IP Library Granted Patent US 12,632,748
Granted Patent B1
US 12,632,748 · App. 16/983,775 · Granted May 19, 2026

Apparatuses, systems and methods for generating a base-line probable roof loss confidence score

Inventors: Joshua M. Mast (Bloomington, IL); Douglas L. Dewey (Bloomington, IL); Todd Binion (Bloomington, IL); Jeffrey Feid (Normal, IL)
Assignee: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE
G06N5/04G01W1/00G06Q40/08G06N20/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,632,748
App. No.
16/983,775
Granted
May 19, 2026
Kind
B1
Abstract

Apparatuses, systems and methods are provided for generating a base-line probable roof loss confidence score. More particularly, apparatuses, systems and methods are provided for generating a base-line probable roof loss confidence score based on hail data. The apparatuses, systems and methods may generate a probable roof loss confidence score. The apparatuses, systems and methods may generate verified probable roof loss confidence score data. The apparatuses, systems and methods may generate property insurance underwriting data based on probable roof loss confidence score data. The apparatuses, systems and methods may generate property insurance claims data based on probable roof loss confidence score data. The apparatuses, systems and methods may generate property insurance loss mitigation data based on probable roof loss confidence score data.

Claims (47)

1 . A system for generating a base-line probable roof loss confidence score associated with a roof of a building, the system comprising:

a building data receiving module stored on a memory of a confidence score computing device that, when executed by a processor of the confidence score computing device, causes the processor of the confidence score computing device to receive building data from a building computing device, wherein the building data is representative of attributes of the building;

a roof data receiving module stored on the memory of the confidence score computing device that, when executed by the processor of the confidence score computing device, causes the processor of the confidence score computing device to receive roof data from a roof computing device, wherein the roof data is representative of a structure forming an upper covering of the building;

a weather data receiving module stored on the memory of the confidence score computing device that, when executed by a processor of the confidence score computing device, causes the processor of the confidence score computing device to receive historical weather data from a weather computing device based on the building data, wherein the historical weather data is representative of storm attributes associated with historical storms that have occurred in a geographic area that includes a geographic location of the building;

a hail data receiving module stored on the memory of the confidence score computing device that, when executed by the processor of the confidence score computing device, causes the processor of the confidence score computing device to receive historical hail data from a hail computing device based on the building data, wherein the historical hail data is representative of attributes of historical hail that has impacted a geographic area that includes the geographic location of the building;

a base-line probable roof loss confidence score data generation module stored on the memory of the confidence score computing device that, when executed by the processor of the confidence score computing device, causes the processor of the confidence score computing device to generate, at the time of property insurance underwriting for the building, base-line probable roof loss confidence score data, to serve as a base-line for generating a subsequent probable roof loss confidence score, based on the building data, the roof data, the weather data, and the hail data; and

a loss mitigation transmission module to implement an action to mitigate property loss based on at least the base-line probable roof loss confidence score data.

2 . A system as in claim 1 , further comprising:

a climate region data receiving module stored on the memory of the confidence score computing device that, when executed by the processor of the confidence score computing device, causes the processor of the confidence score computing device to receive climate region data from a climate region computing device based on the building data, wherein the base-line probable roof loss confidence score data is further based on the climate region data.

3 . A system as in claim 1 , further comprising:

a base-line probable roof loss confidence score verification data receiving module stored on the memory of the confidence score computing device that, when executed by the processor of the confidence score computing device, causes the processor of the confidence score computing device to receive base-line probable roof loss confidence score verification data.

4 . A system as in claim 3 , further comprising:

a verified base-line probable roof loss confidence score data generation module stored on the memory of the confidence score computing device that, when executed by the processor of the confidence score computing device, causes the processor of the confidence score computing device to generate verified base-line probable roof loss confidence score data based on a comparison of the base-line probable roof loss confidence score data with the base-line probable roof loss confidence score verification data.

5 . A system as in claim 4 , further comprising:

a verified base-line probable roof loss confidence score data storage module stored on the memory of the confidence score computing device that, when executed by the processor of the confidence score computing device, causes the processor of the confidence score computing device to store the verified base-line probable roof loss confidence score data on the memory of the confidence score computing device.

6 . A computer-implemented method for generating base-line probable roof loss confidence score data associated with a roof of a building, the method comprising:

receiving building data from a building computing device in response to a processor of a confidence score computing device executing a building data receiving module, wherein the building data is representative of attributes of the building;

receiving roof data from a roof computing device in response to the processor of the confidence score computing device executing a roof data receiving module, wherein the roof data is representative of a structure forming an upper covering of the building;

receiving historical weather data from a weather computing device based on the building data in response to the processor of the confidence score computing device executing a weather data receiving module, wherein the historical weather data is representative of storm attributes associated with historical storms that have occurred in a geographic area that includes a geographic location of the building;

receiving historical hail data from a hail computing device based on the building data in response to the processor of the confidence score computing device executing a hail data receiving module, wherein the historical hail data is representative of attributes of historical hail that has impacted a geographic area that includes the geographic location of the building;

receiving climate region data from a climate region computing device based on the building data in response to the processor of the confidence score computing device executing a climate region data receiving module;

generating, at property insurance underwriting, base-line probable roof loss confidence score data, to serve as a base-line for generating a subsequent probable roof loss confidence score, based on the building data, the roof data, the weather data, the hail data, and the climate region data in response to the processor of the confidence score computing device executing a base-line probable roof loss confidence score data generation module; and

implementing an action to mitigate property loss based on at least the base-line probable roof loss confidence score data.

7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein execution of the base-line probable roof loss confidence score data generation module causes the processor of the confidence score computing device to implement a probability function to generate the base-line probable roof loss confidence score data.

8 . The method of claim 7 , wherein a contribution of a first term of the probability function is weighted, via a first weighting variable, relative to a second term of the probability function.

9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the first term of the probability function is based on the roof data, and wherein the second term of the probability function is based on the hail data.

10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the first weighting variable is dynamically determined based on at least one of the building data, the roof data, the weather data, the hail data, or the climate region data.

11 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the attributes of the building include at least one of: a geographic location of the building, a building orientation relative to geographic cardinal directions, whether the building is single story, whether the building is two story, whether the building is multi-story, whether there is tree cover over the building, location and height of structures surrounding the building, or elevation of terrain surrounding the building.

12 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the roof data is representative of at least one of: a roofing system covering the building, a structural truss system that forms the design and shape of the roof, roof sheathing, underlayment, roofing felt, membrane, self-adhered water and ice-dam protection membrane, tar, tar paper, exterior roofing material covering, roof vents, flashing and drip edges, a component comprising part of the overall roof surface covering of the building, a roofing product age, roof area, a roofing material type, a roofing design, a roofing configuration, a roofing product condition, whether a roof is a gable roof, whether a roof is a hip roof, a roof slope, a number of layers of roofing material, a roof deck condition, a roofing manufacturer product testing result, a roofing installation criteria, a roofing product impact testing result, a roofing product wind testing result, a roofing installation, whether a roofing product complies with a particular roof impact test standard or protocol, whether the roofing product is impact resistant rated, a roofing product impact resistance rating, a roofing product wind rating, a roofing shingle specification, whether a roofing product was installed during cold conditions with hand-sealed roofing cement, a roof underlayment, a roofing facer technology, a polyiso roofing insulation, an EPS insulation, whether a roof includes roof ventilation, an attic detail, a roofing product manufacture warranty, a roofing product installer warranty, or a roofing product third-party warranty.

13 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the attributes of the storm include at least one of: a storm meteorological signature, a storm duration, a storm direction, thermal shock, whether a storm is conducive to producing damaging hail, whether a storm is conducive to producing strong winds, key meteorological aspects of a storm, length of time that the storm impacted the roof, a direction from which the storm impacts the building, a roof temperature prior to the storm, a roof temperature after the storm, or a thermal shock to roofing material.

14 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the attributes of the hail include at least one of: a physical characteristic of the hail, a size of the hail, a shape of the hail, a density of the hail, a hardness of the hail, a range of hail sizes produced by a storm, or a resistance to flexing of the hail.

15 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the climate region data is representative of at least one of a climate associated with a geographic location of the building; a humidity associated with a geographic location of the building, a temperature associated with a geographic location of the building, a moisture associated with a geographic location of the building, or whether a geographic location of the building is associated with a marine climate.

16 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing computer-readable instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to generate base-line probable roof loss confidence score data associated with a roof of a building, the computer-readable medium comprising:

a building data receiving module that, when executed by a processor of the confidence score computing device, causes the processor of the confidence score computing device to receive building data from a building computing device, wherein the building data is representative of attributes of the building;

a roof data receiving module that, when executed by the processor of the confidence score computing device, causes the processor of the confidence score computing device to receive roof data from a roof computing device, wherein the roof data is representative of a structure forming an upper covering of the building;

a weather data receiving module that, when executed by a processor of the confidence score computing device, causes the processor of the confidence score computing device to receive historical weather data from a weather computing device based on the building data, wherein the historical weather data is representative of storm attributes associated with historical storms that have occurred in a geographic area that includes a geographic location of the building;

a hail data receiving module that, when executed by the processor of the confidence score computing device, causes the processor of the confidence score computing device to receive historical hail data from a hail computing device based on the building data, wherein the historical hail data is representative of attributes of historical hail that has impacted a geographic area that includes the geographic location of the building;

a base-line probable roof loss confidence score data generation module that, when executed by the processor of the confidence score computing device, causes the processor of the confidence score computing device to generate, at property insurance underwriting, base-line probable roof loss confidence score data, to serve as a base-line for generating a subsequent probable roof loss confidence score, based on the building data, the roof data, the weather data, and the hail data; and

a loss mitigation transmission module to implement an action to mitigate property loss based on at least the base-line probable roof loss confidence score data.

17 . A computer-readable medium as in claim 16 , further comprising:

a climate region data receiving module that, when executed by the processor of the confidence score computing device, causes the processor of the confidence score computing device to receive climate region data from a climate region computing device based on the building data, wherein the base-line probable roof loss confidence score data is further based on the climate region data.

18 . A computer-readable medium as in claim 16 , further comprising:

a base-line probable roof loss confidence score verification data receiving module that, when executed by the processor of the confidence score computing device, causes the processor of the confidence score computing device to receive base-line probable roof loss confidence score verification data.

19 . A computer-readable medium as in claim 18 , further comprising:

a verified base-line probable roof loss confidence score data generation module that, when executed by the processor of the confidence score computing device, causes the processor of the confidence score computing device to generate verified base-line probable roof loss confidence score data based on a comparison of the base-line probable roof loss confidence score data with the base-line probable roof loss confidence score verification data.

20 . A computer-readable medium as in claim 19 , further comprising:

a verified base-line probable roof loss confidence score data storage module that, when executed by the processor of the confidence score computing device, causes the processor of the confidence score computing device to store the verified base-line probable roof loss confidence score data.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 4, 2020
From: MAST, JOSHUA M.; DEWEY, DOUGLAS L.; BINION, TODD; FEID, JEFFREY
To: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Reel/Frame 053392/0449 →
References Cited (303)
US 5528224A · Wang · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 6424917B1 · Kalkstein et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 8081795B2 · Brown · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8106769B1 · Maroney et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8280633B1 · Eldering et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8346578B1 · Hopkins, III et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8400299B1 · Maroney et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8490006B1 · Reeser et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8527306B1 · Reeser et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8533144B1 · Reeser et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8640038B1 · Reeser et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8665084B2 · Shapiro et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8749381B1 · Maroney et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8756085B1 · Plummer et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8874454B2 · Plummer et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8890680B2 · Reeser et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8917186B1 · Grant · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8976937B2 · Shapiro et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9049168B2 · Jacob et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9057746B1 · Houlette et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9098655B2 · Plummer et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9117349B2 · Shapiro et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9121779B2 · Martin · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9142119B1 · Grant · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9152737B1 · Micali et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9152863B1 · Grant · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9183578B1 · Reeser et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9202363B1 · Grant · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9262564B2 · Plummer et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9262909B1 · Grant · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9286772B2 · Shapiro et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9344330B2 · Jacob et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9424737B2 · Bailey et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9443195B2 · Micali et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9472092B1 · Grant · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9536148B2 · Gross · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9589441B2 · Shapiro et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9609003B1 · Chmielewski et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9633146B2 · Plummer et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9665892B1 · Reeser et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9666060B2 · Reeser et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9678206B2 · Sneed · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9699529B1 · Petri et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9739813B2 · Houlette et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9786158B2 · Beaver et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9798979B2 · Fadell et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9798993B2 · Payne et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9800570B1 · Bleisch · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9800958B1 · Petri et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9812001B1 · Grant · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9888371B1 · Jacob · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9892463B1 · Hakimi-Boushehri et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9898168B2 · Shapiro et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9898912B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9911042B1 · Cardona et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9923971B2 · Madey et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9942630B1 · Petri et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9947202B1 · Moon et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9948477B2 · Marten · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9970881B1 · Hillman et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9978033B1 · Payne et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9997056B2 · Bleisch · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10002295B1 · Cardona et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10032226B1 · Suizzo et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10042341B1 · Jacob · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10047974B1 · Riblet et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10055793B1 · Call et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10055803B2 · Orduna et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10057664B1 · Moon et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10073929B2 · Vaynriber et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10102584B1 · Devereaux et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10102585B1 · Bryant et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10107708B1 · Schick et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10134092B1 · Harvey et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10142394B2 · Chmielewski et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10169856B1 · Farnsworth et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10176705B1 · Grant · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10181079B2 · Labrie et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10181160B1 · Hakimi-Boushehri et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10186134B1 · Moon et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10198771B1 · Madigan et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10217068B1 · Davis et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10229394B1 · Davis et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10235716B2 · Boutin · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10244294B1 · Moon et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10249158B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10268691B2 · Emison et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10282787B1 · Hakimi-Boushehri et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10282788B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10282961B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10295431B1 · Schick et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10296978B1 · Corder et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10297138B2 · Reeser et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10304313B1 · Moon et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10311302B2 · Kottenstette et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10323860B1 · Riblet et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10325473B1 · Moon et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10332059B2 · Matsuoka et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10346811B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10353359B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10354386B1 · Farnsworth et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10356303B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10366288B1 · Kottenstette et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10373256B1 · Allen et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10387966B1 · Shah et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10388135B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10412169B1 · Madey et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10430890B1 · Corder et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10446000B2 · Friar et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10467476B1 · Cardona et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10469282B1 · Konrardy et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10480825B1 · Riblet et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10482746B1 · Moon et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10497250B1 · Hayward et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10506411B1 · Jacob · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10514669B1 · Call et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10515372B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10522009B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10546478B1 · Moon et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10547918B1 · Moon et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10565541B2 · Payne et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10573146B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10573149B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10579028B1 · Jacob · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10586177B1 · Choueiter et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10607295B1 · Hakimi-Boushehri et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10634576B1 · Schick et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10643072B2 · Kottenstette et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10664922B1 · Madigan et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10679292B1 · Call et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10685402B1 · Bryant et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10692160B1 · Lyons et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10699346B1 · Corder et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10699348B1 · Devereaux et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10726494B1 · Shah et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10726500B1 · Shah et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10726558B2 · Ruda et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10733671B1 · Hakimi-Boushehri et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10733868B2 · Moon et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10735829B2 · Petri et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10740691B2 · Choueiter et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10741033B1 · Jordan et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10750252B2 · Petri et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10755357B1 · Davis et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10776883B2 · Labrie et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10795329B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10796149B2 · Labrie et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10796557B2 · Sundermeyer et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10802477B1 · Konrardy et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10804700B2 · Cohen et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10818105B1 · Konrardy et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10823458B1 · Riblet et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10824971B1 · Davis et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10825320B1 · Moon et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10825321B2 · Moon et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10832225B1 · Davis et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10846800B1 · Bryant et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10885587B1 · Mendoza et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10907844B2 · Ribbich et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10922756B1 · Call et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10922948B1 · Moon et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10943447B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10949923B1 · Veith et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10970990B1 · Jacob · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10977490B1 · Bokshi-Drotar et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10990069B1 · Jacob · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11003334B1 · Conway et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11004320B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11015997B1 · Schick et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11017480B2 · Shah et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11017487B1 · Campbell et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11042137B1 · Call et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11042942B1 · Hakimi-Boushehri et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11043098B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11049078B1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11049189B2 · Shah et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11055786B2 · Shreve et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11074658B1 · Burgess et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11074659B1 · Hakimi-Boushehri et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11100594B1 · West et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11100918B2 · Smith et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11118812B1 · Riblet et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11126708B2 · Reimer · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11131597B1 · Oakes, III et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11151378B2 · Kottenstette et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11164257B1 · Devereaux et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11210552B2 · Kossyk et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11210741B1 · Allen et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11222426B2 · Richter et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11232150B2 · Vianello et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11232873B1 · Aspro et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11257166B2 · Coonrod et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11277465B2 · Chmielewski et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11348193B1 · Konrardy et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11361544B2 · Splittstoesser · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11367053B2 · Watson et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11367265B2 · Vianello et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11417212B1 · Farooqui et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11430069B1 · Pedersen et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11593887B1 · Gaudin et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11634214B1 · Parchment et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11709253B1 · Maestas · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11941702B1 · Devereaux et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12182873B2 · Mast et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12354250B1 · McKinney et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20070038484A1 · Hoffner et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070168155A1 · Ravela et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20090216552A1 · Watrous · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090265193A1 · Collins et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20130317861A1 · Tofte et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140019166A1 · Swanson et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140067332A1 · Chen et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140176362A1 · Sneed · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140245165A1 · Battcher et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140245204A1 · Battcher et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140246165A1 · Minisandram · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140266669A1 · Fadell et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140358592A1 · Wedig et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150061859A1 · Matsuoka et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150073864A1 · Labrie et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150082883A1 · Moffatt · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150170288A1 · Harton et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150228031A1 · Emison et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150302529A1 · Jagannathan · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150347910A1 · Fadell et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150348204A1 · Daues · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150356686A1 · Cook et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160048923A1 · Maher et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160048925A1 · Emison et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160189531A1 · Modi et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160239921A1 · Bray et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160265993A1 · Sutter et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160267602A1 · Boutin · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160334545A1 · Varelas et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170032466A1 · Feldman et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170039307A1 · Koger et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170176640A1 · Kodra et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170249510A1 · Labrie et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170270612A1 · Howe et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170270650A1 · Howe et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170330282A1 · Pratt et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170345069A1 · Labrie et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170352099A1 · Howe et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170352104A1 · Hanson et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180071949A1 · Giles · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180336418A1 · Splittstoesser · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180336652A1 · Wani et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190095764A1 · Li · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190114717A1 · Labrie et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190147244A1 · Labrie et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190213688A1 · Boutin · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190251520A1 · Bentley, III et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190304026A1 · Lyman et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200066257A1 · Smith et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200134573A1 · Vickers · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200134728A1 · Vickers · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200134753A1 · Vickers · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200193524A1 · Verstraete et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200302549A1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200327791A1 · Moon et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210027528A1 · Labrie et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210035432A1 · Moon et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210042843A1 · Bryant et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210089811A1 · Strong · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210133891A1 · Jagannathan · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210158671A1 · Jordan, II et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210192631A1 · Coonrod et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210241439A1 · Lutich et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210279811A1 · Waltman et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210312789A1 · Linn · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210383481A1 · Richardson et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220101275A1 · Aspro et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220317639A1 · Karri et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
CN 111626536A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 113138558A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
JP 2003157357A · 2003 [cited by applicant]
KR 20150129845A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014159131A2 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016081511A2 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021087185A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021248030A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2022165303A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
Aufranc, Haven Open Source App Transforms Your Old Android Smartphone into a Smart Security Camera, CNX Software—Embedded Systems News, Dec. 23, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Chen, Smart Home, Investopedia, updated Feb. 25, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Dube, How to Build a Security Camera Nework Out of Old Smartphones, downloaded from the Internet at: <https://www.makeusof.com/tag/how-to-build-a-security-camera-network-out-of-old-smartphones> Jul. 12, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Upgrading your roof? Consider these hurricane-resistant tips, Renew Financial, Oct. 7, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Deep analytics for workplace risk and disaster management, IBM Journal of Research and Development, 64(1/2):14.1-14.9 (Jan. 2020). [cited by applicant]
Hail Monitoring System, HailSens Monitoring (Oct. 2020). [cited by applicant]
Alud et al., Planning for Atmospheric Hazards and Disaster Management Under Changing Climate Conditions, IEEE EIC Climate Change Conference, 1-9 (2006). [cited by applicant]
Powers et al., Measuring and modeling the effect of snow on photovoltaic system performance, 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 000973-000978 (2010). [cited by applicant]
McHale et al., Stormy future for U.S. property/casualty insurers: The growing costs and risks fo extreme weather events, Ceres, Sep. 2012). [cited by applicant]
Gibbons et al., Land management practices associated with house loss in wildfires, PLoS One, 7(1):e29212 (2012). [cited by applicant]
Beck et al., Data Descriptor: Present and future Koppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution, Scientific Data, 5:180214 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Scheel et al., A Bayesian hierarchical model with spatial variable selection: the effect of weather on insurance claims, Appl. Statist., 62, Part 1, pp. 85-100 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Herrera et al., A review of current and future weather data for building simulation, Building Serv. Eng. Res. Technol., 38(5):602-27 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Saghir et al., Weighted distributions: A brief review, perspective and characterizations, International Journal of Statistics and Probability, vol. 6, No. 3, 23 pages (2017). [cited by applicant]
Dean, Probability Weighting, Lecture Notes for Spring 2015 Behavioral Economics—Brown University (2015). [cited by applicant]
Brownlee, A gentle introduction to probability density estimation, Machine Learning Mastery.com, Jul. 24, 2020 (53 pp). [cited by applicant]
Chakraverty et al., IoT based Weather and Location Aware Recommender System, 8th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering (Confluence), 610-617 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Majumdar et al., Design of Weather Monitoring System and Smart Home Automation, IEEE International Conference on System, Computation, Automation and Networking (ICSCAN), 1-5 (2018). [cited by applicant]
“How Predictive Modeling Has Revolutionized Insurance,” Insurance Journal (Jun. 18, 2012). (Year: 2012). [cited by applicant]
Heneka et al., “A Damage Model for the Assessment of Storm Damage to Buildings,” Engineering Structures, (Jul. 17, 2008), p. 3603-3609. (Year: 2008). [cited by applicant]
Pinelli et al. “Hurricane Damage Prediction Model for Residential Structures,” Journal of Structural Engineering. (Nov. 2004), p. 1685-1691. [cited by applicant]