IP Library Granted Patent US 8,029,629
Granted Patent B2
US 8,029,629 · App. 12/617,966 · Granted Oct 4, 2011

Sputtering target and manufacturing method thereof

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,029,629
App. No.
12/617,966
Granted
Oct 4, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

A sputtering target manufactured by die forging is provided. It is characterized in that an average crystal grain size D at a portion where an average crystal grain size is the largest and an average crystal grain size d at a portion where an average crystal grain size is the smallest are related as 1.0<D/d<2.0. Further provided is a method capable of constantly manufacturing a sputtering target excellent in characteristics by improving and elaborating forging and heat treatment processes to render a crystal size fine and uniform, and a sputtering target excellent in quality obtained by this method.

Claims (20)

1. A method of manufacturing a sputtering target, comprising the steps of:

performing hot or cold kneading and straightening annealing to an ingot or billet material;

adjusting crystal grains of the material by performing cold preforming and recrystallization annealing;

thereafter performing die forging; and

after said die forging step, performing straightening or recrystallization annealing.

2. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the sputtering target produced by the method is a hexagonal sputtering target having an erosion face with a total intensity ratio of a (002) face, and a (103) face, (014) face and (015) face within a 30° angle thereof of 30% or more, and variation is within ±10% of an average value.

3. A method according to claim 2 , wherein the sputtering target is made of titanium.

4. A method according to claim 1 , wherein a total absolute value of true strain in said hot or cold kneading is 4 or more.

5. A method according to claim 4 , wherein the material has a melting point of Tm, and said die forging step is performed at a temperature of 0.5Tm or less.

6. A method according to claim 5 , wherein said recrystallization annealing step performed after said cold preforming step and said straightening or recrystallization annealing step performed after said die forging step are performed at a temperature of 0.6Tm or less.

7. A method according to claim 6 , wherein said cold preforming step is performed at a processing ratio of 20 to 90%.

8. A method according to claim 1 , wherein said material has a melting point of Tm and said die forging step is performed at a temperature of 0.5Tm or less.

9. A method according to claim 1 , wherein said material has a melting point of Tm and said recrystallization annealing step performed after said cold preforming is performed at a temperature of 0.6Tm or less.

10. A method according to claim 1 , wherein said material has a melting point of Tm and said straightening or recrystallization annealing step performed after said die forging step is performed at a temperature of 0.6Tm or less.

11. A method according to claim 1 , wherein said cold preforming step is performed at a processing ratio of 20 to 90%.

12. A method according to claim 1 , wherein, as a result of performing recrystallization annealing after cold preforming, an average crystal grain size D 0 at a portion of said target where an average crystal grain size is largest and an average grain size d 0 at a portion of said target where an average crystal grain size is smallest are related as 1.0<D 0 /d 0 <1.5.

13. A method according to claim 1 , wherein, as a result of performing recrystallization annealing after cold preforming, a grain size of said material is 200% or less of an ultimate average crystal grain size of said target.

14. A method according to claim 1 , wherein, as a result of performing straightening or recrystallization annealing after die forging, an average crystal grain size of said target is in a range of 1 to 500 μm.

15. A method according to claim 1 , wherein an average crystal grain size D at a portion of said target where an average crystal grain size is largest and an average grain size d at a portion where an average crystal grain size is smallest are related as 1.0<D/d<2.0.

16. A method according to claim 1 , wherein said target is made of a material selected from a group consisting of copper, titanium, aluminum, nickel, cobalt, tantalum, and alloys thereof.

Assignments (6)
CHANGE OF ADDRESS Recorded Aug 11, 2021
From: JX NIPPON MINING & METALS CORPORATION
To: JX NIPPON MINING & METALS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 057160/0114 →
CHANGE OF ADDRESS Recorded Feb 7, 2017
From: JX NIPPON MINING & METALS CORPORATION
To: JX NIPPON MINING & METALS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 041649/0733 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 12, 2010
From: NIPPON MINING HOLDINGS, INC.
To: JX NIPPON MINING & METALS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 025123/0420 →
MERGER Recorded Oct 8, 2010
From: NIPPON MINING & METALS CO., LTD.
To: NIPPON MINING HOLDINGS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025115/0675 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 18, 2009
From: NIKKO MATERIALS CO., LTD.
To: NIPPON MINING & METALS CO., LTD
Reel/Frame 023533/0700 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 16, 2009
From: HUKUSHIMA, ATSUSHI
To: NIKKO MATERIALS CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 023527/0293 →