Techniques for behavioral pairing model evaluation in a contact center system
Techniques for behavioral pairing model evaluation in a contact center system are disclosed. In one particular embodiment, the techniques may be realized as a method for behavioral pairing model evaluation in a contact center system comprising determining an ordering of a plurality of agents, determining an ordering of a plurality of contact types; analyzing, historical contact-agent outcome data according to the orderings of the pluralities of agents and contact types to construct a pairing model; and determining an expected performance of the contact center system using the pairing model.
1. A method for pairing model evaluation in a contact center system comprising:
analyzing, by at least one computer processor communicatively coupled to and configured to operate in the contact center system, historical contactagent outcome data to construct a first pairing model for a plurality of agents and a first plurality of contact types;
analyzing, by the at least one computer processor, the historical contactagent outcome data to construct a second pairing model for the plurality of agents and a second plurality of contact types;
comparing, by the at least one computer processor, a first expected performance of the contact center system using the first pairing model with a second expected performance of the contact center system using the second pairing model;
selecting, by the at least one computer processor, a higher-performing pairing model of the first and second pairing models for use in the contact center system; and
selecting, according to the higher-performing pairing model, by the at least one computer processor, at least one agent-contact type pairing for connection in the contact center system to optimize performance of the contact center system.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the higher-performing pairing model is a behavioral pairing model.
3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
applying, by the at least one computer processor and prior to comparing the first expected performance with the second expected performance, a behavioral pairing correction factor to at least one of the first and second pairing models.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the pairing model is based on a diagonal behavioral pairing strategy.
5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
determining, by the at least one computer processor, a historical performance of the contact center system; and
determining, by the at least one computer processor, an expected gain in performance of the contact center system using the higher-performing pairing model compared with the historical performance.
6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
analyzing, by the at least one computer processor, new contact-agent outcome data to update the higher-performing pairing model.
7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
analyzing, by the at least one computer processor, new contact-agent outcome data to update the first and second pairing models;
comparing, by the at least one computer processor, an updated first expected performance of the contact center system using the updated first pairing model with an updated second performance of the contact center system using the updated second pairing model; and
selecting, by the at least one computer processor, an updated higher-performing pairing model of the updated first and second pairing models for use in the contact center system.
8. A system for pairing model evaluation in a contact center system comprising:
at least one computer processor communicatively coupled to and configured to operate in the contact center system, wherein the at least one computer processor is further configured to:
analyze historical contact-agent outcome data to construct a first pairing model for a plurality of agents and a first plurality of contact types;
analyze the historical contact-agent outcome data to construct a second pairing model for the plurality of agents and a second plurality of contact types;
compare a first expected performance of the contact center system using the first pairing model with a second expected performance of the contact center system using the second pairing model;
select a higher-performing pairing model of the first and second pairing models for use in the contact center system; and
select, according to the higher-performing pairing model, at least one agent-contact type pairing for connection in the contact center system to optimize performance of the contact center system.
9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the higher-performing pairing model is a behavioral pairing model.
10. The system of claim 8 , wherein the at least one computer processor is further configured to:
apply, prior to comparing the first expected performance with the second expected performance, a behavioral pairing correction factor to at least one of the first and second pairing models.
11. The system of claim 8 , wherein the pairing model is based on a diagonal behavioral pairing strategy.
12. The system of claim 8 , wherein the at least one computer processor is further configured to:
determine a historical performance of the contact center system; and
determine an expected gain in performance of the contact center system using the higher-performing pairing model compared with the historical performance.
13. The system of claim 8 , wherein the at least one computer processor is further configured to:
analyze new contact-agent outcome data to update the higher-performing pairing model.
14. The system of claim 8 , wherein the at least one computer processor is further configured to:
analyze new contact-agent outcome data to update the first and second pairing models;
compare an updated first expected performance of the contact center system using the updated first pairing model with an updated second performance of the contact center system using the updated second pairing model; and
select an updated higher-performing pairing model of the updated first and second pairing models for use in the contact center system.
15. An article of manufacture for pairing model evaluation in a contact center system comprising:
a non-transitory processor readable medium; and
instructions stored on the medium;
wherein the instructions are configured to be readable from the medium by at least one computer processor communicatively coupled to and configured to operate in the contact center system and thereby cause the at least one computer processor to operate so as to:
analyze historical contact-agent outcome data to construct a first pairing model for a plurality of agents and a first plurality of contact types;
analyze the historical contact-agent outcome data to construct a second pairing model for the plurality of agents and a second plurality of contact types;
compare a first expected performance of the contact center system using the first pairing model with a second expected performance of the contact center system using the second pairing model;
select a higher-performing pairing model of the first and second pairing models for use in the contact center system; and
select, according to the higher-performing pairing model, at least one agent-contact type pairing for connection in the contact center system to optimize performance of the contact center system.
16. The article of manufacture of claim 15 , wherein the higher-performing pairing model is a behavioral pairing model.
17. The article of manufacture of claim 15 , wherein the at least one computer processor is further caused to operate so as to:
apply, prior to comparing the first expected performance with the second expected performance, a behavioral pairing correction factor to at least one of the first and second pairing models.
18. The article of manufacture of claim 15 , wherein the pairing model is based on a diagonal behavioral pairing strategy.
19. The article of manufacture of claim 15 , wherein the at least one computer processor is further caused to operate so as to:
determine a historical performance of the contact center system; and
determine an expected gain in performance of the contact center system using the higher-performing pairing model compared with the historical performance.
20. The article of manufacture of claim 15 , wherein the at least one computer processor is further caused to operate so as to:
analyze new contact-agent outcome data to update the higher-performing pairing model.