IP Library Granted Patent US 12,674,863
Granted Patent B2
US 12,674,863 · App. 18/243,062 · Granted Jul 7, 2026

Radar signal interference mitigation with generative networks

Inventors: Xinyi Wei (Helmond, NL); Ruud van Sloun (Eindhoven, NL); Jihwan Youn (Eindhoven, NL); Jun Li (San Jose, CA); Satish Ravindran (Freemont, CA); Jeroen Overdevest (Eindhoven, NL)
Assignee: NXP B.V.
G01S7/023G01S7/354
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,674,863
App. No.
18/243,062
Filed
Sep 6, 2023
Granted
Jul 7, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3648
USPC
342/195
Abstract

A system includes a transmitter configured to transmit a radar signal towards a target object. A receiver is configured to receive a received signal in response to the transmitted radar signal. The system includes a processor configured to receive, using the receiver, a received signal, execute an iterative procedure using a desired signal prior and an interference signal prior and to determine an estimate of an interference signal component of the received signal and an estimate of the desired signal component of the received signal, wherein the interference signal prior is determined using generative modeling and each iteration of the iterative procedure executes a data consistency operation, use the estimate of the interference signal component and the received signal to determine a desired signal, and processing the desired signal to determine an attribute of the target object.

Claims (42)

1 . An automotive radar system comprising:

at least one transmitter and at least one receiver, wherein the at least one transmitter and the at least one receiver are configured to transmit and receive radar signals, wherein the at least one transmitter and the at least one receiver are coupled to a vehicle; and

an automotive radar processor configured to:

cause the at least one transmitter to transmit, at a first time, a first radar signal,

receive, using the at least one receiver, a received signal y, wherein the received signal y is of the form y=x s +x i +n, wherein x s represents a desired signal component, x i represents an interference signal component, and n represents a noise component of the received signal y,

determine a desired signal prior p θ1 , wherein the desired signal prior p θ1 defines a first data distribution expected in the desired signal component x i of the received signal y and is determined using generative modeling,

determine an interference signal prior p θ2 , wherein the interference signal prior p θ2 defines a second data distribution expected in the interference signal component and is determined using generative modeling,

execute an iterative procedure using the desired signal prior p θ1 and the interference signal prior p θ2 and to determine an estimate of the interference signal component x i and an estimate of the desired signal component x i , wherein each iteration of the iterative procedure comprises a data consistency operation to increase a data consistency attribute between the received signal y, the estimate of the interference signal component x i , and the estimate of the desired signal component x s , and

determine a desired signal using the estimate of desired signal component x s , and

process the desired signal to determine an attribute of a target object in a field of vision of the automotive radar system.

2 . The automotive radar system of claim 1 , wherein the automotive radar processor is configured to determine the desired signal by subtracting the estimate of the interference signal component x i from the received signal y to determine the desired signal.

3 . The automotive radar system of claim 1 , wherein the interference signal prior p θ2 is determined by performing denoising score matching on a training data set, wherein the training data set includes simulated time-domain interference signals.

4 . The automotive radar system of claim 3 , wherein values in the training data set are modified by adding Gaussian noise values to the values in the training data set to generate a modified training data set, wherein Gaussian noise values added to the values in the training data set have a range of standard deviations.

5 . The automotive radar system of claim 4 , wherein the generative modeling is configured to estimate gradients of the values in the modified training data set by mapping the values in the modified training data set to corresponding values in the training data set.

6 . The automotive radar system of claim 4 , wherein the Gaussian noise values are determined by a finite number of noise levels.

7 . The automotive radar system of claim 4 , wherein the Gaussian noise values are determined according to a diffusion process, wherein the diffusion process is defined using a stochastic differential equation.

8 . The automotive radar system of claim 1 , wherein the received signal includes a signal encoded as a frequency-modulated continuous wave radar signal.

9 . A system comprising:

a transmitter configured to transmit a radar signal towards a target object;

a receiver configured to receive a received signal in response to the transmitted radar signal; and

a processor, configured to:

receive, using the receiver, a received signal,

execute an iterative procedure using a desired signal prior including a first data distribution expected in a desired signal component of the received signal and an interference signal prior including a second data distribution expected in an the interference signal component of the received signal and to determine an estimate of an interference signal component of the received signal and an estimate of the desired signal component of the received signal, wherein the interference signal prior is determined using generative modeling and each iteration of the iterative procedure executes a data consistency operation,

use the estimate of the interference signal component and the received signal to determine a desired signal, and

processing the desired signal to determine an attribute of the target object.

10 . The system of claim 9 , wherein the desired signal prior is a sparse prior.

11 . The system of claim 9 , wherein the interference signal prior is determined by performing denoising score matching on a training data set, wherein the training data set includes at least one of simulated time-domain interference signals and measured time-domain interference signals.

12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein values in the training data set are modified by adding Gaussian noise values to the values in the training data set to generate a modified training data set, wherein Gaussian noise values added to the values in the training data set have a range of standard deviations.

13 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the generative modeling is configured to estimate gradients of the values in the modified training data set by mapping the values in the modified training data set to corresponding values in the training data set.

14 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the Gaussian noise values are determined by a finite number of noise levels.

15 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the Gaussian noise values are determined according to a diffusion process, wherein the diffusion process is defined using a stochastic differential equation.

16 . The system of claim 9 , wherein the received signal includes a signal encoded as a frequency-modulated continuous wave radar signal.

17 . A method comprising:

receiving a received signal y, wherein the received signal y is of the form y=x s +x i +n, wherein x s represents a desired signal component, x i represents an interference signal component, and n represents a noise component of the received signal y;

determining a desired signal prior p θ1 , wherein the desired signal prior p θ1 defines a first data distribution expected in the desired signal component x i of the received signal y and is determined using a generative network;

determining an interference signal prior p θ2 , wherein the interference signal prior p θ2 defines a second data distribution expected in the interference signal component and is determined using generative modeling,

executing an iterative procedure using the desired signal prior poi and the interference signal prior p θ2 and to determine an estimate of the interference signal component x i and an estimate of the desired signal component x s , wherein each iteration of the iterative procedure executes a data consistency operation to increase a data consistency attribute between the estimate of the interference signal component x i and the estimate of the desired signal component x s ,

determining a desired signal using the estimate of desired signal component x s , and

processing the desired signal to determine an attribute of a target object in a field of vision of an automotive radar system.

18 . The method of claim 17 , wherein determining the desired signal further comprises subtracting the estimate of the interference signal component x i from the received signal y to determine the desired signal.

19 . The method of claim 17 , further comprising determining the interference signal prior p θ2 by performing denoising score matching on a training data set, wherein the training data set includes at least one of simulated time-domain interference signals and measured time-domain interference signals.

20 . The method of claim 19 , further comprising modifying values in the training data set by adding Gaussian noise values to the values in the training data set to generate a modified training data set.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 22, 2024
From: VAN SLOUN, RUUD
To: NXP B.V.
Reel/Frame 068365/0615 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 6, 2023
From: WEI, XINYI; YOUN, JIHWAN; LI, JUN; RAVINDRAN, SATISH; OVERDEVEST, JEROEN
To: NXP B.V.
Reel/Frame 065150/0729 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250076452A1 · Mar 6, 2025
References Cited (50)
US 7675455B2 · Hatono · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 8314732B2 · Oswald · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 9083419B2 · Alexander · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9654158B2 · Dafesh · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10228449B2 · Nguyen · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10234377B1 · Owechko · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10539652B2 · Chrabieh · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10670698B2 · Melzer · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10690748B2 · Paradie · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11002819B2 · Wittenberg · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11313950B2 · Kruglick · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11520031B2 · Chi · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 12045699B2 · DePoy · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 12253626B2 · Zhang · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 12287398B2 · Mansour · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20090051581A1 · Hatono · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20160341814A1 · Nguyen · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170111069A1 · Dafesh · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170153318A1 · Melzer · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20190041492A1 · Paradie · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190122685A1 · Defraene · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190324108A1 · Wittenberg · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200003864A1 · Chi · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200225321A1 · Kruglick · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200292660A1 · Meissner · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210132184A1 · Borosak · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210132185A1 · Lin · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210209453A1 · Meissner · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220291329A1 · Fei · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230129025A1 · Mansour · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230144796A1 · DePoy · 2023 [cited by examiner]
DE 102017007961A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
DE 102020132159A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2023098809A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
Mun, Jiwoo et al., “A deep learning approach for automotive radar interference mitigation.” IEEE 88th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC—Fall), pp. 1-5, 2018, Chicago, IL, USA. [cited by applicant]
Mun, Jiwoo et al., “Automotive radar signal interference mitigation using rnn with self attention.” ICASSP 2020—2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2020, pp. 3802-3806… [cited by applicant]
Nilsson, Jessica et al., “Machine learning for fmcw radar interference mitigation.” Thesis. Lund University, 2020, Lund Sweden. [cited by applicant]
Rock, Johanna et al., “Resource-efficient deep neural networks for automotive radar interference mitigation.” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, Jun. 2021, vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 927-940. [cited by applicant]
Chen, Shengyi, et al., “Automotive radar interference mitigation based on a generative adversarial network.” IEEE Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference (APMC), pp. 728-730, 2020, Hong Kong. [cited by applicant]
Ristea, Nicolae-Catalin et al., “Fully convolutional neural networks for automotive radar interference mitigation” 2020 IEEE 92nd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2020—Fall), 2020, pp. 1-5, Victoria, BC, Canada. [cited by applicant]
Griffin, D.W. et al., “Signal estimation from modified short-time fourier transform.” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Apr. 1984, vol. 32, pp. 236-243. [cited by applicant]
Lin, Guosheng et al., “Refinenet: Multi-path refinement networks for high-resolution semantic segmentation.” 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 5168-5177, 2017, Honolulu, HI. [cited by applicant]
Song, Yang et al., “Generative modeling by estimating gradients of the data distribution.” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32. 2019, NeurIPS. [cited by applicant]
Song, Yang et al., “Improved techniques for training score-based generative models.” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33, 2020, NeurIPS. [cited by applicant]
Song, Yang et al., “Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations.” ICLR 2021, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Mncent, Pascal, “A connection between score matching and denoising autoencoders.” Neural computation, Jul. 2011, vol. 23, Issue 7, pp. 1661-1674, MIT Press. [cited by applicant]
Anderson, Brian Do, “Reverse-time diffusion equation models.” Stochastic Processes and their Applications 12, 1982, pp. 313-326, North-Holland Publishing Company, Australia. [cited by applicant]
Boyd, Stephen et al., “Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers.” Foundations and Trends® in Machine learning, Now the essence of knowledge, 2011, pp. 1-122. [cited by applicant]
Song, Jiamsong et al., “Pseudoinverse-Guided Diffusion Models for Inverse Problems”, International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022, pp. 1-30, Published as a conference paper at ICLR. [cited by applicant]
Uysal, Faruk, “Synchronous and asynchronous radar interference mitigation”, IEEE Access, 2019, pp. 5846-5852, vol. 7. [cited by applicant]