IP Library Granted Patent US 8,542,669
Granted Patent B2
US 8,542,669 · App. 11/424,937 · Granted Sep 24, 2013

Waveform quality feedback for the selection of gateways

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,542,669
App. No.
11/424,937
Granted
Sep 24, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

Techniques are disclosed for selecting transmission resources in a telecommunications system that comprises different networks, where the techniques are based on the quality of the waveform of transmitted media such as audio or video signals, in contrast to the quality of service of the network that transports the media. The problem with only using quality of service to determine which resources to allocate to a call is that quality of service does not guarantee that the quality experienced by the call's participants is satisfactory just because a component network's quality of service is satisfactory. For example, the end-to-end delay experienced in a VoIP network might be satisfactory for most data transfers, but might still be inadequate to control the echo experienced by telecommunications users. The disclosed techniques evaluate the waveform quality (i.e., in terms of loudness, noise, echo, and so forth) of media that is transmitted along a path and allocate alternative resources accordingly.

Claims (48)

1. A method comprising:

evaluating, by a first endpoint, the waveform quality of a media signal that is transmitted by the first endpoint along a first communication path from a first node to a second node, wherein the first communication path traverses: (i) a first network that is packet-switched, (ii) a first gateway that is contiguous with the first network, and (iii) a second gateway that is non-contiguous with the first network;

when the waveform quality is determined to be unsatisfactory regardless of a quality-of-service of the first communication path, transmitting, by the first endpoint a first packet along a second communication path from the first node to the second node, wherein the second communication path traverses the first network and at least one of: (i) a third gateway that is contiguous with the first network, and (ii) a fourth gateway that is non-contiguous with the first network;

wherein the first communication path fails to provide a quality-of-service guarantee;

wherein the evaluating comprises (i) receiving from the first gateway a measurement of the waveform quality of the media signal, and (ii) comparing the measurement to a predetermined requirement to determine whether the waveform quality is satisfactory or unsatisfactory;

evaluating the waveform quality of media that is transmitted along a third communication path from the first node to the second node, wherein the third communication path traverses the first network and at least one of the third gateway and the fourth gateway;

when the waveform quality of media transmitted along the third communication path is more advantageous than the waveform quality of media transmitted along the second communication path, transmitting a second packet along the third communication path from the first node to the second node;

wherein the third communication path fails to provide a quality-of-service guarantee;

re-evaluating the waveform quality of media that is transmitted along the first communication path from the first node to the second node; and

when the waveform quality of media transmitted along the first communication path is satisfactory, transmitting a third packet along the first communication path from the first node to the second node.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the first gateway and the second gateway are contiguous with a second network, and wherein the communication protocols of the first network and the second network are different.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the second network is the Public Switched Telephone Network.

4. The method of claim 2 wherein the first network is Internet Protocol-based.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the evaluating is based on the quality of service of the first communication path being satisfactory.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the evaluating of the waveform quality of the media signal that is transmitted along the first communication path is performed with respect to one or more of echo, noise, loudness, and audio distortion.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the evaluating of the waveform quality of the media signal that is transmitted along the first communication path is performed with respect to one or more of fading, crosstalk, and video distortion.

8. A method comprising:

transmitting by a first endpoint a first packet along a first communication path from the first node to the second node, wherein the first communication path traverses: (i) a first network that is packet-switched, (ii) a first gateway that is contiguous with the first network, and (iii) a second gateway that is non-contiguous with the first network;

evaluating the waveform quality of a media signal that is transmitted by the first endpoint along the first communication path;

evaluating the waveform quality of the media signal that is transmitted by the first endpoint along a second communication path from the first node to the second node, wherein the second communication path traverses the first network and at least one of: (i) a third gateway that is contiguous with the first network, and (ii) a fourth gateway that is non-contiguous with the first network;

when the waveform quality of the media signal that is transmitted along the second communication path is more advantageous than the waveform quality of the media that is transmitted along the first communication path, transmitting a second packet along the second communication path from the first node to the second node;

wherein the second communication path fails to provide a quality-of-service guarantee;

wherein (i) the evaluating associated with the first communication path and (ii) the evaluating associated with the second communication path are both based on the quality-of-service of the first communication path being satisfactory;

evaluating the waveform quality of media that is transmitted along a third communication path from the first node to the second node, wherein the third communication path traverses the first network and at least one of the third gateway and the fourth gateway;

when the waveform quality of media transmitted along the third communication path is more advantageous than the waveform quality of media transmitted along the second communication path, transmitting a third packet along the third communication path from the first node to the second node;

wherein the third communication path fails to provide a quality-of-service guarantee;

re-evaluating the waveform quality of media that is transmitted along the first communication path from the first node to the second node; and

when the waveform quality of media transmitted along the first communication path is satisfactory, transmitting a fourth packet along the first communication path from the first node to the second node.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein the first gateway and the second gateway are contiguous with a second network, wherein the communication protocols of the first network and the second network are different.

10. The method of claim 9 wherein the second network is the Public Switched Telephone Network.

11. The method of claim 9 wherein the first network is Internet Protocol-based.

12. The method of claim 8 wherein the evaluating of the waveform quality of media that is transmitted along the first communication path is performed with respect to one or more of echo, noise, loudness, and audio distortion.

13. The method of claim 8 wherein the evaluating of the waveform quality of media that is transmitted along the first communication path is performed with respect to one or more of fading, crosstalk, and video distortion.

14. A method comprising:

transmitting, by a first endpoint, a first packet along a first communication path from a first node to a second node, wherein the first communication path traverses: (i) a first network that is packet-switched, (ii) a first gateway that is contiguous with the first network, and (iii) a second gateway that is non-contiguous with the first network;

evaluating the waveform quality of a media signal that is transmitted along the first communication path, along a second communication path from the first node to the second node, and along a third communication path from the first node to the second node, wherein the second communication path and the third communication path are different, and wherein each of the second communication path and the third communication path traverses the first network and at least one of: (i) a third gateway that is contiguous with the first network, and (ii) a fourth gateway that is non-contiguous with the first network;

when the waveform quality of the media signal that is transmitted along the second communication path is determined to be more advantageous than both (i) the waveform quality of the media signal that is transmitted along first communication path and (ii) the waveform quality of the media signal that is transmitted along the third communication path, transmitting a second packet along the second communication path from the first node to the second node;

wherein the second communication path fails to provide a quality-of-service guarantee;

wherein the determination of whether the waveform quality of the media signal along the second communication path is more advantageous is based on a quality-of-service of the second communication path being satisfactory;

when the waveform quality of media transmitted along the third communication path is more advantageous than the waveform quality of media transmitted along the second communication path, transmitting a third packet along the third communication path from the first node to the second node;

wherein the third communication path fails to provide a quality-of-service guarantee;

re-evaluating the waveform quality of media that is transmitted along the first communication path from the first node to the second node; and

when the waveform quality of media transmitted along the first communication path is satisfactory, transmitting a fourth packet along the first communication path from the first node to the second node.

15. The method of claim 14 wherein the first gateway and the second gateway are contiguous with a second network, wherein the communication protocols of the first network and the second network are different.

16. The method of claim 15 wherein the second network is the Public Switched Telephone Network.

17. The method of claim 15 wherein the first network is Internet Protocol-based.

18. The method of claim 14 wherein the evaluating of the waveform quality of media that is transmitted along the first communication path is performed with respect to one or more of echo, noise, loudness, and audio distortion.

19. The method of claim 14 wherein the evaluating of the waveform quality of media that is transmitted along the first communication path is performed with respect to one or more of fading, crosstalk, and video distortion.

Assignments (19)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS (REEL/FRAME 53955/0436) Recorded May 18, 2023
From: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
To: AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; AVAYA INC.; INTELLISIST, INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 063705/0023 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS (REEL/FRAME 045034/0001) Recorded May 18, 2023
From: GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: AVAYA INC.; INTELLISIST, INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC; OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS LLC; VPNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; ZANG, INC. (FORMER NAME OF AVAYA CLOUD INC.); HYPERQUALITY, INC.; HYPERQUALITY II, LLC; CAAS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.
Reel/Frame 063779/0622 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS AT REEL 45124/FRAME 0026 Recorded Apr 26, 2023
From: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: AVAYA HOLDINGS CORP.; AVAYA INC.; AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 063457/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 25, 2020
From: AVAYA INC.; AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; INTELLISIST, INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 053955/0436 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 23, 2018
From: AVAYA INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC; OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS LLC; VPNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; ZANG, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 045124/0026 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 10, 2018
From: AVAYA INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC; OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS LLC; VPNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; ZANG, INC.
To: GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 045034/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 9, 2018
From: CITICORP USA, INC.
To: AVAYA, INC.; SIERRA HOLDINGS CORP.; AVAYA TECHNOLOGY, LLC; OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS LLC; VPNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 045032/0213 →
BANKRUPTCY COURT ORDER RELEASING ALL LIENS INCLUDING THE SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 025863/0535 Recorded Dec 15, 2017
From: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST, NA
To: AVAYA INC.
Reel/Frame 044892/0001 →
BANKRUPTCY COURT ORDER RELEASING ALL LIENS INCLUDING THE SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 029608/0256 Recorded Dec 15, 2017
From: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
To: AVAYA INC.
Reel/Frame 044891/0801 →
BANKRUPTCY COURT ORDER RELEASING ALL LIENS INCLUDING THE SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 041576/0001 Recorded Dec 15, 2017
From: CITIBANK, N.A.
To: AVAYA INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS INC.; OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION); VPNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 044893/0531 →
BANKRUPTCY COURT ORDER RELEASING ALL LIENS INCLUDING THE SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 030083/0639 Recorded Dec 15, 2017
From: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
To: AVAYA INC.
Reel/Frame 045012/0666 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 27, 2017
From: AVAYA INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS INC.; OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION; VPNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 041576/0001 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 13, 2013
From: AVAYA, INC.
To: BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., THE
Reel/Frame 030083/0639 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 10, 2013
From: AVAYA, INC.
To: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
Reel/Frame 029608/0256 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 22, 2011
From: AVAYA INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION
To: BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST, NA, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT, THE
Reel/Frame 025863/0535 →
REASSIGNMENT Recorded Jun 26, 2008
From: AVAYA TECHNOLOGY LLC
To: AVAYA INC
Reel/Frame 021156/0689 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 28, 2007
From: AVAYA, INC.; AVAYA TECHNOLOGY LLC; OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS LLC; VPNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: CITICORP USA, INC., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 020166/0705 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 27, 2007
From: AVAYA, INC.; AVAYA TECHNOLOGY LLC; OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS LLC; VPNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 020156/0149 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 18, 2006
From: BATEN, BEN; LO, WING FAI; MOORE, SEAN S.B.
To: AVAYA TECHNOLOGY LLC
Reel/Frame 018406/0646 →