IP Library Granted Patent US 7,167,084
Granted Patent B2
US 7,167,084 · App. 11/054,570 · Granted Jan 23, 2007

Temporary key invalidation for electronic key and locking system

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,167,084
App. No.
11/054,570
Granted
Jan 23, 2007
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and apparatus are provided for rendering electronic keys left behind in a vehicle temporarily inactive. The apparatus comprises a vehicle security control module in wireless communication with the electronic keys, and having operatively coupled together a receiver, a processor, non-volatile memory and a short-range transmitter. When the module receives a valid lock command from any source it sends a short-range interrogation signal to keys within the vehicle. Left-behind keys respond and send their unique ID(s) to the module's receiver. The processor obtains the unique ID(s) from the receiver and sets one or more inhibit flags in memory or equivalent to identify those keys as left-behind keys. The processor thereafter ignores commands from such left-behind keys, thereby rendering them temporarily inoperative until a valid unlock command is received form another source, whereupon the processor clears the inhibit flags from memory and restores the left-behind keys to active status.

Claims (47)

1. A system for inhibiting electronic vehicle keys left behind in the vehicle when the vehicle doors are locked, comprising:

one or more portable keys adapted to send wireless command signals;

a vehicle security control module adapted to receive the wireless command signals from the one or more portable keys, wherein upon receiving a lock command signal, the vehicle security control module is configured to broadcast a short-range interrogation signal adapted to reach substantially only those of the one or more portable keys remaining within the vehicle, to receive a response containing a unique ID from those of the keys remaining within the vehicle thereby identifying themselves as left-behind keys, to store one or more inhibit flags identifying such left-behind keys as no longer valid and thereafter to ignore commands from such left-behind keys.

2. The system of claim 1 wherein the vehicle security control is further configured to retain the inhibit flags until an unlock command is received from a source other than a left-behind key.

3. The system of claim 1 wherein the security control module comprises:

a receiver configured to receive command signals from the one or more keys;

a non-volatile memory configured to store valid key ID(s) and the inhibit flags for left-behind keys;

a processor coupled to the receiver configured to interpret the command signals reaching the receiver, to test the unique ID received from any key to see whether there is a corresponding inhibit flag therefore stored in the non-volatile memory and if so, not processing a command received from such key; and

a transmitter configured to send the short range interrogation signal to the left-behind keys.

4. A method for inhibiting operation of electronic keys left behind in a vehicle, comprising:

receiving a lock command;

sending a short-range interrogation signal adapted to be received by any keys left behind in the vehicle;

receiving from any left-behind key(s) their unique ID(s); and

setting one or more inhibit flags for the unique ID(s) of the left-behind keys, wherein the inhibit flags cause the vehicle to ignore further commands received from such left-behind key(s).

5. The method of claim 4 further comprising:

receiving an unlock command from other than an inhibited key; and

clearing the one or more inhibit flags, thereby returning the left-behind keys to operating status.

6. The method of claim 4 further comprising, prior to the receiving a lock command:

determining first whether a command has been received from a key; and

if the first determining step yields NO, determining second whether a valid lock command has been received from the vehicle; and

if the second determining step yields NO returning to the first determining step; and

if the second determining step yields YES, proceeding to the sending step; and

if the first determining step yields YES, determining third whether the key's inhibit flag is set indicating that the key is invalid.

7. The method of claim 6 further comprising:

if the outcome of the third determining step yields YES, returning to the first determining step; and

if the outcome of the third determining step yields NO, determining fourth whether the received command is a lock command; and

if the outcome of the fourth determining step is YES, proceeding to the sending step; and

if the outcome of the fourth determining step is NO, determining fifth whether the received command is an unlock command; and

if the outcome of the fifth determining step is YES, clearing the one or more inhibit flags, thereby returning the left-behind keys to active status; and

if the outcome of the fifth determining step is NO, executing the received command.

8. The method of claim 5 further comprising after the clearing step, executing a received command.

9. Apparatus for inhibiting left-behind vehicle keys while not inhibiting other keys, comprising:

a security control module in the vehicle for receiving lock/unlock command signals from multiple sources, wherein the security control module comprises operatively coupled elements including:

one or more inputs for receiving lock/unlock commands;

a transmitter for sending interrogation signals to left-behind keys;

a receiver for receiving unique IDs from keys in response to the interrogation signals;

non-volatile memory for storing unique IDs of left-behind keys; and

wherein the apparatus further comprises one or more portable keys for sending command and ID signals to the security control module.

10. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein upon receiving a lock command, the security control module broadcasts through the transmitter the interrogation signal to the left-behind keys.

11. The apparatus of claim 10 wherein the left-behind keys respond to the interrogation signal by sending their unique ID(s) back to the receiver of the security control module, thereby identifying themselves as left-behind keys.

12. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein the security control module stores or marks the unique IDs in the non-volatile memory to identify such left-behind keys as being no longer valid and thereafter, until cleared, ignores commands from such left-behind keys.

13. The system of claim 12 wherein the left-behind keys remain invalid until the vehicle security control module receives an unlock command from a source other than a left-behind key.

14. An apparatus for inhibiting those vehicle electronic keys left behind in the vehicle when its doors are locked, comprising:

a vehicle security control module adapted to receive lock/unlock command signals from multiple sources;

one or more portable keys adapted to send command signals to the security control module and containing memory;

wherein upon receiving a lock command signal, the vehicle security control module broadcasts a short-range signal adapted to reach substantially only those of the keys remaining within the vehicle;

wherein in response to the short range signal, those keys remaining within the vehicle store an inhibit signal in their memory identifying themselves as no longer being valid keys, which thereafter until cleared, causes such keys to not send a valid command to the security control module.

Assignments (13)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 7, 2014
From: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 034371/0676 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 10, 2011
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 025780/0936 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 8, 2010
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
Reel/Frame 025327/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 4, 2010
From: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025245/0442 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 4, 2010
From: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025311/0770 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 28, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST
Reel/Frame 023162/0001 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 27, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Reel/Frame 023156/0052 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 21, 2009
From: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES; CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 023127/0468 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 20, 2009
From: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 023124/0429 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 16, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES; CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES
Reel/Frame 022553/0446 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 4, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Reel/Frame 022201/0610 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 14, 2009
From: GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 022092/0886 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 13, 2005
From: PROEFKE, DAVID T.; UTTER, THOMAS E.
To: GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 016218/0251 →