IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,736,642
Granted Patent B2
US 12,736,642 · App. 18/027,175 · Granted Sep 15, 2026

Method and device for determining false-positive detections of a lidar sensor

Inventor: David Peter (Stuttgart, DE)
Assignee: MERCEDES-BENZ GROUP AG
G01S7/4876G01S17/931B60W2420/408G01S7/4802G01S17/42
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,736,642
App. No.
18/027,175
Filed
Mar 20, 2023
Granted
Sep 15, 2026
Kind
B2
Examiner
LEE, PAUL D
Art Unit
2857
USPC
702/189
Abstract

A method for determining false-positive detections of a lidar sensor in a scanning process of the surroundings of a vehicle involves, for every laser pulse that is reflected back to the lidar sensor in a scan range of this, checking whether this is reflected back several times in different distances. First reflections of a laser pulse that is reflected back several times are clustered and then, if a distance evaluation of reflections from the cluster produced reveals that the laser pulses are being reflected at a reflecting surface that is at least approximately homogeneous, further reflections following the respective first reflection are marked as false-positive detections.

Claims (31)

1 . A method comprising:

emitting, by a lidar sensor of a vehicle, a plurality of laser pulses in different directions in a scanning operation of an environment of the vehicle;

receiving, by the lidar sensor, laser pulse reflections of the emitted plurality of laser pulses;

checking every laser pulse reflection in a scan range of the lidar sensor to determine whether the laser pulse is reflected back several times in different distances;

forming a cluster of first reflections of the laser pulse that are reflected back several times; and then

marking further reflections following the first reflections of the laser pulse as false-positive detections if a distance evaluation of laser pulses reflected at the cluster indicates that the laser pulse is being reflected at a reflecting surface that is planar or is a curved window pane of another vehicle; and

controlling, by a driver assistance system of the vehicle, longitudinal or lateral movement of the vehicle based on the first reflections and omitting the marked further reflections.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the further reflections are then only marked as false-positive detections if the further reflections from the reflecting surface of the cluster occur at a larger distance than the first reflections.

3 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

differentiating a surface of the cluster between

a cluster with the planar surface,

a cluster with the curved window pane,

a cluster extending in exactly one spatial direction, and

a cluster extending in three spatial directions.

4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the cluster extending in exactly one spatial direction is characterized as a cluster representing edges of an object.

5 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the cluster extending in the three spatial directions is characterized as a cluster representing dust, fog, or fine-grained structures.

6 . A vehicle comprising:

a lidar sensor configured to emit a plurality of laser pulses in different directions in a scanning operation of an environment of the vehicle and receive laser pulse reflections of the emitted plurality of laser pulses;

a device, coupled to the lidar sensor, configured to

check every laser pulse reflection in a scan range of the lidar sensor to determine whether the laser pulse is reflected back several times in different distances;

form a cluster of first reflections of the laser pulse that are reflected back several times; and then

mark further reflections following the first reflections of the laser pulse as false-positive detections if a distance evaluation of laser pulses reflected at the cluster indicates that the laser pulse is being reflected at a reflecting surface that is planar or is a curved window pane of another vehicle; and

a driver assistance system, coupled to the device, configured to control longitudinal or lateral movement of the vehicle based on the first reflections and omitting the marked further reflections.

7 . The vehicle of claim 6 , wherein the device is configured to only mark the further reflections as false-positive detections if the further reflections from the reflecting surface of the cluster occur at a larger distance than the first reflections.

8 . The vehicle of claim 6 , wherein the device is further configured to differentiate a surface of the cluster between

a cluster with the planar surface,

a cluster with the curved window pane,

a cluster extending in exactly one spatial direction, and

a cluster extending in three spatial directions.

9 . The vehicle of claim 8 , wherein the cluster extending in exactly one spatial direction is characterized as a cluster representing edges of an object.

10 . The vehicle of claim 8 , wherein the cluster extending in the three spatial directions is characterized as a cluster representing dust, fog, or fine-grained structures.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 13, 2023
From: PETER, DAVID
To: MERCEDES-BENZ GROUP AG
Reel/Frame 063316/0500 →
Priority Claims (1)
DE 10 2020 005 755.1 · Sep 21, 2020 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230366994A1 · Nov 16, 2023
References Cited (31)
US 6323802B1 · Tokoro · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 9354318B1 · Beard et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9921153B2 · Wegner et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10629072B2 · Felix · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11500075B2 · Bhaskaran · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20100034426A1 · Takiguchi et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20160178802A1 · Stainvas Olshansky · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170023473A1 · Wegner et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20190041522A1 · Slutsky · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190293793A1 · Okuya · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200346653A1 · Kondo et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210103055A1 · Allen · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220003871A1 · Troeger et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
DE 19947593A1 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
DE 102018125715A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
EP 3121620A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
JP 2006177858A · 2006 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009036540A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009042177A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009075117A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2014119285A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
JP 2018066679A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019015706A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019124623A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Japanese Notice of Reasons for Refusal mailed Nov. 14, 2023, for corresponding/related Japanese Application No. 2023-518140, including English translation (8 pages). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Nov. 9, 2021 in related/corresponding International Application No. PCT/EP2021/070888. [cited by applicant]
Koch et al.; “Effective Distinction of Transparent and Specular Reflective Objects in Point Clouds of a Multi-Echo Laser Scanner;” Proceedings of the 2017 18th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR), Jul. … [cited by applicant]
Office Action created Aug. 12, 2021 in related/corresponding DE Application No. 10 2020 005 755.1. [cited by applicant]
Rusu et al.; “3D is here: Point Cloud Library (PCL);”2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; Aug. 18, 2011; Shanghai, CN. [cited by applicant]
Schlichting et al.; “Vehicle Localization By Lidar Point Correlation Improved By Change Detection;” The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences; Jul. 12-19, 2016; vo… [cited by applicant]
Office Action dated Jul. 22, 2025 in related/corresponding KR Application No. 10-2023-7009210. [cited by applicant]