IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,683,855
Granted Patent B2
US 12,683,855 · App. 18/114,673 · Granted Jul 14, 2026

High resolution time domain reflectometry (TDR) in fault location measurement in a cable network

Inventors: Daniel Keith Chappell (Greenwood, IN); Loren Eggert (Indianapolis, IN)
Assignee: VIAVI SOLUTIONS INC.
H04L41/0677G01R31/08G01R31/11H04B3/46H04L43/50
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,683,855
App. No.
18/114,673
Filed
Feb 27, 2023
Granted
Jul 14, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2857
USPC
370/242
Abstract

A test instrument connectable to a cable television (CATV) network to provide a high resolution time domain reflectometry (TDR) in a fault location measurement is disclosed. The test instrument may have a port connectable to a test point in the CATV network. The test instrument may also have a processing circuit to perform a calibration measurement and a fault location measurement by, for the calibration measurement, transmitting frequency-chirped probe pulses into a closed calibration circuit within the test instrument, and receiving return signals at an analog-digital converter in the test instrument. The processing circuit may also resample the calibration measurement and the fault location measurement at a high sampling rate, cross-correlate the fault location with the calibration measurement to generate a cross-correlation TDR waveform, and generate a new TDR waveform using a refinement processing technique to remove echoes from the cross-correlation TDR waveform.

Claims (75)

1 . A test instrument connectable to a cable television (CATV) network to provide a time domain reflectometry (TDR) in a fault location measurement, the test instrument comprising:

a port connectable to a test point of the CATV network; and

a processing circuit to:

transmit, into the test point of the CATV network, a first TDR waveform having frequency-chirped probe pulses, wherein the frequency-chirped probe pulses are formed by an oscillatory signal that oscillates at a varying oscillation frequency to form a width of each pulse, and wherein, during the width of each pulse, the varying oscillation frequency of the oscillatory signal increases from a minimum frequency to a maximum frequency of a frequency band;

monitor to receive a first return signal of the frequency-chirped probe pulses;

use the first return signal to identify impedance changes at a fault location in the CATV network;

perform a first fault location measurement by transmitting the frequency-chirped probe pulses at a first sampling rate into the test point of the CATV network;

perform a first calibration measurement by transmitting the frequency-chirped probe pulses at the first sampling rate into a closed calibration circuit within the test instrument; and

perform a second fault location measurement at a second sampling rate and a second calibration measurement at the second sampling rate that is higher than the first sampling rate.

2 . The test instrument of claim 1 , wherein the processing circuit is further to:

determine a distance from the test point to the fault location in the CATV network based on a measure of time elapsed between the transmitting of the first TDR waveform and the receiving of the first return signal, and a speed of propagation of the frequency-chirped probe pulses in the CATV network.

3 . The test instrument of claim 1 , wherein the processing circuit is further to:

determine a resolution of the frequency-chirped probe pulses based on a propagation speed of the frequency-chirped probe pulses in the CATV network and a value of the frequency band between the maximum frequency and the minimum frequency.

4 . The test instrument of claim 1 , wherein the processing circuit is further to:

generate an identification of the fault location in the CATV network to an output.

5 . The test instrument of claim 1 , wherein the processing circuit is further to:

cross-correlate the second fault location measurement at the second sampling rate with the second calibration measurement at the second sampling rate to generate a cross-correlation TDR waveform;

generate a new TDR waveform using a refinement processing technique to remove echoes from the cross-correlation TDR waveform; and

provide the new TDR waveform to an output, wherein the new TDR waveform is a high resolution TDR waveform associated with the fault location in the CATV network.

6 . The test instrument of claim 5 , wherein the processing circuit is to:

filter out artifacts during the performance of the second calibration measurement.

7 . The test instrument of claim 5 , wherein the refinement processing technique comprises:

identifying a highest peak in the cross-correlation TDR waveform;

determining a time value and an amplitude of the highest peak;

converting the time value that corresponds with the highest peak into a delay factor;

delaying the second calibration measurement by the delay factor; and

scaling the second fault location measurement by the delayed second calibration measurement by a specific correlation.

8 . A method for providing a time domain reflectometry (TDR) in a fault location measurement in a cable television (CATV) network, comprising:

transmitting, by a processor of a test instrument, a first TDR waveform having frequency-chirped probe pulses into a test point of the CATV network, wherein the frequency-chirped probe pulses are formed by an oscillatory signal that oscillates at a varying oscillation frequency to form a width of each pulse, and wherein, during the width of each pulse, the varying oscillation frequency of the oscillatory signal increases from a minimum frequency to a maximum frequency of a frequency band;

monitoring, by the processor, to receive a first return signal of the frequency-chirped probe pulses;

using, by the processor, the first return signal to identify impedance changes at a fault location in the CATV network;

performing, by the processor, a first fault location measurement by transmitting the frequency-chirped probe pulses at a first sampling rate into the test point of the CATV network;

performing, by the processor, a first calibration measurement by transmitting the frequency-chirped probe pulses at the first sampling rate into a closed calibration circuit within the test instrument; and

performing, by the processor, a second fault location measurement at a second sampling rate and a second calibration measurement at the second sampling rate that is higher than the first sampling rate.

9 . The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

determining a distance from the test point to the fault location in the CATV network based on a measure of time elapsed between the transmitting of the first TDR waveform and the receiving of the first return signal, and a speed of propagation of the frequency-chirped probe pulses in the CATV network.

10 . The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

determining a resolution of the frequency-chirped probe pulses based on a propagation speed of the frequency-chirped probe pulses in the CATV network and a value of the frequency band between the maximum frequency and the minimum frequency.

11 . The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

generating an identification of the fault location in the CATV network to an output.

12 . The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

cross-correlating the second fault location measurement at the second sampling rate with the second calibration measurement at the second sampling rate to generate a cross-correlation TDR waveform;

generating a new TDR waveform using a refinement processing technique to remove echoes from the cross-correlation TDR waveform; and

providing the new TDR waveform to an output, wherein the new TDR waveform is a high resolution TDR waveform associated with the fault location in the CATV network.

13 . The method of claim 12 , further comprising:

storing the first calibration measurement and the second calibration measurement in a memory.

14 . The method of claim 12 , further comprising:

filtering out artifacts during the performance of the second calibration measurement.

15 . The method of claim 12 , wherein the refinement processing technique comprises:

identifying a highest peak in the cross-correlation TDR waveform;

determining a time value and an amplitude of the highest peak;

converting the time value that corresponds with the highest peak into a delay factor;

delaying the second calibration measurement by the delay factor; and

scaling the second fault location measurement by the delayed second calibration measurement by a specific correlation.

16 . A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions that, when executed by a processor of a test instrument, cause the processor to:

transmit a first time domain reflectometry (TDR) waveform having frequency-chirped probe pulses into a test point of a cable television (CATV) network, wherein the frequency-chirped probe pulses are formed by an oscillatory signal that oscillates at a varying oscillation frequency to form a width of each pulse, and wherein, during the width of each pulse, the varying oscillation frequency of the oscillatory signal increases from a minimum frequency to a maximum frequency of a frequency band;

monitor to receive a first return signal of the frequency-chirped probe pulses;

use the first return signal in a TDR technique to identify impedance changes at a fault location in the CATV network;

perform a first fault location measurement by transmitting the frequency-chirped probe pulses at a first sampling rate into the test point of the CATV network;

perform a first calibration measurement by transmitting the frequency-chirped probe pulses at the first sampling rate into a closed calibration circuit within the test instrument; and

perform a second fault location measurement at a second sampling rate and a second calibration measurement at the second sampling rate that is higher than the first sampling rate.

17 . The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16 , wherein the instructions further cause the processor to:

determine a distance from the test point to the fault location in the CATV network based on a measure of time elapsed between the transmitting of the first TDR waveform and the receiving of the first return signal, and a speed of propagation of the frequency-chirped probe pulses in the CATV network.

18 . The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16 , wherein the instructions further cause the processor to:

determine a resolution of the frequency-chirped probe pulses based on a propagation speed of the frequency-chirped probe pulses in the CATV network and a value of the frequency band between the maximum frequency and the minimum frequency.

19 . The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16 , wherein the instructions further cause the processor to:

cross-correlate the second fault location measurement at the second sampling rate with the second calibration measurement at the second sampling rate to generate a cross-correlation TDR waveform;

generate a new TDR waveform using a refinement processing technique to remove echoes from the cross-correlation TDR waveform; and

provide the new TDR waveform to an output, wherein the new TDR waveform is a high resolution TDR waveform associated with the fault location in the CATV network.

20 . The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 19 , wherein the refinement processing technique comprises:

identifying a highest peak in the cross-correlation TDR waveform;

determining a time value and an amplitude of the highest peak;

converting the time value that corresponds with the highest peak into a delay factor;

delaying the second calibration measurement by the delay factor; and

scaling the second fault location measurement by the delayed second calibration measurement by a specific correlation.

Assignments (4)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST AT REEL/FRAME 73189/0873 Recorded May 28, 2026
From: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
To: INERTIAL LABS, INC.; VIAVI SOLUTIONS INC.; VIAVI SOLUTIONS LICENSING LLC
Reel/Frame 075642/0381 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 14, 2025
From: VIAVI SOLUTIONS INC.; VIAVI SOLUTIONS LICENSING LLC; INERTIAL LABS, INC.
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 073571/0137 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 21, 2025
From: INERTIAL LABS, INC.; VIAVI SOLUTIONS INC.; VIAVI SOLUTIONS LICENSING LLC
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 073189/0873 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 27, 2023
From: CHAPPELL, DANIEL KEITH; EGGERT, LOREN
To: VIAVI SOLUTIONS INC.
Reel/Frame 062813/0361 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 15964890 · Apr 27, 2018
Provisional Application 62620969 · Jan 23, 2018
Related Publication 20230269131A1 · Aug 24, 2023
References Cited (33)
US 5272439A · Mashikian et al. · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5352984A · Piesinger et al. · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 7173431B1 · Lo et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 8559813B2 · Harman · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9414126B1 · Zinevich · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 9838679B2 · Harris · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10684319B2 · Berge et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10694177B2 · Harris · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20040022332A1 · Gupta et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040044489A1 · Jones · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050234666A1 · Taylor et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20070110042A1 · Li et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20110211827A1 · Soto et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120006117A1 · Kordon et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20140111184A1 · Dalebroux · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140161390A1 · Winzer et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150009340A1 · Chappell et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150009795A1 · Gray et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150016816A1 · Piehler · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150020128A1 · Maxson et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150020129A1 · Chappell et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150139349A1 · Hamzeh · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160018443A1 · Guenther · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160112214A1 · Currivan et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170023629A1 · Berge et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170034507A1 · Harris et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170104522A1 · Zinevich · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170119325A1 · Tamura · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20200249266A1 · Jung · 2020 [cited by examiner]
EP 2398148A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
“Time Domain Reflectometry Theory”, Application Note, Agilent Technologies, May 31, 2013, USA, pp. 1-16. [cited by applicant]
Maxim, “MAX5878 16-Bit 250 Msps, High-Dynamic-Performance, Dual DAC with LVDS Inputs”, Apr. 3, 2007, www.maxi mi nteg rated .com/en/products/analog/data-converters/dig ital-to-anal og-converters/MAX58 7 8. htm l (Year: … [cited by applicant]
Maxim, “MAX5877 14-Bit, 250 Msps, High-Dynamic-Performance, Dual DAC with LVDS Inputs”, Apr. 5, 2007, www.maxi mi nteg rated .com/en/products/analog/data-converters/dig ital-to-anal og-converters/MAX58 77. htm l (Year: … [cited by applicant]