at least one outer edge configured to be at a first boundary condition;

the confinement system comprising:

a laser source arranged to create a plurality of confinement regions;

a source of an atom cloud, the atom cloud capable of being positioned to at least partially overlap with the plurality of confinement regions; and

an excitation source for exciting at least some of the particles from the first state to the excited state.

22 . The system of claim 21 , wherein the particles are atoms, and wherein the excitation source is configured to excite at least some of the atoms into a Rydberg state.

23 . The system of claim 21 , wherein the two-dimensional array comprises at least 96 particles.

24 . The system of claim 21 , wherein the two-dimensional array comprises at least 200 particles.

25 . A method of making a 2 Quantum Spin Liquid ( 2 QSL), comprising:

arranging a two-dimensional array of particles, wherein:

each particle is disposed at a vertex of a ruby lattice having a parameter ρ greater than

1

2

;

each particle has a first state and an excited state;

the two-dimensional array has at least one outer edge;

exciting about 25% of the particles into the excited state, thereby causing each particle in the excited state that belongs to at least three unit cells of the ruby lattice to have a blockade radius sufficient to blockade at least six nearest neighboring particles in the ruby lattice; and

optionally, imposing a first boundary condition on the at least one outer edge.

26 . The method of claim 25 , wherein the particles are atoms and the excited state is a Rydberg state.

27 . A method of encoding a topological qubit in a 2 Quantum Spin Liquid ( 2 QSL), comprising:

preparing a 2 QSL according to the method of claim 25 , wherein the two-dimensional array comprises at least a first outer edge, a second outer edge, a third outer edge, and a fourth outer edge;

imposing a first boundary condition on the first and third outer edges and imposing a second boundary condition on the second and fourth outer edges.

28 . The method of claim 27 , wherein the two-dimensional array has a plurality of outer edges, the method further comprising imposing either the first boundary condition or the second boundary condition on each outer edge, each outer edge having a different boundary condition than any adjacent outer edge.

29 . The method of claim 27 , wherein the outer edges configured to be in the first boundary condition are e-condensed, and the outer edges configured to be in the second boundary condition are m-condensed.

30 . A method of encoding a topological qubit in a 2 Quantum Spin Liquid ( 2 QSL), comprising:

preparing a 2 QSL according to the method of claim 25 , wherein the two-dimensional array comprises at least one interior edge.

31 . The method of claim 30 , wherein each vertex enclosed by the at least one interior edge is not particle-occupied.

32 . The method of claim 31 , wherein the at least one interior edge encloses at least four vertices.

33 . The method of claim 30 , wherein the at least one interior edge encloses particle-occupied vertices.

34 . The method of claim 33 , further comprising imposing on the at least one interior edge a boundary condition that is different from the boundary condition of the at least one outer edge.

35 . The method of claim 33 , further comprising imposing on the at least one interior edge a boundary condition that is a same boundary condition as that of the at least one outer edge.

36 . The method of claim 30 , wherein the two-dimensional array has a plurality of interior edges, each interior edge enclosing a corresponding plurality of vertices, wherein at least one enclosed vertex is particle-occupied.

37 . The method of claim 36 , further comprising imposing a boundary condition on an interior edge of the plurality of interior edges and enclosing the at least one particle-occupied vertex that is different from the boundary condition of the at least one outer edge.

38 . The method of claim 37 , wherein the interior edge configured to be at a different boundary condition is selected from e-condensed or m-condensed edges.

39 . A method of reading a state of a topological qubit encoded in a 2 Quantum Spin Liquid ( 2 QSL), the method comprising:

receiving an indication of a state of each particle of a two-dimensional array of particles,

each particle disposed at a vertex of a ruby lattice;

each particle having a first state and an excited state;

each particle that belongs to at least three unit cells of the ruby lattice having a blockade radius, when in the excited state, sufficient to blockade each of at least six nearest neighboring particles in the ruby lattice from transitioning from its first state to its excited state,

and wherein the two-dimensional array has a plurality of outer edges, each outer edge being either in a first boundary condition or in a second boundary condition, each outer edge being in a different boundary condition than any adjacent outer edge;

determining a first path through the two-dimensional array from a first outer edge of the plurality of outer edges having the first boundary condition to a second outer edge of the plurality of outer edges having the first boundary condition via a first plurality of vertices of the ruby lattice having thereat a first plurality of particles;

assigning a first value to the first path based on the state of each of the first plurality of particles;

based on the first value, determining the state of a first topological qubit.

40 . The method of claim 39 , wherein, prior to determining the first path, a basis rotation is applied to the first topological qubit.

41 . The method of claim 39 , further comprising

determining a second path through the two-dimensional array from the first outer edge of the plurality of outer edges to the second outer edge of the plurality of outer edges via a second plurality of vertices of the ruby lattice having thereat a second plurality of particles;

assigning a second value to the second path based on the state of each of the second plurality of particles; and

based on the first and second values, determining the state of the first topological qubit.

42 . The method of claim 41 , further comprising:

determining a third path through the two-dimensional array from the first outer edge of the plurality of outer edges to a third outer edge of the plurality of outer edges having the first boundary condition, via a third plurality of vertices of the ruby lattice having thereat a third plurality of particles;

assigning a third value to the third path based on the state of each of the third plurality of particles; and

based on the third value, determining the state of a second topological qubit.

43 . A method of reading a state of a topological qubit encoded in a 2 Quantum Spin Liquid ( 2 QSL), the method comprising:

receiving an indication of a state of each particle of a two-dimensional array of particles,

each particle disposed at a vertex of a ruby lattice;

each particle having a first state, and an excited state;

each particle that belongs to at least three unit cells of the ruby lattice having a blockade radius, when in the excited state, sufficient to blockade each of at least six nearest neighboring particles in the ruby lattice from transitioning from its first state to its excited state,

and wherein the two-dimensional array comprises at least one outer edge and at least one interior edge;

determining a first path through the two-dimensional array from the at least one interior edge to the at least one outer edge via a first plurality of vertices of the ruby lattice having thereat a first plurality of particles;

assigning a first value to the first path based on the state of each of the first plurality of particles;

based on the first value, determining the state of a first topological qubit.

44 . The method of claim 43 , further comprising:

determining a second path through the two-dimensional array from the at least one interior edge to the at least one outer edge via a second plurality of vertices of the ruby lattice having thereat a second plurality of particles;

assigning a second value to the first path based on the state of each of the second plurality of particles;

based on the first and second values, determining the state of the first topological qubit.

45 . The method of claim 43 , wherein the two-dimensional array has at least a second interior edge, the method further comprising:

determining a third path through the two-dimensional array from the second interior edge to the at least one outer edge via a third plurality of vertices of the ruby lattice having thereat a third plurality of particles;

assigning a third value to the third path based on the state of each of the third plurality of particles;

based on the third value, determining the state of a second topological qubit.

46 . The method of claim 39 , wherein determining the first path comprises:

assembling the path piecewise from a plurality of segments, each segment extending between two vertices in the ruby lattice wherein each segment either:

extends between two vertices in a triangular portion of a unit cell of the ruby lattice, or

extends between two vertices in different unit cells of the ruby lattice without crossing any unit cells of the ruby lattice.

47 . The method of claim 39 , wherein determining the first path comprises:

assembling the first path piecewise from a plurality of segments, each segment extending between two vertices in the ruby lattice wherein each segment:

extends between two vertices in a quadrilateral portion of a unit cell of the ruby lattice.

48 . A method of operating on a topological qubit, comprising:

preparing a topological qubit according to the method of claim 27 , wherein the first boundary condition is an e-boundary condition;

creating a first and a second e-anyon in the two-dimensional array;

removing the first e-anyon from the two-dimensional array via the first outer edge and removing the second e-anyon from the two-dimensional array via the third outer edge.

49 . A method of operating on a topological qubit, comprising:

preparing a topological qubit according to the method of claim 30 ,

creating a first and a second e-anyon in the two-dimensional array;

pinning the first e-anyon; and

moving the second e-anyon along a circular path circumscribing the at least one interior edge and having an end point at a position of the first e-anyon, thereby destroying the first and the second e-anyons.

50 . A method of encoding a first and a second topological qubit in a 2 Quantum Spin Liquid ( 2 QSL), comprising:

preparing a 2 QSL according to the method of claim 25 , wherein

the two-dimensional array comprises a first interior edge and a second interior edge, the first interior edge having a first boundary condition and the second interior edge having a second boundary condition different from the first boundary condition, the first topological qubit corresponding to the first interior edge and the second topological qubit corresponding to the second interior edge,

the two-dimensional array comprises a first outer edge, the first outer edge having the first boundary condition,

the two-dimensional array comprises an additional edge, the additional edge having the second boundary condition and being either an interior edge or an outer edge.

51 . A method of operating on a first and second topological qubit, comprising: encoding the first and second topological qubit according to the method of claim 50 ;

moving the first interior edge along a closed continuous path circumscribing the second interior edge.

52 . The method of claim 50 , wherein either (i) the first boundary condition is m-condensed and the second boundary condition is e-condensed, or (ii) the first boundary condition is e-condensed and the second boundary condition is m-condensed.

53 . The method of claim 43 , wherein determining the first path comprises:

assembling the first path piecewise from a plurality of segments, each segment extending between two vertices in the ruby lattice wherein each segment either:

extends between two vertices in a triangular portion of a unit cell of the ruby lattice, or

extends between two vertices in different unit cells of the ruby lattice without crossing any unit cells of the ruby lattice.

54 . The method of claim 43 , wherein determining the first path comprises:

assembling the first path piecewise from a plurality of segments, each segment extending between two vertices in the ruby lattice wherein each segment:

extends between two vertices in a quadrilateral portion of a unit cell of the ruby lattice.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 5, 2025
From: VULETIC, VLADAN
To: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Reel/Frame 072175/0995 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 5, 2025
From: BLUVSTEIN, DOLEV; GREINER, MARKUS; CONTRERAS, ALEXANDER KEESLING; LEVINE, HARRY JAY; LUKIN, MIKHAIL D.; OMRAN, AHMED; SEMEGHINI, GIULIA; VERRESEN, RUBEN; VISHWANATH, ASHVIN; WANG, TOUT TAOTAO; EBADI, SEPEHR
To: PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE
Reel/Frame 072176/0078 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation PCTUS2021060138 · Nov 19, 2021
Provisional Application 63166165 · Mar 25, 2021
Provisional Application 63116321 · Nov 20, 2020
Related Publication 20240029911A1 · Jan 25, 2024
References Cited (206)
US 3872470A · Hoerz et al. · 1975 [cited by applicant]
US 4479199A · Friedlander et al. · 1984 [cited by applicant]
US 5684621A · Downing · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 6988058B1 · Sherwin et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 11380455B2 · Keesling Contreras et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11710579B2 · Keesling Contreras · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11985451B2 · Kim et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12051520B2 · Keesling Contreras et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12165004B2 · Pichler · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 12282242B2 · Christen · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20020089718A1 · Penninckx et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20040000666A1 · Lidar et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040017833A1 · Cundiff et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040126114A1 · Liu et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20060225165A1 · Maassen van den Brink et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070113012A1 · Cable et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080116449A1 · Macready et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080185576A1 · Hollenberg et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080237579A1 · Barker et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080313430A1 · Bunyk · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090204877A1 · Betts · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090299947A1 · Amin et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20110238607A1 · Coury et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20140025926A1 · Yao et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140200689A1 · Utsunomiya et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140253987A1 · Christmas · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150317558A1 · Adachi et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160064108A1 · Saffman et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160125311A1 · Fuechsle et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160328253A1 · Majumdar · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170300817A1 · King et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180217629A1 · Macfaden · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180218279A1 · Lechner et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180260731A1 · Zeng et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190266508A1 · Bunyk et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200185120A1 · Keesling Contreras et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210279631A1 · Pichler et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210365827A1 · Monroe et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210383189A1 · Cong et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220060668A1 · Kim et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220138608A1 · Ramette et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220197102A1 · Christen et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220293293A1 · Contreras et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220391743A1 · Wild et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230326623A1 · Keesling Contreras et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230400492A1 · Xu et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240029911A1 · Lukin et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240185113A1 · Cong et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240289665A1 · Pichler et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240346352A1 · Bluvstein et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240347995A1 · Levine et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
CN 106980178A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
EP 1171968B1 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
EP 3113084A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
EP 3438726A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
GB 0205011A · 1923 [cited by applicant]
JP 2007233041A · 2007 [cited by applicant]
JP 2008134450A · 2008 [cited by applicant]
JP 2008158325A · 2008 [cited by applicant]
JP 2014197733A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
JP 2017078832A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014051886A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019014589A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020072981A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020172588A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020236574A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021007560A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021141918A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2022132388A2 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2022132389A2 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2022174072A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2022132388A3 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2022132389A3 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2023287503A2 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2023287503A3 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2023287503A9 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2023080936A2 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2023080936A3 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2023132865 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2023132865A9 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2024155291A2 · 2024 [cited by applicant]
Adachi et al., “Application of Quantum Annealing to Training of Deep Neural Networks,” arXiv.org: 18 pages (2015). [cited by applicant]
Aliferis et al., “Computation by measurements: A unifying picture,” Arxiv: 13 pages (2004). [cited by applicant]
Anonymous., “Magneto-optical trap,” Wikipedia, retrieved online <https://web.archive.org/web/20210125084412/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magneto-optical_trap>: 7 pages (2022). [cited by applicant]
Auger et al., “Blueprint for fault-tolerant quantum computation with Rydberg atoms.” Physical Review A 96(5): 052320 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Barredo et al., “An atom-by-atom assembler of defect-free arbitrary 2d atomic arrays,” arXiv:1607.03042, Jul. 11, 2016, pp. 1-7. [cited by applicant]
Barredo et al., “An atom-by-atom assembler of defect-free arbitrary two-dimensional atomic arrays,” Science, 354(6315): 1021-1023 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Barredo et al., “Synthetic three-dimensional atomic structures assembled atom by atom,” Nature, 561: 79-82 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Baur et al., “Single-Photon Switch Based on Rydberg Blockade,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 112: 073901 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Beugnon et al., “Two-dimensional transport and transfer of a single atomic qubit in optical tweezers” Nature Physics, vol. 3, p. 1-4 (2007). [cited by applicant]
Brion et al., “Quantum Computing with Collective Ensembles of Multilevel Systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 99: 260501 (2007). [cited by applicant]
Browaeys et al., “Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms,” Nature Physics, 16: 132-142 (2020). [cited by applicant]
Bruzewicz et al., “Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing: Progress and Challenges,” Applied Physics Reviews, 6(2): 021314 (2019). [cited by applicant]
Chao et al., “Fault-tolerant quantum computation with few qubits.” npj Quantum Information 4.1 (2018): 42. [cited by applicant]
Cong et al., “Hardware-efficient, fault-tolerant quantum computation with Rydberg atoms”, Physical Review X 12(2): 021049 (2022). [cited by applicant]
Cong et al., “Quantum convolutional neural networks” Nature Physics, vol. 15, p. 1273-78 (2019). [cited by applicant]
Couvert et al., “Optimal transport of ultracold atoms in the non-adiabatic regime” Europhysics Letters, 83: 5 pages (2008). [cited by applicant]
Debnath et al., “Demonstration of a small programmable quantum computer with atomic qubits,” Nature, 536(7614): 63-66 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Dordevic et al., “Entanglement transport and a nanophotonic interface for atoms in optical tweezers” arXiv: 16 pages (2021). [cited by applicant]
Ebert et al., “Coherence and Rydberg Blockade of Atomic Ensemble Qubits,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 115: 093601 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Endres et al., “Atom-by-atom assembly of defect-free one-dimensional cold atom arrays,” Science, 354 (6315): 1024-1027 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Endres et al., “Cold Matter Assembled Atom-by-Atom,” arXiv:1607.03044, Jul. 11, 2016, pp. 1-12. [cited by applicant]
Engstrom et al., “Calibration of spatial light modulators suffering from spatially varying phase response,” Optics Express, 21(13): 16086-16103 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for EP Application No. 19854402.5 dated May 9, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for EP Application No. 19868908.5 dated Jun. 13, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for EP Application No. EP 18831504 mailed Mar. 30, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Farhi et al., “Classification with Quantum Neural Networks on Near Term Processors,” arXiv:1802.06002, 1-21 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Fienup., “Phase retrieval algorithms: a comparison,” Applied Optics 21(15): 2758-2769 (1982). [cited by applicant]
Fowler et al., “Surface code quantum communication” arXiv, pp. 1-4 (2010). [cited by applicant]
Fowler et al., “Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation,” Phys. Rev. A, 86: 032324 (2012). [cited by applicant]
Fowler et al., “Surface Codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation” Physical Review, vol. 86 (3), p. 1-54 (2012). [cited by applicant]
Gerchberg et al., “A Practical Algorithm for the Determination of Phase from Image and Diffraction Plane Pictures,” Optik, 35(2): 237-246 (1972). [cited by applicant]
Gorniaczyk et al., “Single-Photon Transistor Mediated by Interstate Rydberg Interactions,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 113: 053601 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Graham et al., “Demonstration of multi-qubit entanglement and algorithms on a programmable neutral atom quantum computer” arXiv, p. 1-25 (2022). [cited by applicant]
Grant et al., “Hierarchical quantum classifiers” ArXiv, p. 1-16 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Gunter et al., “Interaction Enhanced Imaging of Individual Rydberg Atoms in Dense Gases,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 108: 013002 (2012). [cited by applicant]
Gunter et al., “Observing the Dynamics of Dipole-Mediated Energy Transport by Interaction- Enhanced Imaging,” Science, 342(6161): 954-956 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Haegeman et al., “Order Parameter for Symmetry-Protected Phases in One Dimension,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 109(5): 050402-1-5 (2012). [cited by applicant]
Haldane, “Nonlinear Field Theory of Large-Spin Heisenberg Antiferromagnets: Semiclassically Quantized Solitons of the One-Dimensional Easy-Axis Neel State,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 50(15): 1153-1156 (1983). [cited by applicant]
Hashizume et al., “Deterministic Fast Scrambling with Neutral Atom Arrays” Physical Review Letters, vol. 126: 14 pages (2021). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2021/060136 dated Aug. 11, 2022. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US18/42080 dated Oct. 22, 2018. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/049115 dated Jan. 7, 2020. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/054831 dated Feb. 6, 2020. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2020/019309 dated Jul. 14, 2020. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2020/033100 dated Sep. 2, 2020. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2020/041709 dated Oct. 28, 2020. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2021/012209 mailed May 3, 2021. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2022/016173 dated May 24, 2022. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2022/031297 dated Feb. 21, 2023. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion of Application No. PCT/US2021/060138 dated Aug. 19, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Isenhower et al., “Demonstration of a neutral atom controlled-NOT quantum gate,” arXiv:0907.5552, Nov. 24, 2009, pp. 1-5. [cited by applicant]
Jahromi et al., “Topological spin liquids in the ruby lattice with anisotropic Kitaev interactions,” Physical Review B, 94(12): (10 pages) (2016). [cited by applicant]
Jahromi et al., “Topological Z [cited by applicant]
Jaksch et al., “The cold atom Hubbard toolbox,” Arxiv, (30 pages) (2004). [cited by applicant]
Johnson et al., “Rabi Oscillations between Ground and Rydberg States with Dipole-Dipole Atomic Interactions,” Physical Review Letters, 110(11): 113003-1-4 (2008). [cited by applicant]
Kaufman et al., “Hong-Ou-Mandel atom interferometry in tunnel-coupled optical tweezers,” arXiv:1312.7182, Jun. 17, 2014, pp. 1-17. [cited by applicant]
Kaufman et al., “Quantum thermalization through entanglement in an isolated many-body system” arXiv: 19 pages (2016). [cited by applicant]
Killoran et al., “Continuous-variable quantum neural networks” ArXiv, p. 1-21 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Kim and Swingle., “Robust entanglement renormalization on a noisy quantum computer” ArXiv, p. 1-17 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Labuhn et al., “Realizing quantum Ising models in tunable two-dimensional arrays of single Rydberg atoms” arXiv: 1-12 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Labuhn et al., “Tunable two-demensional arrays of single Rydberg atoms for realizing quantum Ising models,” Nature, 534(7609): 667-670 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Lengwenus et al., “Coherent Transport of Atomic Quantum in a Scalable Shift Register” Physical Review Letters, 105: 4 pages (2010). [cited by applicant]
Leonardo et al., “Computer generation of optimal holograms for optical trap arrays,” Optics Express, 15(4): 1913-1922 (2007). [cited by applicant]
Lester et al., “Rapid production of uniformly-filled arrays of neutral atoms,” arXiv:1506.04419, Jun. 14, 2015, pp. 1-5. [cited by applicant]
Low et al., “Practical trapped-ion protocols for universal qudit-based quantum computing”, Physical Review Research 2(3): 033128 (2020). [cited by applicant]
Lu et al., “Aluminum nitride integrated photonics platform for the ultraviolet to visible spectrum,” Optics Express, 26(9): 11147 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Ma et al., “Generation of three-dimensional optical structures by dynamic holograms displayed on a twisted nematic liquid crystal display,” Applied Physics B Lasers and Optics, 110(4): 531-537 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Matsumoto et al., “High-quality generation of a multispot pattern using a spatial light modulator with adaptive feedback,” Optics Letters, 37(15): 3135-3137 (2012). [cited by applicant]
Mazurenko, “Optical Imaging of Rydberg Atoms,” Thesis (S.B.)—Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Physics (2012). [cited by applicant]
Mehta et al., “Towards fast and scalable trapped-ion quantum logic with integrated photonics,” Proc. SPIE 10933, Advances in Photonics of Quantum Computing, Memory, and Communication XII, 109330B (2019). [cited by applicant]
Morgado et al., “Quantum simulation and computing with Rydberg-interacting qubits,” Arxiv, Cornell University Library: 36 pages (2020). [cited by applicant]
Murmann et al., “Two Fermions in a Double Well: Exploring a Fundamental Building Block of the Hubbard Model,” arXiv:1410.8784, Feb. 17, 2015, pp. 1-12. [cited by applicant]
Negretti et al., “Quantum computing implementation with neutral particles,” Arxiv, (19 pages) (2011). [cited by applicant]
Nogrette et al., “Single-Atom Trapping in Holographic 2D Arrays of Microtraps with Arbitrary Geometries,” Physical Review X, 4: Article 021034 pp. 1-9 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Perez-Garcia et al., “PEPS as unique ground states of local Hamiltonians,” Quant. Inf. Comp., 8: 0650 (2008). [cited by applicant]
Persson et al., “An algorithm for improved control of trap intensities in holographic optical tweezers,” Proceedings of SPIE, 8458: 8 pages (2012). [cited by applicant]
Persson et al., “Minimizing intensity fluctuations in dynamic holographic optical tweezers by restricted phase change,” Optics Express, 18(11): 11250-11263 (2010). [cited by applicant]
Persson et al., “Real-time generation of fully optimized holograms for optical trapping applications,” Proceedings of SPIE, 8097: 10 pages (2011). [cited by applicant]
Persson et al., “Reducing the effect of pixel crosstalk in phase only spatial light modulators,” Optics Express, 20(20): 22334-22343 (2012). [cited by applicant]
Persson., “Thesis for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy: Advances in Holographic Optical Trapping,” Department of Physics University o Gothenburg: 82 pages (2013). [cited by applicant]
Pichler et al., “Computational complexity of the Rydberg blockade in two dimensions,” arXiv: 1809.04954 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Poland et al., “Development of a doubly weighted Gerchberg-Saxton algorithm for use in multibeam imaging applications,” Optics Letters, 39(8): 2431-2434 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Pollmann et al., “Detection of symmetry-protected topological phases in one dimension,” Phys. Rev. B, 86(12): 125441-1-13 (2012). [cited by applicant]
Prongue et al., “Optimized kinoform structures for highly efficient fan-out elements,” Applied Optics, 31(26): 5706-5711 (1992). [cited by applicant]
Rehn et al., “A fractionalised “Z2” classical Heisenberg spin liquid” arXiv: 5 pages (2016). [cited by applicant]
Reichle et al., “Transport Dynamics of single ions in segmented microstructed Paul trap arrays” Forschritte der Physik Progress of Physics, 54 (8-10): 666-685 (2006). [cited by applicant]
Saffman et al., “Quantum information with Rydberg atoms,” Rev. Mod. Phys., 82(3): 2313-2363 (2010). [cited by applicant]
Saffman et al., “Scaling the neutral-atom Rydberg gate quantum computer by collective encoding in holmium atoms,” Phys. Rev. A, 78: 012336 (2008). [cited by applicant]
Satzinger et al. “Realizing topologically ordered states on a quantum processor,” 27 pages, (2021). [cited by applicant]
Savary et al., “Quantum Spin Liquids” arXiv: 60 pages (2016). [cited by applicant]
Shi, “Deutsch, Toffoli, and CNOT Gates via Rydberg Blockade of Neutral Atoms,” arxiv.org, Cornell University Library, 201 Olin Library Cornell University Ithaca, NY (2018). [cited by applicant]
Shi, “Fast, Accurate, and Realizable Two-Qubit Entangling Gates by Quantum Interference in Detuned Rabi Cycles of Rydberg Atoms,” arxiv.org, Cornell University Library, 201 Olin Library Cornell University Ithaca, NY (20… [cited by applicant]
Sorace-Agaskar et al., “Multi-layer integrated photonics from the ultraviolet to the infrared,” Proc. SPIE 10510, Frontiers in Biological Detection: From Nanosensors to Systems X, 105100D (2018). [cited by applicant]
Tamura et al., “Highly uniform holographic microtrap arrays for single atom trapping using a feedback optimization of in-trap fluorescence measurements,” Optics Express, 24(8): 8132-8141 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Tanasittikosol et al., “Microwave dressing of Rydberg dark states,” Arxiv, Cornell University Library: 12 pages (2011). [cited by applicant]
Thimons et al., “Investigating the Gerchberg-Saxton Phase Retrieval Algorithm,” SIAM: 11 pages (2018). [cited by applicant]
Torlai et al., “Integrating Neural Networks with a Quantum Simulator for State Reconstruction,” Cornell University Library, (15 pages) (2019). [cited by applicant]
Urban et al., “Observation of Rydberg blockade between two atoms,” Nature Physics, 5: 110-114 (2009). [cited by applicant]
Verdon et al., “A Universal Training Algorithm for Quantum Deep Learning” ArXiv, p. 1-83, (2018). [cited by applicant]
Verresen et al., “One-dimensional symmetry protected topological phases and their transitions,” Phys. Rev. B, 96(16): 165124-1-23 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Verstraete et al., “Criticality, the Area Law, and the Computational Power of Projected Entangled Pair States,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 96: 220601 (2006). [cited by applicant]
Vidal, “Class of Quantum Many-Body States That Can Be Efficiently Simulated,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 101(11): 110501-1-4 (2008). [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., “Coherent Addressing of Individual Neutral Atoms in a 3D Optical Lattice,” Physical Review Letters, 115(4): 043003-1-5 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Wu et al., “Erasure conversion for fault-tolerant quantum computing in alkaline earth Rydberg atom arrays,” arXiv.org: 16 pages (2022). [cited by applicant]
Yang et al., “Coherence Preservation of a Single Neutral Atom Qubit Transferred between Magic-Intensity Optical Traps” Physical Review Letter, 117: 6 pages (2016). [cited by applicant]
Yavuz et al., “Fast Ground State Manipulation of Neutral Atoms in Microscopic Optical Traps,” Physical Review Letters, 96(6): 063001-1-4 (2006). [cited by applicant]
Ying, “Entangled Many-Body States as Resources of Quantum Information Processing,” Center for Quantum Technologies National University of Singapore (2013). [cited by applicant]
Yoder et al., “Universal fault-tolerant gates on concatenated stabilizer codes”, Physical Review X 6(3): 031039 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Zimmermann et al., “High-resolution imaging of ultracold fermions in microscopically tailored optical potentials,” arXiv:1011.1004, Apr. 8, 2011, pp. 1-15. [cited by applicant]
Du et al., “Superconducting circuit probe for analog quantum simulators”, [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2022/039189 dated Aug. 4, 2023. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US22/37325 dated Jun. 16, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Keating et al., “Adiabatic quantum computation with Rydberg-dressed atoms”, Physical Review A 87, 052314, May 2013. [cited by applicant]
Levine, “Quantum Information Processing and Quantum Simulation with Programmable Rydberg Atom Arrays” The Department of Physics at Harvard University, PhD Thesis (2021). [cited by applicant]
Meschede, “Quantum engineering with neutral atoms one by one”, [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., “Quantum state manipulation of single-Cesium-atom qubit in a micro-optical trap”, [cited by applicant]
Willner et al., “Optics and photonics: Key enabling technologies”, [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US23/26737 dated Sep. 30, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Jaksch et al., “Fast quantum gates for neutral atoms.” arXiv (2000): 2208. [cited by applicant]
Keating et al., “Robust quantum logic in neutral atoms via adiabatic Rydberg dressing.” Physical Review A 91 (2015): 012337. [cited by applicant]
Nickerson et al., “Freely scalable quantum technologies using cells of 5-to-50 qubits with very lossy and noisy photonic links.” Physical Review X 4.4 (2014): 041041. [cited by applicant]
Ramette et al., “Fault-tolerant connection of error-corrected qubits with noisy links.” npj Quantum Information 10.1 (2024): 58. [cited by applicant]
Weimer et al. “A Rydberg quantum simulator.” Nature Physics 6.5 (2010): 382-388. [cited by applicant]
Levine, “Quantum Information Processing and Quantum Simulation with Programmable Rydberg Atom Arrays” The Department of Physics at Harvard University, PhD Thesis, published Jan. 12, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Monroe et al., “Remapping the quantum frontier.” Physics World 21.08 (2008): 32. [cited by applicant]